Latest posts of: Coin-1

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 159 »

1781

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits

on: November 06, 2018, 02:17:39 AM

Weekly update. The analysis didn't detected a new merit source this week. In addition, I published monthly statistics for October 2018. As far as I can see, QuestionAuthority dropped to third place in this TOP-200 and is likely to be rated fourth next week.

1782

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits

on: November 06, 2018, 02:08:13 AM

This is a monthly statictics for October 2018 below.

The most generous users giving merits (October 2018)

	User name	Sent merits	Received merits	Generosity
1)	suchmoon	906 (in 222 txns to 145 users)	149 (in 96 txns from 39 users)	831 (max 833)
2)	dbshck	811 (in 361 txns to 171 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	809 (max 809)
3)	chimk	502 (in 367 txns to 160 users)	17 (in 17 txns from 16 users)	493 (max 493)
4)	Foxpup	454 (in 173 txns to 50 users)	22 (in 11 txns from 9 users)	443 (max 443)
5)	QuestionAuthority	410 (in 17 txns to 16 users)	5 (in 1 txn)	407 (max 407)
6)	qwk	401 (in 224 txns to 77 users)	71 (in 48 txns from 36 users)	365 (max 365)
7)	Flying Hellfish	377 (in 99 txns to 59 users)	65 (in 23 txns from 16 users)	344 (max 348)
8)	TMAN	339 (in 91 txns to 61 users)	26 (in 19 txns from 16 users)	326 (max 326)
9)	bones261	325 (in 182 txns to 124 users)	10 (in 9 txns from 9 users)	320 (max 320)
10)	paxmao	232 (in 137 txns to 75 users)	31 (in 17 txns from 12 users)	216 (max 216)
11)	JayJuanGee	231 (in 231 txns to 115 users)	48 (in 43 txns from 30 users)	207 (max 207)
12)	LoyceV	281 (in 234 txns to 134 users)	169 (in 80 txns from 48 users)	196 (max 197)
13)	bryant.coleman	185 (in 41 txns to 37 users)	5 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	182 (max 182)
14)	Halab	176 (in 66 txns to 41 users)	17 (in 11 txns from 6 users)	167 (max 168)
15)	EFS	161 (in 47 txns to 31 users)	0	161 (max 161)
16)	LFC_Bitcoin	180 (in 122 txns to 70 users)	39 (in 37 txns from 20 users)	160 (max 160)
17)	frodocooper	149 (in 72 txns to 30 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	148 (max 148)
18)	MalReynolds	144 (in 105 txns to 98 users)	0	144 (max 144)
19)	OgNasty	130 (in 129 txns to 124 users)	34 (in 25 txns from 23 users)	113 (max 113)
20)	teramit	118 (in 69 txns to 52 users)	11 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	112 (max 112)
21)	Vlad2Vlad	116 (in 7 txns to 6 users)	11 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	110 (max 110)
22)	snakey	109 (in 29 txns to 28 users)	0	109 (max 109)
23)	Greshamsches Geld	104 (in 32 txns to 16 users)	1	103 (max 103)
24)	lyka	100 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	100 (max 100)
25)	DarkStar_	119 (in 59 txns to 54 users)	38 (in 21 txns from 17 users)	100 (max 100)
26)	krogothmanhattan	124 (in 74 txns to 59 users)	49 (in 24 txns from 18 users)	99 (max 100)
27)	Jet Cash	113 (in 55 txns to 45 users)	33 (in 23 txns from 13 users)	96 (max 96)
28)	Micio	104 (in 42 txns to 19 users)	19 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	94 (max 94)
29)	vapourminer	93 (in 75 txns to 59 users)	6 (in 5 txns from 4 users)	90 (max 90)
30)	Vod	117 (in 42 txns to 37 users)	60 (in 30 txns from 22 users)	87 (max 89)
31)	Globb0	92 (in 20 txns to 13 users)	15 (in 14 txns from 8 users)	84 (max 84)
32)	BobLawblaw	103 (in 78 txns to 33 users)	46 (in 39 txns from 19 users)	80 (max 80)
33)	MoreFun	76 (in 18 txns to 18 users)	0	76 (max 76)
34)	streazight	71 (in 12 txns to 10 users)	0	71 (max 71)
35)	hajimasan	70 (in 9 txns to 9 users)	0	70 (max 70)
36)	jovan85	70 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	70 (max 70)
37)	3x2	67 (in 20 txns to 17 users)	0	67 (max 67)
38)	Welsh	70 (in 22 txns to 18 users)	8 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	66 (max 67)
39)	Anon11073	67 (in 15 txns to 6 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	66 (max 66)
40)	esmanthra	70 (in 25 txns to 20 users)	15 (in 13 txns from 8 users)	62 (max 65)
41)	xandry	61 (in 44 txns to 38 users)	4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	59 (max 59)
42)	generous	57 (in 8 txns to 8 users)	0	57 (max 57)
