Hehe, ich meinte natürlich den Bärenmarkt.  
Ist entsprechend korrigiert.  


Definitiv, die mit dem Halving verbundenen Auswirkungen werden sich mit der Zeit abschwächen aber zumindest dieses (und nächstes) Halving ist das bestimmt noch etwas Besonderes für viele (neue) HODLer. Irgendwann wird dann auch der psychologische Effekt abnehmen, wenn eine gewisse Halving-Müdigkeit eintritt.
Vielleicht ist das an den Punkt erreicht, wenn bei dem neu ausgegebenen Bitcoin pro Block die Menge unter 0,xx BTC fällt und sich beim nächsten Halving die Zahl vor dem Komma nicht mehr ändert?

It's getting really interesting: after Bayern lost yesterday, Union Berlin only achieved a draw against Schalke 04.
Borussia Dortmund won 4-1 against Hertha BSC and now, Bayern, Union and BVB have the same number of points:



Freiburg, Leipzig and Frankfurt are still close as well and if the Bundesliga top teams should waste some more easy points, even different teams could end up winning the league.
Bayern is only still leading because of their impressive number of goals. 

Next week, Bayern will face Union in Allianz Arena. Odds are favoring Bayern massively but even if they only share points, Dortmund could end up leading the table next week.
It's a bit surprising to see Union slip against Schalke... 

No problem, I've also checked your left trust feedbacks and didn't saw a negative one sent recently, so everything is fine.
Many thanks for getting active on DT and acting against abuse, +1 

We are always happy to get more Bitcointalk members actively using the DT system, making it a bit more decentralized. 

Yeah, I've added the right link for download accordingly.

Nice to hear, I hope you found some nice vanity addresses. 

I've tried it as well, I don't get such an error but doesn't work for me as well because it depends on your device. Maybe that's a good question for the original topic and someon can help you for your question.
The original topic is in Development and Technical Discussion, so someone probably has a valid answer. 
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]

Yeah, that would be a good idea, although I beleive I have at least explained him the difference between the use of positiv, neutral and negative trust or even linked our German translation of your Trust guide topic. But he still doesn't know the difference between neutral and negative trust...
If there's an opportunity, I'll provide a link to your topic of course.  


According to our DT standards, we should be hesistant to give out a negative trust for the abuse mr.relax did. Distrusting him would be more appropriate because it would remove him from DT and his left feedbacks would only be visible under "untrusted feedback". Such feedbacks would not show up as default.
Distrusting works by adding ~mr.relax to your trust list, which you'll find here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Of course, it would be the best solution if mr.relax realizes his abuse. But I doubt it after his recent abuses.
Here's also a good beginners guide about DT: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

Allesklar, dann nehme ich 1$ vereinfacht für die Zwischenauswertungen.  

Klar, sofern GazetaBitcoin dem zustimmt, können wir es gerne so machen, dass der Gewinn zwischen euch beiden aufgeteilt wird, falls eure beiden Stablecoins dann führen und keiner kollabiert ist.  

Da GazetaBitcoin hier nicht mitlesen dürfte, habe ich die Frage mal per Direktnachricht weiter geleitet und um Antwort gebeten.  

Sicher, Zentralbanken sind "KomMuNiStiSch"....
Was ein hirnverbrannter und eindimensionaler Propagandaspot.
Aber immerhin haben sie schöne Stockvideos verwendet.  

---

Gut 2 Tage später steht der Kurs noch immer auf diesem hohen Niveau, was ein gutes Zeichen ist, dass die Bären aktuell wenig Chancen haben.
Sobald sich der Kurs über 25k hält, spricht viel dafür, dass wir rasch die 30k USD sehen und damit würde ich den Bärenmarkt ebenfalls als beendet ansehen.
Das Halving ist noch ein Jahr entfernt, daher würde es mir persönlich nichts ausmachen, wenn es noch etwas zwischen 20 und 25k schwankt, denn wenn es zu schnell ansteigt, könnte das wieder dazu führen, dass das Momentuum schon wieder verpufft ist, bevor das Halving eintritt.
Denn als Großereignis sollte man die marktpsychologischen, positiven Auswirkungen nicht unterschätzen. Vielleicht stehen wir zur Zeit des Halvings schon bei 100k USD.
Mal prüfen in einem Jahr, ob das so eingetreten ist.  

A very unlucky red card for Bayern very eraly in the game opened the door for Gladbach. Upamecano barely touched the Gladbach player, so very harsh decision extremely early in the game. Bayern still managed to score 2 goals but overally, one player less on the flied and some defensive mistakes were too much against a well-paying Gladbach team today.

