...
If someone across the street much less halfway across the globe asked you to donate $100 to their cause you wouldn't until you had done some checks and balances.
@crwth - what sort of advance notification did you or the others receive that an entire bitcoin would twice be donated?
|
|
|
Okay, let's look at it this way: (these receipts aren't on the spreadsheet posted just above BTW)Three scrunched up receipts from eleven months ago. Two are hand written with no contact details and a vague letter "C" as if that's supposed to explain all. Then receipt 0367 in image three has the wording: This document is not valid for claim of input taxes."Did it occur to you on reading (the tax disclaimer) that you might run into difficulties later on down the track if there were an audit of your expenditure?
@LoyceV - was it really necessary to give this person four merits for a Covid test receipt and three vague hand written receipts (one of which is for *bags*?) from eleven months ago. ?
|
|
|
So you had a "PCR" test which is just another name for a "Covid test" that literally millions of people globally are taking each and every week. According to the form, "the patient" requested it, not "a Doctor". Good for those who get tested every time. I got tested because I got symptoms of suspected covid. Having fever, diarrhea, body pains is not a joke. This is to verify if you have covid, I consulted a doctor first and it was recommended as well, if you want to see the medical prescription, PM me. That's not the main point of the thread though.You made it the point of the thread when you posted it as your response in this thread. As others have pointed out: Sorry if this is true but what this has to do with the proof you were supposed to post here? The image is dated on 23rd December while this thread has been posted on 11th December. By the way, such images can be easily made up, faked or what's not? You have provided some receipts, do they really prove anything? I really don't think so.
Time for some tough questions: - Where's the money?
- Who's idea was it to first dip into the funds for personal needs? And, as a follow-up: How long then did it take to become "normal" to use the funds for non charitable payments?
- How many people do you owe money to? (And how much do you owe)??
|
|
|
It's unlikely that this alt will be come active again, but am just placing it here so that it is on the record: 2 Accounts Connected: bL4nkcode01, bL4nkcode, 2016-02-10, 11:24:27 Date Registered: bL4nkcode01 2016-02-12, 01:17:03 Date Registered: bL4nkcode 2016-11-28, 00:59:25 Last Active: bL4nkcode01 2021-12-22, 08:15:01 Last Active: bL4nkcode Proof:
|
|
|
I think temptation and the availability of a large amount of money got the best of at least one of the members involved.
Ok, let's take this possibility as true. What did the other two do? 2021-12-19, 18:56:31 Last Active: cabalism13 2021-12-21, 13:00:09 Last Active: crwth 2021-12-22, 08:15:01 Last Active: bL4nkcode The three options are: All three are alts. I discount this scenario due to the fact there had to be collaboration between at least two parties in promoting the "charitable work" being done.- There are two users. I favor this scenario in which two users, for example cabalism13 and crwth are alts are able to persuade the other person (two votes to one) how to spend the funds.
There are three users. Two users might be able to persuade a third user for some of the time, however, the third person will at some-point form a differing opinion and voice concerns. That hasn't happened.
