The Bitcoin education is important to children but at the right age say above 10 years when they are able to understand what it actually is like the money system or how we have banks in our system.But at the young age they should live freely without any burden of learning enjoying their life but we should feed them some basic stuff through intersting manner like stories and make them aware in full when they are ready.
Screw Bitcoin. Heavily prioritize investing and finance in general. Knowing Bitcoin wouldn't matter at all if the kid doesn't even know how to save money or to be smart with finances in general.
|
|
|
Teaching children about finance is great, but you don't need to shove Bitcoin down their throats — especially knowing that chances are, they barely even understand what money is and how money works. Sometimes you just need to let the youth enjoy their childhood, then educate them when they're ready.
|
|
|
There's really no one strategy that will work on every asset. While that could work on short to mid-term trades, if you're long-term bullish on a certain asset, why do you necessarily need to sell at a 85-90% increase; especially in bull markets? That's one way to get left in the sidelines.
|
|
|
No one knows what the best time would be. Because if we knew, we'd all be rich already. Obviously markets don't work that way; and if everyone had a price target of selling and the price target is close to each other, bitcoin would immediately crash from that pricepoint.
|
|
|
Absolutely, this might be just some market manipulations done by big whales. But what I can see is that currently Bitcoins are at 22,900$. It has fell down in price if we compare to last week. But this doesn’t mean that Bitcoins will completely collapse now. As we know before any big rise, there is a small setback or fall. So this might be the same. Moreover if we see the OP’s doubt, then let me make clear that, the price majorly increases when the demand of the coin increases. So more demand will ultimately lead the price to rise up. So anything is possible to be honest.
Doesn't really matter much regardless if the price movement was caused by whales, or actual market interest. You still can't make market decisions based off that move alone.
|
|
|
Agree. It’s not worth to risk the money. Do we have a lot more horror story of guy get screwed in stock market? Remember retail on the GME? Also the billionaire one from Tesla? It seem baffling to me, well, I can imagine all their loss would contribute into the rich getting richer, notably the banker. Many may not get to know but 530, 2015 is remembered to be the day shanghai stock exchange wipe out a lot of hard earned money from many traders. Whether it’s IPO or it is blue chip, they’re not good to risk on.
I mean, profit from stock markets have never been guaranteed to start with. There will always be people that will be making bad/trades investments, just as how there will always be people that will make bad life decisions. What's the problem here?
|
|
|
Why are you so certain that we will continue to grind up just because we had a jump from 20k to 24k? A 20% increase in price of bitcoin or literally any asset at all doesn't guarantee anything.
|
|
|
The lies about "If invested $1000 during IPO for MSFT you would have made $1.6m"
You probably misunderstood what they're trying to say with this. Do you really expect every single person to be investing in a company in the first place? Or better yet, a company that's actually just in it's early stages of growth? It's more of a fun fact about how taking risks can potentially pay out really well. Not necessarily the fact that everyone should be risking their money into IPOs lmao.
|
|
|
Just to add more info: good alternatives to the likes of LastPass would be either Bitwarden or KeePass; with both being open-source and free. https://bitwarden.com/https://keepass.info/Still, don't store your wallet's backups on such software unless you 100% know what you're doing; which like 95% of people don't.
|
|
|
You already know the potential punishments, so why not just reference anyway? It's not like people are requiring you to write a 500-word essay about the source. You're literally just going to copy-paste a link.
|
|
|
Or better yet, have multiple income streams. Just so you have a backup if you get fired from your job or your main income goes bust.
|
|
|
So.. where would we get the bitcoin to that's going to be distributed? Unless you're willing to fund this giveaway yourself, because obviously bitcoin just doesn't appear out of thin air — it's only done through mining.
|
|
|
Name a single industry that has the worst rate of delivered promises than the cryptocurrency industry lmao. At this point it should be expected by default that teams will heavily under deliver.
And worse, this case doesn't even look like under-deliverance. It seems to be a typical rug pull.
|
|
|
What you can benefit from Bitcointalk is almost the same things that you can benefit on other social platforms like Facebook/Twitter/etc. Bitcointalk is just older generation, with it having the classic internet forum style.
|
|
|
I'm not sure that's true. If bitcoin was this magical panacea for money launderers, as the government and banks like to portray it as, then why isn't the vast majority of global money laundering already using it? There is plenty of volume and plenty of off ramps to support billions or even trillions of dollars in money laundering. The bottom line is that cash remains, by far, the chosen method of money launderers.
Yes, with more crypto usage there will be more money laundering, but I'm not convinced it will "skyrocket".
My assumption is just that once on/off ramps aren't necessary(when bitcoin/crypto gets actual heavy adoption in terms of day-to-day payments/transactions), laundering will rise/skyrocket simply due to the fact that they wouldn't need to touch KYC'd platforms. Of course I do agree that cash is still the best for laundering.
|
|
|
Lol you're likely to not get 100% loss on bitcoin unless you buy on leverage, or if you get hacked or scammed. Bitcoin can crash 50% or more, but a 100% loss? That's too unlikely that you might as well say it's impossible.
|
|
|
|