Here’s the thing. In some ways the objective truth doesn’t matter.
The appearance to the world is that the American President is a weak fool. That damages American interests and it damages Western interests by extension.
The "appearance" is created and managed by the media, at least 90% of it. President himself through his actions and polices controls maybe 10%. The media can demonize anyone, or make someone a hero, easily. So take a guess who is responsible for "damaging American interests and Western interests by extension" here. |
|
|
|
So compassion is not really a factor here, right? Only a potential "threat" is a factor.
It’s one factor but needs to be viewed in a broader context, including threat scenarios. The bit the alt-right completely misses is when the walls go up, most of them are so poorly educated and poor that most of them will be on the wrong side of the wall, and the wrong end of the sentry guns. By working to destroy social protections, the rootless, low educated, white males who are Steve Bannons troops are only digging themselves a hole. I intend to be inside the walls. But I would rather that there were no walls at all and we all managed to get along peacefully. If the walls do go up, it is because we have made bad choices as a society and focused on ourselves to the exclusion of all others, enough to make those others desperate and dangerous. Yet you're against peaceful relations with Russia. Walls might protect you from poor "low educated white males" masses, but they provide zero protection from nukes, you know. |
|
|
|
|
So compassion is not really a factor here, right? Only a potential "threat" is a factor.
|
|
|
|
Sanctions, like interest rates, are a crude weapon.
But necessary? Even though poor people in those countries might eventually become extremely dangerous and violent? Still worth it? |
|
|
|
|
I wonder how the same "compassionate" people can support sanctions against other countries, knowing full well that poor people in those countries might eventually become extremely dangerous and violent.
|
|
|
|
I would also like to blow my own trumpet a little bit here... Despite the constant negative press $6900 covfefe
|
|
|
|
target 4700
No soup for you Maybe mean’t 7400 nope Maybe meant YEP. |
|
|
|
Well if peace means surrender, including siding with Putin against the findings of the Republican controlled Senate Intelligence Committee, then yes. After all, there’s nothing wrong with cock sucking. I’m sure many find it quite tasty. I certainly hope my wife does.
If Trump needs Russian help to defeat the ((deep state)), then so be it. They may have allied to fight the most dangerous enemy in the world, the ((deep state)). Furthermore, I have no problem with cozying up to Russia, and distancing ourselves from Western Europe if it furthers our national interests. Not a debate about which intelligence service is more honest than another intelligence service (hint they are both dishonest).
There is no debate. The President of the United States should side with his own country. They don't represent "the country". They're actual people with their own personal agendas. They want to destroy Trump, and he should side with them? |
|
|
|
No I’m a leftie. Which means I want to disrupt the banks and break up the cozy corporatist monopolies and bust big pharma and big healthcare. We can start by dangerously giving free healthcare to poor people. That's all fine. You can be a leftie for those reasons, but you don't have to buy into conspiracy theories like "Hillary lost because Russia hacked the election". |
|
|
|
Well if peace means surrender
Hmm... no it doesn't. Peace means peace. |
|
|
|
|
Yes and now the left is crying "Treason" because "He is befriending our enemies (Russia etc)" instead of starting WW3, as any responsible President should.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember "Wanted for Treason" poster from 1963?
"He is befriending our enemies (Russia etc)".
History goes full circle.
|
|
|
|
The daily 200 MA is falling pretty steeply these days. At this rate, it won't be much longer until it encounters the 50 MA for a golden cross.
Assuming the 50 MA flattens out around current prices, this would bring us to mid-September-ish. This is how it played out the last time we had a golden cross in 2015: the 200 MA fell to meet a flat 50 MA.
200 MA fall would slow down, pretty soon. It would be just barely under $8000 in September. It might even stop there... We would be very lucky if the price (let alone 50 MA) reaches $8000 in September. |
|
|
|
|
Price dynamic seems different today.
It's no longer sideways->jump->sideways.
|
|
|
|
But let's not forget that "widespread Russian disinformation campaign" itself is a crazy conspiracy theory invented by Democrats and their Deep State allies like Michael Hayden... |
|
|
|
Who would have thought that you could take down two skyscrapers with a bunch of box cutters?
Not me. I am of the opinion that the governments official conspiracy theory is one of the least plausible of the many conspiracy theories I have encountered regarding that event. I think Skripal poisoning case takes the cake. Absolutely no one believes the official theory. |
|
|
|
And who brags about a SeaDoo and some night vision goggles? Trolls are all 12 year old boys now? Wtf does a grown man do with night vision goggles?
It puts the lotion in the basket. |
|
|
|
Played with different SMA intervals, until 3 bottoms lined up perfectly (at 56-hour SMA):  Looks like a falling wedge: https://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.aspWhen the pattern completes, and the price breaks out of wedge, it is usually in the opposite direction the wedge was pointed. This is why it is called a reversal pattern. For example, if a wedge is angled downward—called a "falling wedge"—the price will often break above the top of the pattern and rally.
Bullish. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
