Why is this a weekly update for excusdo smfh

  Right the good ol it was all for lol comment. Well, how about you switch your name sooner than later, stop talking about haven with every comment and actually create and implement your own roadmap.

  I really do wonder how much hash your project will currently have, if you organically grew your idea like most legit project. I wonder if the huge hash amount is due to miners who saw a haven knockoff and are hoping to replicate haven's success this is akin to youtube video, where an irrelevant artist uploads their song with the name of a popular artist and when the video has garnered a lot of  views, the artist replaces the name with their own name and act like the views were organic.

  You and i know that you took a shortcut by co-tailing a successful product (like one of those ebtc, etherdark BS coins) to get free publicity and no one but you and your few associates find your little comment about naming for the lol truly funny cos its quite easy to see through the bullshit.

  As for bittrex been a shit exchange that just list indiscriminately well, luckily for us that use it, hopefully we won't have to deal with your project on that exchange cos obviously the exchange is unworthy to list such a fine project as yours. Legit projects like yours deserve to be on mercatox, yobit or the other meticulous exchanges that cater to such fine projects like yours

And they were paid 2 million for that platform, not even sure why they bothered, would have felt better if they exit scammed but this process feel s like purgatory.

  You absolutely right seb, let me head on over to bittrex (one of the hardest exchanges to get into and purchase this scam) keep in mind it was just listed, long after their listing criteria has tighten up.  You on the other hand is riding the scam's dick.
  
  If its such a scam seb, why did you attach the name to your project? I guess the best way to distance your self from a scam to claim the name of the scam project right? Free bitconnect (quite genius i might add) you could have named this project candida, syphilis whatever and organically grew your project like haven did but you decide to co-tail a bigger project (to gain free publicity) while acting like a salty triggered concubine.

  As for the no zero plans to emulate haven's protocol, i will leave you with a copy of the ann from your co admin pharmEcis. You guys plan to change the world but can't even get your story straight Anyway, cont with the BS.

I would say your scamming ass is part of the problem Mr convery of droxne. Oh yeah, i still remember how you exit scammed on the investor. Wonder if you still using that bs excuse of transferring the account to someone else.

 I really didn't say anything about them not delivering on the promises/project been a scam. Just that i find it weird that they feign an ignorance of the reason for the fud/hate and making claims that haven is a scam when they intentionally interjected the haven title in their name (for free publicity) and made plans to emulate haven's protocol (again for free publicity)

  Like i said they could have named this project candida, grown it organically and implemented all those promises, but they intentionally took short cuts to co-tail a well known project. Simple as that. I will check out their discord later, but it can't really change the stance of my post, cos its not directly related.

 So its the investors fault for having buy orders on dex? Lets even say they didn't have buy orders on dex but bought it after the snapshot cos they were unaware of a post that was made on medium/blockfolio, so is it their fault for buying a legit prl token from a legal exchange? This is not swapped tokens, or some kinda fake token but real legit prl tokens (keep in mind the new contract not only distributed the originally prl amount, but 27 million tokens was added to the prior max amount, so its not like allocation for those tokens weren't included in the new contract) So they actually still have those opq tokens that were emitted to replace those rejected prl tokens in their possession.

 I guess the admins are also well within their right to create 27 million tokens with no real allocation for 7 million but refuse to swap legit (emphasis on legit) prl token? Its like the new incoming tesla CEO deciding to null all stocks that was bought post the musk incriminating tweet cos its not a true reflection of the current state of the company, then transferring the value of those stocks to the internal employees. Its quite literally aligned to that scenario.  

 We really need to get out of this current mindset, and start holding this guys accountable rather than defaulting to the common that's just the way it is concept. The same guys with rumor that they had planned to dump, currently have 27 million coins at their disposable and didn't even make an effort to disclose the real use for 7 million tokens, and all is docile, least their current investment in opq is further negatively impacted. That set of thinking is one of the main problem in this sphere and till we get of that sheep mentality, a wider adoption of this products will always be undermined.

