Hi eXtremal,
I`m with Win10 388.31 drivers, all cards are on 85% TPD +150 core 500 memory and 1060-6 are with 0.21 cpd , 1070 are with 0.31, 1070 ti with 0.34 cpd . What is TPD on your tests? Do you think 388.31 is the reason?
I use stock settings, not used any overclock utility. What is it TPD? Do you mean TDP or power limit? Drivers 388.31 not tested (only 390.xx and 397.31), and it can be reason of low performance, we don't have enough statistics for NVidia. Windows 10 x64, Nvidia 1080 x2, drivers 397.31, EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b works on my system.
I used the default config as it seems proper for Nvidia, and tried disabling all but first 2 devices in the config but same results. Anything for me to try?
Error 999 on initialization (cuInit CUDA driver call) is "unknown error", NVidia does not provide documentation about it. Google founds some discussion.. reason of this error usually broken driver installation and conflicts with other software (but google found nothing about Windows 10, only Linux issues). You can try cleanup and reinstall drivers, try 390.76 and run miner with administrator rights. |
|
|
|
xpmclient-10.2.3 ClientName = 'DESKTOP-87F55AQ' ClientID = 2088950240 InstanceID = 3958697088 Address = 'AMgtSW8ge2mvqxaiWo11GqTKx6rQ2J57yA' error: 999
failed with error CUDA_ERROR_UNKNOWN at C:/build/xpmclient/src/xpm/cuda/xpmclient.cpp:825I'm stuck  Very informative post  What OS, drivers, GPUs do you use? Do other CUDA miners (for example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1707546.0) work on your system ? |
|
|
|
Some cuda miner tests from 5 or 6 GPU rigs, all uses Windows 10 (screenshots), drivers 390.77 6xGTX1060 0.25 CPD  5xGTX1070 0.34 CPD  6xGTX1070Ti 0.42-0.43 CPD  Linux version GTX 1070Ti [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.108900 fermat=208991/sec cpd=0.46/day
(ST/INV/DUP): 117x 7ch(1/0/0) 13x 8ch(0/0/0) 1x 9ch(0/0/0)
GPU 0 found share: 7-ch type 1
Share accepted.
GPU 0 found share: 7-ch type 3
Linux version GTX1070 [GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.108708 fermat=169177/sec cpd=0.37/day
(ST/INV/DUP): 2397x 7ch(4/0/0) 236x 8ch(0/0/0) 15x 9ch(0/0/0) 4x 10ch(0/0/0) 2x 11ch(0/0/0)
GPU 0 found share: 7-ch type 3
Share accepted.
[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.108709 fermat=171544/sec cpd=0.37/day
(ST/INV/DUP): 2398x 7ch(4/0/0) 236x 8ch(0/0/0) 15x 9ch(0/0/0) 4x 10ch(0/0/0) 2x 11ch(0/0/0)
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply, good work with the miner pulling out
Work received: height=2649627 diff=11.763103 latency=64ms
[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.108455 fermat=151145/sec cpd=0.32/day
equal to
XPM per day: 0.600
BTC per day: 0.0002
USD per day: 1.910
but its moreover the same as with 10.2.2 beta
With one cpu no difference except CPU load around 0%. What card you use? With 390.xx drivers I got 0.37 CPD on 1070 and 0.46 CPD on 1070Ti. |
|
|
|
Hi @eXtremal is there any progress with the cuda miner ? I`m very excited about the stuff !  Windows version: http://coinsforall.io/distr/xpmclient-cuda-win64.tar.gzIt's usable (1-3% CPU load per one video card, you can use Celeron with 6 and more NVidia cards), but linux version still faster up to 5%, need more research to optimize miner for Windows. |
|
|
|
xpmforall.org: problem at VPS now, repairing...
coinsforall.io and xpmforall.org - is it possible to synchronize the balance? It's two different pools, not one distributed. coinsforall.io was planned as distributed pool.. may be later I implement this feature. --- xpmforall.org repaired. It was an accident with file system (ext4fs), only rescue mode helped |
|
|
|
|
xpmforall.org: problem at VPS now, repairing...
|
|
|
|
to eXtremal...
Latency 2000ms... 5000... 8000... 12000...
