Analysis are being done by analysts.
Analysts are often making wrong prediction.
In short, don't follow what they are saying. Don't even listen to them in general.
I don't personally listen to them because I don't want to. I don't know, but there might be a chance that many of them are being paid just to make this analysis or prediction to brainwash newbies. Analysis and prediction are just the same. They just changed the word to make it more formal, but in the end, they don't know what can happen to the market. Just don't listen to these analysts in media and I'll add those crypto Youtubers who are posting their predictions as well.
The fact is — 99% of those people aren't actual "analysts" in the first place. Most are just typical crypto influencers trying to capitalize off their followers one way or another (though mostly through pump and dumps). |
|
|
|
|
You can't know for sure if one user is a scammer or not unless you complete a transaction/trade. All you need is prevention — only trade/transact with people with high reputation, especially with higher amounts of money.
|
|
|
|
I am not know many about security or such program. how to proved the hardware is safe? 'cause I bought them from 3rd party.
Why did you purchase hardware wallet in the first place if you're not convinced that it's secure? And you shouldn't even be buying from 3rd parties in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
Define "high prices"? Because an asset that went up in price doesn't automatically mean its price is high; and inversely, an asset that went down in price doesn't necessarily mean it's cheap. Markets are far more nuanced than what you think.
|
|
|
|
|
Up to this day it still boggles my mind why of all other cryptocurrencies, PayPal decided to add freakin Litecoin and BitcoinCash. Love em or hate em and call them centralized all you want, but at least BNB, TRX, and SOL are more usefull than both LTC and BCH.
|
|
|
|
Then how to get private key with secure way?
Generate the wallet through the hardware wallet; that's one of the main reasons why you purchase a hardware wallet in the first place — so you can generate wallets in a secure manner because the private keys never leave the hardware wallet device itself. |
|
|
|
I don't get it for leak things, does vanity is not safe? there is more than safe with phrase ?
If you have a wallet with a vanity address, chances are, you created that wallet through a computer device. And unless you generated that wallet on a device that you're quite sure is air-gapped(running a Linux OS, etc), I'd deem that wallet unsecure. |
|
|
|
Exactly. That took me some time to realize, but I'm glad I'm not wasting my time on it now, and I recommend that to all others. Everyone were screaming about $100K last year, but we all know how it ended.
There will always be "analysts" that will be screaming bull, and there will always be "analysts" that will be screaming bear. And while some will be right, it's pretty much a 50-50 bet in the end. I could almost guarantee that not one of them will be able to predict things consistently in a longer time frame. |
|
|
|
|
The trick is to never listen to those so-called "analysts" because no one knows crap what's going to happen. Not only is listening to "analysts" a huge waste of time, but you're likely to get inverse results.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm personally not a fan of both silver and gold as in my current situation, as I'm very better off taking risks than going too safe. Maybe I'll buy gold sometime in the future when I'm older? But I'm not sure why I need to do that if bitcoin already exists.
|
|
|
|
Here's the historical data; feel free to make your own conclusions. Note: price patterns doesn't always follow past price patterns, so don't make conclusions solely off this information. |
|
|
|
|
Just a heads up: only import wallets that have been generated through a hardware wallet. If you generated a wallet using a computer/mobile phone, importing it to a hardware wallet defeats the purpose of a hardware wallet because the wallet's keys might've already been leaked in the first place.
|
|
|
|
scammers dont care about their reputation. its all about money
even their investors who work with the scammer dont care about reputation. its all about the money
even if all the lies are revealed. it doesnt matter to them because now they have a action packed biography fit for a book, movie deal where they still remain famous not due to reputation but due to dis-repute
fame and riches does not require good reputation. it just requires knowing how to sell yourself
and con artists know how to sell themselves no matter the story
its not about reputation. its about popularity
more people know about hitler, read books about him,. seen movies and such.
but how many know the name or the history or read or watched movies about... inventing (random choice)the solar panel..
even where its a known fact that solar panels have benefitted the world alot more then hitler.
You're right to some extent, but reputation is still relevant. Because if I were to guess, not literally 100% of people on CSW's side are malicious. At least some of them are just tricked and lied to. |
|
|
|
|
You might want to rephrase the cryptocurrency part because I couldn’t understand it one bit.
But to answer your question — chances are, food wouldn’t be literally inaccessible. It’s just that food will end up being really really expensive in a food shortage, so if you can’t afford the surplus, you’re screwed.
So the solutions are obviously:
- Work hard and smart so you can continue affording food even if food becomes expensive.
- Try growing your own food.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin at 2x its all-time high is roughly around 2.5 trillion USD. Sounds pretty reasonable in my opinion, but reaching that point ain’t going to be easy. I still expect us to be receiving regulators attacks left and right that would hinder that growth; so while it’s definitely very possible, it might take longer than usual.
|
|
|
|
Take a look at bitcoin’s price history. Seeing the historical charts should give you a good idea on what to expect. As for wallets and exchanges, you have a lot to learn. https://cryptosec.info/wallets |
|
|
|
As far as I am informed, not even the Bitcoin Core developers can retrieve Bitcoins to CW, for obvious reasons concerning the private keys. Correct me if I am wrong, but the only way it can happen it would be through a hard fork? Since it would not make sense developers had the arbitrary power to "move" coins which do not belong to them. As someone already mentioned, the community would never accept a fork which would only benefit this unsavory character.  Not 100% sure, but I think a hard fork would be required as well. Not that CSW would know the difference though, as what he wants to happen is totally irrational and impossible to achieve to begin with. If he actually ends up getting the devs to push such an update, people wouldn't run the core update and it would just end up being another Bitcoin fork. |
|
|
|
While your theory sounds reasonable, I am afraid we should not underestimate the way these kind of grifters continue their antics even after declaring themselves to be bankrupted. We are talking about irrational individuals, after all.
Assuming he ran out of money, he could still try to fool ill-informed people in order to raise more funds so can continue to fuel his life long crusade to nowhere. I am sure you have already read or heard about people who had done so.
That's definitely possible, but as time goes that he gets no good results at all, his reputation(assuming there's much left) will surely go down hence the number of potential supporters go down as well. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
