What is his purpose? I figured I'd just ask on Telegram, and the answer is: "For campaign". That doesn't tell me anything  ... Or start bumping service with those high ranked accounts, if they have merit then the bumping power will be higher and there you go, nobody cares that those accounts are with red trust.
I was suspecting that this might happen and here we have a fresh example. The bumping power doesn't depend on rank, only on Activity and Merit earned in the past year. If he wants Merit or sMerit, I'd expect that to be specified. I kinda expect the accounts to be used to shill for a project, but who's going to believe a thread that has many higher ranked accounts with red trust posting in it? |
|
|
|
Where can I leave a complaint about your signature spam here? Report to moderatorThe right translation is: "He isn't better) he is the same douchebag too who imaging he is God". It was written about LoyceV, one of "the most known users". We were discussing this topic and some members of English DT. Cute! You're going to love this topic: LoyceV - robovac. low worth, low achieving, sig spamming fool. - REAL DEBATE.You seem to be mistaken about a few things. First: I neither know nor care about trolls on local boards: I don't read it. I Merited the post because a low-ranking user made a decent post. That doesn't even mean I have to agree with the post, it means I'm doing what Merit sources do. As for the amount: it depends on how many sMerit I have left, so it varies. Is that really Merit source material? Ask theymos  Unlike you, I don't mind being questioned once in a while about my sMerit distribution. But there's also this: Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that. You don't need to stress about it or defend yourself constantly. It's conceivable that someday you and I will end up disagreeing too much about this stuff and I'll remove your source status, but it's really not a big deal. No one is questioning LoyceV's merit distribution but most of the users here are questioning yours I'd be interested to see a Meta-topic on this alledged Merit abuse from Vadi2323 to Viktor SPB. |
|
|
|
Is this allowed? It's very close to a 30 day ban: Most giveaway threads are no longer allowed in the Alternate cryptocurrencies sections. From now on, posting or replying to such threads could result in being banned. Existing threads will be locked.
Specifically, you are not allowed to give people any incentive to post insubstantial posts in your threads. You can't offer to pay people who post their addresses, usernames, etc. You can do giveaways off-site and link to the giveaway page in a thread, but you can't give people any bonus for replying to your thread. They could argue they only pay for substantial posts, but that's not very likely on the Altcoin boards. |
|
|
|
Why not pay attention to your own self first before pointing fingers over others, Vadi2323?
What was so special to reward Viktor SPB around 50 merits in a period of just 2 days? You've had those merits to be sent to the most deserving candidates but all you did was sent these merits as a special treatment to Viktor SPB while most merits were sent over a single topic? I can't help but think Vadi2323 uses his source sMerits for his personal agenda. Yesterday, Maggiordome summoned me to a Russian thread, and I noticed Vadi2323 merited this post: Сорри, там должен быть вот этот текст ~
Lol, he excluded me too:
этот не лучше) такой же долбоеб строящий из себя бога Google Translate translates this to: "this is not better) is the same hollow building from God". Is this really Merit source material? |
|
|
|
Enough time for a sweet bull run after this drop. A quick price doubling to make me win this one, followed by another doubling to make me win BAKKT. It's possible! /keeps dreaming |
|
|
|
You still think that spam will only be reduced if paid signatures are banned ?
It may introduce many other complications / effects but for the SPAM, i think it will be completely eliminated. I guess you haven't seen patrol yet: almost all Newbie posts are only spamming links to Facebook and Twitter. Barely any of these posts are worth reading, and they can't even wear a signature yet. |
|
|
|
Twenty-seventh week paid. Received! Thanks again |
|
|
|
we can consider the 75th to 90th percentile as that's where most of the (non-extreme) high-quality posters should reside. That might bring a better daily merit number. Here's the earned Merit of each userID (until last Friday). If it's 0, that means the user only sent Merit without receiving any. It's quite easy to make a Pareto chart out of this. |
|
|
|
Of the space of users that have earned 1 or more merit, what is the average merit earned? Last Friday, 30410 users had received at least 1 Merit. In total, 460749 Merit had been sent. That's 15.15 Merit on average. I don't think this is a very useful number though |
|
|
|
I was started to distrust by supporters of the blackmailer Izooomrud. Merit doesn't mean support. Well, that is assuming you use Merit the way it should be used. This is very similar to abuse of merit. I can't read the posts, so I can't really judge it. But Vadi2323 is a Merit source, and if you can prove Merit abuse, you should make a topic about it in Meta. Theymos has removed a few Merit sources for that reason, possibly undoing the Merit transactions too. (sorry, raw HTML in Russian doesn't work well on the forum) |
|
|
|
Lol, he excluded me too: Could this be the reason? I didn't pay attention to it earlier. |
|
|
|
Can you fix the links? "?topic=1234.msg1234#1234" doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
What's wrong with a limited form of stability in randomness? I don't know, I didn't make the system But I understand the desire not to restrict DT1 to only very old members. |
|
|
|
But I'd only suggest you Loyce for the job. You're clearly overestimating me here This is not my area of expertise. |
|
|
|
|
WTF? So this drop isn't exactly what I expected, could it be BAKKT was overly hyped for so long that nobody cares anymore?
If I can continue speculating: I wouldn't be surprised institutional investors are going to cause a price increase once Bitcoin is low enough.
|
|
|
|
I don't think that would work - how would you deal with multiple threads requesting a bump to the top? They'll have to compete with each other for the first place. If there's a commercial option I would prefer a separate page for it and a bid process to get one of 20 (or 50, or 100) spots on it guaranteed for e.g. 24h, randomized with each load perhaps - somewhat like the current forum ad banner. But given theymos allergy to ICOs it's unlikely that he would want to make money off that. I've suggested before to sell "sticky" spots, but indeed, I don't think it's very likely to be implemented. |
|
|
|
i use windows so yes it has to be python You can use bash utilities on Windows too. Or boot your computer from an Ubuntu LIVE DVD just to do this. yes it is very very slow for files above 1,000,000 lines when i want to compare a files with +10,000,000 lines to other 2,000,000 lines (i had to cancel and close the script  ) It took me a while to create 2 test-files with 50,000 Bitcoin addresses, so I just copied the same addresses to the same files to make it 10 million and 2 million lines per file. The comm-code above took 9 seconds to find all matches (and my PC is not very fast). I strongly suggest to use the proper tools for the job Update: it used 1.5 GB RAM to do this. If you have much more data to compare, it might reduce memory load if you sort the files first. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
