|
Don't worry text filters are soon to be implemented in every browser.
Every time when someone writes something like the word *#*% they will replace it with some nonsense like *#*%.
|
|
|
|
Libertarian presidential hopeful only accepting gold, Bitcoin for donations
While the 2016 presidential election is still far off, one hopeful is getting a head start on fundraising by accepting unorthodox forms of campaign donations.
In an open letter to the Federal Election Commission, Libertarian Party presidential candidate Darryl Perry declared that his campaign will use Internet currencies like Bitcoin wallet and Litecoin wallet as well as precious metals to finance his bid for the White House.
“The Darryl W. Perry for President (2016) campaign will not be accepting donations in currencies recognized by the federal legal tender laws,” the letter states.
...
“I believe this is a major step in the progression of presidential campaigns and elections, in general,” Perry said in a press release announcing his candidacy. “If I’m going to avoid their regulations in my campaign, I should also avoid using their money in my campaign.”
While Bitcoin is not currently accepted as tender in most places, the Libertarian Party announced that it will be accepting donation pledges in the form of the Internet currency.
“Many Libertarians have begun using Bitcoin, a decentralized digital currency. The Libertarian Party is now equipped to accept Bitcoin donations through the services of BitPay,” the party’s website states.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/01/libertarian-presidential-hopeful-only-accepting-gold-bitcoin-for-donations/ |
|
|
|
|
DSA. Das letzte mal gespielt vor ungefähr 15 Jahren. Hatte alle Erweiterungspacks die es damals gab.
Hach...
|
|
|
|
1. launch your bitcoin client as usual and wait for it to load the blockchain and start up
2.click on 'help' in the menu bar (top right)
3.click on 'debug window'
4.select the 'console' tab
5.type: walletpassphrase "your walletpassphrase here" 600
6.type: dumpprivkey [your public key here]
7.this will return the private key, you can copy it now; ensure you clear your clipboard/history afterwards
8.type: walletlock
|
|
|
|
Vielleicht wenn das ganze ein paar Monate gereift ist und mehr OTC Verknüpfungen vorhanden sind.
Wie sieht's denn mittlerweile aus? Ich finde das Projekt an sich ziemlich interessant... Ich habe zu Testzwecken mal was investiert: https://btcjam.com/listings/3997Scheinbar hat Akka bereits positive Erfahrungen mit dem Typen gemacht....auf gut Glück. Naja, ich bin da keine gute Referenz. Hab mal etwas damit versucht und bin jetzt mit ca. 90% Verlust da wieder raus. Sei vorsichtig. Seit BTC so im Wert angestiegen ist zahlt fast niemand mehr zurück. Der spezielle Lohn den du hier aufgeführt hast, hier ist das Business bekannt für das die Coins benötigt werden: https://btcquick.com/ - also schon mal ein Plan dahinter und der Typ hat schon mehr zurückbezahlt als er sich momentan leiht - kein Ponzi. Trotzdem ist das ganze ein Hochrisiko Geschäft. |
|
|
|
LOL. Is there some kind of reward for the worst performing company of the year? Like the Golden Raspberry for movies? I would gladly nominate BFL, I think they could really clean up some prices. And the Price for the worst project management goes to... |
|
|
|
How does the protection against double-spending work? Is not needed. If it's done right, the vending machine itself doesn't run a BTC client, but receives a paid notification from the vending machine company server that runs the node and is located elsewhere, which would be a good protection against a race attack as you can't make sure miners get the double spend transaction first (the vending company node gets the double spend transaction before the "valid" one). Therefore leafs only the Finney attack which requires a pool or very large miner to participate to even have a slight chance of success. Which is obviously to expansive to get a bag of popcorn for free. Also, real cool machine. This could be a great advantage for the snack industry as no money has to be stored on this machines if the machine doesn't contain any private keys, which would be unnecessary anyway. |
|
|
|
As the self-appointed president of The Bitcoin Hero Member Foundation, I approve this thread.
Hey, why didn't make an announcement of you 12345th post? Or did I miss the party? |
|
|
|
Hero member is nothing but an indication your post count is larger than some arbitrary number. I don't think a reward for this is necessary or even deserved.
What are you some sort of Commie? I've donated enough epic wisdom to this forum in my path to Hero Member status.... I think its only fair that I get a prize Wait in line. There are 1362 Hero Members before you to receive their price. Price distribution is handled by BFL so you better make yourself comfortable. |
|
|
|
Das Risiko ist zu gross. Wir sollten vorsorglich alle potentiellen Scammer auf dem Scheiterhaufen verbrennen. Sicher ist sicher.
Du hast absolut recht, aber ohne "faire" Verfahren könnten wir das nicht rechtfertigen. Wir brauchen eine Organisation die potientielle Scammer befragt und zu einem Geständnis bring. ... Ich verkünde hiermit die Gründung der heiligen Bitquisition und ernenne mich selbst zum Groß-Bitquisitor. Es wird Zeit diesen Ketzern Scammern Respekt vor der Blockchain zu lehren! |
|
|
|
Ich glaube, es wäre schon sehr damit geholfen, den Thread bzw ähnliche Threads, in Unterforen zu verschieben und nicht auf der deutschen Startseite zu belassen.
Wie gesagt es schadet uns Allen.
Egal ob Scammer, Kleinganoven oder einfach nur Trolle, ihr leistet einen Bärendienst.
Es reicht doch derzeit schon, dass fast die Hälfte aller Exchanges flöten geht.