A win for Union would be great to overtake Bayern in the table. And Dortmund could also come close to Bayern by winning against Hertha BSC Berlin tomorrow.
Should be likely for Union to win against Schalke but as everyone expected, Bayern also lost to Gladbach today, which many participants of our prediction pool didn't expect...

Exactly. If Buchi-88, as a DT1 member, keeps trusting mr.relax, it needs 2 DT1 exclusions for mr.relax to be kicked out from his DT2 position.
Accounts are DT2 as long as one DT1 inclusion is active and are kicked out if they have 1 more DT1 exclusion than DT1 inclusion.
As far as I know, maybe someone can confirm.  

---

Not anymore because if I'm correct, 1 DT1 inclusion makes him DT2 - and he needs 2 DT1 exclusions to be kicked out again. But before I created the topic, he only had 1 exclusion.

---

Yes, according to BPIP, NeuroticFish excluded him: https://bpip.org/TrustLog

Same here, I need to scroll as well.

I'm viewing it from my largest device but I'm sure it won't get better on smaller devices or even mobile devices, so I've cosen the approach to add PrivacyG's contribution below.
We can still change the table or add the column on the right side but it might be cut off entirely then.

+1  

You are right, I need to spell PrivacyG's name properly, my dear GazetaBitcoin.  
I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female  ).  

---

We could do it like that, if it's ok for everyone:


Bitcoin block explorers:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating)	Works without JS	Rated by	Comments
________________________	____________________________	_______________	___________________	______________	________________	________________________________________________________________________
Blockchair.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	8 / 10 Points	Yes	1miau
Trezor Bitcoin Explorer	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	7.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	Saint-loup	The only one with Blockchair to manage zpub keys
mempool	Yes (10/2020) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (10/2020)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Detailed and great UI
OKLink	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	It quickly became one of my favorites!
bitaps.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
BTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
chainflyer.bitflyer.jp	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	Alveus
BitcoinWho'sWho	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	GazetaBitcoin	Very efficient, including very interesting features; now it supports Bech32 addresses as well
BitcoinExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Simple and clean.
bitquery	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address
TokenView	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath.
BitInfoCharts	Yes (09/2022) / No (11/2022)	No (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially (see Comments)	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance. If using no-JS, click a random TX, Block or Address and edit the URL in your browser to view the desired information.
SoChain	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2021)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Blockcypher.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
cryptoID	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
ViaBTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / No (10/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Btcscan	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	6 / 10 Points	Yes	SFR10
Blockchain.com	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
Localbitcoinschain.com	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Great UI but it doesn't support addresses with large # of TX's. Currently unavailable.
BitcoinBlockExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Learnmeabitcoin	Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple and nothing more than that. Currently a few k Blocks behind.
Atomic	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	4.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Outdated UI / currently mirroring Trezor Explorer
CoinCap	Yes (10/2020) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2020)	4 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Yogh	Yes (10/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	4 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple but less interesting
Blockexplorer.one	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	LTU_btc
Blockpath	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Outdated UI
Blockstream	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	2 / 10 Points	?	pooya87	good details, blocks visitors from my country
Insight	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	1 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Walletexplorer.com	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	0 / 10 Points (avoid)	Yes	1miau	Risk of getting your IP tracked, not recommended to use
Spiral	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (09/2022)	x / 10 Points	No	cygan	beta phase ... only working for addresses with balance right now

Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome.  

Yes, probably he's not DT2 anymore, I've looked it up on wednesday and it might have changed by now. As far as I know, he's just one exclusion away from getting kicked out of DT2 since he has been distrusted by Nestade, GazetaBitcoin and me before the incident (see LoyceV's trust list viewer).

---

I've not even really insulted him, but he likes to paint himself as victim...  
Obviously he doesn't like it when his fraudulent tactics are criticized or his questionable positions in general.
It's quite funny because he has been the one pushing lies repeatedly like the unproven claim, that Nestade would be my alt and that my trust from November 2022 would be a negative trust.
He has even sent unsolicited and harsh PMs to other forum members.  


Exactly, there are so many disagrements. What a shitshow if we would start to give out a negative trust for disagreements for example in Bitcointalk's reputation section.  

Buchi-88 is a trustworthy member and it's just a coincidence.


