That's what we're here for

I don't think there are any working accelerators left for low-fee transactions.

This should work:
Can you use "CPFP" (Child Pays for Parent)? Use the funds from one of the 2 receiving transactions, make a new transaction with the full balance to one of your own addresses, and set 0.00025BTC as fee. That should be enough to cover the fee from the current transaction and the new transaction, and a miner should confirm both transactions at once.

I know What I meant is: if any new tags are placed because of this topic, I'll add one too.

Thanks! It still feels 90% incomplete though.

I've postponed creating this thread for quite a few months now, because the evidence is scattered over several long topics. There's literally too much posted to go through in a timely manner.
Therefore, I welcome adding more information, but please provide quotes with links to support all claims.

Accounts involved
BetKing.io (Trust: !!!:  +2 / =2 / -8) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
BetKing Support (Trust: !!!:  +0 / =0 / -7) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PocketRocketsCasino (Trust: !!!:  +2 / =1 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
dean nolan (Trust: !!!:  +0 / =0 / -6) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Update: Dean created another account:
Betking Manager

Flags against these accounts

Topics involved
BetKing.io - ICO - $4.7 million raised, last week to take part!
[ANN][ICO][BKB] BetKing Bankroll Token - Tokens distributed to your account (archived)
BetKing.io - Invest commission lowered to 10%! (archived)
(incomplete list)

Scam accusation
I'll stick to the main thing: BetKing.io broke it's ICO promise. The BKB-token was supposed to be tied to a dollar value, with quarterly buybacks.
I'm not sure when exactly the buybacks stopped (and my Withdrawal History was removed). I don't think it was officially announced on Bitcointalk, so my estimate is the last buyback happened around a year ago.
I kept BKB tokens as a hedge against Bitcoin price drops, organized by the very trustworthy guy who previously returned 6000 BTC to investors. When Bitcoin was rising, BetKing was gladly buying back tokens each quarter at lower and lower Bitcoin prices.

BetKing's defense is stating that they spent 600 BTC buying back tokens, which I can't verify but it's irrelevant for my case anyway. I have nothing to do with other people's buy backs.
What I can verify though, is that a large amount of ICO money wasn't returned to token holders:

I have 7278 BKB left, which (at $0.099 per BKB) was supposed to be worth just over $700. The last time BKB was traded for Bitcoin on betking.io's own exchange, it would have been worth around $2 in total.
Currently, the only option is to exchange 1 BKB for 20 BKT. BetKing claims hourly buy backs, but that's only with a part of the profit, at the rate on their own exchange. It doesn't do justice to the dollar value it was supposed to have.

https://betking.io/exchange doesn't have any buy orders at BTC-BKT. There are buy orders at LTC-BKT, with the last price being 0.000001 LTC per BKT.
That means my 7278 BKB are worth 145563 BKT which is worth 0.145 LTC which equals $8.21. That's close to a 99% drop from the fixed pegged in dollar price BetKing guaranteed at it's ICO.
I should have been able to sell back 10% quarterly at a rate pegged in dollar, meaning around $70 for the first quarter, $63 the next quarter and so on.

There's much more
There was also controversy over canceling the bounty program (which was understandable), new games that were promised but never created, ICO money that wasn't used as bankroll as promised, a "may or may not have happened" 25 BTC donation to charity, a wagering contest that wasn't paid, software piracy instead of buying a 2 BTC licence, removing all affiliates, and probably much more. I welcome links here to add those to the list.
On top of all this, they're now trying another ICO with a 10 times larger market cap.
In the recent BetKing EOS Airdrop, they airdropped 3 times more tokens to EOS-holders than they sold in the entire first ICO (which was worth close to $6.5M at the time). BKB went from "being worth the entire company" to "being worth only a fraction of the company".

The guaranteed BKB buy backs were supposed to lead to scarcity, and thus an increase in price. Instead, BetKing is now strongly diluting the tokens by issuing new tokens and making a token swap the only option.

Tags
The accounts involved have red tags already, but not yet from me. I want opinions first, and if any DT decides to tag them based on this topic, I'll tag them too.

