"Umm, I don't know"
Yeah.. what a fucking scumbag scamming goofball, and seeing his actual words contributes to such impressions.
Ok. So what are the options in this Trial?
1) he loses and then claims he has no access to funds due to trust as stated in trial..ie nothing for plaintiffs?
2) he loses and also gets 3-4 weeks for contempt suspended and/or served? (Someone said on the thread no more than that unsure)
3) He wins the case, and blithely goes along claiming to be Satoshi?
Is there an actual chance he could lose in court and actually LOSE all his assets and/or go to Jail? Or would such a civil case not allow
extradition and/or he would easily reside in a country and just avoid it?
I just don't see any info/articles on the 'bad stuff' that will happen to him if he loses the case.
enlightenment anyone?
Brad
This case is going absolutely nowhere.
It is a claim on 1.1 million Bitcoins supposedly mined by CSW and Dave Kleiman. But the only evidence that any Bitcoins were mined at all comes from CSW.
Dave Kleiman did not leave behind any mining gear.
In all likelihood no Bitcoins were ever mined, or only a very small number. Everything else is just the product of Craig’s fertile imagination.
I have not seen a single piece of evidence which can be independently corroborated from before 2013. In all likelihood this rubbish was just cooked up by Craig in his ATO dispute to try to confuse the ATO who was (and continues to) pursue him for tax fraud.
Edit:
Unfortunately for us, given both sides insist that the Bitcoins exist (they almost certainly do not), there is a real risk that the judge find CSW an unreliable defendant and orders CSW to cough up the Bitcoins. Which of course CSW cannot do even if he was so inclined.
CSW then uses this as proof he is Satoshi.
Show Posts