Exactly but mr.relax is just 1 DT1 exclusion away from getting kicked out of DT2.
And the current DT selection is very favorable for mr.relax because normally, GazetaBitcoin, Nestade and I are usually DT1.
(edit: I misread that part, mr.relax loses his DT2 position if there are more DT1 exclusions compared to DT1 inclusions)

It's a suitable approach but I don't want to bother Buchi-88 right now, especially because I expect that DT will exclude mr.relax quickly.
I expect at least 4 new DT1 exclusions for mr.relax due to his abuse listed above.
So, let's see next week.  

Yes, you are right. Obviously, GitHub has changed a bit and my current link is not supported anymore...
I've added it in my OP and replaced the link.
Many thanks for pointing it out. 

If you need a customized SegWit-Address generator, you might also be interested in VanitySearch from Jean_Luc.
He's even active on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112311.0

Nice giveaway, I'm in of course and my prediction is 4,11 USD.
Helau. 

In our German local section, mr.relax committed already an offence recently: mr.relax luring readers into risky trades (and therefore losing Sats)

After his previous offence, it didn’t take long for him to commit a new one, where he once again made misleading claims about his technical analysis (TA) trading strategy - and then sent me a negative trust after I criticized him...

In addition to his unproven and bold claims, which he made already previously such like, that his technical analysis strategy would be

"4-7 times more profitable than HODL" (archived)
"outstandingly better than HODL" (archived)

he created a new topic called "Trendtrading" (trend trading), where he claimed to "prove" his strategy.
So far, there’s nothing wrong about creating such a topic and documenting his technical analysis strategy. Quite the opposite: I’m in favor of new and interesting topics.
But the problem of mr.relax and his topic: it has been intransparent from the beginning and just to be there to "prove" that his recent bold claims about TA have been right by using misleading strategies.
To "prove" his strategy, mr.relax resorted to a number of clumsy manipulations to make his strategy look better:

• his entry time for his first trade in his topic was misleading: while mr.relax started his topic on February 07, 2023, he dated his trade back to January 14, 2023 – while Bitcoin’s price had already risen massively making his trade look better. And if his trade from January 14, 2023 wouldn’t have worked out, we would have never heard from it. But now, he presented it as "successful". It's always easy to point out, that a trade has been successful after it happened. His fraudulent tactics have been covered in mr.relax luring readers into risky trades (and therefore losing Sats) already.
• After I asked him to post a trading chart to prove that his indicators were indeed showing a change in trend at that time, he refused to do so because he claimed he doesn’t want to reveal his strategy and if he does, it would result in endangering his strategy because "everyone would use it". Sure, if everyone on Bitcointalk had such a power to move markets and decides to use his unproven strategy...  
• He didn't make realistic considerations to add trading fees and taxes into his trades – refusing to include fees and taxes would benefit his trading strategy even more – but to have a realistic review of strategy, he need to include trading fees and taxes – so far, he didn't make proper considerations.
• mr.relax repeated his misleading claims of "4-7x more profitable than HODL" several times.

After I criticized his intransparent approach and misleading claims (because his calculations are massively sugarcoated) and I suggested to be more transparent and less misleading, he childishly demanded from mole0815 to close his topic (because I exposed him) and mr.relax left me a negative trust feedback - LOL.



It’s outright abuse of negative trust from mr.relax.


tl;dr

In our German section, mr.relax abused negative Trust, which he left on my account, just because I criticized his misleading claims and intransparent Technical Analysis (TA trading) strategy topic.
Since mr.relax is DT2 currently (nowadays many clueless and / or fraudulent accounts are in DT2), he should be distrusted for abusing negative trust feedback.


Conclusion:

~mr.relax

Was soll denn mit den Bayern los sein?
Problem dürfte gegen Gladbach hauptsächlich die frühe rote Karte gegen Upamecano gewesen sein, welche zudem nicht wirklich eine klare rote Karte war.
Dann spielt es sich 80 Minuten in Unterzahl deutlich schwieriger und Gladbach war heute auch nicht so schlecht wie in vergangenen Spielen.

Naja, gegen PSG in Paris auswärts zu gewinnen ist ja schon eine Leistung an sich.
Dass da etwas Dusel dabei war, ist trübt jetzt den Erfolg auch nicht so wirklich, schließlich hat Bayern diese Saison in der Chaimpions Leage alle Spiele gewonnen und das gegen Top Vereine, u.a Barcelona, wo Lewandowski jetzt spielt.

Nein? Woran macht man das fest? Die Bundesliga-Saison war bisher vielleicht etwas schwächer als gewohnt, besonders der Start in die Rückrunde aber in den ca. letzten 10 Jahren waren die Bayern besonders gegen Saisonende am stärksten.
Zudem ist Mané verletzt.
Und die hervorragende Bilanz der Bayern in der Champions-League lässt einen Schluss auch nicht zu, dass sich Bayern nach dem Abgang von Lewandowski "nicht erholt" hätte.

