Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:19:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 »
1881  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 21, 2013, 01:15:11 AM
Satoshi Dice ddos attacking u guys?  Roll Eyes
1882  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: WTS 100+ BTC on: May 20, 2013, 09:21:17 PM
Be careful with this bud, "Hero members" don't mean they're super trusted like I originally thought. Thought they had to be a member for awhile but turns out its just based on forum posts...saw a dude who registered last week and was Hero status. Just trying to prevent any scams.
1883  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: $1000 or $2000 worth of BTC on: May 20, 2013, 07:46:14 PM
I apologize but I would not send the cash via mail. The reason I am trying to buy the btc is because a couple of my models I use for baseball betting show very high ROI% for a couple of tonights games. Thus I am trying to bet 4 BTC on each of those 4 games. Normally I would use a cash offshore book but moving a couple thousand is very difficult and the fees for withdrawing add up quick.
1884  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: $1000 or $2000 worth of BTC on: May 20, 2013, 07:42:37 PM
Bump. Still looking for the BTC. Would prefer to do this transaction in $500 increments. Send the BTC and then I will send the moneypak. I will provide photos of my ID, facebook link, twitter, receipts of the moneypaks, me holding the moneypaks, etc and can skype also to prove I am who I appear to be in my ID. I would be open to using an escrow however it is very hard to get a hold of any of them on a short notice. If interested please PM me or comment here.
1885  Economy / Currency exchange / [CLOSED] $1000 or $2000 worth of BTC on: May 20, 2013, 06:02:47 PM
I am looking to buy $1000 or $2000 worth of BTC for tonights MLB games. At weighted price right now this would $122.16, so 8.19 BTC for $1000 or 16.38 BTC for $2000. I bet a lot on sports and have been very profitable. A couple big games have peaked my interest thus I am in need of BTC because it is the easiest to move when dealing with 4 figures or higher compared to an offshore book. I can pay with deposit to bank account or moneypaks. If I can't find a buyer within the next 4.5 hours please disregard this post. I am very high in trust and have done many sales/trades on Sealswithclubs and can be seen in the web of trust on sealsdeals.info, I have over 1600 trust and numerous comments about my transactions going flawlessly. If you are interested in this trade please comment or PM me. Thanks.

EDIT: Bought 11 btc from seals players. thank you to all who sold to me and every one went flawlessly.
1886  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [WTB] LTC for Moneypak or MG: 180 LTC for $500, 110 for $300, 57 for $150 on: May 20, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
Got an offer from someone and the problem were having is no trusted escrow around...if anyone reads this and IS TRULY trusted like has done multiple transactions or are a moderator PLEASE comment here that you'd be willing to help. I'd very much appreciate it.
1887  Economy / Currency exchange / [WTB] LTC for Moneypak or MG: 180 LTC for $500, 110 for $300, 57 for $150 on: May 20, 2013, 12:13:57 AM
Hi,
I am looking to get into the litecoin world and am looking to buy up to $500 worth of Litecoin using moneypak or Moneygram. However I believe the price to be slightly inflated so 180 LTC for $500 is my offer. I also would offer $300 for 110 LTC if anyone is interested in that price. Or $150 for 57 LTC. I am highly trusted on sealswithclubs and have done many trades using moneypak for BTC on there. Check "sealsdeals.info" (website) for web of trust username "Kingofsports" (current trust is 1697 with 52 "trusts" and over 20+ comments regarding trades/sales). I WILL NOT send first because scammers go after these cash for alt currencies trades I've noticed far more often then BTC (I don't know why or if this is true its just what I've seemed to notice here). Escrow would be fine but I wouldn't want to wait more than an hour for the transaction to be completed if used. If you are interested in doing this trade please PM me or comment here, I will be active in the SwC chat as well from time to time over the next couple days. Thanks!
