Outside of perps DEXs, there's almost no reason to use the front-ends of the likes of Pancakeswap, Curve, and Uniswap due to the fact that DEX aggregators already exist. That way, you wouldn't need to manually check each DEX on which one's is best to use for a specific trading pair.

? ? ?

It's literally the same with almost any other publicly traded stock. You're (supposedly) free to buy/sell equity at any time inside trading hours.


?

Heads up: solely turning off the internet doesn't help that much. If you're technically literate enough to decently understand bitcoin/crypto, you should be technically literate enough to learn how to create a bootable Linux OS on a flashdrive and do the wallet generation through it.

1. CoinGecko
2. Delta
3. CoinMarketCap
4. Create your own spreadsheet

That's pretty much your valid options.

The way the world is moving — internet connection globally is getting highly highly better in terms of adoption and overall stability, and will inevitably continue to move forward. Though it's technically an issue, I'd rather we focus on other things than "what if we lose internet connection?"

Bitcoin's distribution has been pretty fair — it's accessible to anyone that's heard of it and at the same time got interested in it.

If you want distribution to the point that even your grandchildren's grandchildren will have access to newly minted bitcoin, then you're pretty much describing a protocol with endless inflation. Might as well use your local currency?

MtGox aside, why can't people just make the assumption that maybe, just maybe, that OG bitcoin holders just want to move their funds? Why does it always have to be something very bombastic like a mass hacking?

I think it's pretty simple: low volume --> fewer people are interested in trading --> the market is likely to be highly more volatile.

Low trading volume can't necessarily give you better odds in knowing what direction a certain asset is likely to move towards.

The beauty of the hierarchy of Bitcointalk ranks is that it virtually doesn't matter when talking about discussion purposes. It only matters when talking about campaigns and marketplace purposes.

7 years.

- Became more literate with money/finance/investing
- Protected myself from losing money through inflation, and at the same time earned a huge multiple over my holdings
- Prevented my financial information from being exposed to centralized entities — regardless if malicious or not

Not sure if there's a single valid reason for me to change my ways. Once you go non-custodial, there's simply no going back.

To make it more simple and probably easier to understand, you can look at it this way.

Bitcoin (with a capital B) = the technology, the network
bitcoin (with a small b) = the investment, the currency, the asset, etc

It's somewhat a naming convention flaw that makes it a bit confusing for the uninformed.

It will be whenever most people(especially retail) least expects it. If most people think that the 'real' bull run will start at X date — chances are, it will happen earlier or later than that date. Markets dynamics are truly fascinating!

Sorry OP, those memes are barely even average.



Pretty weird — probably the first instance where I found out that imgur deleted some older photos.

Archive.org backup: https://web.archive.org/web/20200502164327/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5232907.msg54030831#msg54030831

1. Doesn't matter. We haven't reached close to how much demand bitcoin could get.
2. But yet we have so much hashpower.
3. These people will end up investing in some "cheap"(a.k.a. high supply) coins/tokens and end up getting totally burned.

What do you mean by "inactivated address"? Do you mean a wallet address that you don't personally own?

Also, if you didn't approve any transaction, it might be the fact that your wallet got hacked. Hopefully it's not a lot — because the chances of you getting your money back is next to zero.

Yes, because everyone makes money with altcoin pumps /s. Always remember that trading is a zero-sum game, in which investing is not. If you're confident that you can outperform other people with altcoin pumps, then go ahead. As long as you pick the correct ones in the huge ocean of alts that isn't even going to get any public acknowledgement at all.



You do you — but the fact is, it's a lot easier said than done to pick the right alts that actually ends up gaining a significant amount of price increase in a bull run. A lot of people always think that it's just as easy as "buy alts and sell at the peak of the bull market lmao". It's simply not the case. Especially if you make picks based on "price predictions".

But in the end, you do you lol. Best of luck.

If you make your conclusions based on those brain-dead price predictions on YouTube or whatever social media, then you're bound to fail in trading and/or investing. Go make your own individual conclusions or don't trade/invest at all.

Also taking note that we're talking about the total utter shitstain that is XRP.

How is trading bitcoin or trading in general "disrupt" any market at all? Trading has existed since the dawn of humanity. How is it any different today? Trading will always exist as long as there's a market.


Also, today I learned: Bitcoin has been around for several decades already/s

Nothing to see here besides just a slightly rephrased version of one of the most common bitcoin "investment advice" that has been frequently echoed through various communities since like, forever.

Binance knows that you own that certain amount of bitcoin on that certain wallet address, but you can still cut the traceability to only that point by using coinjoins/mixers. So if you use coinjoins/mixers, any transaction you do that point forward, they won't be able to trace you (assuming you do everything correctly).