|
I want him to answer why almost identical logos are not misleading. I am almost looking forward to his dancing, weaving, obfuscating bullshit.
|
|
|
|
You forgot the bit where the big blockers try to fool newbies into thinking Bcash lol and BSV are Bitcoin.
Quite a different proposition than trying to fool newbies into thinking BCH or BSV are BTC. But nobody is doing that. That would be dishonest. How about addressing the substance of my post which you have selectively cut off? Your entire value proposition is based on fraud. One of these logos is a BSV logo. One of these logos is a Bitcoin logo. I can’t tell the difference so I can’t see how a newbie could. This is plainly fraudulent passing off.   It is more than dishonest. It is fraudulent. |
|
|
|
And as far as BSV is concerned, well let's not. Its been proven an outright scam by this point and there's nothing left to be said.
Defend your statement. In what way is BSV -- the blockchain, the payment system, and the protocol -- a scam? Don't try to make this an argument of semantics when you know full well what I'm referring to. That's weak sauce. Get real. I am merely responding to your literal fucking words. If you don't mean to imply that BSV itself is a scam, then don't say "as far as BSV is concerned, well let's not. Its been proven an outright scam". Because that would be lying, you conniving bastard. And lying is scammy behavior. Should we all tag you now? Defend your statement. Or retract it. Any other path forward for you would be dishonorable. I am talking about the reason why BSV was born: it was born as a scam. Meaningless drivel. There was a split in the community as to the proper way forward. Small blockers thought the the big blockers' route would break Bitcoin. Big blockers thought the small blockers' route would break Bitcoin. That's not a scam, you nincompoop. That's an honeest disagreement about the properties of the protocol. You ignored my entire defense
What defense? If you want to counter something, counter the reasoning below:
I'd be happy to, if you had something to respond to other than 'a couple of the people who believe this is the route forward have engaged in behavior I consider unsavory'. But you don't. There is nothing to respond to.Again: Defend your statement. Or retract it. Any other path forward for you would be dishonorable. And as far as BSV is concerned, well let's not. Its been proven an outright scam by this point and there's nothing left to be said.
Defend your statement. In what way is BSV -- the blockchain, the payment system, and the protocol -- a scam? Don't try to make this an argument of semantics when you know full well what I'm referring to. That's weak sauce. Get real. I am merely responding to your literal fucking words. If you don't mean to imply that BSV itself is a scam, then don't say "as far as BSV is concerned, well let's not. Its been proven an outright scam". Because that would be lying, you conniving bastard. And lying is scammy behavior. Should we all tag you now? Defend your statement. Or retract it. Any other path forward for you would be dishonorable. I am talking about the reason why BSV was born: it was born as a scam. Meaningless drivel. There was a split in the community as to the proper way forward. Small blockers thought the the big blockers' route would break Bitcoin. Big blockers thought the small blockers' route would break Bitcoin. That's not a scam, you nincompoop. That's an honeest disagreement about the properties of the protocol. You ignored my entire defense
What defense? If you want to counter something, counter the reasoning below:
I'd be happy to, if you had something to respond to other than 'a couple of the people who believe this is the route forward have engaged in behavior I consider unsavory'. But you don't. There is nothing to respond to.Again: Defend your statement. Or retract it. Any other path forward for you would be dishonorable. You forgot the bit where the big blockers try to fool newbies into thinking Bcash lol and BSV are Bitcoin. Your entire value proposition is based on fraud. One of these logos is a BSV logo. One of these logos is a Bitcoin logo. I can’t tell the difference so I can’t see how a newbie could. This is plainly fraudulent passing off. |
|
|
|
Has anyone else noticed the severe drop in liquidity on coinbase pro for BTC/USD?? Order book averaged about $50 million+ in buys all the way down to $2200 up until yesterday. Within the last 24 hours it dropped from $50 million down to barely over $10 million. What happened here?