Der BTC verträgt derzeit keine permanenten Negativmeldungen.
Irgendwie ist der BTC in letzter Zeit ein Opfer seines eigenen Erfolges geworden.
MfG
+1 Der Thread sollte zumindest verschoben werden. (Mod?) Auf der Startseite des deutschen Boards hat das nichts zu suchen. |
|
|
|
What will be the next exciting coin?
Excitocoin? |
|
|
|
sind das ankauf angebote?
Ja. Bid = kaufe x für Ask = verkaufe x für |
|
|
|
wir sind übrigens schon auf platz 3 im listing  Jetzt seh ich's auch. Gratuliere Candoo. Und auf Platzt 2 direkt nach ASICMINER. |
|
|
|
ich bin dafür das candoo einen scammer tag kriegt. warum? ganz einfach, er verkauft Hier: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160797.0 Anteile Für 60€ und lässt die Käufer im unklaren, da er ihnen nicht mitteilt das sie niemals gewinne erzielen werden da die ASICS von BFL zu spät verschifft werden. Grade die ganz neunen Anteilhaber habens sehr schwer. zudem noch eines zu dem User Akka: Ich dachte du betreust die User die was von candoo kaufen, aber du meldelst dich nicht, warnst die leute nicht. ich bin auch dafür das Akka einen scammer tag kriegt, weil ich genau weis das er gemeinsame sache mit candoo macht. Ich würde nur einschreiten wenn Candoo eine seiner Vereinbarungen verletzt. Das ist bsher nicht der Fall. Zu den von dir aufgeführten Risiken: BFL sendet seine ASICS nicht und gibt auch keine Refunds. Das wäre wohl kaum Betrug von Candoo aus, sondern von BFL. Ich habe dieses Risiko dargestellt und auch klargestellt, dass ich in diesem Fall Candoo nicht als Betrüger sehen würde. Auch dass das Mining unprofitabel sein kann habe ich dargelegt. Jedem sollte bewusst sein, dass Mining keine Garantie ist Geld zu verdienen, sondern auch ein Verlustgeschäft sein kann. Candoo garantiert nirgends in seinem Projekt Gewinne, sondern bestellt und verwaltet das Equipment nur für die Teilnehmer. Ob sich das ganze letztendlich lohnen wird, liegt wohl kaum in seiner Macht. Hierzu nehme ich jetzt mal noch keine Stellung: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=190016.0 denke nicht, dass daran was dran ist, schaue aber zu. Zur gemeinsamen Sache: Ich habe weder BTC von Candoo noch von irgendeinem Teilnehmer angenommen und mache das ganze nur für nette Wünsche und ein Dankeschön, dass ich aber bisher noch von keinem Teilnehmer bekommen habe  *Erstes und einziges Kommentar dazu. |
|
|
|
What I see as disadvantage of the faster block time is f.e. the propagation time of new block through the network.
[...] resulting in a much increased traffic for the network and therefore increasing Bandwidth requirements for LTC.
Ok I see. But this is a problem @ BTC, too. So once BTC gets big enough we need a solution for this problem anyway... For BTC not that early, but that doesn't really matter... Who cares about 3 months or 5 years (or whatever), the problem is there. For BTC and LTC. Yes, but you see that basically the backslash of faster confirmation times. The faster the Blocktimes, the higher the requirements for the network. That's why I don't see it only as an advantage. And therefore I don't see LTC as better or worse because of this, it's only a difference. |
|
|
|
Yes, this are faster, but this doesn't only introduce advantages, but also new disadvantages.
Confirmation time with a credit card (until it can't be chared back anymore) is about 180 days. the 10min of BTC are fast enough. I think you are trying to say, that it might be a disadvantage because the time until a payment can be charged back should NOT be too short. Well thats true, but in practice it is no problem to artificially prolong this time... On the other hand it is not possible to shorten it, if the network is technically not able to do it faster. So, I still see an advantage for LTC here. A little one, but still... No, it's one of the "principles" of Bitcoin that there are no charegebacks. Also a double spend is not that easy. And it will get harder to make on as Bitcoin develops. What I see as disadvantage of the faster block time is f.e. the propagation time of new block through the network. If LTC grows in usage and the block size also grows it will take longer until new blocks are propagated through all nodes. Let's say at some point it takes on average 1 Minute until all nodes have a new found block. This increases the chance that 2 Miner find the same block and relay it to nodes. Now one of the 2 chains will have to become longer and form the new valid chain, therefore orphan the other block. This already happens in BTC all the time. But I can see this happening in LTC much more often resulting in a much increased traffic for the network and therefore increasing Bandwidth requirements for LTC. Also increased cost of securing the network as miners mine more blocks without a reward. |
|
|
|
Instead of just saying "no" it would really be interesting why you guys think LTC will never overtake BTC.
Isn't it true, that LTC provides faster transactions than BTC?
No, transactions are almost instant in both systems. Do you mean confirmations? Yes, this are faster, but this doesn't only introduce advantages, but also new disadvantages. Confirmation time with a credit card (until it can't be chared back anymore) is about 180 days. the 10min of BTC are fast enough. And isn't it true that there are no disadvantages compared to BTC?
Basically no, there are no real disadvantages. But I also don't see any real advantages. It's practically the same, only some of the Variables where changed (Number of Coins, Blocktime, Mining Algorithm) but nothing fundamentally. It's practically the same. No real disadvantage, but also no real advantage. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