43)	tarmi	55 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	55 (max 55)
44)	Sweminer777	52 (in 4 txns to 3 users)	0	52 (max 52)
45)	billotronic	50 (in 1 txn)	0	50 (max 50)
46)	citronick	50 (in 1 txn)	0	50 (max 50)
47)	infofront	54 (in 54 txns to 31 users)	27 (in 24 txns from 12 users)	40 (max 41)
48)	MiLkz	38 (in 15 txns to 12 users)	0	38 (max 38)
49)	Zz	40 (in 11 txns to 11 users)	3 (in 1 txn)	38 (max 38)
50)	Cyper_BLC	37 (in 1 txn)	0	37 (max 37)
51)	redsn0w	40 (in 9 txns to 9 users)	5 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	37 (max 37)
52)	yo-blin	37 (in 16 txns to 13 users)	5 (in 5 txns from 1 user)	34 (max 37)
53)	s1lverbox	35 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	4 (in 1 txn)	33 (max 33)
54)	Daniel91	33 (in 33 txns to 15 users)	0	33 (max 33)
55)	BitmarkInvest	33 (in 16 txns to 15 users)	0	33 (max 33)
56)	flash101k	32 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	32 (max 32)
57)	gold969	31 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	0	31 (max 31)
58)	BitcoinNewsMagazine	36 (in 9 txns to 7 users)	9 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	31 (max 32)
59)	hugeblack	35 (in 34 txns to 24 users)	8 (in 5 txns from 5 users)	31 (max 31)
60)	RegulusHr	36 (in 35 txns to 19 users)	11 (in 11 txns from 9 users)	30 (max 30)
61)	rgornik	30 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	3 (in 1 txn)	28 (max 28)
62)	krishnapramod	30 (in 28 txns to 26 users)	4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	28 (max 28)
63)	MikeMike	26 (in 4 txns to 3 users)	0	26 (max 26)
64)	Buchi-88	27 (in 23 txns to 14 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)	25 (max 25)
65)	sabotag3x	26 (in 26 txns to 18 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	25 (max 25)
66)	Q_R_V	24 (in 3 txns to 2 users)	0	24 (max 24)
67)	Piggy	82 (in 59 txns to 33 users)	116 (in 56 txns from 38 users)	24 (max 25)
68)	Barcode_	25 (in 16 txns to 8 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	24 (max 24)
69)	eternalgloom	31 (in 20 txns to 19 users)	14 (in 10 txns from 7 users)	24 (max 24)
70)	Hueristic	35 (in 26 txns to 23 users)	21 (in 16 txns from 10 users)	24 (max 25)
71)	Vadi2323	23 (in 23 txns to 11 users)	0	23 (max 23)
72)	jbreher	27 (in 19 txns to 15 users)	8 (in 8 txns from 6 users)	23 (max 24)
73)	HairyMaclairy	59 (in 36 txns to 22 users)	72 (in 61 txns from 25 users)	23 (max 27)
74)	jimmybob_007	22 (in 1 txn)	0	22 (max 22)
75)	linenoise	22 (in 14 txns to 13 users)	0	22 (max 22)
76)	Dice-Bet	23 (in 11 txns to 7 users)	1	22 (max 22)
77)	buckrogers	22 (in 11 txns to 6 users)	0	22 (max 22)
78)	cryptominer420	21 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	0	21 (max 21)
79)	Romanknickl	21 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	21 (max 21)
80)	yogg	32 (in 17 txns to 12 users)	21 (in 12 txns from 7 users)	21 (max 22)
81)	Vishnu.Reang	25 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	10 (in 1 txn)	20 (max 25)
82)	Danos	20 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	0	20 (max 20)
83)	bestBTCdomains	20 (in 1 txn)	0	20 (max 20)
84)	filharvey	20 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	20 (max 20)
85)	xyzzy099	20 (in 11 txns to 8 users)	0	20 (max 20)
86)	NLNico	21 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	2 (in 1 txn)	20 (max 20)
87)	Zapo	21 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	19 (max 19)
88)	DdmrDdmr	97 (in 88 txns to 68 users)	155 (in 76 txns from 36 users)	19 (max 25)
89)	Matt9301	19 (in 10 txns to 8 users)	0	19 (max 19)
90)	ETFbitcoin	71 (in 68 txns to 41 users)	103 (in 48 txns from 23 users)	19 (max 19)
91)	theymos_away	19 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	0	19 (max 19)
92)	OmegaStarScream	29 (in 19 txns to 16 users)	19 (in 11 txns from 9 users)	19 (max 23)
93)	SWTCoin	18 (in 1 txn)	0	18 (max 18)
94)	mu_enrico	47 (in 41 txns to 17 users)	57 (in 39 txns from 18 users)	18 (max 19)
95)	jakelyson	18 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	18 (max 18)
96)	o48o	18 (in 12 txns to 7 users)	0	18 (max 18)
97)	joniboini	40 (in 31 txns to 15 users)	44 (in 33 txns from 19 users)	18 (max 18)