  I personally don't see a problem with me politely disclosing on the public thread that MrRedPanda is insisting that all token that was purchased post the snapshot will not be swapped and ccing the other admins to verify that this was the generalized agreement. It would have been different if my post were rude/insulting to MrRedPanda, but i was quite polite. I just relayed the info he gave me in pm to verify what am been told, that my 8 ETH investment is nullified due to negative action that wasn't my fault.

  As for me comparing how much that was stolen by bruno to the mint, it quite relevant cos bruno did state that this guys intended to dump this token and he beat them to it. Even if he was lying, as it currently stands, there is 7 million tokens out of that 27 newly minted token with no real use attributed to it, thus my bewilderment on why they refuse to swap real legit (emphasis on legit) prl tokens that were bought before the swap.

  20 million for salary, 5 million for grant (not sure why they need this if allocation has been made for salaries) and 2 million on reserve (again not sure why this is needed if 20 million has already been allocated to salary) So, we basically have 7 million with no real allocation and they can't swap legit tokens that were purchased by investors before the swap. In any other sector but crypto, this will be highly illegal. So, my comparison has nothing to do with the integrity of PRL smart contract, it was wise to swap to a different contract. However, the issue is that 27 million extra coins were created with no real allocation for 7 million. So, it seems like they just padded their pockets to circumvent the loss they might have taken from bruno while leaving their investors out to dry.

 Again, bruno did state that this guys intended to dump, but he beat em to the punch, and bruno only dumped 3 million tokens, this guys currently have 27 million tokens at their disposable. I would have faith in their intentions/statement about burning coins if they were honorable and did right for all their investors. But off the gate, they created a loophole to fuck several investors and pocket 7 million for themselves. So, bullshit like this need to be weeded out from the ecosystem cos its part of the problem.

 While i appreciate discord, if i made my earlier post on discord, i won't be surprised if my account is immediately banned for quote on quote fudding, i have dealt with that on several project discord/telegram. So in the spirit of maintaining transparency/freedom of speech, some of us prefer a public forum with limited censorship.

  Yes i did get in contact with the developers on telegram. I had a long conversation on pm with one of the admin (MrRedPanda) and he continuously stated that its wasn't their fault, so they can't do anything about it. I gave him my address/transaction id of sending my tokens from delta to mew to verify transaction date (which personally, i didn't even think should be an issue cos the swap had yet to occurs, thus all prl coin in existence was legit, and thereby should qualify to be swapped)

 I kept trying to make a point that the buy order on delta had been present for awhile and its also not our fault that it was filled post the disruption of trading on the centralized exchange/ also trying to get him to understand that every prl currently in existence is legit since a swap is yet to occur and bruno already dumped his tokens. So it made no sense to create 27 extra million tokens and refuse to swap those that were bought after a snapshot that happened few hrs after one of their co-workers dumped on everyone. He replied that they released a message on medium/blockfolio  stating that ppl should cease trading so i should have known to take down the buy order.

 I explained that i and several others work long hrs/have families and we can't dedicate every living minute to monitor post and also stated that they created extra funds with more than enough to make everyone whole, so i was still puzzled on why they refuse to swap legit prl tokens that were bought before the swap, he stated that the fund were for internal use and they can't just distribute it to everyone that fills entitled. He suggested that i should contact bruno to get my money back because there is nothing they could do for me.

 I again explained that this are legit tokens that were bought before the swap, so it wasn't like i bought tokens that were already swapped and trying to swap it again, so i am still confused on why they can't swap this tokens. He replied that there is nothing else he can do for me and any token bought post the snap shot will not be swapped.

 Then weirdly he stated that this is not a direct swap but rather a fork, and if it was a direct swap then maybe they could do it, but since this is a fork, there is nothing they could do about it. I replied that i didn't know you could fork ERC tokens and asked him to provide a better explanation on why we are left to dry when they have created 27 extra million coins, he replied that he has answered all my questions and there was nothing else he could do for me.