Already upgrade, look coinsforall.io if you need low latency. Last news about CUDA version, GPU code finished, all benchmarks works. Only miner code remaining, it's not so hard... - GeForce GTX 1070; Compute capability 6.1
[1] GeForce GTX 750 Ti; Compute capability 5.0
Benchmarking GeForce GTX 1070; 15 compute units
square 320 bits: 36.326ms (3694.812M ops/sec)
multiply 320 bits: 55.180ms (2432.362M ops/sec)
square 352 bits: 44.570ms (3011.392M ops/sec)
multiply 352 bits: 66.563ms (2016.401M ops/sec)
Fermat tests 320 bits: 90.851ms (2.885M ops/sec)
Fermat tests 352 bits: 119.466ms (2.194M ops/sec)
*** hashmod benchmark ***
MHash per second: 737.312
Hash per iteration: 36.969 (0.000441 %)
Average hash multiplier size: 30.779
Hashed with primorial 13 is 12.637%
Hashed with primorial 14 is 68.174%
Hashed with primorial 15 is 19.189%
*** sieve (check) benchmark ***
*
[OK] found candidates by CPU: 1914 by GPU: 1914 * [OK] invalid candidates: 0 * [OK] CPU/GPU candidates difference: 0 *** sieve (performance) benchmark *** * scan speed: 77.071 G * iteration time: 10.714ms * candidates per second: 184692.857 * candidates per iteration: 1978.83 (854.16 320bit, 1124.67 352bit) * 320bit/352bit ratio: 0.759/1 Benchmarking GeForce GTX 750 Ti; 5 compute units square 320 bits: 151.284ms (887.191M ops/sec) multiply 320 bits: 208.753ms (642.950M ops/sec) square 352 bits: 169.990ms (789.562M ops/sec) multiply 352 bits: 254.647ms (527.074M ops/sec) Fermat tests 320 bits: 326.958ms (0.802M ops/sec) Fermat tests 352 bits: 475.107ms (0.552M ops/sec) *** hashmod benchmark *** MHash per second: 133.405 Hash per iteration: 37.844 (0.000451 %) Average hash multiplier size: 30.626 Hashed with primorial 13 is 13.666% Hashed with primorial 14 is 68.043% Hashed with primorial 15 is 18.291% *** sieve (check) benchmark *** * [OK] found candidates by CPU: 1398 by GPU: 1399 * [OK] invalid candidates: 0 * [OK] CPU/GPU candidates difference: 0 *** sieve (performance) benchmark *** * scan speed: 14.236 G * iteration time: 58.005ms * candidates per second: 34194.568 * candidates per iteration: 1983.47 (766.39 320bit, 1217.08 352bit) * 320bit/352bit ratio: 0.630/1 |
|
|
|
Hi all, the question was already asked but not answered: How is the pool http://xpmforall.org/ paying XPM (time, min value...) ? xpmforall.org: 4 XPM minimal payout, payments every hour, no delay now. coinsforall.io: configurable payout (minimal 0.1 XPM), manual request supported, payments every 10 minutes. 2 days i don't receive payment. 4xpm on my balance. AR1MADPn2rB9aWG4TDmqqkA1f6YpwQbC7u
just in first day i receive 1xpm. what to do?
I see 5 XPM payed, 0.11 on balance at xpmforall.org. I have a few mining rigs of 8x 1080ti's per mining rig, and my CPU is very shit (Intel Celeron G3930). This is the optimal mining rig setup for mining other coins. But mining on XPM I seem to get only 0.1-0.15 CPD per card. Does my setup not work for mining this coin since my CPU is too shit? Will the new miner version 10.3 solve this problem? I followed most of the instructions in the config file.
platform = "nvidia"
onCrash = "0"
cpuload = "0"
target = "auto"
sieveSize = "210"
weaveDepth = "65536"
width = "auto"
windowSize = "12284"
multiplierLimits = ["26", "33", "36"]
devices = ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1", "1", "1", "1"]
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5", "5", "5", "5"]
Anything else from the settings above that can be causing problems? ^
Thanks in advance
xpmclient 10.2.2 support 8x1080Ti but on Linux only, native CUDA miner almost ready, wait a little bit plz. |
|
|
|
# Target Cunningham chain length, default = 10
target = "10";
You put in calculator CPD with target=10, it's different CPD! Use version 10.2.2 with target="auto" settings. Also, for properly work of rig with 6 NVidia GPUs Ubuntu needed. If I understand right, you want $50 a day from one 1080Ti, hmm.. XPM price is not bad now, but not so high |
|
|
|
Thanks for getting back so quickly! Yes, those are the settings I'm using. The G4400 CPU's are on a Ubuntu dist. My 1080 Ti's get around 0.45-0.5 and my RX 570's get around 0.3.
