There you go again. All you do is simply talk.

Quantum physicists don't agree with me in what way? Are you one of the quantum physicists that dooesn't agree with me? How do you know that they don't agree with me; are you able to even understand what I and they are talking about so that you know this? I don't know if I can prove any quantum physicists wrong; do you mean in the best move to make in the middle of a checkers game that I am playing with one of them?

You are so mixed up that you don't even know what you are talking about. I mean, this thread is about evolution being a hoax (or not). How are you trying to incorporate quantum physicists into evolution or evolution theory?

You sound kinda frustrated. Do you even read more than every fifth word of a post? Or don't you have enough imagination to even see that there are more ideas in what's being posted than the simple things you spout? How do you even live?

But that, alone, is not adaptation. And it is not evolution theory evolution. ETE includes random beneficial mutations, which contradicts C&E, and which have never been found in such a way that they fit ETE. In fact, the probability that suggests beneficial mutations, suggests so many more detrimental mutations, and so many like-begets-like life operations (immune systems destroying all mutations), that any beneficial mutations would be destroyed long before they could be carried on.

Forget it. ETE simply can't and doesn't happen. Evolution is a hoax.

Cops are expected to not be bad, even once. But they are bad in multitudes of ways.

ISIS is expected to be bad according to our definition of bad. When they are bad in that way (our definition of bad), they are being good according to the things that they and their people expect from them. And, ISIS is expected to be good towards their own... good according to our definition of good, which is also good according to their friends and neighbors. So, they are good.

Cops have some good and some bad according to their people.

ISIS has good and barely any bad according to their people.

Since there are a lot more cops, and since cops are treacherous at times, cops are way worse than ISIS, who honestly does what they were designed to do.

Any considerations have opposing considerations. All you are doing is showing that no evolution has ever been proven.

Evolution is a hoax.

You are so funny - lol!  

You won't accept what I tell you, even when I show you the evidence, and then you want me - who you don't trust - to do your research for you!

And then you get upset with me when you can't show facts against ...

ISIS is nothing compared to U.S. cops.   

  

The basic fact of reality regarding evolution is, the facts of existence fit non-evolution type of adaptation and like-begets-like far better than they fit evolution. Therefore, there is no example of evolution that is factually known to be such.

In addition, there are loads of reasons why evolution is absolutely impossible. Google "evolution is impossible" to see them. The supposed rebuttals against them are incomplete, or circular references, or fail in some other way, and are therefore not rebuttals.

Oh my, lol. I present you with one little site, and that's all you can focus on. You truly are becoming humorous. Seems that you can't even begin to see that all the criminality of cops covers far, far more than you could ever examine. That in itself is evidence that cops are worse than ISIS.

Another point that shows that cops are worse than ISIS is the fact that ISIS does its dastardly deeds right out in the open, but the cops hide theirs as much as they can. The reports and videos in the site I provided, are the tip of the iceberg. If cops did their bad stuff right out in the open, the people would have gotten rid of them long ago, because then everybody could see how crooked they are. At least ISIS is honest.

You are missing a whole lot about cops, especially in America.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/category/cop-watch/police-brutality-cop-watch/

 

Never heard of fake news? Like in fake statistics? Or fake statistic applications?

Well, thank you for honoring me, but personally I don't believe you have enough information to tell that I know better than most scientific theories... at any point.

I wouldn't accept any Nobel prizes.

The number of scientific articles I have to write will probably increase, since I don't intend writing any. But that could always change.

Thank you for all the friendly chitchat from the past in this thread, now that you have finally agreed that...

Evolution is a hoax.

The fact that C&E matches programming, shows us that there is a programmer, even if we have no idea who or what it is. I mean, if you find an old computer in the dump, and you take it home and fire it up, this doesn't mean that you know who the programmer is/was. But the programs might still work perfectly, showing that there was a programmer.

That's exactly why evolution theory evolution is not real. The theory doesn't take into consideration any programmer, but C&E in everything shows that there is a programmer.

Evolution is a hoax.

I bet you made those videos.

Do some of them show ISIS people indicting each other?

You still don't have any evidence.

You whined about someone not producing a link for the German policy of giving govt employees different vaccines than they gave to private citizens.

In two seconds I found a link which was perfectly satisfactory to show they yes, sure enough this DID happen.  Ironically, not long ago you were carping that someone could have found a certain link with a quick web search.

Now you are bitching that I didn't take enough time to find a link and it is, I guess, a lie because I found it so quickly.

Looser.

