|
I'm yet to get the usage of NFT (if any) lol. However, I know how NFT craze was few days back and maybe still there are some craze of it. But having any NFT based on bitcointalk doesn’t make any sense IMO. Some people here consider any other coin than bitcoin as shitcoin. Since, these NFT has nothing to bring good, I don’t think creating it is something worthy.
If you are personally up, you can create your own and give it a try to sell. Maybe you will be lucky enough as the Philippines guy who sold NFT of his selfies.
|
|
|
|
I remember that I still have some balance left here although it is enough to make few bets only.
Unfortunately, I cant load the selected game for this challenge as it stuck on loading 100%.
I tried few different browsers but still stuck, I have no idea what is wrong but I'm still trying to find the way to open the selected game F777 Fighter.
Yes it is a good chance to win some money with small funds, unless there are much more players notice about this challenge and we will get harder challenge to compete for the rewards.
It's working fine on my end. I just had try and I had a 13x win  I think it's problem from your side. I have tried through Chrome on my mobile. Which browser you are trying with. I had a few free spins there and I have tried with earn from the free spin. Have to deposit (just learnt that they have 100% deposit bonus as welcome. I haven’t yet claimed that bonus. It's good for me |
|
|
|
Is it for real that the top 5 winner's multiplier is all under 31x?
If it is real, I feel so unfortunate to miss the August challenge as it should not be a hard thing to win one of those rewards.
Regarding the 1x wager requirement for the reward, can it be played in all games or limited to crash game only?
31x seems pretty low considering I have won higher in crash games a few times though the amount I bet was pretty low (I don't gamble huge money). Their minimum bet is $0.10 which makes enough room to take this chance and win some good prizes. I will too check it out and give a try tonight. Edit- I messed the competition but after reading on their platform, I got it now. Still it seems a good chance. |
|
|
|
I think users are leaving neutral feedbacks because they prolly want to use the trust system in the 'correctest' way possible, which is for trade and commerce risk, @BitcoinMoses is a blatant troll, and definitely we don't want users coming here impersonating Satoshi,
Maybe I'm wrong but impersonating someone else is a red alert always. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick payment.
Please changed the title into CFNP. It says open.
|
|
|
|
I started well again (got the correct result in the Inter game), but at half-time a lot of other results are going against me. Let's hope for some goals from the home teams  Man, I lost 6 points in the last 10 minutes. I haven’t watched how ATM played but predicted 0-0 and it was until the last few minutes. So does in LFC game, my pick was 1-1 and LFC won at 89th minute. Bad luck in my bet too. Tottenham has broken me  |
|
|
|
I'm looking forward to watching the game. He is more familiar with the group and their style of play, which will give Barcelona a significant advantage this time.
Maybe you are right. However, Barca game is more dependant on Lewandowski. He is going to have a lot of chances definitely and we all know how capable he is. But Bayern too know who he is and how to play with him. Won't be an advantage for Bayern 1.93 for Bayern is so good of course and so does for Tottenham (2.18). I'm going to bet only on these 2 matches. Though we may have seen some good surprises tonight. Specially in FCB vs Bayern. |
|
|
|
@jackg I thought rest are some iconic threads lol, didn’t click the link either. I have seen this for the first time. Nothing important but just want to know when added and what's the procedure. From what I understand, factoids are somewhat similar to the animated advertisements shown in random sections of the forum, no? This is the first I've heard of the term, and I have no idea if I've ever seen anything like it on bitcointalk. Or perhaps the question would be; Does it still exist today?
No, factoid slots are text (link too) only advertisements. Out of 10 available ad slots, only 9 are auctioned off and the rest is set for facoid slots ad. You can see all the information here- https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adinfo |
|
|
|
|
I didn’t know that BPIP got a factoid slot in forum advertisement section. Since when they got this? And did suchmoon requested or theymos considered or both? It’s just my curiosity. Great to see this though. BPIP deserves more attention and so does LoyceV project too though BPIP has linked loyce.club in many options. Thanks to theymos for adding this.
|
|
|
|
Gamblers should make a habit of reading the ToS before trying a new platform especially if they are against the KYC rules.
