What's the minimum bid increment? I assume auction end < trading start?
Let's say 0.0001 bid increment. Auction ends in Timer removed. End time: 2013-07-31+20:00:00 to give 30 minutes lead time for payment and transfer. GO GO GO *added timer and clarification |
|
|
|
I'm willing to transfer 150 shares of LABCOIN to highest bidder. Bidding starts at 0.002 / share Let's Go!   Bid Increments 0.0001 Timer removed. End time: 2013-07-31+20:00:00 time left to give 30 minutes leeway for payment and share transfer. I'll take BIN offers too  |
|
|
|
Looks like the script is in action: <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 169 @ 0.001 = 0.169 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 11419 @ 0.001 = 11.419 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7329 @ 0.001 = 7.329 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6143 @ 0.001 = 6.143 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 67052 @ 0.001 = 67.052 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 17954 @ 0.001 = 17.954 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4013 @ 0.001 = 4.013 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2226 @ 0.001 = 2.226 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7 @ 0.001 = 0.007 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 61816 @ 0.001 = 61.816 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 398 @ 0.001 = 0.398 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 8523 @ 0.001 = 8.523 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 16380 @ 0.001 = 16.38 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 12935 @ 0.001 = 12.935 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2362 @ 0.001 = 2.362 BTC <assbot> [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20238 @ 0.001 = 20.238 BTC |
|
|
|
Drama and memes are ohhhh so entertaining  |
|
|
|
The SEC should have deferred to BTCTalk for punishment. A bunch of fucking idiots who believed 7% weekly returns are a possibility should be happy with their scammer tag above his avatar. It would be a real shame if all of the fucking morons who threw their bit at such stupidity were able to recoup anything.
They won't. Reading between the lines, Pirate lost most (90%+) of the stolen funds day trading. He siphoned off ~150K BTC of victims funds (~700K BTC deposited, ~550K BTC paid back as withdrawals & interest). At the time 150K BTC was worth >$1M yet he had trading losses and withdrew less than $150K from the exchange account. So most of what was stolen is either a)imaginary interest which is never coming back or b) money Pirate lost playing day trader. Of the remaining $150K I would imagine he has probably wasted a good chunk of that. Say there is $50K left, remember this was a BTC based scam and the price of BTC has risen 10x to 15x since then. Today $50K/$100 ea = 500 BTC. 500 BTC out of ~150,000 BTC stolen isn't much of a recovery. TL/DR Pirate stole siphoned off ~150,000 BTC and best case scenario the feds might be able to recover 500 BTC (0.3%). The feds may simply seek in reim forfeiture as the entire operation violated federal law and victims will never see a dime. Not saying it is fair but honestly we are talking a 99% to 100% loss for investors. A nifty visual representation:  |
|
|
|
TU.SILVER is operated in Asia by a non-US citizen. As such we are not under any US regulations regarding securities. However, to avoid offending our US brothers, effective immediately we will no longer process redemption orders destined for the United States. Further, all US citizens, regardless of their country of residence, are strongly encouraged to tender their shares for sale.
Coward. |
|
|
|
|
I've only read about 3/4ths of this thread so far. Was wondering if anyone could answer a few questions for me.
1. Has Ken provided detailed accounting yet, if not does he plan to?
2. What is the ETA on getting ActiveMiner listed on BTCT? Last I heard only 1 more vote was needed?
|
|
|
|
Jumping to conclusions much?
Why would s.dice holders receiving modest payouts dump their dicidends all at once?
They're not releasing all $160 to one person you know.
"The sky is falling, the sky is falling!"
^ THIS is what depresses the price, and it's YOUR fault.
There are 100 million shares, so it's 350k BTC, and they're to be released tomorrow within a few hours: This letter is being posted roughly 24 hours prior to the payout, at which point MPEX holders will receive .0035 BTC per share plus the small additional amounts mentioned above. […] The payout will occur in roughly 20 increments over a period of several hours
The sky isn't falling, the sun is exploding and it's consuming the earth. Goodbye. edit: Nvm, I read you wrong. Of course they won't dump their dividends all at once. Just a fraction. How did you ever become a mod? |
|
|
|
I sensed that incoming when I saw the activity on havelock
And assets locked
Will the new company license the software or will they also release shares ?
Yea whats up with that? Insider trading?  |
|
|
|
So what do you guys think is going to happen? I asked on tradingview 6 hours ago and everybody was absolutely convinced that we were going to 75-88.
bullish now?
place your bids at 90 and pray to wtv god(s) you believe in.  89.5 if you're feeling lucky Really? I think we are going to the 70s sometime between now and Tuesday. |
|
|
|
He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S
In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already? Feel free to hit the ignore button by my name.
He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S
In what world in which people need to work to live, does it say that someone has to be glued to an IRC channel 24/7? It's been 10 minutes since someone started asking a question on IRC. Will you please cool it already? This is all part of the merger process. Insightful! |
|
|
|
Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.
Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then. How did they almost triple their div in a week? Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income. Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week. In all seriousness... it might have been a typo. 183 satoshi's would have been expected, 1830 has to be a mistake. Yet no response from Ken? I would think if he made a mistake (again) he would have said so already. I too would like to know why it was so high. One can speculate why... Is Ken allowed to sleep? Or does your approach to business require abandoning this barbarous habit? As for 'One can speculate why...', give it up won't you? It has gotten stale and dare I say, very boring. He has been asked directly on IRC by many people and wont respond, but is responding to other questions :S Hopefully some time today he will make an announcement here. |
|
|
|
Holy crap! Waking up to this !
Thank god I covered my shorts below $70. Wish I had held onto the long though ...
Oh well ... sidelined for now
Happy Bull Day people !
What service are you using to short? All the ones I have tried (1broker, bitfinex, icbit, 796) are lacking in terms of features. Kraken really needs to go live! |
|
|
|
I am curious where all this money come from, especially since the mining address only showed ~86 BTC. It was a nice surprise to wake up to that much BTC but I'm really hoping it wasn't a typo!
+1 Doesn't make sense. 86 / 0.0000183 ~= 4.7 M This might well be the total number of issued shares, as in shares actually bought by investors, not as BitFunder understands it. That would make sense, I think I remember Ken saying that Bitfunder was going to fix this. |
|
|
|
I am curious where all this money come from, especially since the mining address only showed ~86 BTC. It was a nice surprise to wake up to that much BTC but I'm really hoping it wasn't a typo!
+1 Doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
Remember that ActiveMining receives its dividends through the AMC shares it holds by tendering, so summing both is wrong.
Ok so AMC earned 141BTC then. How did they almost triple their div in a week? Each avalon machine is 1.1BTC a day, they would need 15-20 Avalons to generate that income. Edit: on top of this, they are still doing 430GH/s, so nothing changed from last week. In all seriousness... it might have been a typo. 183 satoshi's would have been expected, 1830 has to be a mistake. Yet no response from Ken? I would think if he made a mistake (again) he would have said so already. I too would like to know why it was so high. One can speculate why... |
|
|
|
you have a decent amount of capital right now, how about you use that as collateral for a loan with no payments for a year, remove the bid wall, and let the market do its thang
leverage baby
interesting idea. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