Why would it be okay to screw over 10-20% of token holders? If it's such a small amount, why didn't you continue the buy backs?

It's pretty easy to understand that I can only exchange my BKB tokens for something that's worth only 1%.

Negative? I didn't change the numbers at all

There's one thing I've always thought to be a good joke for casino roll results: switch red and green! That could work here too. My Trust for example would be: 87: -0 / +14

---

---

And make them Mods

Back in January:
Of course, there are still 11 days left, so she can still be totally right (isn't she always?)! But just in case, I'll use her number again: 7800 for Q2 too
In an ideal scenario, it shoots up to 7800 in 11 days, goes sideways for 3 months, and then goes full moon towards my other prediction which turns out to be even higher than I remembered:

Seriously though: good luck, and thanks for hosting this micgoossens!

If DdmrDdmr has enough time, he'll beat me to it. He's earned more than twice as much Merit per post, and he can easily go up faster than I can (see graph).

Or more likely: at some point a new user like nullius joins, and quickly earns more Merit than any other user did.

I'd say give them some time to process the KYC:

The only thing you can do at this moment, is to create your own Trust list. If enough users do that, DT will have less power over them.
However, I think the majority is fine with the current trust system, and you too haven't create your own list yet. You've been included and excluded by many users, including Admin:

In short: choose who's judgement you trust and create your own Trust list

Assuming this is correct, your funds are safe. Just keep the seed!

If you don't want to use anything other than Tails, waiting for a newer version seems to be the easiest right now. You can of course export your private keys and switch to a different wallet, but I don't recommend doing that if you're not absolutely sure what you're doing.

Install the latest version of Electrum from the official website (and nowhere else!), import your seed, and your funds should show up again.

He has had 2 red tags from Mitchell and BadBear (both former staff) since 2015. I don't think he deserves +100, but I also don't think he deserves -246.
Somewhere in between fits the case better.

This user got -256 after scamming more than 16 Bitcoin. There it's appropriate.
This user got just -4 after scamming 7.37 Bitcoin.
The number of tags seems to depend on how "high profile" a user is.

Did you save the 12 word seed phrase somewhere? You need either the wallet file, or the seed phrase. Without it, you can't recover Bitcoins.

This I agree with. If you would have stopped here instead of repeating the same thing you always post anywhere, I would have merited your post as being worth reading. Now I'm quoting just the relevant part.

My account LoyceMobile is on DdmrDdmr's Rank pipeline. It lacks Merit for Full Member, because I don't type much on my phone. It got me thinking: I kinda want to make it rank up, would it be considered Merit begging if I use it to post my next big post?

Those are the Newbies I send Merit to when I see them. Real users who aren't here to spam the forum shouldn't be restricted by the Merit system.

Good catch! There are more, this is my full list:
    1.coorphirenent1982
     2.lispiraraf1975
     3.alovvase1989
     4.riesolrarich1980
     5.ocolsoton1975
     6.dualivotna1987
     7.zercuudeset1974
     8.vemasenvi1971
     9.valpubajor1977
    10.bladafeschus1970
    11.xelrekeja1978
    12.chielyndlolop1979
    13.bubbriworri1981
    14.tentlambtelscomp1980
    15.procunahap1977

I'll report them all to be nuked. Nuked!

You're right, but if someone lends out money without doing the slightest background check, that's on them. I stand by my neutral feedback from 5 days ago:
He repaid, that's something. He has plenty of warnings, that should be enough to warn others in the future.

Loyce

I think you're confusing wallets with exchanges.
A wallet gives you and only you full access to your private keys and thus funds, and (depending on the wallet) lets you set the fee.
An exchange doesn't give you access to private keys, and you'll have to jump through whatever hoops they come up with.

In short, download and install Electrum (make sure you use the real site, there are many fake sites trying to steal your funds), and set custom fees.
However, know that low fees could mean it takes a long time to confirm your transaction, and collecting small amounts of Bitcoin can lead to higher fees when you want to spend it. See Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!