1888  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 19, 2013, 10:41:22 PM
Zaih what you are not seeing is the losing players and how much they lost. I personally was up 3 BTC and gave it all back + 2 more. So I'm down 2 BTC. I guarantee that Stunna is not down 250 BTC or even close to that. With the past day or so of bets honestly I think he/she has gotten back probably at least 10% of the 212 he/she lost right from the get go. I can see this being a very addicting game to some and thus many "degens" will lose a ton to this game no matter even if the expected value is +EV because of chasing losses.
1889  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 11:55:18 PM
@zaih this site is definitely going to become big. And the whole story of one of the first players winning 200+ btc and being offered to be paid immediately will definitely keep the success going even after week 1. Hopefully the house edge is truly 1% otherwise could get ugly. However, the whole gambling and doubling your money literally within 5 seconds will keep many gamblers going beyond their set targets thus increasing profits for the house in the big picture. Althought the big hit in the beginning, I wouldn't be surprised if Stunna has gotten back already 1/8 or more of that 212 btc lost in the beginning.

@Stunna I PMed you a question I have about your site.
1890  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bet on the Preakness! on: May 18, 2013, 10:31:49 PM
Wow, what an upset! Oxbow is the winner of the preakness! Only person who bet on Oxbox was John Krakatoa who wagered 2 chips and has been paid 30 chips (.03 btc) for the bet!
1891  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bet on the Preakness! on: May 18, 2013, 06:36:27 PM
I am going to be visiting some relatives this afternoon so if you have bets you want to place, please comment here or PM me. Then send your chips on SwC to "kingofsports". As long as I receive your chips and your specific bet(s) before 6:15pm EST, your bets will be official. Sorry to all and I promise all winners will be paid within 5 hours of the race (so please don't freak out if I'm not around in chat at time of race), most likely winners will be paid within 1 hour though. Good luck to all!
1892  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 06:22:30 PM
Okay thanks for your sample info. Much appreciated!
1893  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 06:04:27 PM
Fred Trader, I am very interested in your sample. If you could please post your statistics from your account or PM them to me that would be wonderful. Trying to build a sample size to see if the odds of these wins are actually -EV. I have questioned that myself. Although we all love winning against the house, I would feel horrible if this is a +EV game due to a bug or something. Thus I am finding P-values for some of the players stats. Please post or PM yours if you can.
1894  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 05:35:52 PM
Everyone in the poker was playing this so I had to give it a shot. Started with 6.25 BTC and finished with 8.25 (and cashed out). I feel good for winning but bad for taking more of Stunna's money /:
1895  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 04:50:31 PM
I saw there was another big bettor, player "37360d73b9", how'd he do Stunna? Sorry I'm quite interested after all this to see if people are losing or winning. I've kept track of the two first big winners. I'm running statistics on the numbers Wink I'm one of those people tho that this type of game would make it hard for me to stop, I'd invest 2 BTC and either walk away with 50+ BTC or 0. Probably better for both of us, I don't play haha.
1896  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bet on the Preakness! on: May 18, 2013, 04:45:12 PM
Bump!
1897  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 09:07:43 AM
If it wasn't 5am in the morning here in the US, I'd run out to my car and get my calculator to find the p-value for that sample size. It probably would be significant at a p-value of <.05 but don't know bout .01 or less without actually computing it.
1898  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 09:00:01 AM
I almost feel like your program is messed up. Over these # of bets these players should have lost or not been up as much as they were. I feel like the over 50.5 is happening more often than it should be thus creating +EV or that a pattern is noticeable enough to be profitable for the bettor. I would check your program for any bugs, I know nothing of programming but the wins so far almost seem too good to be true with a supposed -EV.
1899  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 08:34:11 AM
Another big bettor. Lets see how this one turns out.
1900  Economy / Gambling / Re: PrimeDice.com | The New Way to Roll | 1% House | Instant Betting | Free BTC on: May 18, 2013, 08:08:13 AM
True.
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!