weeeeeeeee  diamondzzz? |
|
|
|
that list its all dogshit look why would they even list rogers bcash scheme? :-D lmfao Maybe because they are called Coinbase, not Bitcoincorebase or btcbase.  i was a cornbase beta tester stop your propaganda :-D lol |
|
|
|
1) Litecoin does not have the same level of exposure to the wider market that Bitcoin does, as Bitcoin is the primary reserve currency. In the event of a market wide selloff Bitcoin would be hammered as investors rush to cash out so they can purchase items for day to day survival. Bitcoin is still the most popular gateway into a more easily spendable fiat currency, because it offers the path of least resistance.
In conclusion, I think that the greatest disservice that Litecoin's leadership and community can do themselves is self-identify as silver to Bitcoin's gold. They are signaling that Litecoin deserves a silver medal for runner up, and that Bitcoin can never be overtaken. Litecoin is effectively throwing away a very real opportunity to become 'Facebook to Bitcoin's Myspace'.
How Litecoin Is Different Than Bitcoin https://dcebrief.com/how-litecoin-is-different-than-bitcoin/What do you think? Btc only has 8x more addresses than ltc so why is btc 100x more expensive? I think based on this ltc will gain vs price of btc. This is based on old data, really old data. Litecoin can be exchanged directly into fiat on all major exchanges that support fiat: -Bitfinex -Coinbase -Bitstamp -Kraken -Bithumb -... Even Gemini will be adding it. has anyone used Gemini? it's prolly the only big outfit i'd actually feel safe using  lol hah |
|
|
|
I believe with Kovri that map will vanish. But again someone can correct me if I am wrong.
Most nodes will run in dual mode with both Kovri and a regular IP. People who want can go full stealth (network monitoring can only tell that you are using i2p, not that you are running Monero or anything else through it) will be able to run only Kovri, but there are tradeoffs and most people don't need that. Also, anyone wanting full stealth probably currently probably uses at least a VPN and/or Tor, etc. and won't be on that map now. So the map won't change much. Wouldn’t this create the “optional privacy” problem that Zcash and other coins have? If you have the option to turn on full stealth it would single out those who are, right? No, this is only a question of whether or not your ISP can tell you are running a Monero node. It doesn't affect anyone else or single out people who are hiding from their ISP. The default method will be for transaction submission to always go over I2P so that no transactions will be linkable to an IP address. I'm not familiar with the I2P "fork" issue, so I can't comment on that. I do not believe that a Monero-only I2P network/protocol would be suitable for the purpose described above, but again I don't know the details. i2p is no silver bullet :-D ha |
|
|
|
that list its all dogshit look why would they even list rogers bcash scheme? :-D lmfao |
|
|
|
So after the fork happened and Bitcoin Cash was created, as of today on CoinMarketCap it shows:
Bitcoin
capital $118,038,167,261
price $6,962.42
circulating 16,953,612
volume last 24 hrs $4,671,340,000
Bitcoin Cash
capital $11,306,077,844
price $663.06
circulating 17,051,288
volume last 24 hrs $286,801,000
On every count Bitcoin beats Bitcoin Cash so the question arises, what was the point of creating Bitcoin Cash? Apart from making very rich bitcoin holding people even more wealthier by creating Bitcoin Cash and adding to their portfolio it seems that there was no need for it. I hear about transactions fees and groups of devs so on being better at Bitcoin Cash but in all honestly what was the point?
Did all those advocating the demise of Bitcoin actually exchange all their BTC for BCH? I doubt it.
To me it seems Bitcoin was always going to come out on top of that battle so why did those whales pushing for the fork really do it and create Bitcoin Cash?