Gamblers barely does unless they are a high roller/gambler. I also don't read ToS while signing up on a casino though I don't join a lot of sites frequently, even if I do, I join only for test with small balance. Having a confirmation message where user will know that KYC is forced, will increase the trustworthiness of the casino in my opinion. |
|
|
|
ইথিরিয়ামে ট্রেডিং এর লাভ: $২১.৭০
পলিগনে ট্রেডিং এর লাভ: $২.২৫
সম্প্রতি অনেকেই গ্রিড ট্রেডিং নিয়ে কথা বার্তা বলেছে। স্টকের ক্ষেত্রে গ্রিড ট্রেডিং খুবই কার্যকরী কিন্তু ক্রিপ্টোর ক্ষেত্রে প্রুভেন কিনা জানি না। আপনার এই প্রফিট কত দিনের এবং এর জন্য আপনার বিনিয়োগ কত? সেটা জানালে উপকৃত হতাম। আমার কিছু ফান্ড বেকার আছে কিন্তু নির্ভরযোগ্য রিটার্নের জন্য কোথাও বিনিয়োগ করা হচ্ছে না। |
|
|
|
A non trade option doesn't quite fit into the feedback system.
But a lot of the feedback visible by default are from NON TRADE. Don’t ask me for stats. This NON TRADE feedbacks help some scammers to scam big sum which we have already seen few times. I don't want to name anyone here but we all know how feedback system is working here. Let me be honest, I checked your sent feedbacks and they were quite satisfactory but a lot of DT members don't practice this at all. Even "trade feedback" is often used too easily: I've seen many users with positive feedback from a seller and the escrow, even though none of them risked anything to the user (but both earned from the trade).
True indeed but in current feedback system, a lot of positive feedback has nothing to do with the positive feedback. And sadly you can't get out of them. If I have to ~ them, I believe I will be left with nuetral trust score for everyone (maybe little more). |
|
|
|
I don't understand why you cannot create a page for your policies and why the need to download them or send them to your users through emails,
You got him wrong. He will have a pop up to show the policy and of course there will be a page but there will be option to download the policy page too. It doesn’t need they have to download to read them. Also, they must send the update to the email because if some of the old gamblers on their platform claim they don't know about the policy update, OldChief won't be able to prove that. You can't simply say we have updated the policies. It’s a MUST to send email when you update policy of your casinos so that gamblers know what they are going to face. |
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of feedbacks which are oriented from non-trade but because people trust him due to their forum activities etc. Would it bring any benefit if theymos allow us to choose whether it's a feedback oriented from trade or not.
We have option to select neutral, positive, negative. There will be two more options on another section which will be something like-
°Trade Feedback
°Non Trade Feedback
And the output will be visible by score with a different color.
Do you think it will be a good idea to force this when user will leave a feedback?
|
|
|
|
After all, who needs Epochtalk when she have development here on SMF?
No matter what you develop, it will still be SMF forum software which has a lot of limitations when it comes to having a modern forum software (I don't have problem using SMF but it would never be the first choice of many). So, yeah, we of course need a better forum software and that's what I think. |
|
|
|
Nice work by OP and of course, a great thanks to theymos. This is somewhat a very simple update but something necessary. Damn, first forum update I've seen in years.  Now we won't have to keep explaining to people what we mean when we say the word "OP". Nice work @PowerGlove. I think you are wrong. Now, you have to explain this to more hundreds of members. I wouldn’t be surprised if we now see a few threads daily here on what is OP and why it is there though it is self explanatory |
|
|
|
Even the best apps and movies do not get the full review mark, so a negative feedback from an untrusted account is not supposed to be harmful to you, and the more positive treads you make, and trust from other members, the more people pass that negative trust (something I'm using a service with a rating of 4.1)
In general, what is the cause for negative trust? paid Google Translation?
He is talking about the neutral feedback from TECSHARE. You can check it out. I don't think it should be an issue. Don't know why OP is so serious about that neutral feedback. hugeblack, by any chance, do you have bitcoingirl.club in your ignored list? He has already shared the about the feedback OP is talking about. |
|
|
|
is there any chance of your trust wallet getting hacked?
Very much unlikely/likely because it depends how you operate your phone. But why not a hardware wallet? It's more secure, it has the option to hold most of the familiar crypto. But you can't know for sure since the software is not open source, not fully anyway.
But they claim it as open source, I don't know though. Can you please share some more info on "not fully"? This is what they say on their website- Trust Wallet is a community driven, open-source, multi coin crypto wallet. It enables blockchain developers to build their DApps and wallets natively without having to worry about the low-level implementation details. |
|
|
|
Hey, I'm Legendary now |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