The indictment of the people seen through Internet searches on "police brutality" shows that the true indictment is way higher than any legal indictment. The fact that only 10% of crimes are ever brought out into the open shows that cops get away with a ton of things that they shouldn't do, and that should be brought into the open so we can all see what criminals they are. And it's worse with cops, because the people are afraid of cops, and don't bring out the accusations that they would if they had no fear.

Turn a blind eye to the criminality of cops, and you become just as bad as they are.

ISIS, on the other hand, is expected to do just like they do. Indeed, their people consider that they are good for doing what they do. Even proponents and supporters of ISIS in the U.S. Government like what they do, even if you and most of the rest of the world don't.

Besides, there are probably less than 1000 ISIS members left. And there are probably less than 10,000 ISIS supporters (outside of the members of the U.S. Government who set ISIS in place). So, even if you took the worst activities of these ISIS people and their supporters, and stood them side-by-side the bad stuff the hundreds of thousands of cops do, the literal numbers of bad incidents, themselves, would show that Cops are way worse than ISIS.

Within their areas of operation...

ISIS is nothing compared to U.S. cops.

Look again.  Maybe you should lay off of the 'flu shots' and statins?


'Sheeple' will always fall for the psy-ops like 'flu pandemic', 'ebola' and 'zika'.  The people engineering this stuff are legitimately concerned about the failure of the human species now that there are 'no predators to thin the herd.'  (Yes, those who wrote the screenplay of Idiocracy were quit familiar with the writings of those who are influential among today's powers that be...and this is reflected in the stunning level of prescience that the film displayed.)  Seems almost like big pharma is taking over the role of the predators.  Namely, killing off the weak and [intellectually] lame, and vaccines seem like one of the tools in their toolkit.

The release of Idiocracy as described by Mike Judge was quite interesting.  Clearly there was an attempt to bury it even if it cost money.  Hmmm.

Time is an enemy of mine and I think they tried to sugar-coat things a little in the article, but I still used the information.  When I can make a point (which I did) by using source material which is antagonistic to my point of view, I'll often do so.

How do you square the idea that vaccines are perfectly safe with no downsides against a situation where a government gives it's government paid minions a more expensive vaccine because it has 'fewer side effects.'   Hmmm?

Anyway, the H1N1 thing was mostly a giant scam.  It did, however, have the useful effect of getting (some minority of) people asking questions about the corp/gov medical complex because the vaccine did so much damage.  As with all of these scams the so-called H1N1 was no big deal anyway.  At least for people who stayed away from vaccines and thus had functional immune systems.  Same with the last bit 'pandemic flu' they tried to scare us with.  Dog flu?  Swine flu?  I don't even remember because it was such a nothingburger.

Generally speaking a pleb dying of infections disease does the medical/industrial complex no good (aside from the benefit of having fewer 'human viruses' infecting 'mother Gaia' for the fruitcakes who are into that religion.)  The drugs are are old-school and out of patent, and death usually comes fairly quickly.  Cancer, OTOH, is a true gift from God.  (Their god who is know to Christians by a different name.)  They can string people along for years selling them 'newly developed' pills for $10,000 a pop.  And with Obamacare they can use my money to pay big pharma the $10,000 per.

What does your knowing or not knowing have to do with what exists? The forces on the rolling of the dice through the hand, and from outside sources like gravity, and possibly the flow of the air, are complex beyond imagination. Knowing them or not knowing them doesn't eliminate their existence.

Evolution is a hoax.

Here's an interesting vid about organic mercury compounds.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ7M01jV058

The guy has a funny presentation style, but his information is quite good and accurate even if it may sound to some people like jargon.  Some of his info was new to me.

The multi-dose flu vaccine which they use to shoot up the plebs in the local grocery store's pharmacy continues to be preserved with organic mercury compounds similar to that discussed in this vid.  Thankfully these were finally removed (mostly) from most of the single-dose vaccines which pleb class people are supposed to be shooting their kids up with.  Especially in certain 'progressive' states like California.

The vid makes mention several times of lipids (aka 'fats'.)  These are highly important for many body functions and especially in cell membranes.  Putting detergents in vaccines (the Polysorbate-80 mentioned in the ingredients list posted above) to be shot directly into the blood stream is actually quite interesting.

Also cholesterol is a form of lipid and much of the neural tissue is made of it.  It is interesting that the definitions for 'healthy levels' of cholesterol keep being dropped down down down until almost everyone 'should' be taking statin drugs to help eat up the cholesterol.  Various trial balloons have even been floated about putting statin drugs into the water supplies.  These drugs basically 'eat your brain' in an almost literal sense.  So it seems to me.