1L583LDAunnoksUUu16MqrzpsNK9sbL2Ki
just to be sure, is this sig okay?
and how does tracking work? do we have to track ourselves or will you?
No, we track. The sig is ok. |
|
|
|
So what activity would we need? I have 112 at the moment.
In response, we will still track the post count. Ah awesome, still going by posts. There's a discussion going on in the meta sub forum. Yes, just read it. Seems like a good system. |
|
|
|
So what activity would we need? I have 112 at the moment.
In response, we will still track the post count. |
|
|
|
So, how will this work now, seeing post count got replaced by activity?..
It's based on post count. The more posts you have during the period, the more you get paid, and vice versa. |
|
|
|
Added: 1LQh2s6gMHtxkebBYUCeX2aGtp9rRXZR4z
Is mine OK? I've resized it a bit
Yes, it is ok. |
|
|
|
14Wgjr2JhU6enjxZGeyB3iKP9rsCSHRVdK  Add me? You had 160 posts 2 days ago, what happened? New account? |
|
|
|
|
We will leave 48 more hours for him to show up and put a statement. Afterwards, whoever is interested in his information, contact us and we will provide you with such. We pretty much know who he is. It seems to be the right thing to do given the circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh God. I really rooted for this guy... even donated.. What a charade..
|
|
|
|
|
6/18
lewisg 146Sha1RGTW85UThGEjUKuCwrHZRs2EBv8 93 130
thaayb 14vyzwSN1N4QdwDeJhkm4iomCYByAkuEpq 66 92
Paid.
Transferred to the new model.
|
|
|
|
Why is this date so prevalent and so stuck in people's heads?
I don't care when the last satoshi will be mined. What really matters is this: 90% of all coins will be minted by 2023 (in ten years). 98% of all coins will be minted by 2033 (in twenty years). In 2023 the annual inflation rate will be around 2-3%. In 2033 the annual inflation rate will be less than 1%. So in just 10-20 years the inflation will be so insignificant, newly minted coins won't make any difference on the market. If fiat money happen to survive for the next 20 years, miners won't be able to produce 10-20% price volatility due to selling BTC to pay for equipment. Illustration by Matt Whitlock:  So what this potentially means that if bitcoins keep the newcomer demand high, and the supply falls, there will be a great rise in the bitcoin price on a daily basis. And in just 10 years from now, 1 bitcoin could be worth 10k or more (a bit optimistic). |
|
|
|
Added! 1LxfshDCEK6hPjLeC6X8M1moyhBcXLcxmV Thanks,  Confirmed. |
|
|
|
Hey, when is my first payout? If so, could you payout to :
1BoeLensDrVHLjYW4pPab5UENKBuDupfKt
Thanks!
6/23 Address changed. |
|
|
|
Previously, I had already received payment from bit777. bit777 is legit. Ok, Thanks. Based on your post count, I can't offer you upfront. Minimum for upfront payments is 800 posts. OK, After time is up, do I pm you, or do you just do it. We just do it. |
|
|
|
We are as safe to do business with as a bank  |
|
|
|
Based on your post count, I can't offer you upfront. Minimum for upfront payments is 800 posts. |
|
|
|
We were actually thinking about switching to a performance model. The more posts in the period, the higher the pay. Thoughts?
You're encouraging people to spam with this model. +1. to bit777: You can add a constraint. For example at least 60( or 80) posts per month... In the end of the day there will always be people who like it, and people who don't. We will be sticking with the performance model. |
|
|
|
We were actually thinking about switching to a performance model. The more posts in the period, the higher the pay. Thoughts?
You're encouraging people to spam with this model. Nope. We are against spam and do not encourage it. The performance model is fair towards the participants. I don't think you get it. By paying people purely on how many posts they make, you effectively encourage useless posts, not posts with content and value. Yes I understand what you mean, but how is it fair if someone has 2000 posts and gets .20btc a month for posting 30-40 times, compared to someone who has 300 posts, and has posted 250 of them and gets .01btc. On a side note, isn't that other model by itself promoting the idea that by having more posts, you get paid more, hence ending up with the exact same result of people aiming to achieve a higher post count? |
|
|
|
We were actually thinking about switching to a performance model. The more posts in the period, the higher the pay. Thoughts?
You're encouraging people to spam with this model. Nope. We are against spam and do not encourage it. The performance model is fair towards the participants. |
|
|
|
If I reach the maximum amount before the month has ended, can I request a payout?
It is still considered "per month", so yes you could and we will gladly pay, but you will have to keep the sig till the proper date. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like a very interesting gadget. As long as it is secured, it can help the community.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
