will be interesting to watch https://glbse.com/asset/view/TYGRR-BANK for weekly dividend payments
that shows now also number of shares that got them, providing an easy to follow indicator of shares in circulation.
if he was lucky enough to get a place in Pirate's fund and gets higher interest that he pays to glbse members, that's his business. his extra costs are btc held in glbse for open buy order at face value (that will not bring revenue at Pirate's)
I'm curious how many of the 16k bank bonds have been bought back by him this week

with each asset created there is a sub-account created to manage that asset.
that means you should see an account labeled BTC - this is your main user account
and accounts labeled as your assets. those are asset management accounts.

every account has a btc balance and potfolio (can trade shares, receive dividends and so on)
when you issue new shares, they appear in the asset management account and from there you can sell/transfer them etc.
and only shares outside the asset management account are entitled for dividends & can vote.
thus if you issued 1500 shares for tygrr mining and own part of it, make sure it is in your personal account.
switching between accounts is done in the portfolio page, by clicking on the account name ...

should not affect you. what happens is a program checks if the date/time you specified in the IPO form has passed and creates the shares.
they will appear in your sub-account created specially for the issuer as an asset management account which will have 0 BTC balance
and all 10000 bonds/shares you asked to be created.

if you check https://glbse.com/asset/view/BITBOND total shares issued this will change from 0 to 10000.
then you have to create a sell order to offer them to the public.

afaik there are no bugs in creating sell orders nor in the ipo process. but I see if you have problems to login and create the sell order, it will be delayed.

good indicators are
1) the https://glbse.com/ipos list will no longer contain bitbond
2) the https://glbse.com/asset/view/BITBOND asset page will display count of shares issued > 0
3) trading starts (or at least asks not empty)

I guess this qualifies as extreme situation : )

I thought all boards have room temperature, disregard the paste used.

yes, still the same opinion (split would do good)
as far as for this feature to be supported, it _should/is_ not that complicated.
all it needs is a clean spec/request, approve the request (is it what we wanted?) and write it.
from testing to implementation is usually quick. and development is novadays also quick

yes, that makes perfect sense. thanks for the comment.

btw could we after login land on the portfolio page automatically? same as after registering new account. that would also save a mouse click on every login

I don't like it either but I would disagree, as it makes brute force attempts harder and in end effect improves a bit glbse
(even if you pay a service to solve captcha for you it would cost money and anyway introduce a delay between attempts)

/o\

well enough, but you took the simple approach
ignoring difficulty changes.
with this year's mining activity peak the dividends will be probably getting smaller as the year end approaches

you have to log in, click on settings and enable it for any (or all) of the supported options
by default it's off

& my 2 million satoshi: any asset issuer could pro-actively seek nefario with a request to verify his identity.
with nefario keeping the submitted docs offline and only indicating their statuses on the asset page it's only between the asset issuer and nefario.

edit: I installed the google authenticator app, enabled 2step authentication in my account and then set up glbse to use it.
and it works like a charm. when enabled, it adds a new entry field on the page and retyping the code is easy. only 6 chars.
should also work over phone once forgotten at home and it would have to be read by somebody else to you. me gusta

if bought on the last day of ipo the price is not that bad (from potential seller's point of view).
fpga.contract sells around .50 today and btcsyn under .30 is a nice discount imho

and people are already selling into it! 2 trades according to twitter so far.
interesting. thanks for the tip

@Blitzboom I've no idea how many people lost their keys from 1.0 but I'm sure it's harder to brute force a key pair then pwning an email, if very frequently all it needs is to answer a question "did you get laid this year? y/n"

once your email account is pwned you have a attack vector that bypasses glbse

title proposal:

bring back web keys. say no to user name / password authentication

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

waiving good-bye to to cheap buy orders ... (misinformed sellers are better than no sellers)

just don't leave open bids @.7 or any other significant price above the sale price from Meni or you end up paying a lot more (see history price graph and twitter feed for this issue's data)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74863.msg829561#msg829561
well, ^^ here I was returning from the general topic detour if that link between a file and its timestamp would stand in court. got confused by the reply (forgo the proof unless answering qui bono) and thought about the seti@blockchain for a while but was unable to contribute to the talk.
I mean finding a hash of anything useful in the blockchain should be harder than finding a blockchain (unless I have the file, know which function to use to get its hash and the method how it's encoded in the blockchain).

so refocusing back to OP, I think it is a proof. while a use of a commercial authority to provide something like XAdES-T (signature with certified timestamp) could be easier to justify in a court, blockchain would do basically the same without revealing who made the request in the first place

well you mention somewhere that you'll be timestamping twice a day. that means either you'll timestamp two documents or two collective documents with a list of timestamped documents. if the later is the case, the list of timestamped docs is the master document. did my clarification help?

fair genug (fuer mich persoenlich kaeme lieferung erst mit der juli lieferung in frage, rechne 20 stck april, 40 mai, 40 juni und bereits sind 100+ bestellt). zahlung in juni geht klar. werde stueckzahl noch bestaetigen, bitte um platz reservierung in der warteschlange. verbleibe mfg