What about project translations?
|
|
|
I kind of read that this token has some limitations on the transfer, what does it mean?
What kind of restrictions are you talking about? Well, I read that there are some restrictions on the transfer of tokens. It seems to be relevant for US residents, but I do not quite understand what exactly this means Have you read this on the website? No, I think I read about it in the whitepaper and did not quite understand what it meant.
|
|
|
I kind of read that this token has some limitations on the transfer, what does it mean?
What kind of restrictions are you talking about? Well, I read that there are some restrictions on the transfer of tokens. It seems to be relevant for US residents, but I do not quite understand what exactly this means
|
|
|
I kind of read that this token has some limitations on the transfer, what does it mean?
|
|
|
Will this token be supported by crypto-exchange exchanges?
You mean will he bargain on the exchanges? Well yes That's exactly what I meant I think yes. At least they are negotiating with the EtherDelta exchange at the moment
|
|
|
Will this token be supported by crypto-exchange exchanges?
You mean will he bargain on the exchanges?
|
|
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential! Well, suppose the risk reduction is possible, if you invest a much smaller amount. But how can this positively influence profit? C'mon... I do not see anything fundamentally new in terms of portfolio investment in the pulsar scheme! Also, more projects do not provide any guarantees for the success of projects. Easily 50% of the selected projects can fail. Investing is always a risk! No one will give you a guarantee of success of the project! The main purpose of various investment approaches is to minimize risks as much as possible. The devs decided that their approach is effective in this regard. I believe them, because the team is very experienced and knows what it does!
|
|
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question? Wel... It's not quite like a "new" strategy. They simply reduced the amount of investment at the initial stage of the project, and also increased the number of companies. Is it possible to call this a new strategy? So, I think this is the principle of a quantitative portfolio approach, is not it? This reduces risks, and increases the profit potential!
|
|
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions? Ok, now I'll try to explain The approach in the "old" investment model is an early $ 15 million investment per 1 transaction. Total portfolio size: 10-15 companies. Their model works on this principle: Investments in $ 100,000 - 2 million for 1 transaction Total portfolio size: 25+ companies. So what's the fundamental difference? I do not quite understand the problem. What exactly is causing you a question?
|
|
|
The project is curious, but I did not understand what is different about the Pulsar investment model, from the "old" model. They claim that their model is more effective, but why?
LOL And what exactly do you not understand in their investment model? What causes questions?
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean? Ok, now I'll explain. I wrote an article of good quality and I think where to put it. If I put my article on a more popular portal, then can I get a bigger reward? Hmm... Have you seen information about this in the description and rules of the campaign bounty? Specifically about this situation, I did not find any information If there was not any information on this, then it does not matter, I suppose! Why? It's not right! LOL Why do you think so? The more popular the portal, where I laid out my article - the more interested investors in the project, is not it? You're confusing your tasks a little! If you started writing an article, then you get paid for it, no matter where you put it, though you will send it to the developers, the main thing is the material you will write in the article! Hmm... It makes sense. And what if I am the owner of a large information portal and I want to promote this product? Is there a specific bounty program for me? I'm definitely not sure if you need to check the conditions or contact the developers on this issue!
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean? Ok, now I'll explain. I wrote an article of good quality and I think where to put it. If I put my article on a more popular portal, then can I get a bigger reward? Hmm... Have you seen information about this in the description and rules of the campaign bounty? Specifically about this situation, I did not find any information If there was not any information on this, then it does not matter, I suppose! Why? It's not right! LOL Why do you think so? The more popular the portal, where I laid out my article - the more interested investors in the project, is not it? You're confusing your tasks a little! If you started writing an article, then you get paid for it, no matter where you put it, though you will send it to the developers, the main thing is the material you will write in the article!
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean? Ok, now I'll explain. I wrote an article of good quality and I think where to put it. If I put my article on a more popular portal, then can I get a bigger reward? Hmm... Have you seen information about this in the description and rules of the campaign bounty? Specifically about this situation, I did not find any information If there was not any information on this, then it does not matter, I suppose! Why? It's not right! LOL Why do you think so?
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean? Ok, now I'll explain. I wrote an article of good quality and I think where to put it. If I put my article on a more popular portal, then can I get a bigger reward? Hmm... Have you seen information about this in the description and rules of the campaign bounty? Specifically about this situation, I did not find any information If there was not any information on this, then it does not matter, I suppose!
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean? Ok, now I'll explain. I wrote an article of good quality and I think where to put it. If I put my article on a more popular portal, then can I get a bigger reward? Hmm... Have you seen information about this in the description and rules of the campaign bounty?
|
|
|
About Blogging campaign. Does it make sense where my article will be posted?
What exactly do you mean?
|
|
|
They say that they refused pre-ICO and other things. But nevertheless the stage of tokensale is divided into several stages. What is the difference?
I think there is no difference Well, in fact, there is a difference! The developers say that they are confident in their project and invest enough of their own money in it. That's why they refused pre-ICO LOL It sounds very stupid. Why, then, was it necessary to break the stage of selling the tokens into 5 stages? Each stage gives a certain bonus. This attracts users to purchase tokens. LOL But is not the pre-sale phase working on the same principle? Actually, no. The developers explain their choice by the fact that they are not going to spend the money collected at the pre-sale stage for various stages of ICO. They want to invest the whole amount in real things. Start implementing your business plan. What is the minimum amount that developers are counting on?
|
|
|
They say that they refused pre-ICO and other things. But nevertheless the stage of tokensale is divided into several stages. What is the difference?
I think there is no difference Well, in fact, there is a difference! The developers say that they are confident in their project and invest enough of their own money in it. That's why they refused pre-ICO LOL It sounds very stupid. Why, then, was it necessary to break the stage of selling the tokens into 5 stages? Each stage gives a certain bonus. This attracts users to purchase tokens. LOL But is not the pre-sale phase working on the same principle?
|
|
|
They say that they refused pre-ICO and other things. But nevertheless the stage of tokensale is divided into several stages. What is the difference?
I think there is no difference
|
|
|
They write in the WP that the country is experiencing a deficit of dairy products, but is this so? I did not notice any deficit, the stores are full of dairy products. and I did not hear any news about it. Perhaps they specially inflate the problem from scratch to justify their project?
This is a Russian project, Russia is a very large country, where do you know for sure what's going on in other regions and regions? if your area does not have a deficit of dairy products, this does not mean that it does not have the other. They write about the whole country, if it were really so, then there would be news, probably. But I have not heard anything about it. Do you do business in agriculture? If not, then I think you just do not know many things. I believe in this project, unlike many it carries a real benefit!
|
|
|
|