I gave @MrCrank negative for promoting a fake humanitarian project. Exploiting human suffering and crisis in Ukraine for personal gain is one of the most unethical actions imaginable, and that's why I don't trust such a member. Anyone who disagrees with my judgment is free to remove me from their Trust list.

I recognized @Jawadu from a previous case where he accepted to promote a project that the previous manager had labeled as scam and refused to work with them. Here is the reference. After the QI Scam was exposed for plagiarism, he persisted in defending the project for his personal benefit, as you can see here. A few months later, the token's value to plummet from $0.4 to $0.02. So basically, I'm still waiting for him to prove me wrong. 

As for @Prasagta, I don't know who that guy is and I don't think I've ever tagged him.

Not only the whitepaper, but also the website (and most of the content in the ANN topic) is also plagiarized from various sources, but mostly from the Cypherdog project: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5430836.msg61635556#msg61635556

It's clear from a simple five-minute Google search that this project is nothing more than a simple copycat scheme. They take bits and pieces from other projects without any original ideas or concepts, just to deceive uninformed investors and make a quick buck before disappearing in a month or two.

Yes, this is a big red flag and definitely something to be cautious of. I did some more research and it's pretty clear that this project has not only plagiarized their whitepaper, but their website^[1] as well. A lot of the content seems to have been copied from the medium article of the Cypherdog project^[2].




Original source: https://medium.com/@e.kozera/what-makes-cypherdog-stand-out-a2149ae6e471

This is an unacceptable act and a blatant violation of intellectual property^[3], and raises serious concerns about the credibility of the project. Anyone considering investing or becoming involved with this project should be aware that it has engaged in such a dishonest and unethical behavior.

---

[1] https://memv.net/
[2] https://www.cypher.dog/
[3] https://www.cypher.dog/terms-of-service/

It's been a month since this scam accusation was first made, but nothing has changed. Their website still has a link to the same plagiarized whitepaper and there's still no information about their team, despite what MetaMallVerse promised.


MetaMallVerse, it's been several weeks and it seems that you haven't kept your word. Can you please explain what has been happening with your project and your team? It is very important to be transparent with your community and stakeholders. Your failure to deliver on your promises is a serious concern.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention! I had completely forgotten about this plagiarism case and wasn't familiar with their bounty campaign as I don't regularly check that board. I'll definitely take a look at it now. My thoughts are that any bounty manager should always do their own research before promoting a project. If they continue to actively promote a project despite clear indications that it's a scam, then they should be held accountable.

If I understand correctly, you are participating in a pay-per-post campaign, which means that even though some of your posts were rejected, you were still compensated for the remaining ones. I wouldn't be upset about that, as it is typical for a manager to have stricter rules in such a campaign.


Personally, I wouldn't mind if managers paid more attention to the quality of their participants' posts, particularly in the Gambling section, where there seems to be a lot of spam. (I want to make it clear that I haven't checked your posts, and I'm not saying they were spam.)


I recall having a similar discussion a few years ago when I was just starting my journey in this community. I was inexperienced and naive (in terms of this forum) and the manager's actions offended and hurt me emotionally. But over time, you learn to develop a thicker skin and not be affected by such things as much. Looking back, today I would say that everyone has the right to hold their own opinion, and even if it differs from yours, it's important to learn to respect it. The only thing within your control is your own actions, and working on bettering yourself and proving them wrong, as I have done, is the best course of action. As others have pointed out already, this is their party, they make the rules. Either you dance to their tune or you can always leave the dance floor.

That's right. The website utilizes EXIF metadata analysis to detect fake photos. However, unlike real photos that can be fingerprinted and contain EXIF data, screenshots don't have the necessary EXIF information for this purpose. Besides, as you also noted, the images are no doubt already modified anyway (censored sender) so any further analysis is irrelevant.


I agree. Even if the screenshots are pixel perfect and free of that chat bubble glitch, that still doesn't guarantee their authenticity. Unfortunately, some members will accept such flimsy evidence at face value to incriminate a member.

Hey there! Welcome to the forum!
I understand that you might be feeling a bit discouraged about your rank at the moment. But, it's important to remember that progress takes time and effort. Along with the merits, you also need at least 30 activity points for your next rank. My advice to you is to take the time to get involved in the community. Keep an eye out for interesting discussions and posts by other members, and join in on the conversation. This will help to establish a positive presence and build your credibility and over time, as you continue to contribute and engage, your rank will gradually increase.