98)	babo	20 (in 19 txns to 12 users)	4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	18 (max 18)
99)	klarki	21 (in 21 txns to 20 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 1 user)	18 (max 18)
100)	HagssFIN	47 (in 18 txns to 12 users)	59 (in 16 txns from 9 users)	17 (max 24)
101)	HeRetiK	39 (in 39 txns to 30 users)	43 (in 25 txns from 16 users)	17 (max 17)
102)	crairezx20	19 (in 13 txns to 10 users)	4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	17 (max 17)
103)	MedaR	19 (in 7 txns to 5 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	17 (max 17)
104)	tyz	20 (in 12 txns to 10 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 2 users)	17 (max 20)
105)	cAPSLOCK	23 (in 13 txns to 10 users)	11 (in 11 txns from 8 users)	17 (max 17)
106)	fcmatt	17 (in 8 txns to 5 users)	0	17 (max 17)
107)	Hhampuz	29 (in 15 txns to 14 users)	23 (in 10 txns from 10 users)	17 (max 22)
108)	Lauda	22 (in 6 txns to 4 users)	9 (in 7 txns from 6 users)	17 (max 17)
109)	greenplastic	17 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	1	16 (max 17)
110)	goldkingcoiner	48 (in 26 txns to 18 users)	64 (in 35 txns from 21 users)	16 (max 16)
111)	el kaka22	21 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	10 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	16 (max 17)
112)	OculusMan	16 (in 4 txns to 3 users)	0	16 (max 16)
113)	BossBee	27 (in 5 txns to 4 users)	23 (in 1 txn)	15 (max 15)
114)	deadsilent	15 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	0	15 (max 15)
115)	Coolcryptovator	36 (in 36 txns to 32 users)	42 (in 31 txns from 26 users)	15 (max 23)
116)	ladydark	15 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	0	15 (max 15)
117)	MarketMagic	15 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	15 (max 15)
118)	matveevka	15 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	0	15 (max 15)
119)	CoinCube	18 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	5 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	15 (max 17)
120)	CjMapope	15 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	15 (max 15)
121)	Cacingkemi	15 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	15 (max 15)
122)	icreator	14 (in 3 txns to 2 users)	0	14 (max 14)
123)	cryptomaxsun	15 (in 13 txns to 10 users)	1	14 (max 14)
124)	kurious	26 (in 19 txns to 13 users)	23 (in 19 txns from 17 users)	14 (max 14)
125)	F2b	18 (in 18 txns to 14 users)	7 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	14 (max 14)
126)	malevolent	16 (in 5 txns to 3 users)	4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	14 (max 14)
127)	trinaldao	14 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	14 (max 14)
128)	Eatbatterys	14 (in 1 txn)	0	14 (max 14)
129)	FrueGreads	16 (in 8 txns to 6 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	14 (max 14)
130)	WhiteManWhite	15 (in 11 txns to 10 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	14 (max 14)
131)	pawel7777	17 (in 14 txns to 13 users)	6 (in 5 txns from 5 users)	14 (max 14)
132)	Patatas	19 (in 4 txns to 3 users)	10 (in 7 txns from 6 users)	14 (max 15)
133)	Monnt	13 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	13 (max 13)
134)	morvillz7z	28 (in 25 txns to 21 users)	30 (in 17 txns from 12 users)	13 (max 13)
135)	HasHe	13 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	13 (max 13)
136)	Lorilikes	13 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	0	13 (max 13)
137)	kpcian	13 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	13 (max 13)
138)	PoolMinor	17 (in 10 txns to 8 users)	7 (in 4 txns from 3 users)	13 (max 13)
139)	The Pharmacist	77 (in 60 txns to 48 users)	128 (in 76 txns from 36 users)	13 (max 19)
140)	Vovka4	12 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	0	12 (max 12)
141)	cryptolord2077	12 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	0	12 (max 12)
142)	dragonmike	15 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	5 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	12 (max 12)
143)	sockpuppet1911	12 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	0	12 (max 12)
144)	SamReomo	14 (in 5 txns to 4 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	12 (max 13)
145)	wttbs	12 (in 4 txns to 2 users)	0	12 (max 12)
146)	Wind_FURY	18 (in 11 txns to 10 users)	12 (in 8 txns from 8 users)	12 (max 13)
147)	Thule	15 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	5 (in 1 txn)	12 (max 12)
148)	Slark	12 (in 12 txns to 12 users)	0	12 (max 12)
149)	mindrust	13 (in 7 txns to 6 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	12 (max 12)
150)	mfort312	21 (in 17 txns to 11 users)	17 (in 15 txns from 11 users)	12 (max 12)
151)	beeelzebub	12 (in 1 txn)	0	12 (max 12)
152)	marlboroza	37 (in 37 txns to 27 users)	50 (in 31 txns from 20 users)	12 (max 13)
153)	theymos	82 (in 19 txns to 18 users)	140 (in 59 txns from 43 users)	12 (max 15)
154)	Laviathon	18 (in 1 txn)	14 (in 2 txns from 1 user)	11 (max 18)
155)	btcdiggingmaster	11 (in 1 txn)	0	11 (max 11)
156)	naughty1	11 (in 6 txns to 4 users)	0	11 (max 11)
157)	bigc1984	23 (in 1 txn)	23 (in 1 txn)	11 (max 23)
158)	halisakal	11 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	11 (max 11)
159)	avtandil	11 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	0	11 (max 11)
160)	MOSSAD	11 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	11 (max 11)
161)	Moloch	41 (in 28 txns to 22 users)	59 (in 22 txns from 7 users)	11 (max 12)
162)	Cloudbet	20 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	18 (in 7 txns from 3 users)	11 (max 15)
163)	Myra4	11 (in 5 txns to 4 users)	0	11 (max 11)
164)	lowbander80	11 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	0	11 (max 11)
165)	FIEX	13 (in 9 txns to 7 users)	4 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	11 (max 11)
166)	coinplus	16 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	10 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	11 (max 12)
167)	whitetoo	11 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	11 (max 11)
168)	Dim4ik	11 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	11 (max 11)
169)	wuvdoll	12 (in 9 txns to 9 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	11 (max 11)
170)	notsofast	11 (in 1 txn)	0	11 (max 11)
171)	ancientcoins	11 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	11 (max 11)
172)	Dunkelheit667	14 (in 14 txns to 13 users)	5 (in 5 txns from 3 users)	11 (max 11)
173)	Strongkored	11 (in 7 txns to 6 users)	0	11 (max 11)
174)	fanbeila	10 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	10 (max 10)
175)	Herbet Fry	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
176)	TheIrishman	11 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	1	10 (max 11)
177)	meatmeat	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
178)	Rasel5209	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
179)	ubeing	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
180)	FinFx	10 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	0	10 (max 10)
181)	Bitze	11 (in 11 txns to 10 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	10 (max 10)
182)	mandica	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
183)	paulmaritz	11 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	1	10 (max 10)
184)	Dux2K	10 (in 6 txns to 3 users)	0	10 (max 10)
185)	savetherainforest	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
186)	kaltun	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
187)	Gronthaing	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
188)	UdjinM6	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
189)	Gandalf86	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
190)	clipman77	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
191)	BitHodler	13 (in 13 txns to 12 users)	6 (in 5 txns from 5 users)	10 (max 10)
192)	bathrobehero	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
193)	ChipMixer	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
194)	jacktheking	10 (in 9 txns to 9 users)	0	10 (max 10)
195)	stingers	10 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	10 (max 10)
196)	Wekkel	22 (in 21 txns to 16 users)	24 (in 23 txns from 13 users)	10 (max 12)
197)	gribble	20 (in 1 txn)	20 (in 1 txn)	10 (max 10)
198)	baba0000000000	12 (in 12 txns to 8 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	10 (max 10)
199)	TimeTeller	10 (in 10 txns to 9 users)	0	10 (max 10)
200)	actmyname	26 (in 19 txns to 17 users)	31 (in 16 txns from 11 users)	10 (max 15)

In October 2018 total sent 18592 merits (in 10307 txns to 3492 users):

13% to Newbies: 2341 merits (to 1492 users)
12% to Jr. Members: 2252 merits (to 686 users)
13% to Members: 2489 merits (to 443 users)
10% to Full Members: 1937 merits (to 320 users)
12% to Sr. Members: 2254 merits (to 249 users)
14% to Hero Members: 2535 merits (to 222 users)
26% to Legendaries: 4784 merits (to 387 users)

Total user count on Nov 1, 2018:

1608 Legendaries (1135 of them sent merits)
1569 Hero Members (1221 of them sent merits)
3010 Sr. Members (2475 of them sent merits)
5758 Full Members (4907 of them sent merits)
8856 Members (7155 of them sent merits)
10401 Jr. Members (1467 of them sent merits)
about two millions newbies

1783

Local / Русский (Russian) / Re: [ЛOГ] Пoльзoвaтeли, пoвыcившиe cвoй paнг - Пoздpaвлeния!

on: November 03, 2018, 11:34:29 PM

Мои посты на первой странице были обновлены. На этой неделе появился новый русскоязычный Full Member: Polkeins. Поздравления с повышением ранга!

1784

Other / Meta / Re: [LOG] The ranked up members - Congratulations!

on: November 03, 2018, 11:21:27 PM

My posts on the first page have been updated again. mu_enrico who is active in the indonesian local board has become a Senior Member this week. These members who are mostly active in russian, italian and japanese local boards have reached a Full Member level: Polkeins, Plutosky and hakka. Congratulations on ranking up!

1785

Local / Кодеры / Re: Сигнатура в keccak-256 для регистрации ETH адреса (hex string)

on: November 03, 2018, 03:30:04 AM

Quote from: adamgud on November 02, 2018, 12:33:39 PM Вот задача. Manual registration Sign the keccak-256 hash of the message "I agree to the terms and conditions for signing up for the nahmii airdriip." the same way geth or web3js would, and enter the accociated address and signature below. Пытался полученную через https://www.myetherwallet.com/signmsg.html подпись конвертировать в keccak-256, но вот что именно (сколько знаков -какой формат) вставить в строку непонятно. Помогите, добрые люди!) KECCAK256 это алгоритм хеширования, намного более ресурсоёмкий, чем SHA256. Широко применяется в Ethereum при генерации ETH-адресов и т.п. Результатом хеширования входной последовательности байтов является 256-битная (то есть 32-байтная) строка. Скорее всего, сначала Вам нужно хешировать требуемый текст при помощи программы keccak256, затем, используя приватный ключ, подписать полученное 32-байтное число асимметричным шифром ECDSA secp256k1, после этого определённым образом инкрустировать полученную 64-байтную HEX-строку в ETH-транзакцию и отправить её в блокчейн Ethereum в поле DATA.

1786

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)

on: November 03, 2018, 02:26:02 AM

Weekly update. iluvbitcoins is a new DT2 member. Congratulations! Also LoyceV has gained +1 score from another DT2 member and rose from 146th to 101st place. Currently DT1 members trust 164 users. Quote from: bill gator on October 27, 2018, 08:00:04 PM Okay, then I understand where your numbers are coming from; my argument would be that your wording is a bit confusing or misleading. Calling them "scores" puts my head somewhere else, maybe it would be better to just refer to them as "inclusions" and "exclusions". I think more people would immediately know what you are talking about if you were to tweak your wording a bit. I appreciate the clarification, but maybe instead of saying you're basing these ratings on "Marketplace Trust System" you could say something like "Trust lists", or "Trust Hierarchy". I think that "score" is a good term for calling the overall trust from many individuals. Perhaps the mentioned file is a dump of the Marketplace trust network. Quote from: bill gator on October 27, 2018, 08:00:04 PM I'm pretty interested in hearing the reasoning behind dogie excluding philipma1957, but that's discussion for another thread. I'm interested too. I guess that philipma1957 doesn't know about it. Quote from: tmfp on October 27, 2018, 08:52:33 PM Heh heh, looks like DT3's a cool place to be, look at the company I'm keeping.... Yes, satoshi is a DT3 member.

1787

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!

on: October 30, 2018, 10:51:43 PM

Weekly update. Another 306 newbies received at least one merit this week. Total supported 3791 newbies by 1739 members. Now OgNasty is rated first in this TOP-200.

1788

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits

on: October 28, 2018, 07:10:56 PM

My three posts on the first page have been updated again. The analysis spotted another two merit sources: 1) Barcode_ (moderator of the chinese local board) 2) F2b (active in the french local board) Quote from: suchmoon on October 23, 2018, 01:21:54 AM Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 23, 2018, 12:33:38 AM Here's a piece of potential gossip. It appears that within the past day or two, the number of merit sources has gone down from 120 to 119. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=sources And it was a big one, 1000 sMerits worth - the total went down from 23045 to 22045: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030366.msg45811297#msg45811297 I'm gonna guess it was QuestionAuthority. QuestionAuthority has confirmed that theymos removed him as a merit source: Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 24, 2018, 06:27:53 PM Apologies to all concerned, I will no longer be handing out merit in this thread. Theymos removed me as a merit source because he disagreed with the way I spent my merit. I will leave this thread open and you can continue to post merit requests here if you like; however, I won’t be answering them. Good luck to all. CBH Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 23, 2018, 02:03:54 AM but anyhow, assuming that the merit source removal was QA, unless theymos shared his rationale, none of us would really know if there may have been a multitude of factors (besides just the seemingly random WO thread give away), and the one incident (or handful of incidents that we might be able to identify) would have merely served as marginal facts (the straw that broke the camel's back type) to push theymos into such a merit source removal decision (again assuming that it was QA). Undoubtedly, QuestionAuthority has a specific merit distribution policy. Typically, he sends 20-30 merits in one transaction. His following post could probably be "the straw that broke the camel's back type": Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 06, 2018, 10:08:03 PM Oh, I am going to do one thing before I sign off for now. Since most people are off work/school today because it’s the weekend, and there should be more people on line than during the week and I have too much merit laying around, the next 5 people to respond to this thread get 30 merit. As I can see, he didn't send any merit since Oct 11, 2018.

1789

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)

on: October 27, 2018, 06:46:13 PM

Quote from: bill gator on October 27, 2018, 06:32:17 PM Still though, I am left confused by the following line, which is just one example as there are many. Quote 9) philipma1957 Legendary 2 scores 5 (+6 / -1) scores It claims that a DT2 member has given a negative rating to philipma1957, unless I am misunderstanding the table and accompanying key. Can you help me understand what the -1 score represents in this particular example? As I can see in the dump of the Marketplace trust system, 2 DT1 members trust philipma1957: Code: OgNasty->philipma1957 Tomatocage->philipma1957 6 DT2 members trust philipma1957: Code: MarkAz->philipma1957 hedgy73->philipma1957 EcuaMobi->philipma1957 suchmoon->philipma1957 HagssFIN->philipma1957 TookDk->philipma1957 1 DT2 member does not trust philipma1957: Code: dogie-/>philipma1957

1790

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)

on: October 27, 2018, 06:26:45 PM

Quote from: bill gator on October 27, 2018, 06:17:12 PM In your OP it has philipma1957 listed as a Full Member, with the trust of 5 (+6 / -1) scores, help me understand. Ranks are fixed just now.

1791

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)

on: October 27, 2018, 06:14:07 PM

Quote from: bill gator on October 27, 2018, 05:52:25 PM https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted This is Vod's rendition of the most trusted users around the forum. I do not mean to sound discouraging, but what exactly are you bringing to the table/conversation that is not already available or has not already been said? I appreciate the effort, and find these kind of things interesting, but you're sort of recreating the wheel if you ask me. I know about the useful resource made by Vod. Please note that my lists are based on the Marketplace trust system, not on feedbacks. Let me explain how I create this TOP-200. Every week theymos publishes the dump of the Marketplace trust system here: https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz This file does not contain feedbacks. The "->" substring indicates a positive trust, the "-/>" substring indicates a negative trust. My analysis can read this dump and create TOP-200. Best wishes.

1792

Other / Meta / Re: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)

on: October 27, 2018, 05:41:51 PM

My first three posts have been updated. As I can see, RHavar dropped from 146th to 160th place in the list of DT2 members. Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 14, 2018, 10:11:52 AM Quote from: LeGaulois on October 14, 2018, 10:07:50 AM Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 14, 2018, 09:30:26 AM Why am I not in DT3? I have one + trust from hilarious&co. Or am I missing something in how it works? The trust list is based on a person name included in the trust list of someone. Not based on a feedback from a DT. Otherwise, imagine all the members the DT 2 would have considering all feedback left by DT 1 members Thanks! Please note that hilariousandco is a DT1 member. If he had add you to his trusted list, you would become a DT2 member, not a DT3 member.

1793

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ETF approval is high

on: October 27, 2018, 04:59:12 PM

I have read this article. To be honest, I do not trust to the "anonymous sources" mentioned by its author. As far as I know, in September 2018 the SEC published the reasons why they rejected the application for the VanEck SolidX ETF. There are still no significant changes in the crypto currency world, so I do not expect the SEC to approve Bitcoin ETF in the near future. Maybe circumstances will be better in the third quarter of 2019.

1794

Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Why trading is unhealthy?

on: October 27, 2018, 04:37:59 PM

Quote from: btc_love on October 24, 2018, 12:32:18 PM The first problem you can have is - eyes problems. Spending more time in front of your computer can be harmful to your eyes. The second - stress. Stress can cause many problems from high blood pressure to depression. Your display is probably too small. You need to buy a high-quality and large monitor and your eyes will not get tired too quickly. You can also eat special vitamins for the eyes. Yes, psychology matters. Personally I become distressed too if I suffer losses from trade, but I try to correct my financial mistake as soon as possible and my mood normalizes rather fast. Quote from: btc_love on October 24, 2018, 12:32:18 PM “That’s odd” - I thought. I eat healthy food and I do sports. Right. Physical culture is necessary for all people. Maybe you need to do another exercises or increase the load. Quote from: btc_love on October 24, 2018, 12:32:18 PM I know it’s all individual. Some people trade days and night and they feel pretty good. I just told you my story with my experience. I don’t pursue anyone to stop trading. It’s just important for me to warn some people who can have the same problems. Every trader should keep to check on his/her health and wealth.

