I would like to add that LoyceV would be a great option to help you out. I would if I could, but I have no experience with either pywallet or team viewer.
|
|
|
What is team viewer?? This sounds intriguing 🤔 If you find a private key that way, the person with remote access will instantly see your private key on his screen. Be very careful who you trust!
|
|
|
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
It's one of the criteria of DT1 selection. Theymos can use something like this for someone being in DT2 too. Point is if someone is not active for certain amount of time then despite being in the trust list of DT1, the user will lose their DT2 status. The risk is letting scammers who are only tagged by one person off the hook. Maybe the DT2-requirement should be that a user has been active in the past 6 months or 1 year? On the other hand, it's up to active DT1 members to keep a responsible Trust list. If anything is going to change, I'd much rather see a requirement of 2 DT1 inclustions instead of 1 to become DT2, that limits the number of " Trust selfscratchers".
|
|
|
This is xelja from bitcointal.or and today is 2019.08.13 Please confirm my address. 1CCzSWVkvMikWboDtAxq6An9XQivYYgrJn Quoted. I guess this isn't your only account if this is your first post? That signed message has nothing to do with Bitcointalk, but I guess it proves you're able to sign a message.
|
|
|
So you mean people with less merit = spammer? Let's put it this way: spammers earn less Merit. I have ever found a member posting with long characters and got merited, and that post was low quality (in my opinion) because he just repeat the same statement. I don't know what "long characters" means, but a single merited post doesn't matter much. And there is quite some Merit abuse to rank-up to Jr. Member. Higher ranks are much harder to reach for low-quality posters. But with the actual reason put on the report will let reported members to know what's wrong with their post and help them to be better members. You could have opened a topic in Meta when your first few posts got deleted. People are more than willing to help you figure out why that happened.
|
|
|
Hello , can you remove me from this list ? Lol, I highly doubt that! Because I never intention to make spam posts. Of course your intention isn't to spam. Your attention is to earn from your signature. Having 63 posts deleted is just an inconvenience to your money making. Really, I don't understand what 'spam post' is, That's the problem ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Let's count your Merit earned per post: User rijaljun ( full history)
I think it's good to add the reason instead of just deletion notification. Reporting and removing posts already takes more effort than the average spammer puts in to post it.
|
|
|
So after spamming Twitter and Facebook links, we've now reached the new low of spamming Bitcointalk links to bump the spam thread? Like this, for example. HAPPY HUNTING! The spam thread won't care if posts get deleted, if they even check anything at all.
|
|
|
Type 2 (or 3) need Support from at least 3 DT-members to be Active. You can find the flag here: Inactive flags
This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate.
|
|
|
Combined with this topic, I'm pretty sure this isn't legit. A legit user wouldn't just promise large percentages, but would instead say what it's about. What's with the weird modes of communication anyway? Who uses icq or wickr? Get Telegram, PM or email!
|
|
|
I came here after I saw this Flag: 2019-08-12 Mon 16.12hsource: loyce.club613 Insufficient support. SpectreSecurity flagged tvplus006 (type 1, see why). Supported by Niann, SwayStar123, asscror, freegold, shbour, SpectreSecurity, mouseadm, SquireAu, Myke500, Elite_WMD, SamiAhmed, Rossman01, Disputin, jdoerrerstl1977, Huatah, mattnyy, drumandbass, prissyme67, Kasan0024, scotlarock727, Adachi, johnnyboycrypto, Gotchaback, Eagle175, cmccolli, AdaKlkn, ZeekSora, hrksz01, EliteMOA, Stroyen, gbujanin, Toxicstingz, SRoyce4888, RaginWeez, Bowlkart, Hambone7, Darkrico, Skirata97, Trinitm, rl_brm, EmmWin. Opposed by bones261, witcher_sense, tvplus006, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Coolcryptovator, TalkStar, logfiles, blurryeyed, as9ardia. This is the largest number number of Newbie Flag-supporters I've ever seen, and that's what caught my attention. It also uses this thread as a reference, while this thread isn't about tvplus006. This is Flag abuse, and for that reason, I'm Opposing the flag.
|
|
|
...? B1tUnl0ck3r != bL4nkcode Do the math: 1 + 0 + 3 = 4 ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) (or I'm as clueless as you are)
|
|
|
Jeez, I can't believe I'm still on the recent most generous merit-senders list, since I've been slacking off as of late. Comparing the Most generous merit senders, all time with the Most generous recent merit senders, you can just see who's on vacation ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You should try to empty your source. Have you read this? If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down. I wouldn't just drop 50 Merit on any good post though, but I do try to give more Merit per post if my source amount inreases. I became a Merit source in May last year, and my source amount was doubled to 400 in January this year. I am the #2 "most different profiles Merited to or from" though ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) And only 4 transactions to go to be #1 ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Actually, I've been sending less the last month, due to a one week family road trip. Normally, I try to keep my source as low as possible, so I can use some of "my own" sMerits, but currently my source still has 50 left. I need to Merit a few more to beat bones261 (who has a bigger source than mine) ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) From those evidence, I guess @suchmoon was a merit source very soon after merit system started I'd say suchmoon is on vacation, usually the monthly total was much higher.
|
|
|
I asked this question to a crypto site's Admin a couple years back. He said .io is popular with developers because not much names had been taken yet.
That off course also instantly gives a problem: if you're using a .io website, people can still accidentally try to find you at .com. Just like you need to buy .eu, .net, .org and several other common names if you want to prevent easy phishing attacks.
|
|
|
Scammers are smart Lol, who to believe? scammers are often pretty stupid
|
|
|
That's the same guy who asked how to delete an account ( twice!). This is especially annoying since he created this many (spammy) topics, that now have the OP removed. Maybe they can be reported as "insubstantial posts" so he'll actually lose his Activity too?
|
|
|
In defense of the allegations that my account awesome31312 is connected with other accounts If your evidence is good enough for the account recovery team, it should be good enough to have red trust removed too. However, there were many posts I was unable to delete, for various reasons. You can't delete topics started by you(r account), but you can edit the OP (for example this one and change it to something like: "this was written by the person who hacked my account, see Reference link"). If you can't delete a post, you could try "Report to moderator" on your own post, with a short explanation. I am happy to answer any questions, possibly even sign messages to prove that what I have said here is true. If you have a staked address, why didn't you start by signing a message? It's the best possible evidence you can get! Please sign from 12vARzQRPwUf19sCGUNUYasBK1kYu3F3xw and add today's date.
|
|
|
Thank you, community. Consequently, I managed to recover my account. It looks legit: From https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php?: Today at 02:32:31 PM - awesome31312 - woke up Today at 02:32:16 PM - awesome31312 - password reset via email Today at 02:25:02 PM - awesome31312 - manual recovery, previously-queued ownership change completed August 05, 2019, 01:34:29 PM - awesome31312 - manual recovery, ownership change queued (completed)
|
|
|
|