 the BEGINNING of a new exponentially accelerating rally?  looks more like the rally is topping off...
|
|
|
|
Executive Director of Bitcoin Foundation is incompetent and dangerous to Bitcoin so.... what are you going to do about it? |
|
|
|
ya thats 2011 tax returns not 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30
>12.70 - 2 (14.3%)
12.6x - 0 (0%)
12.5x - 7 (50%)
12.4x - 1 (7.1%)
12.3x - 1 (7.1%)
12.2x - 0 (0%)
<12.10 - 3 (21.4%)
Closing price of 12.4
1 person got it right.
|
|
|
|
FUCK This is bad. Real bad.  Why? 5 blocks in a row and appearing fully legit. False alarm. See the last post in that thread. puh.. thanks. still this raises the question how they got around to relaying this many blocks. By chance alone that means they are up to something. link to what your talking about? |
|
|
|
|
then again we might just be about to bubble up and over 32......
i really have no clue, all i know is i sold, and I'm not buying back until I see it top off and crash.
|
|
|
|
Adam? Have you bought?  The FUD is over^^ I still think we are going to hit 10$ at one point. the walls are only getting bigger because volume has been low. buying now is risky as fuck IMO |
|
|
|
I can feel after that. The thing I am trying to make you understand the whole time is that Gavin already had this level of control. He has control over the Git tree which he is aiming to share with this foundation thing. So in a way things are for the better.
In order to solve this issue we would need a completely decentralized approach to collaborative software development which currently does not exist.
Great, that is the question: Are all human involved systems destinied to be centralized? People have to agree on some thing in common to communicate, which is a common protocol, and if that protocol is fixed, the decentralization can happen, but anyway some degree of centralization (common protocol) is required to build the system The centralization becomes a problem if it gets a degree of power to where it can change and upgrade the protocol on a whim. you just don't get it, anyone can and always was able to, change and upgrade the protocol on a whim. But, Everyone must agree to the change. so what changed? not much... the core team is given funding to continue to improve and promote bitcoin, and they now have a board of directors to report too. so they are doing Exactly what they did before, only now they are more transparent, and have financial back up. your argument is simply not valid... I think this adds too much legitimacy to the bitcoin.org client. [sarcastically] - your right its so unfair, we should we have the bitcoin government step in and put a stop to the foundation.  |
|
|
|
I can feel after that. The thing I am trying to make you understand the whole time is that Gavin already had this level of control. He has control over the Git tree which he is aiming to share with this foundation thing. So in a way things are for the better.
In order to solve this issue we would need a completely decentralized approach to collaborative software development which currently does not exist.
Great, that is the question: Are all human involved systems destinied to be centralized? People have to agree on some thing in common to communicate, which is a common protocol, and if that protocol is fixed, the decentralization can happen, but anyway some degree of centralization (common protocol) is required to build the system The centralization becomes a problem if it gets a degree of power to where it can change and upgrade the protocol on a whim. you just don't get it, anyone can and always was able to, change and upgrade the protocol on a whim. But, Everyone must agree to the change. so what changed? not much... the core team is given funding to continue to improve and promote bitcoin, and they now have a board of directors to report too. so they are doing Exactly what they did before, only now they are more transparent, and have financial back up. your argument is simply not valid... |
|
|
|
|
Sept. 29
>12.60 - 2 (20%)
12.5x - 1 (10%)
12.4x - 2 (20%)
12.3x - 3 (30%)
12.2x - 0 (0%)
12.1x - 0 (0%)
<12.00 - 2 (20%)
20% got it right.
|
|
|
|
Atlas this is happening now, with or without the foundation, makes no difference anyone can go and change the bitcoin soruce code. and guess who looks over the changes... Now that they just put a cute label on their team, and you go nuts...  you should be happy now that they are no longer an underground mysterious group of people. |
|
|
|
We will be fighting to keep the network as it is.
This is not an experiment. This is not a toy. This is real money, real value and a new frontier in liberty. We will not be losing it to a central authority.
Atlas i hear what your saying but your going over board... who ever doesn't like this new development with foundation can vote with their bitcoin,
just sell,
it is that easy
its not that i don't like it, its that i know their are a few groups doing the EXACT same thing. why should i favor this group? |
|
|
|
early adopters running out of funds? now they want me to donate anyone else seeing it this way? |
|
|
|
molecular: "what choice do I have?"
*prints loads of EUR, gives them to banksters, watches them buy up all assets, watches greece, spain, france, everyone else give up sovereignity, ducks*
molecular: "here we go, silverbox"
silverbox: "cool, thanks!"
*watches 'race to the bottom', banks runs, flight into hard assets, gold price sky-rocket, the daaaash to digital caaash, fiat burning in piles, 3rd world war, economic collapse*
silverbox: "ooouh yeah!"
silverbox *eats some silver for breakfast*
molecular *eats some bitcoins for lunch*
cypherdoc: "bitcoin up 562,000%, gold only up 372,000%, see? Hm, maybe I should finally these gold shorts..."
pretty good. QE forever, is a fantastic idea and should provide some short term stability for now, gold is still going down |
|
|
|
The squirrel feels nothing but the need to hoard moar.  At worst based on existing trend, we are looking at around 11.5. Unless this trend changes, holding is going to be better than selling in the long term. you see that trend line says we should be at 11  |
|
|
|
There is too much resistance at 12.50 and below, half of it doesn't even seem to be on the order book. I'm turning bear. And yes I sold.
How do you know its there if you cant see it? don't you feel it? |
|
|
|
Any luck in finding the software to operation a Bitcoin exchange?
I'm interested in something like this as well...
no. but I'll write it for you, for 32,000BTC |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