A) Yes
B) Under
C) No
Tiebreaker: 298

Der Vorschlag gefällt mir, zumindest wäre das ein Indikator, den man in die Betrachtung ziehen könnte. Kann sich jeder Kampagnen-Manager dann selbst entscheiden, wie er diesen Indikator mit einbezieht, Teilnehmer auszuwählen bzw. aus der Kampagne zu entfernen.
Leider wird sowas im Forum mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht implementiert, da die Verantwortlichen im Forum es bisher nicht einmal in mehr als 7 Jahren und mit über 2,5 Millionen USD Finanzierung hinbekommen haben, das neue Design im Forum zu implementieren. 

---

Ist halt die Frage, ob es für Krypto-Kasinobetreiber so sinnvoll ist, Beiträge aus dem Glücksspielbereich nicht zu werten - ist das doch die Zielgruppe, die regelmäßig solche Angebote nutzt.
Dass dies eine Lösung für Krypto-Kasinobetreiber sei, stelle ich also einmal in Zweifel.

Womöglich ist es sogar eine Strategie, die kontraproduktiv ist, wenn die Zielgruppe die Werbung nicht sieht.

Nachdem der Kürbis-Wettbewerb so erfolgreich war, hat mich das auch gewundert bzw. wundert es mich immer noch, dass da so ein Gefälle besteht zwischen den beiden Gewinnspielen und deren Teilnehmeranzahl. Kuchen backen finde ich sogar einfacher als Kürbis gestalten...
Naja, vielleicht hat RickDeckard den Beitrag einfach im falschen Forumsteil veröffentlicht, denn aktuell befindet er sich im Teil "Spiele und Runden", welcher leider immer wieder zugemüllt wird. Gut möglich daher, dass dort nur wenige Nutzer hineinsehen. Der Kürbis-Wettbewerb war in "Collectibles", da gibt es deutlich weniger Spam und sehr wahrscheinlich werden dort auch mehr Nutzer regelmäßig hineinschauen.

Bleibt zu hoffen, dass RickDeckard noch ein paar Teilnehmer für seinen Wettbewerb bekommt. 

I beleive it's best for us to have a look at the big picture:

From 12/2013 to 12/2017, Bitcoin increased around 16x (from 1.2k to 19.5k)
From 12/2017 to Summer 2021, Bitcoin increased around 3.5x (from 19.5k to 67k).
Next cycle, we need to take 67k as our new starting point.

Next cycle, we'll could see increases of 2.0-2.5x, which would be around 125k to 150k.
And it would be a 5x - 7x from where we are now. 

Finally, we should also consider: last ATH (2021) we didn't have any halving but now, in 2024, we'll have one, resulting in a possibly more bullish environment.

Ja, die Geschichte ist echt interessant und da wurde auch schon viel recherchiert, weil die Frage natürlich ein bis heute ungelüftetes Geheimnis ist.
Dass es ein Mann in Japan ist, der zufällig so heißt, ist natürlich prinzipiell möglich.

Viel wahrscheinlicher ist es jedoch, dass der Name aus dem Umfeld von Hal Finney kommt, denn zufällig heißt ein Nachbar von Hal Finney Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, der damals pensionierter Ingenieur war. Nachbar nicht direkt aber er wohnte zur Zeit der Veröffentlichung des Bitcoins auf jeden Fall in der Nähe von Hal Finney. Zudem hat der Erfinder von Bitcoin (Satoshi Nakamoto) die erste P2P Bitcoin-Transaktion mit Hal Finney zusammen abgewickelt.
Nun ist das schon ein bisschen viel Zufall alles und daher würde ich vermuten, dass Hal Finney zumindest der Namensgeber von "Satoshi Nakamoto" ist. Und da er Japaner ist, fand Finney das vielleicht passend.
Dorian Nakamoto hat später zudem abgestritten, der Erfinder von Bitcoin zu sein.
Ob Hal Finney direkt Satoshi Nakamoto ist oder Finney den Erfinder des Bitcoins nur aus dem Internet kennt (schon von vor Bitcoin) und von Finney lediglich die Idee kommt, dass der Erfinder so heißen soll, wäre weiter zu ergründen, da unsere Geschichte hierzu keine konkreten Beweise liefert.
Aber zumindest könnte das die Herkunft des Namens "Satoshi Nakamoto" plausibel erklären, dass die Idee für den Namen von Hal Finney stammt.  


Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto