penso sia partito il rintracciamento, in 10 min passati da 13.8k a sfondare un sell di 200btc ( su bitstamp, forse fake(?) ) a 12k
Ha fatto un tonfo in 10s che neanche DAO {ot} Benvenuto nella board italiana, è strano trovare un nuovo legendary in questa sezione. {/ot} |
|
|
|
«Proprio nella settimana che sembra poter cambiare per sempre il mondo delle criptovalute, con la presentazione da più parti ritenuta ormai imminente di Libra (la moneta virtuale di Facebook), ecco rifarsi vivo Bitcoin. Il suo valore è tornato a superare la soglia dei 9.000 dollari dopo oltre un anno, più precisamente dal maggio 2018. Come sempre è difficile capire quali siano le ragioni ad aver innescato il rialzo.» https://www.punto-informatico.it/bitcoin-valore-sopra-9000-dollari/ |
|
|
|
«Paul Solotshi Calder Le Roux, a 46-year old criminal mastermind, is currently serving time behind bars and may not be out anytime soon. He is a known creator of software E4M and TrueCrypt (the cryptography encryption software Satoshi Nakamoto supposedly used to lock up his 1 million BTC).» https://www.coinspeaker.com/solotoshi-satoshi-conspiracy/ |
|
|
|
«L’amministratore della Berkshire Hathaway, una delle principali società mondiali di investimento, attiva in diversi settori dalle ferrovie al petrolio e, più recentemente, entrata in Amazon, ha comparato BTC ad un gettone per il gioco d’azzardo con cui sono state realizzate molte frodi: “Si tratta di un prodotto per il gioco d’azzardo e ci sono state molte truffe collegate. Ci sono state sparizioni dei token e perdite molto consistenti. Bitcoin non ha prodotto nulla”» https://cryptonomist.ch/it/2019/05/06/warren-buffett-bitcoin-valore/ |
|
|
|
|
Bastardi a me non esce il mio bel badge verde ahahha
Dovevo per forza mettere qualcosa nei field del kyc?
|
|
|
|
Articolo del 3 marzo, Wired - «La scorsa settimana in Venezuela, secondo Coindance, un sito che monitora le transazioni in criptovalute, gli scambi tra bitcoin e bolivar venezuelani hanno superato i 6 milioni di euro. Una cifra che da sé dice poco o nulla, ma a dire molto è il confronto col passato. A ottobre del 2018 i bolivar scambiati in criptovalute erano meno della metà. Poi a gennaio il salto: da una settimana all’altra gli scambi hanno toccato quota 1.700 bitcoin, segno secondo gli analisti che la madre di tutte le criptovalute è entrata prepotentemente nell’economica venezuelana. Per salvarla, dice qualcuno, visto la crisi scoppiata tra il governo del presidente Nicolas Maduro e Juan Guaidò, alla guida dell’assemblea parlamentare, che si è autoproclamato presidente ad interim lo scorso 23 gennaio» https://www.wired.it/economia/finanza/2019/03/04/bitcoin-venezuela-petrolio/ |
|
|
|
|
Se qualcuno ha qualche post da segnalare ho a disposizione diversi merit dalla source, purtroppo vedo che nella sezione italiana c'è stata una diminuzione di attività e ho difficoltà a reperire post meritevoli
|
|
|
|
Prima di tutto in nessun contratto ENEL la corrente la paghi 7 centesimi, di media è superiore ai 20 centesimi. Il calcolo non include l'aumento di difficoltà e tiene conto del prezzo costante. |
|
|
|
Avevo letto su reddit che i presunti fondi del cold wallet si sono effettivamente mossi, se ciò fosse vero sarebbe un ennesima brutta pubblicità per le crypto.
Se fosse davvero così (e dovremmo sapere quali sono questi address) gia mi immagino una mega class action |
|
|
|
Aggiunte le modifiche: - Non puoi fare più di 5 feedback ad un utente.
- Il punteggio totale inviato è limitato a 3 volte la tua activity, ma minimo 1
- La lunghezza del commento del feedback è limitata a 600 caratteri ma ogni nuova linea conta 120 caratteri.
Dare Merit a coinlocket$ per l'aggiornamento |
|
|
|
Bentornato ti auguro una buona permanenza, la situazione è cambiata da quando te ne sei andato, ti consiglio di dare un'occhiata ai thread principali |
|
|
|
Scusate OT. Solo un secondo per il check della firma di Micio. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nbC0hKWCjlUEpico! Il Sig. Giancarlo poteva scegliere il volgare soldo, ha scelto l’immortalita! Scusate, torniamo a parlare di cose serie. Hahahahahhahaha finalmente qualcuno l'ha notato, il Sig. Giancarlo ha preferito la gloria eterna a qualche soldo stralcio, lode a lui [/ot] |
|
|
|
Micio puoi aggiungere al primo post questa formula quà sotto, così diventa più completo, grazie.  Si può rimouovere questa parte: Se vuoi far pesare maggiormente il feedback sul punteggio feedback aumenta il Risked BTC a >50. I bitcoin rischiati ora non hanno più peso sul punteggio come si vede sotto dal post di theymos The trust score numbers are now slightly different: - The first number is the trust score. - The second number is the number of unique users who have given that person negative feedback. - The third number is the number of unique users who have given that person positive feedback. - The fourth number was removed. I also completely changed the trust score algorithm to this: if there are no negative ratings
score = 0
for each rating, oldest to newest
if this rater has already been counted
continue
score += min(10, round_up(months since rating))
else
score = unique_positive - 2^(unique_negative)
if score >= 0
start_time = time of first negative
score = unique_positive since start_time - unique_negative since start_time
if(score < 0)
return ??? (orange)
move score to range [-9999,9999]
return score This algorithm is a little slower than the previous one. Post here if you think you see extra slowness due to this change. Maybe I need to add extra caching to compensate. Also post here if someone has a trust score that seems wrong. I was going to change it so that everyone with 0 trust had orange trust, but I decided that this looked bad and changed it back. Grazie mille per la segnalazione, thread aggiornato con i nuovi dettagli e l'algoritmo per calcolare il rating |
|
|
|
a lot all of your feedbacks
Also the risked amounts don't seem to be credible. Of course 50 risked BTC amount is not real but if you look at the 2013's post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664 : "If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating." I followed the rules and put 50 risked BTC to give a stronger rating. Other risked BTC amounts are 100% real! |
|
|
|
Thank you for your suggestion, I appreciate the commitment but I don't want to remove any feedbacks (even if the accounts are old and inactive). These are proofs that trade went well and some users could get irritated. I think I'm using the feedback system as it should be used: send feedbacks after trades and send feedback to users I really trust. There's no reason to remove feedbacks. Anyway, if any of the users in my list or in my sent feedback list do something wrong I'll be ready to remove them or leave a negative feedback. I feel responsible for my DT list and feedback list.
I want to continue with my line of thought so it's better to be removed from DT for the moment, I don't want to bother you and any other DT member so I'm asking coinlocket$ to remove me from the list.
Trust ratings should have references. This helps other users to verify the validity of your ratings and your judgement overall. It's not a problem if a few are missing. It doesn't look good when there is not a single one. Perhaps you can revise the ratings or if you want to get off DT for now - you can always come back later when your sent trust ratings look more solid. Keep in mind that nobody can really order you what to do so I'm just advising you how you could avoid an exclusion (which might be difficult to remove in the future) and instead earn a more credible inclusion. I feel like I need to add this disclaimer due to all this drama lately. I never thought about inserting reference link, it never was on top of my mind when I sent feedbacks, I'll surely care about it from now on. Anyway, some are "I trust this user" feedback, so doesn't need reference link and some are feedback I sent to user who sent me feedback with reference link  |
|
|
|
User duesoldi added by coinlocket$, He have left 9 positive feedback starting from 2019-01-11, and also by local language. No any reference link or no any negative feedback. User Micio added by coinlocket$, Although his all feedback old. He does not leaving feedback from last 2 month but all the feedback is positive, no any negative feedback there. @coinlocket$ can you please revise your custom list (DT2) ? Imho, there was no reason to leave negative feedbacks or positive feedbacks before this change. I wasn't in DT so I would not have made any difference. Since 2014, every year I received and sent feedbacks when I trusted people or I completed a transaction. From now on I'll take more care about the trust system. You should really revisit all of those ratings, especially if some of those accounts are now inactive (which makes them a liability). Maybe rewrite the ones on such accounts to neutral. If there's any problem I can be removed from DT, I don't want to be an obstacle.
Would be great if you did what I just suggested. If you don't want to bother with it, or DT in general you can just ask coinlocket to remove you. Thank you for your suggestion, I appreciate the commitment but I don't want to remove any feedbacks (even if the accounts are old and inactive). These are proofs that trade went well and some users could get irritated. I think I'm using the feedback system as it should be used: send feedbacks after trades and send feedback to users I really trust. There's no reason to remove feedbacks. Anyway, if any of the users in my list or in my sent feedback list do something wrong I'll be ready to remove them or leave a negative feedback. I feel responsible for my DT list and feedback list. I want to continue with my line of thought so it's better to be removed from DT for the moment, I don't want to bother you and any other DT member so I'm asking coinlocket$ to remove me from the list. |
|
|
|
User duesoldi added by coinlocket$, He have left 9 positive feedback starting from 2019-01-11, and also by local language. No any reference link or no any negative feedback. User Micio added by coinlocket$, Although his all feedback old. He does not leaving feedback from last 2 month but all the feedback is positive, no any negative feedback there. @coinlocket$ can you please revise your custom list (DT2) ? Imho, there was no reason to leave negative feedbacks or positive feedbacks before this change. I wasn't in DT so I would not have made any difference. Since 2014, every year I received and sent feedbacks when I trusted people or I completed a transaction. From now on I'll take more care about the trust system. User duesoldi added by coinlocket$, He have left 9 positive feedback starting from 2019-01-11, and also by local language. No any reference link or no any negative feedback. User Micio added by coinlocket$, Although his all feedback old. He does not leaving feedback from last 2 month but all the feedback is positive, no any negative feedback there. @coinlocket$ can you please revise your custom list (DT2) ? I've sent him a PM about this. Hopefully he will respond soon. If there's any problem I can be removed from DT, I don't want to be an obstacle. |
|
|
|
Con tutte le probabilità coinlocket$ sarà in DT1 se ho capito bene le nuove regole, vai così |
|
|
|
|
Thread aggiornato con le nuove regole, un ringraziamento a coinlocket$. Aggiunto anche un banner in alto per segnalare il cambiamento.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