BTI is the real bitcoin :-D weeeee ===> https://freiexchange.com/market/BTI/BTC |
|
|
|
When Cryptopia? Freiexchange is cool but Cryptopia would be nice.  instant is talking to a few exchanges ~ radar: bisq is stepping up their game(mobile devices) , bti is on there already *cough wink* weeee |
|
|
|
ABC is Bcash !! are you new here? Facepalm. BitcoinABC is but one of many clients for accessing the Bitcoin Cash blockchain. its the main one right? lol ===> Amaurys' Bitcoin Cash  |
|
|
|
BitCoin has had the ability provably to do tokens since 2012/3
ABC is adding parts needed for future wormhole cash upgrades that use Jihan Wu patents in conjunction with his his AI chips he sells using a method called incrementalism. This method of slow, small incremental changes allows them to say today that it is not what they are doing while reserving the right to do it tomorrow LOL.
..the concept of smart contracts predates digital money. Further data sig verify does not lend anything to an on chain smart contracts at all if one understands the elements to a smart contract fully. DSV opens up the chain for a huge attack vector for little benefit that can be more durably achieved in many other ways for a far greater benefit..
Lead dev Amaury SECHET does not believe in the markets nor competition. Read his blog. and yet he claims to work on BitCoin lol! In reality Jihan found him after he was turned away by core devs after he tried to work for them. Jihan then hired him to create ABC and fork btc.
the split last Aug 1st was the result of a trick that Jihan Wu of Bitmain played on CSW. There would not have been any split if Jihan Wu did not backstab (gaslight) CSW. CSW made the mistake of trusting Jihan with his plan to save BitCoin from segwit and small blocks 4eva.
Jihan Wu does not care about any one coin over the other (p2p cash) as he makes more money from more coins by selling asics. He is looking to secure a platform (coin) to launch his proprietary AI based token concept however. Jihans wormhole would not work on 1MB blocks 4eva hence why he paid ABC to split the chain so he could grow his sacrificial coin to launch wormhole onto. You have been warned.
Amaury is trusted dev weeee |
|
|
|
Buffett in particular has always been more careful than others with buybacks - insisting on a low price/book value ratio before actually buying back. But he recently pulled up the minimum threshold, as I'm sure you know. Buffett's attitude is similar with regards to dividends. "Just sell some," he says. The guy's biased as an old school cobalt tape, but he is no dummy and does know about value - at least in his old-school stocks and securities realm. Buffet says buy bitcoin it's better than any derivative weeeee |
|
|
|
Today they turned on withdrawal and I received my coins, now I feel much better when I see my BTX . Glad to hear it. I hope you keep your coins until they are valued much higher then you should sell them. Totally! When this selloff ends, hopefully in a few months, I think we may see at least $5 again. That’s a nice run from here. btx to 1 satoshi you paid shills are ruining our bitcoin paradise with this pink dogshit! :\ meh |
|
|
|
CSW and bitmain aren't long term partners, but they cooperated long enough to stop core fucking Bitcoin forever more, so it was a good partnership while it lasted.
"Core" is "Bitcoin". NOBODY else in the entire cryptosphere calls it "core"! The entire world agrees upon this other than those who decided to invest in the altcoin bcash and potentially its spinoff, now they're protecting it with religious zealot fervor, even after weathering 80%+ losses. As many rational minds have stated, if Bcash wanted the least bit of respect, they would change their name to something other with "Bitcoin" in it, and stop trying to win support through confusion and non-stop attacks on bitcoin. You obviously move in other parts of the cryptosphere to me, I see neutral people referring to 'Bitcoin core' all the time, to distinguish it from 'Bitcoin cash'. Neutral people don't take sides, and the history of the split from my point of view is it's far too early to know what the eventual outcome will be, but btc and bch can both use the name 'bitcoin' because they share the same genesis block. Which version is closer to the original and therefore has the best claim to Bitcoin name is an opinion, not a fact, so for now both should use it, but add meaningful word after Bitcoin to help distinguish them. Only zealots on one side or other would disagree, probably to stifle honest discussion. What would really help distinguish Bcash is if they removed the word "bitcoin" from their name. That sure would clear up a great deal of confusion. BTW, "neutral" people don't refer to it as "Bitcoin Core" either. It's pretty obvious that if BCH was indeed "the real bitcoin," it would have proven itself as such by now. Instead its just managed to sink in price in terms of BTC, and now its going to further fracture its user base. I'm quite honestly not invested in either one, I just think Bcash's approach to marketing itself has been extremely dishonest. cashcoin sounds good to me .. oh wait there is already a cashcoin!  lol |
|
|
|
…So this thread is only there to advertise shitty pools and exchanges no one has ever heard of? No discussion at all, no acknowledgement of relevant questions?
