I have as well except I did mine with all manual calculations. All lower case is easy to find, even manually. So I would say all lowercase is much easier. Here are 5 I found, manually, since your post. Yes, I have the private keys to these as well. 1qpbraasdpncxqkrzboqwbigasigepmzi
1rrijdwhccjjahpamurehaqsxykpaukoy
1tskaxjoazwwbkqawcupnzmkfoscpoyao
1zqrvaogwcrrfcskeodsmzuagfvfsqtsz
1hmnhsdudvskdzimkfwpijjeyamdfikxi
What do you mean by you did it "manually"? What was your process? I'm also curious to find out how you have the private keys as well. Maybe if you change the algorithm to only produce an address with lowercase characters? I like to see a hash 160, public key and a private key for at least one of them. @WP, pretty please.🥰 |
|
|
|
|
OP, I don't deserve to be among the top 10 notorious members.🤣🤣, don't know why but I never visited this board, seems to be a dead one.
|
|
|
|
|
After rewriting their topics, should the new OP credit the original author by mentioning their names or just plagiarize them?
Edit, curious case of Benjamin Button!😂
|
|
|
|
|
@albert0bsd, does MikeJ_NPC know your real identity? If they don't know it, this might have been a trick all along to track you down, if indeed you actually were able to crack the wallet, this could be their vetting mechanism and by moving the funds you just passed their test and now they want you, they could be russians, chinese, essentially anyone/ group.
Either way they are after you and it could be that, it's not about the money, they wanna know who you are.
Just my theory.
Edit, I was hoping for something more dramatic.😉
|
|
|
|
I did try to look through this to see if it has been answered, but attempting to find a GPU accelerated nostr vanity address generator, and this is as close as I've found so far. Obviously not the same thing but, just trying to figure out if there is a branch of this that could do that, or something else made to do so? Using CPU only is brutal.
You could go to project development : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=12.0 there are some windows GPU versions, some are not open source, so do your research before using. |
|
|
|
Quote please, also note please, Have no sM to send, thank you.😘 H0WbM4UD02lS31+nFKFj5B1s8TCy/9+rA+7ucqUWddDFQVPFFXfeSSUPr4VuaruCmMUbgNdAiOF5ADS3rkHuZaw=
1BitcoineaxiCQ4C27mJAoN4k5VjRU1S1G
Vanity NFT signature chain, digaran, bitcointalk.
IFTw4q6SDMn0Xbub7jaYWceRV9TXlq8/ZX7HvYK3bF6YFTyn4kRhP5Gh2osSAVgWFLs+p09Gk5DpESYhiZNB0l8=
1Digaran3NonkAJQ3hRmCMNAHKBKzkJAP1
Personal vanity address, digaran, bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
|
I paid for nord for 1 year, after less than 3 month it's blocked now. Can I use your VPN on mobile phone, which app do I need to install?
|
|
|
|
I call on everyone to start dissociating NFTs from crapy pictures and distinguishing NFT art as a subset of non-fungible tokens. NFT art is synonymous with NFTs now but there are NFTs that are useful and have value (like event tickets, in-game and metaverse assets, licenses, etc.).
In-game and metaverse, both digital illusions good for entertainment, they don't solve any of the world's problems. NFT was always possible on bitcoin, but nobody cared enough back then to create a hype for it, because bitcoin was the main focus until the realization of ICO's potential, altcoin potentials, they tried all the tricks they had up on their sleeves with alt/ Ico, now is the time for new methods to scam the world. Metaverse! What a joke. |
|
|
|
|
Were the 10 k BTC real and were they moved for real? If MikeJ could post here saying that he owns the said address, it'd be great. Note that nothing about this should be discussed in private, if this is about stolen coins, we might be able to (*have a piece, just act normal and let me lead.) find some details and help to return them back to their rightful owners.
*=lol.
|
|
|
|
Red Box or red trust or something like that
You are not sure yourself what you are talking about.
When I'm logged out, I can see a red box on a topic which I started, I can't see such a red box on other people with negative trust, therefore I'm asking if that's intentional or just that people with green trust can avoid having the said red message box? @shasan, there are some new posts on "stake your address topic". Lol let me fix this bug on my profile.
