Don't get impatient guys, the dev can obviously code pretty much anything.
I feel the roadmap will bring some good news and additional investments.
|
|
|
Orderbook bought up till 1660 Someone became impatient.
|
|
|
Wow, big sell on bittrex down to 1200 ...
I am pretty sure he/she sold most of that CRAIG for himself.
|
|
|
noobs? Mmmmh, which is the sense to invest in a ICO, buy some coin @ X price, and just the moment the market open, you sell your coin lower than the price you bought! Ok if you sell lower after a week, after some days, because it's dumping and you don't want to lose more, but sell just the right moment it opens it's very strange. Is not a matter of be noob...imho
People are afraid of getting dumped on --- after all the scams, the mentality among a lot of people out there is "dump before you´re dumped on." I´m not sure you can blame these people for being skittish. I don´t think it has much to do with Craigscoin personally (the coins seems legit to me). It´s just a reflection of the kind of market we´re in these days. The scams have really battered confidence in everything and people will bail at the faintest sign of weakness figuring, "dump first, ask questions" later. Kinda sad that legit coins are impacted by that. If thats the reason for selling early, why even invest in an IPO where your coins get locked down for a week? lmao
|
|
|
why are people selling below ipo price? WEAK NOOBS They thought that will make x100 in first hour but after 13 seconds of waiting dumped and left in tears. RIP Weak hands, you won't be missed. Im not selling below 2-3k.
|
|
|
How many hours left for markets to open?
Should be in 8 hours.
|
|
|
I'm wondering, if at the moment bittrex will open craig market all of us that have invested in it, decide together to put sell order from 3k, no one of us should sell below of 3ksat, can we really decide the price? So at the least who wanna leave will take a 100% profit, and all the sell order are higher than 3k so who decide to stay will make huge profit. Is this possible?
that would be a smart thing to do +1, I would love to see the early investors work together
|
|
|
FUD
You didn't even invest lol. Delete the comment of this guy please.
|
|
|
if everyone who bought has half a brain and refuses to sell under the IPO price, it wont go under the IPO price!!! Simples! +1
|
|
|
Someone just bought for 15 BTC.
Exciting few hours ahead.
|
|
|
As someone suggested I will spend 5% of the gathered BTCs on the Marketing of CraigsCoin
Would it be dumb to obtain an existing or develop an ANON system for the coin? Since it's a decentralised AD system, some people may prefer to hide their identity when obtaining coins for advertising. This could open the gate for a wider audience. (Not implying anything illegal, but it's a preference for a lot of us) Hmm when thinking about anon one must think who will use anon. And analyze possible privacy attack vector. There are 3 major groups of users expected for this coin: 1. Sellers 2. Buyers 3. Traders Whos privacy do you think must be protected at first place? Sellers because they are the ones who need to buy CRAIG to be able to post ADs as far as I understood. ANON wouldn't be useful when purchasing from the exchanges because they would not go with the optional ANON send feature when giving you the coins, but atleast you could hide your coins when transfering between 2 of your own wallets before posting an AD. For 2 and 3 it doesn't really matter (except when a trader wants to avoid local financial regulations in the future). See the problem is that to sell most of normal things you need to disclose your contacts anyway (how else buyer will reach you otherwise?) So protecting the seller in general kinda feels irrelevant. Also 5 coins per ad is such a low price so I imagine most of people will be able to easily get enough free CRAIGs to have several ads postings. For example any site that parses CraigsCoin can giveaway 5-10 CRAIGs to new users to allow couple free postings in order to promote themself. Remember Ad listing fee is there only to prevent spam. It is not intended to fill my pockets with gold Contacts don't need to be disclosed when for example selling virtual goods and services through BTC (or any crypto). But for physical goods you need to, you are right in that. Hmm, let's imagine I sell virtual service. Hosting or VPN or something of this sort. I payed 5 CRAIGs fee to post ad. What kind of threat I should expect and from who? I mean what help will be the Anon for me? I'm asking this because to implement effective solution I need to elaborate possible attack vectors and threats. obviously anon is needed for those who want to post illegal stuff. But it may be good for the coin, more demand Also this, lets not forget that BTC boomed when it was used on the darknet.