Hey Frankolala, I have no doubt that you will reach Sr. Member rank in no time, but note that you still lack 16 activity points. I suggest you focus on that, and the merits will come naturally by then anyway. 

Ban Evasion:

Accounts Connected:
1. riocasinoback
2. Riocasino
3. Fishy001 [BANNED]

Proof:

[archive]

[archive]

[archive]

Yeah, it seems our suspicions have been confirmed. This fool outright admitted to evading the ban.  

riocasinoback = Riocasino = Fishy001 => Ban Evading!

[archive]

[archive]

Most of the discussions about sports betting have their own dedicated threads, so I don't think it is necessary to create new child boards . If you don't want to see any more sports betting threads, simply mark them as ignored (which will make other gambling discussion threads stand out).

I agree. There seems to be something suspicious going on here.

This story bears a striking resemblance to the troll known as Fishy001, with a similar level of poor writing skills, comparable accounts of both significant losses and victories in the casino, as well as the presentation of false evidence. OP, do you have any association with Fishy001 account?

It appears that you may not have fully comprehended the context of the posts you are replying to. We were discussing a hypothetical situation in which ignore lists were made public. Clearly, that is not the current state of affairs.

Da. Nije mi sporno složiti se s 10% poreza, ali doslovno je nemoguće biti 100% u skladu sa zakonom. Problem je u dokazivanju porijekla prihoda. Porezna će se vjerojatno u nekom trenutku obračunati s nekolicinom pojedinaca u crypto industriji, a budući da nemaju resursa za praćenje svih, vjerojatno će se fokusirati na one slučajeve gdje imaju čvrste argumente. Vjerujem da, barem za sada, pojedinci koji barataju beznačajnim iznosima mogu mirno spavati.



Da pogodim: Tetris, PacMan, Space Invaders... Ili možda Pong? 

There are many reasons why some people prefer to gamble on their phone, rather than from a desktop-based option. One reason could be that some people find it more convenient to use their phone, as it is always with them and they can access their gambling account from anywhere. Some people are also simply more comfortable using a mobile device, as they have grown up with this type of technology and prefer it over other options.

For me, it was always a matter of convenience. If I'm at home or in the office, I use a desktop computer; if I'm traveling somewhere and don't want to take my laptop or tablet with me, then I'll use my phone. It's that simple.

Yes. If the casino you want to review already has a thread, whether official or unofficial, post your review there rather than creating a new topic. This helps keep the discussions on the forum organized and easy to follow. Creating a new thread for each individual comment can get a bit confusing, so let's avoid that if we can, okay?

So you claim that "ole777.in" is not your domain? Are you also claiming that "ole777.io" is not your domain? Both domains were registered just one day apart.



Besides, if they're not your domains, why haven't you reported them to the domain registrars or taken any legal action against them? They are clearly using your name, branding and copyrighted materials, and both domains have been active for some time.

Your lack of transparency raises questions about the legitimacy of your team and the authenticity of your project, which appears to contain plagiarized content, as pointed out by @holydarkness. Explain yourself now and provide evidence to support your claims. There is no team listed on the website. Are you part of the team?

I have a different perspective on this. Firstly, trust lists are made public in order to prevent manipulation, as they have a significant impact on how the trust system functions overall. Whereas, as you mentioned, ignore lists only affect an individual's experience on the forum.

However, if ignore lists were made public, they would have a much greater detrimental and adverse effect on the individuals who are included on them. Not only would it potentially damage their reputation within the community, but it could also lead to the exclusion of such members from any marketing campaigns and job opportunities on the forum. The perception of being on an ignore list by a significant number of reputable community members could discourage managers from hiring such individuals.

Additionally, making ignore lists public would likely discourage individuals from expressing their opinions or participating in discussions, as they would fear being added to an ignore list and facing the associated consequences. Ultimately, this would likely lead to a less inclusive and less healthy community.

I'm not on board with this idea. As Ratimov said, when it comes to sending merit, the only thing that should be considered is the quality of the post and the poster's contribution to the community, everything else is irrelevant and should be disregarded. Let's keep the process as simple as possible.