Will the CUDA version be faster for Nvidia cards on Windows compared to Linux? I'm in the process of getting rid of Windows if possible.
RX 570 really shows only 0.3 with amdgpu-pro, it's not suitable drivers for XPM. 0.45 CPD for 1080Ti also too slow, what driver do you use? You can try this: user@userpc:/root$ nvidia-smi
user@userpc:~$ nvidia-smi
Sun Apr 29 09:20:00 2018
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.48 Driver Version: 390.48 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
CUDA version will bring 1-2% speedup on both OS and low CPU load for Windows. |
|
|
|
Besides what is written in the example config, are there any specific settings I can change for 1080 Ti's? At best I'm getting 0.63 cpd per card (with an i5 6600K) but most get around 45-50 cpd (G4400) on Linux. They have the same settings.
I'm assuming that the G4400 isn't powerful enough to get up to 0.6 cpd? I'm using the default Nvidia-settings that are already present in the config as comments.
# Maximal bit size of multipliers using with primorials 13, 14 and 15;
# Default values are 26, 33, 36
# Less values increases prime probability, but sieve generate less candidates
multiplierLimits = ["24", "31", "35"];
Also try use this multiplier limits. And if possible, use Ubuntu instead of Windows now (10.2.2 version works on windows with 100% cpu load), CUDA version for Windows will be ready in 2-3 days. |
|
|
|
I also noticed that you sent less coins today than usual...yesterday 48 coins, the day before 44 and today barely 36...Are there some problems with the pool?
Diffuculty raises very fast, orphan rate also too high. With current network hashrate diffuculty must be 11.7. Is there a ready compiled version of this for linux?
I'm working with a mining os which is pretty closed.
Miner release contains linux version than can run almost everywhere (compiled on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04). Hello guys, is there a nvidia miner for this?
Miner works with NVidia, but at this moment Linux recommended, because Windows version have a problem - 100% CPU load. |
|
|
|
for 13 hours 2 coins in all
2 coins in 13 hours? It looks that you use target="10" in config.txt.. what GPUs you use? Also you can post your XPM address. |
|
|
|
why the pool calculator does not correspond to the reality I have a speed of cpd 25 and should be 6-7 coins per hour and on the case itself 0.3 coins in one hour
Pool is PPLNS - pay per last N shares. In details, xpmforall and coinsforall calculate hashrate using number of last shares from ~1.5 hours (1 hour 30 minutes). How much time you stay at pool ? |
|
|
|
Why 11ch =/= 10x 10ch?
12ch = 11ch I can understand, but why not reward the blocks finders?
Pool must reward miners according to hash rate only, not according to luck. Luck? I found several blocks, but was credited less than the half I should have got. I am going to solomine then. It was a good experience there though, just not good for bigger miners. Ok, for example today you found 10 blocks, pool must pay 80 XPM, right? Tommorow you will found 0 blocks, what reward is right for you? 0 XPM? If you thinks that is ok, solo mining is better for you. Using pool you will receive 40XPM today and tommorow. Any pool pays for shares according to your hashrate, not for blocks and mining calculator shows estimated profit in ideal conditions. |
|
|
|
Why 11ch =/= 10x 10ch?
12ch = 11ch I can understand, but why not reward the blocks finders?
Pool must reward miners according to hash rate only, not according to luck. hi my friend))how your sweet holidays?
when you want release miner vers 10.3 on windows?which dates or months? Why you decide about holidays, too long time without new miner releases? Yes, because 10.3 will have a lot of new features. I planned release 10.3 at 15-20 May, but at the end of April I release CUDA port of 10.2.2 for testing. |
|
|
|
Could you add a backup server and failover functions in the new version?
xpmforall has only one address.
Sometimes it disconnects all my miners. Sometimes i get a very high latency
Failover functions will be full enabled in 10.3, now it not works correctly on all systems. First priority for next release is CUDA version. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