|
|
|
<snip> Also of note, of the four, just finaleshot2016 DT distrusted me and now they are the last one standing:
Exit scam? I'll leave that for you to decide... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) 2021-12-19, 18:56:31 Last Active: cabalism13 2021-12-21, 13:00:09 Last Active: crwth 2021-12-22, 08:15:01 Last Active: bL4nkcode 2021-12-22, 14:31:24 Last Active: finaleshot2016 To be honest, Timelord2067 I don't trust your hunches
Call it a "hunch" if you like, I don't imagine any of these four will be back any time soon. ( finaleshot2016's last actual post was twelve days ago )
|
|
|
Relevant addresses:
33tZjC2ZdVib9JLdWZH4rg7HzhuuTG5WZd - crwth 32RYTtV6xGTX55i5QdfA7T8iWgAd2QK7yo - legendster 33c9Df6J6vkGU1cuX84AePoeH2qzuzbcF1 - cabalism13 3LjVmpw2wDWawaPGa8Lj5JYjYciXDAePbW - cabalism13 3LvwmWgo6kS64Rtz5JVwpq3v1R8NXckX2W - crwth 351ZYYihVwJnKKv9iAdGeFxhaJ3t7zzrcA - bl4nkcode bc1qlk9s9tmsv79hk345s98atht534fac3qu0nrayu - probably cabalism13 1a3eegDyFQAotunG5CknN4JntFzfZC3Mo - not sure who own bc1qxu65xsfjecr8cxc3ywsp2pjzqp35dvs69tulem - not sure who own 3KwDEEzZycWYC73juBsrbjJjB1zumrx37v - marlboroza bc1q20yenlspxprxk9dqttc6gue8yz02auth89jdvq - not sure who own (0.56622723 BTC received worth of $18789#1)
- 33tZjC2ZdVib9JLdWZH4rg7HzhuuTG5WZd - is part of Wallet [00000dd86b] which has 7,860,540 total transactions (i.e. it's an online wallet/address) and is attributed to crwth
- 32RYTtV6xGTX55i5QdfA7T8iWgAd2QK7yo - is part of Wallet [00002dbb51] which has 1,116,489 total transactions (i.e. it's an online wallet/address)
- 33c9Df6J6vkGU1cuX84AePoeH2qzuzbcF1 - is part of Wallet [00000dd86b] which has 7,860,540 total transactions (i.e. it's an online wallet/address) and is attributed to cabalism13
- 3LjVmpw2wDWawaPGa8Lj5JYjYciXDAePbW - is part of Wallet [00000dd86b] which has 7,860,540 total transactions (i.e. it's an online wallet/address) and is attributed to cabalism13
- 3LvwmWgo6kS64Rtz5JVwpq3v1R8NXckX2W - is part of Wallet [824a27b6c9] and has just two wallet addresses:
3J8cyEFx5n4twscaFPtsXbqez8vRfs1JcX 0. 1 632402 3LvwmWgo6kS64Rtz5JVwpq3v1R8NXckX2W 0. 1 632402 - 351ZYYihVwJnKKv9iAdGeFxhaJ3t7zzrcA - is part of Wallet [aecaac8472] and has just two wallet addresses:
351ZYYihVwJnKKv9iAdGeFxhaJ3t7zzrcA 0. 1 632490 39FPTdMxZaS4QtYQWfjb3LucnKy49ydPkh 0. 1 632490 - bc1qlk9s9tmsv79hk345s98atht534fac3qu0nrayu - is part of Wallet [ddbf7dd4a9] and is the sole wallet address
- 1a3eegDyFQAotunG5CknN4JntFzfZC3Mo is part of Wallet [Bittrex.com] which has 8,432,605 total transactions (i.e. it's an online wallet/address)
- bc1qxu65xsfjecr8cxc3ywsp2pjzqp35dvs69tulem - is part of Wallet [60b5a51434] and has just two wallet addresses:
bc1qflr28lwmtss4j62ayg53q4fvugctajap336ssk 0. 1 659937 bc1qxu65xsfjecr8cxc3ywsp2pjzqp35dvs69tulem 0. 1 659937 - 3KwDEEzZycWYC73juBsrbjJjB1zumrx37v - is part of Wallet [5da4e581b8] and is the sole wallet address.
- bc1q20yenlspxprxk9dqttc6gue8yz02auth89jdvq - is part of Wallet [00039e3f52] of which there are 138,594 transactions. (i.e. it's an online wallet/address)
|
|
|
Fall guy? How long we will need to wait for a public documentation, a kind of spreadsheet would be nice. There are a lot of conversations already but I think most importantly we need a proper documentation. cabalism13 please update.
The block-chain entries of what *should* be there is a good starting reference. With the price of Bitcoin having apparently sunk over the last few weeks/months, it should be easy enough to revert the funds (in any currency) back into Bitcoin at a "new" wallet address (made public before the purchase occurs) where we can see what new transactions transpire. I thought this is already settled by it seems they choose to keep silent.
Good - where's the money?
|
|
|
Seven random photos of bulk food in shopping trolleys (under the circumstances) without any receipts as "proof of purchase" is not very convincing when you think about it... The problem with this reasoning is that we can't prove anything as long as they don't provide all data. By that reasoning, they can't be guilty as long as they hide whatever happened. I'd say that shouldn't apply to at least cabalism13 and bl4nkcode: both of them should have made sure this couldn't have happened and both of them should have made sure all expenses were clearly documented. I'm not sure (yet) about crwth's role in all this.
cabalism13 set the thread in motion asking for donations, while bl4nkcode carried the funds (how do we know this? - bl4nkcode signed a message using the actual wallet address for donations). The funds are apparently no longer there.