 So i went back on the main public thread, cc bill cordes the ceo, and disclosed my conversation with this aforementioned admin on pm. I did it to make sure this wasn't the opinion of one admin but rather a shared stance among them. The admin that i had a conversation with, immediately banned me and sent me a pm stating that i was banned because i tried to make him feel guilty/pressured by disclosing the content of our conversation in public.

 I should also state that i sent bill cordes a pm before engaging this admin and he never replied. By the way, still have a copy of the entire pm conversation with MrRedPanda.

  When you talking about financial structures, you can't use the statement that nothing in life is fair. A clear con is a clear con. I guess its all fair that they create 27 million coins(with no clear indication for the use of 7 million) but individuals that actually invested legit money into the project are left with nothing.

  If a token was bought before the swap, they should have honored those token, cos this are real prl token. Its not like we bought prl tokens that have been swapped and tried to swap it again. This is legit tokens, that were bought during the dump cos some of us had buy orders on dex. So, one of their co-workers fucks up, the investors get to pay for it and they create extra tokens for themselves to supplement the loss they have taken and its all good.

  Again, they created 27 million extra tokens, with no clear distinction on what 7 million will be utilized for (keep in mind that bruno only dumped 3 million and did state that they planned on dumping till he beat them to it) So there is a lot of discrepancy and acting like its not an issue, is part of the issue in crypto and ultimately dissuade greater adoption. We need to weed bullshit like this out. Supplement crypto with any other ecosystem and replicate this scenario and see if its adding up.

  So, i rather lose the value of my opq but make sure bullshit like this stay on the forefront cos new investors that are naive about the project, need to be aware of what they getting into. Its that greed/sheep mentality that is so presrnt in this sphere, where the dev is held above mistake/con that is hindering the greater adoption on this thing we all love.

  Sometime you have to be willing to take a lose for the greater good, and judging from the action of this group, i seriously doubt that they trying to save the project for the long run, rather i think they just trying to keep it afloat long enough that the market hopefully recovers, so they can carry out their original plan that was sidestepped by bruno

 So, most of your post sound like a con man trying really hard to convince me that the subject at hand is not a con. Am not saying your project is a con, but i get that healing snake oil merchant vibe from you. Also, if you have such an issue with haven, then why did you utilize their name while naming your project? You could have named this project candida and still implemented all that shit you keep quipping about. But by utilizing haven while naming/constantly talking about haven and stating that you intend to implement everything that they do, that indicates that you actually love what haven is doing and you just plan to co-tail their success.

  You could have just kept haven out of your name and grew your product organically like haven did. As far as am concerned, your product falls in line with those ebtc, etherdark, monerodark or whatever other bs clones that curtail a big projects name. As for your hash rate, this is crypto where ppl will mine boobie coin with hope of making a profit. Shit you can create a thread about placing feces on a blockchain and if you make the coin mineable, a bunch of ppl will mine it.

  So i wonder how much hash you will really have if you didn't have that haven title in your name/ riding their co-tail. Haven is a clear success, so it doesn't take a genius to deduce that when ppl see the name/hear your quip about emulating it, they will easily jump on board, hoping it replicate haven success. So stop complaining about the hate/fud cos we all know that you like it. You knew what you were doing when you incorporated that name into your title. You basically took short cuts to get free publicity.

  As for haven been a scam, they must be one helluva scam group, cos bittrex listing requirement has seriously tightened up over the past yr and they easily slid in there. So stop acting like the jealous concubine and accept your place in the ecosystem. If you want to be taken seriously, fork your coin in this early stage, rename it to something completely originally and stop interjecting haven into every post. Also create and implement your own roadmap, don't wait to emulate haven's roadmap as you stated cos haven is a scam right?

  Haven devs organically did it by themselves, and you just sound like a dick rider (excuse me) Not saying your project might not end up been successful, this is crypto after all. Speculation can turn a turd into the price of gold but you shouldn't act all surprised/disappointed of the hate/fud cos you intentionally courted it and we all know that internally, you loving it.