this shitcoin is a bittrex insider trading scam..move along :\ meh |
|
|
|
ABC is forcing the fork with their versioning item they added. So if you are running ABC now then it will not work when the newer version comes out causing people to need to upgrade to the new software with ctor and all the other untested features no one asked for.
I think ABC has proven themselves to not be professional software devs with this behaviours
ABC is Bcash !! are you new here? |
|
|
|
No. It would be best for him and for BTC and BCH that he does now verify. I have clearly explained why that is so. He has cited himself to be Satoshi - yet has provided no hard verifiable proof - to date. I'm well aware of the safe guards placed on Satoshi's account by this forum. I do hope you realize that I've been here for sometime ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188I agree that it would be best for him. However, it would then put him in an exalted position, like Vitalik Buterin. I really don't think BCH or BTC needs that. I prefer not knowing exactly who satoshi was. Also, if proof is ever provided, I hope it doesn't come in the form of a rage quit and dumping on our heads. Good. Realize that he has already put himself into this exalted position (Satoshi or not), by actually claiming to be Satoshi. I to believe that Satoshi group is/was best preserved by myth and legend alone. This was Mythopoeia. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythopoeiaI don't imagine the real Satoshi would 'rage quit' in this regard. With a high probability the main drivers of original Bitcoin (BTC) are now unfortunately no longer with us (deceased).  Read the thoughts of some cypherpunks, these are the peers that Satoshi originally announced Bitcoin to. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk- https://moxie.org/stories/money-machine/ <<<< really good read this one! Peace. that's impossible I AM PETER TODD :-D LOL |
|
|
|
Bloomberg predicts crypto prices 2019 onward.  -Stupid source. -Cardano is here to replace Ethereum... completely. Wait and see how that happens within just 2 years. -Even if Cardano somehow fails to do that, then there's no way that Ethereum will remain that low. There'll ALWAYS be one good smart-contract platform available with a very high value. Rankings IMO (by marketcap): No 1. Bitcoin No 2. Ethereum/Cardano (smart-contract) (ONLY ONE OF THESE WILL EVENTUALLY BE AT THIS RANK) No 3. Monero/ZCash (privacy) (ONLY ONE OF THESE WILL EVENTUALLY BE AT THIS RANK) No 4. Shitcoin No 5. Shitcoin . . . . No 10000. Shitcoin BTC:BTI pumping towards 20K weeeeee |
|
|
|
There is something to be fixed in the Monero GUI-wallet. At least in the Linux version.
Only way to open the GUI is to type ./start-gui.sh in command line. Too complicated for many people. There must be an icon to click.
When the GUI is shut down, the flag and language selection box still remains open. It must be shut down from the ubuntu desktop launch menu by right clicking the Monero logo. Too complicated for many people. The GUI must be able to shut down by just one click.
When the GUI is shut down on full screen mode, the flag and language box which still remains open, is on full screen mode too, so the ubuntu desktop launch menu and the Monero logo in it, is not reachable. So it cannot be right clicked and shut down. Only way is to open the wallet again, switch of the full screen mode, shut down the wallet and right click the Monero logo in the launch menu. Too complicated.
Pease fix these.
i'n my opinion this is a joke? no gui? bwaaahahaha |
|
|
|
Is it still minable?
yes plus there is bounties available ~ join BTI slack/telegram |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