|
|
|
As someone suggested I will spend 5% of the gathered BTCs on the Marketing of CraigsCoin
Would it be dumb to obtain an existing or develop an ANON system for the coin? Since it's a decentralised AD system, some people may prefer to hide their identity when obtaining coins for advertising. This could open the gate for a wider audience. (Not implying anything illegal, but it's a preference for a lot of us) Hmm when thinking about anon one must think who will use anon. And analyze possible privacy attack vector. There are 3 major groups of users expected for this coin: 1. Sellers 2. Buyers 3. Traders Whos privacy do you think must be protected at first place? Sellers because they are the ones who need to buy CRAIG to be able to post ADs as far as I understood. ANON wouldn't be useful when purchasing from the exchanges because they would not go with the optional ANON send feature when giving you the coins, but atleast you could hide your coins when transfering between 2 of your own wallets before posting an AD. For 2 and 3 it doesn't really matter (except when a trader wants to avoid local financial regulations in the future). See the problem is that to sell most of normal things you need to disclose your contacts anyway (how else buyer will reach you otherwise?) So protecting the seller in general kinda feels irrelevant. Also 5 coins per ad is such a low price so I imagine most of people will be able to easily get enough free CRAIGs to have several ads postings. For example any site that parses CraigsCoin can giveaway 5-10 CRAIGs to new users to allow couple free postings in order to promote themself. Remember Ad listing fee is there only to prevent spam. It is not intended to fill my pockets with gold Contacts don't need to be disclosed when for example selling virtual goods and services through BTC (or any crypto). But for physical goods you need to, you are right in that. Hmm, let's imagine I sell virtual service. Hosting or VPN or something of this sort. I payed 5 CRAIGs fee to post ad. What kind of threat I should expect and from who? I mean what help will be the Anon for me? I'm asking this because to implement effective solution I need to elaborate possible attack vectors and threats. The main idea for me to use this system would be that I don't have to register anywhere or disclose my identity to a 3rd party here when selling or buying goods. This concept can be broken when buying CRAIG on exchanges (or AD sites) because there you have to disclose atleast some of your information. It's simply a personal preference from me to do this if I can, like when browsing through a VPN or proxies. It may not be priority on a development roadmap, but it can be a plus for atleast a % of the userbase.
|
|
|
As someone suggested I will spend 5% of the gathered BTCs on the Marketing of CraigsCoin
Would it be dumb to obtain an existing or develop an ANON system for the coin? Since it's a decentralised AD system, some people may prefer to hide their identity when obtaining coins for advertising. This could open the gate for a wider audience. (Not implying anything illegal, but it's a preference for a lot of us) Hmm when thinking about anon one must think who will use anon. And analyze possible privacy attack vector. There are 3 major groups of users expected for this coin: 1. Sellers 2. Buyers 3. Traders Whos privacy do you think must be protected at first place? Sellers because they are the ones who need to buy CRAIG to be able to post ADs as far as I understood. ANON wouldn't be useful when purchasing from the exchanges because they would not go with the optional ANON send feature when giving you the coins, but atleast you could hide your coins when transfering between 2 of your own wallets before posting an AD. For 2 and 3 it doesn't really matter (except when a trader wants to avoid local financial regulations in the future). See the problem is that to sell most of normal things you need to disclose your contacts anyway (how else buyer will reach you otherwise?) So protecting the seller in general kinda feels irrelevant. Also 5 coins per ad is such a low price so I imagine most of people will be able to easily get enough free CRAIGs to have several ads postings. For example any site that parses CraigsCoin can giveaway 5-10 CRAIGs to new users to allow couple free postings in order to promote themself. Remember Ad listing fee is there only to prevent spam. It is not intended to fill my pockets with gold Contacts don't need to be disclosed when for example selling virtual goods and services through BTC (or any crypto). But for physical goods you need to, you are right in that. And also as you could see ANON is one of the most requested features in the crypto world since long. I am not using the word hype because this has lived longer than a few months now.
|
|
|
As someone suggested I will spend 5% of the gathered BTCs on the Marketing of CraigsCoin
Would it be dumb to obtain an existing or develop an ANON system for the coin? Since it's a decentralised AD system, some people may prefer to hide their identity when obtaining coins for advertising. This could open the gate for a wider audience. (Not implying anything illegal, but it's a preference for a lot of us) Hmm when thinking about anon one must think who will use anon. And analyze possible privacy attack vector. There are 3 major groups of users expected for this coin: 1. Sellers 2. Buyers 3. Traders Whos privacy do you think must be protected at first place? Sellers because they are the ones who need to buy CRAIG to be able to post ADs as far as I understood. ANON wouldn't be useful when purchasing from the exchanges because they would not go with the optional ANON send feature when giving you the coins, but atleast you could hide your coins when transfering between 2 of your own wallets before posting an AD. For 2 and 3 it doesn't really matter (except when a trader wants to avoid local financial regulations in the future).
|
|
|
As someone suggested I will spend 5% of the gathered BTCs on the Marketing of CraigsCoin
Would it be dumb to obtain an existing or develop an ANON system for the coin? Since it's a decentralised AD system, some people may prefer to hide their identity when obtaining coins for advertising. This could open the gate for a wider audience. (Not implying anything illegal, but it's a preference for a lot of us)
|
|
|
my goodnes, this coin is getting more expensive by the hour! how in the hell are we suppose to make some profits!? the only guy who makes profits here is the dev. Several cryptos with similar coin counts could reach a few thousand sats as far as I remember. It all depends on the whales.
|
|
|
MineralsPR What about inappropriate adds?
What if somebody puts an add up with child porn or nuclear bombs for sale. How will you counter this?
He's not the police. The police have to deal with this issue. And who is the first person the police will go to? It's a p2p network, he can't stop it as soon as it is released.
|
|
|
Rebought some after mining + selling for decent profits. It's hard to avoid with this good entry price and seems it's unable to go lower. Awaiting the developments
|
|
|
This all means that you can't actually code yourself. Also you are terrible at marketing.
What can you do properly?
Avoid this coin please. Rly man, you want the ppl to pay for your expenses of setting up a basic shitcoin?
And btw loljosh can make you a coin with nodes, website, 024 support for 0.5 btc... Pft.
|
|
|
|