  I guess you will also take the octaex scam serious, when we submit an evidence to authorities or the prl debacle when bruno goes to jail etc.Sadly this assholes keep getting away with bullshit, cos some scooped up the coin for the low and their greed dictates that they rather the negative info is kept at bay till they can sell for a huge profit. Am yet to see a thief willing admit that they stole from someone, especially an anonymous thief.

 As for pistolhonda (the aidos kuneen shill smfh) i love how you dole out insults all over the thread, all one has to do is peruse your post history. Your inability to maintain a legit argument usually results in you doling out massive amount of insult with hope that it hides your true intention/greed lol. Psychology has a good way of explaining such characters and i will leave it at that.

 And as i mentioned several times already, just block my account if you already invested/positively biased about the project. My comments is meant to provide a new naive investor with a complete history, not just the shill you rather sell.

 You a legendary member, so i guess you probably know more about the project than me, but what form of development has prl/opq engaged/provided yet? From my understanding all they have done so far is make promises and create an ERC token to back the claim. Also, if am not mistaken, the lead dev is bruno and he already checked out, so who is the technical mind leading this new operation? all this seem to me is a bunch of ppl trying to salvage a sunk ship and clear as much bread before vacating the spot.
 
 And while am at it, i will repost my earlier comment and wonder what other ecosystem, someone could pull such stunt and get away with it.
 
"Let me reiterate that they created 27 extra million coins. 20 million for salary, 5 million for employee grant (not sure why they need this if they already made salary allocations) and 2 million for reserves.

 However, legit buy orders on dex, that were filled post their snapshot (which occurred within hrs of their co-worker dumping on everyone) was excluded from the swap.

 Keep in mind bruno (whomever he might be) dumped only 3 million to create this fiasco and did state that this guys had intention to dump on the investors, prior to his act. So, this guys now have 27 extra million tokens to dump on the market at their leisure. Even if they intend to do right by the community, as it stands 20 million is well accounted but the other 7 million (again bruno dumped 3 million) seem like a bag secure for themselves to circumvent any loss they might have suffered from bruno"

  Am going to reiterate that when ppl don't have legit reasons to counter a point, they usually result to insults with hope of getting their point across. For the individual talking about BTC dump, the dump wasn't coordinated by one sole miner as it seem to be the case with this project. BTC was an organic dump, that is not the situation here (but most are blinded by the greed thus the resentment displayed toward those that do dare to continuously speak about it)

  As i aforementioned, am yet to see anyone complain when a project is been positively hyped, but if a project does something shady we are expected to turn a blind eye/be mum about it. However, the same individuals are quick to complain about issues with crypto mass adoption. So, you either in the sphere to blindly flip any coin with no regards, or you actually care about progressing this institution by shining light on shady practices within the sphere (you can't have it both way). I would suggest that anyone that cares, take the time to peruse my post history to see where i stand (yet to make an unwarranted negative comment) Thanks

  Let me reiterate that they created 27 extra million coins. 20 million for salary, 5 million for employee grant (not sure why they need this if they already made salary allocations) and 2 million for reserves.

 However, legit buy orders on dex, that were filled post their snapshot (which occurred within hrs of their co-worker dumping on everyone) was excluded from the swap.

 Keep in mind bruno (whomever he might be) dumped only 3 million to create this fiasco and did state that this guys had intention to dump on the investors, prior to his act. So, this guys now have 27 extra million tokens to dump on the market at their leisure. Even if they intend to do right by the community, as it stands 20 million is well accounted but the other 7 million (again bruno dumped 3 million) seem like a bag secure for themselves to circumvent any loss they might have suffered from bruno.