You posted the same thing yesterday. Order books are irrelevant - whales use APIs. |
|
|
|
Good news YangGang. Our outspokenly pro Bitcoin/Crypto future President Andrew Yang has regained 3rd place again in Democratic Nomination betting markets. He was briefly overtaken by Hillary Clinton and put into fourth as she stirred up speculation that she will run again. However Yang has conquered her and Biden and Warren are next on the hit list. https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/3633/Who-will-win-the-2020-Democratic-presidential-nominationTrumps prospects look dimmer by the day as his own homies Foxnews have released a poll saying 51 percent of Americans back Impeaching and removing him from office. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-record-support-for-trump-impeachmentWhoever is the Dem nominee will likely be the 46th pres imo and imo that man is Andrew Yang. We can expect the debates to get unprecedented ratings as people realize how vulnerable Trump is. As America turns its gaze towards Yang he will surge in popularity as he exposes the other candidates as too old, too out of touch, or too much of a corporate whore. The coming six years will be ruff for you. I thought Trump would be President for the next 16 years? |
|
|
|
you people
well, there you have it... weeee the people |
|
|
|
|
My posts with the same content have also been deleted. I am heart broken.
|
|
|
|
Buulllllsshhheeeet.
I thought you were pulling my leg and wasted 20 minutes looking for rude gifs.
And then I thought to actually check my profile. Dammmm.
I guess I can sit at the big boys table now.
wtf hairy a legend?  !? well i guess game over now. we can all go home. we have overdone it, the last tiny drop that makes the barrel spill... /s CONGRATS DUDE!  Haha suck it up. I am one of you now. |
|
|
|
Buulllllsshhheeeet.
I thought you were pulling my leg and wasted 20 minutes looking for rude gifs.
And then I thought to actually check my profile. Dammmm.
I guess I can sit at the big boys table now.
I said as much just a couple days ago - "the last merit I can award to nonlegendary Hairy". Long overdue if you ask me. GRATZ! Thanks man. But how did you know ? You had 966 activity. It is known new activity points come each other Wednesday (just a few days after that post). Assuming the random threshold activity to be equally distributed between 775 and 1030, I turned my probe beam to full power. SOMA analysis did the rest. I am concerned about the use of the terms probe beam and SOMA in close proximity |
|
|
|
Buulllllsshhheeeet.
I thought you were pulling my leg and wasted 20 minutes looking for rude gifs.
And then I thought to actually check my profile. Dammmm.
I guess I can sit at the big boys table now.
I said as much just a couple days ago - "the last merit I can award to nonlegendary Hairy". Long overdue if you ask me. GRATZ! Thanks man. But how did you know ? |
|
|
|
|
Buulllllsshhheeeet.
I thought you were pulling my leg and wasted 20 minutes looking for rude gifs.
And then I thought to actually check my profile. Dammmm.
I guess I can sit at the big boys table now.
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, the version "Go fuck yourself Fatman" was also deleted. So, not a program deleting.
Then who is it? Show yourself!
Largely, I agree with the sentiment of your post, but even you realize that repetition of such similar responses even while quoting diptwat fatty, does not really add any value to the thread. I have had quite a few posts deleted over the years that upon reflection do not really add much if any value, and of course admin has some discretion here, including imposing harsher penalties on you for continuing to engage in the behavior that they are removing. This forum is not like a completely free form way to express any god damned thing that you want, even though we know that some posters, sometimes do seem to get away with some pretty outrageous off-topicness and even socially repulsive posts. In any event, I remain a bit puzzled why you would conclude that your mostly non-substantive posts (beyond a kind of childish form of expressive art) are really worthy of remaining on WO's historical record or that admins (whoever the fuck they are) would have to either explain themselves or admit to which one(s) are deleting your objectively true as non-substantive thread clogging contributions (if you would deem them as such)... We need a bigger blockchain so that Fuck you Fatty can be immortalised forever |
|
|
|
Where did "fatty fuck you" come from? Its all over WO. Am I missing out on something?
he seems to be a BigBlocker. Surely a reason for personal denigration, if ever one there were.  The current era of big blockers are fraudsters and scammers. Just spend 10 seconds researching Ver or CSW. That’s sufficient reason for personal denigration. I am an unapologetic big blocker. I am neither fraudster nor scammer. IOW, Go Fuck Yourself. You are in bed with CSW. A man is known by the company he keeps. |
|
|
|
|
Money is only a proxy for power. Once you have sufficient power, money is irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Where did "fatty fuck you" come from? Its all over WO. Am I missing out on something?
he seems to be a BigBlocker. Surely a reason for personal denigration, if ever one there were. The current era of big blockers are fraudsters and scammers. Just spend 10 seconds researching Ver or CSW. That’s sufficient reason for personal denigration. |
|
|
|
|
I thought Tuesday was your day?
|
|
|
|
What do you think?  Definitely darmklachten |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