1795

Economy / Economics / Re: Economic crash in 2019!

on: October 27, 2018, 04:14:26 PM

First of all, I do not believe that an economical crash is imminent in 2019. I think that the countries with powerful armed forces will compete with each other in order to protect their own markets by imposing import taxes on certain goods and raw materials. Such a policy probably can lead to insignificant negative economical results on a global scale, but this will not affect all countries. Quote from: hatshepsut93 on October 24, 2018, 12:45:19 PM There's no guarantee that Bitcoin will be unaffected or will benefit from a global financial crisis. Bitcoin is still too volatile to be considered a safe haven, so just because it's not tied to traditional markets it doesn't mean that it is safe. There might be even some mechanisms that can make it drop during a crisis, so no one should bet on Bitcoin with all their savings. People says that Bitcoin can be a "safe haven" for money in these times. I tend to agree with this.

1796

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How Phillipines adopting BITCOIN

on: October 27, 2018, 03:51:56 PM

I am glad to hear that Philippines is adopting Bitcoin. I am confident that the government pursues right policy in this new area of economy. As a result, the overall demand for crypto currencies is likely to increase, and we see positive movements of the BTC price on global crypto exchange markets. Best wishes to the Philippine nation.

1797

Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2018-10-25] Bitcoin (BTC) is 10,000 Times More Efficient Than Banks

on: October 27, 2018, 03:34:06 PM

Quote from: BitHodler on October 26, 2018, 07:22:23 PM Overall, literally anything is better than Bitcoin's current ~7 TPS throughput. The ultimate goal is to have people leave their channels open and buy their coins through an exchange allowing them to withdraw through LN. It's going to take a couple of years for sure, but it is likely going to happen. Undoubtedly, The Lightning Network is a good solution for making millions of transactions, but it is an external technology designed for Bitcoin. Not many people use LN channels yet, but I see how its network is growing day by day. The author of this article is trying to compare efficiencies of the top rated crypto currency and the traditional banking system. I think it is not correct to state such conclusions, because Visa, Mastercard and other payment systems make much more transactions that transfer fiat currency between customers. If so many people send their funds using the Bitcoin blockchain, transaction fees will soar up drastically.

1798

Other / Meta / Re: [LOG] The ranked up members - Congratulations!

on: October 26, 2018, 03:01:02 PM

Weekly update. There is no new Legendary, Hero Member or Sr. Member this week. goldkingcoiner, Paolo.Demidov and r1s2g3 ranked up to Full Members! Well done!

1799

Other / Meta / Re: [LOG] sMerit HODLers who sent merits for the first time

on: October 25, 2018, 08:08:43 PM

Quote from: TMAN on October 25, 2018, 06:24:37 PM Taking 6months to send 1 merit is suspicious, but I don’t think you are handing the data in the best way here OP. I agree with you. Perhaps here is too many data. I just excluded from these lists the users who were Members on January 24, 2018. Quote from: Steamtyme on October 25, 2018, 07:46:30 PM To play devils advocate as to why some of these members(likely a small percentage) would engage in this behavior. Of course, most of these members who sent merits for the first time are decent and honest, but some of them look suspicious.

1800

Other / Meta / Re: [LOG] sMerit HODLers who sent merits for the first time

on: October 25, 2018, 06:35:43 PM

Quote from: Marshall14 on October 25, 2018, 06:18:51 PM Isn't it obvious that when the new merits system was introduced,the willingness to also hand out merits was stimulated,members(high ranked) became more liberal in handing out merits to good posters(at least so they could rank up/differentiate them from shitposters.... As I remember, people sent a huge amount of sMerits in the early days when the merit system has been introduced. This analysis takes in consideration only those members who did not make any merit transaction until September 17, 2018. Quote from: Marshall14 on October 25, 2018, 06:18:51 PM I don't see the reason making this boring list,if you have any proof against them, report to a MOD or DT I don't blame sMerit HODLers. It's just statistics that can be interesting and probably useful.

Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 159 »