Looks like a bug, not sure though, when someone has several negative feedback with no positives, you can see the red box emphasizing this person is believed to be a scammer, while members with green trust/ DT or not won't show anything. That would automatically creates a false sense of trustworthiness, which is a unsafe method IMO. Maybe I'm wrong. Also showing a large red box on the header is far from administration being unbiased. Anyhow, felt there is something wrong and had to mention it. |
|
|
|
|
I'm shocked to see nobody pulled a gun to grab both the cash and the bitcoin, have you seen US tubers carrying an empty PS5 box going around the hoods? Then people would come to grab the box at the first chance they get!😁
|
|
|
|
|
So the red box above is just there by default on non-DT members but doesn't show on DT members? Viewing DT members as guest doesn't show that red box, they have negative trust though.
|
|
|
|
Is the above gigantic warning a default setting based on negative feedback? According to OP, one has to create a flag for the warning to show up, I wonder who planted that flag on my territory.🤔
Edit, couldn't see such red box on a DT member with several negatives.
It is not based on negative trust but it is based on the flag type as well as flag supporters. When any flag (flag type 2/3) is created and supported by 3 or more DTs. It shows on the profile "Trade with extreme caution" and the topic created by that person shows like the image you have mentioned. So do I need to remove the exclusions on my trust page to see who posted, supported the flag? I didn't know I was such of a big threat to this community to have me red flagged during inactivity, or maybe it's recent? I can't tell because there is no time and date. Anyways this is a sad development for scammers like me, no more shortcuts then. lol. |
|
|
|
|
Man you talk too much with little meaning, you don't need to repeat yourself over and over. One thing you should know; this forum is not a service, hence they have no legal obligations to prevent you, forcibly stop you from giving him your data, forum has a trust system, despite many flaws, it works and has been tried to keep it decentralized and fair as possible.
If you really owned the coins, you'd have sought for help by other, safer means, not by trusting 10 k bitcoins to a stranger, I mean WTF since when people have gone mad?
FYI, there is a challenge since 2015, prize is the bitcoins if we find them, so all of the developments discussed here are targetted towards that goal, however it is possible that a malicious intent was behind the whole puzzle solving in order to trick software developers share their findings, either to identify the capable people, or to find a shortcut for some large amounts, or it could be just a simple game of showing the strength of the private keys.
Summarizing my points, forum administration/ staff members are not responsible for scams, only individuals on DT network could fight against scam and any ill-intent behavior, they are just a few individuals comparing to the population, so yes this forum lacks enough trust police!
You should seek legal advice from experts in cyber crimes and move to the next level, sue him and request for a full audit on his financial affairs, there has to be some evidence somewhere to link him to the stolen funds.
Guys don't forget my cut, you sneaky albert. Lol. Don't mind this redacted part, this is our secret (crypto) communication algorithm in these woods.
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of your post is that you don't know how to do this but you just have idea and wanting others to do all the job?
I don't do social media, but if you ever needed FUD for your competitors, shilling for your own project, you know where to find me. I'm trying to stay with the flow as I have seen that shilling is working greatly for people around the world.
Remember, a good strategy is to have a plan B for every plan. Causing panic, spreading FUD, complementing own projects, these are the tools nowadays used by 99% crypto ecosystem.🤑🤥
|
|
|
|
On github I found that '' Almost all bitcoin addresses with a balance are in the 254-256 BITs range. ''
Is This True ? Best range is -b 256 ?
It is a probabilistic distribution bit 256 is the Half of the whole key space, bit 255 is a quater and bit 254 is have a 12.5% of the whole range, if you add those values it is 50% + 25% + 12.5% that is 87.5% How did you come up with those numbers? 256 is two times of 255, and 255 bit is x2 of 254 bit. Searching in 2^256 decreases the chance of finding a single address/key by 2^96. I just haven't figured a way to only search 160 bit range in order to get all com/uncompressed keys. Let me know if you do.😉 |
|
|
|
~snip.
Do I know you? Who is you?
I wanted to fuck around enough to find out, you know? Lol.
If Joe is a serious hacker with a team of expert programmers then there is at least 2M $ in the pot for now, and there are already so many people with millions lost in broken wallets, incomplete private keys, etc. Since he has shown his face, people know who he is, they know his face, and that is an advantage, people would trust such individuals more, I wanted to know if it's a good idea to send him some clients and maybe get a little something on the side for myself, you know? I hope we're good. |
|
|
|
Hey boss😘😘. How can I see who created and supported a flag on me? With my account I couldn't find anything, as a guest I could see the following, with an imprisoned(newbie) account I can see the same with no links. Is the above gigantic warning a default setting based on negative feedback? According to OP, one has to create a flag for the warning to show up, I wonder who planted that flag on my territory.🤔 Edit, couldn't see such red box on a DT member with several negatives. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