They added an extra 27 million into the total supply. Apparently they need 20 million for salary, 7 million for grant (whatever that might be) and and another 2 million to be stored. And no one knows who bruno is, they don't even know who bruno is and he was one of their co-worker. For all the we the same individual crying foul about bruno might just be bruno himself. Welcome to crypto and thus the reason why mass adoption is not going to happen anytime soon till bs like this is dealt with.

  Yes its quite professional that they didn't have any idea of whom they were working with. The individual that ended up dumping on every investor and since they did such a good job with that, they decided that it will be wise to add an extra 27 million coins into the total supply. 20 million for salary, 5 million for grants ( whatever that is) and an extra 2 million for storage (again whatever that might be) but they can't afford to swap tokens that were legitimately bought before the swap cos its past a snapshot which occurred several hrs after their co worker decided to dump on everyone (emphasis on a few hrs cos that quite sufficient b/c ppl don't have lives away from monitoring crypto announcement and there weren't several buy orders set on multiple exchanges)
  So, you absolutely right that this is how a company operating in the financial sector should operate. Keep in mind that the only individual with any technical ability to advance the project has dumped and quit, and the extra 7 million for grant/storage has no real indicative use but rather suggests that they might be creating extra bags for themselves to circumvent any loss they might have suffered from bruno. So yes the whole thing was handled quite professionally SMFH

 Lets be clear, there is a difference btw unwarranted negativity and warranted negativity. Yet to see anyone complain when a project is been positively hyped, but if a project does something shady we expected to turn a blind eye/ be mum about it, lest you be labelled a fudder. And i don't agree with the sentiment that exposing shady scenarios in a project scares aware investors from crypto, rather it helps investors make educative decisions and foster an environment that ultimately leads to better adoption.

 In other for serious institutions/investors to take this sphere serious, this sheep mentality where the dev is always right has to be negated. As i mentioned, in any other sector but crypto there is enough bs from the camp to warrant an investigation for collusion.

  Well, sir this butthurt individual actually bought this coin OTC before it was even listed on octaex, and i actively promoted it and got a lot (emphasis on alot) of ppl  interested in the project. Several friends were still on the fence but when a solid stability was maintained at 1k for awhile, they got on board. So, no one will have any complaint if this coin was organically dumped by the mass but when it is a coordinated dump from a sole miner and the dev was made aware of it early on with multiple proofs on discord, but choose to do nothing to curtail the act, then it becomes a problem. Cos it presents a possibility of collusion.

  So, excuse me for not been a sheep/not having a problem with losing on an investment by exposing issues that i find shady. Something am sure a fine young sovereign individual like you would not do. So, sadly, crypto is still at a stage where assholes can fuck over their investors and authorities can't be of much help. Am currently dealing with that from oyster pearl. Shit, we dealt with that on octaex too.

  Coinmarkets pulled an exit scam but the main butter on that exchange was eca, and the dev took the extra step to track them down and hold them accountable till they came back and released all that fund to their investor. Aro was the bread and butter on octaex, the admins were shilling the shit out of that exchange. There are multiple comments from them on discord about it been reliable and how ppl should use it over otc to create a visible liquidity (that if those comments haven't been scrubbed) but then octaex pulls an exit scam, and their investors lose hundreds of thousand of dollars,  all we get is sorry, there is nothing we can do about it. Even one of the admin went as far as to make fun of ppl on discord for trusting a new exchange.

 So yeah, even though my post is not proven and might border on libel if my hypothesis is wrong, in any other sector but crypto, this guys will be investigated for collusion. Last i checked, in the financial sector, collusion is a felony charge and a libel claim is a minor misdemeanor, and there is definitely enough bs from their part to warrant that investigation. So.... yeah. Again, if you are already invested in the coin or positively biased about the project then my post is not meant for you. So if my continuous post is a bother, please block my account so you don't have to see my post anymore. Thanks and take care.

 For the prospective investor make sure to read back a few pages to get a full picture of the history of the project and plz be aware that the wallet on mercatox has been on maintenance for really long time, so no one can deposit their coin to sell. So the current price is heavily manipulated.