At this point blame goes cabalism13 - 45% / bl4nkcode - 45% and 10% to crewth for not saying anything.
I will leave the questions and accusations as is, until cabalism provide the whole list of the past transactions and activities in a single sheet. Also, I apologize for the lack of response and misunderstandings, hope this will be resolve already to clear all the misunderstandings. Simple question: - Where's the money?
|
|
|
IIRC, Ratimov and Lauda speak different non English languages, so perhaps if you could show they do speak the same language(s), or, claim to come from the same region (or Bitcoin TX's etc) then there *may* be some truth. But, for now, there is no link that I can see.
|
|
|
cabalism13 has been offline for about the last four days since yahoo62278 started their thread Bitcointalk Charity and its funds concerning: THREAD on the subject
ACCOUNTS INVOLVED
cabalism13 crwth bl4nkcode
Let me start with I am currently just looking for answers. I seen someone bump this thread a week ago, so I started digging. I noticed the last activity posted was May 2 2021. I also noticed the last post by any of the 3 was June 2 2021. I went to check this address 1CHAriTyyuCzLdXshSDVohyjgxTxW9Bhx and noticed the balance was 0. According to cabalism - Funds will be hold by an escrow (bl4nkcode), and for every donations TXID will also be posted here to let the public keep in touch.
- Note: No Minimum, No Maximum Donations. It should be just from the heart, and should also have the will to help the others.
- Updates, Activities, Images will be posted here as soon as we have conducted such activities.
I placed this *neutral* trust feedback on cabalism13's trust feeedback wall more than twelve months ago as an (unheeded) warning to others: cabalism13 I had observed in the thread Loan Default - asu u=519783 seemed to be propping up asu's default trust membership around the same time I had noticed connections between finaleshot2016, cabalism13, asu and ... theyoungmillionaire The latter two managed to scam @DireWolfM14 while cabalism13 has taken out loans with DireWolfM14... | DireWolfM14 | | 2019-05-10 | | Reference | | Borrowed 0.003BTC from him for the reason I needed an extra funds for a trade, He never gave my application a second thought and funded me right away. Repaid my debt with interest, Thanks for helping me, until next time. Good Day! |
Interestingly, when talking of asu to DireWolfM14, cabalism13 said this: didn't know it would turn out to be like this, sorry for your big loss @DireWolfM14.
Also of note, of the four, just finaleshot2016 DT distrusted me and now they are the last one standing: https://loyce.club/trust/2021-12-18_Sat_05.08h/888099.html
Exit scam? I'll leave that for you to decide... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
You are not only cheating and violating the rules of the campaigns, but apparently also violating the rules of this forum by ban evading. You know you're not allowed to create a new account if one account has already been banned?
... The only exception to that rule is to create a "Ban Appeal" account that should only be used for, as the name suggests, appealing a ban. (they haven't ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) )
|
|
|
@Cat20 - who did you purchase your accounts from?
|
|
|
Context:Back in 2018: | TMAN | | 2018-01-06 | | | | Left me a negative for stating facts about nastfans.. these idiots are brainwashed |
- Included by only one DT1 member who has a grudge against TMAN. Also self-scratching.
Context:Back in 2013: | OgNasty | | 2013-07-15 | | | | Great operator and trustworthy individual. A real asset to the community. |
Are you sure it's not just because nutildah "no longer distrusts silverfuture" (as a DT1) that you are making this appeal? Doesn't silverfuture trust OgNasty (whom you distrust) But the real question is why haven't you distrusted silverfuture yourself, yet you ask others to do so for you?
|
|
|
Which just goes to show the trickle down of merits isn't occurring as theymos had intended.
|
|
|
hmm, I see. thanks
icopress does not speak on my behalf.
|
|
|
Does anyone speak Philipino? I have an old thread I'd like someone with ETH experience to review.
If anyone can help, can they PM me, please?
|
|
|
(35/135)*(34/134)*(23/123)*(33/133)=0.3% chance indeed!
I think youll find it's (100/135)*(100/134)*(100/123)*(100/133)=??% chance given there are ?always? one hundred selected each month while the number of candidates each month varies. ... and I've been selected to DT1 for the fourth month in a row.
|
|
|
|