Payouts have been made as promise. We will also be giving away 25GH/s to 10 users sometime tomorrow!
Keep the chat going and you may be chosen!
Can you post the txid? |
|
|
|
|
This guy got ripped off in the AM fiasco and I understand he's trying to do something to get his money back but he's created 9 threads in the securities sub-forum all about this issue. All the involved parties have their own thread and this issue is currently being discussed in those threads. There is actually no need for AirWolf to make any new threads to discuss this but I can understand the desire to have a thread where information specific to this issue can be collected. There is simply no need to create 9 threads about the issue and keep bumping them daily though. That's just spamming and something the mods should be taking action against.
If this is allowed to continue, pretty soon the whole front page of the securities sub will be related to AM and Havelock.
|
|
|
|
math is wrong . they have 50k accounts . doesnt mean active accounts . if you dont purchase a contract you dont get the credit . and you didnt calculate re-investments or merged contracts.
The maths is correct. If cloudminr.io are faking their data, that's not my problem. |
|
|
|
@notspoonchop I heart a good dance party. This thread isn't reason to party for anyone but you. Have a great time bud.  I see what you did there! Party on  Apparently, they're all Mircea Popescu's sock puppets. |
|
|
|
We didn't say it was, We bought the emails from a user on this site. We are unsure as to where he received them. You misunderstand.
What user did you buy the list off? |
|
|
|
All the lacks makes it a factual basis for the dying cash cow that was AM.
Of course it doesn't, don't be silly. Like I've told you repeatedly now, you seem not to understand what a fact is as you keep trying to claim that your opinions are facts. |
|
|
|
Paying out, does not make it legit, proof of legitimacy does. They haven't shown any proof as of yet but claim they will do so in a couple of weeks. Gives them a fair bit of time to collect some BTC and run. They're just as legit as every other "cloud mining" service that ran away with the money after failing/refusing to provide any proof of legitimacy. Also, none of these new "cloud mining" ponzis can get enough initial customers and collapse within days. |
|
|
|
|
Nothing LambChop or RoadStress said had any factual basis. That makes them about as right as a broken clock.
|
|
|
|
Can you provide proof of hashing power?
We Can, Yes. But for the sake of anonymity, At this moment we do not want to disclose our mining addresses, This will be soon. We currently live far from our mining host due to cheaper mining costs, so this will be a matter of days, maybe a couple of weeks before we can take some up to date photographs. Well, I'm leaving negative feedback then which I will remove once you have proven your hashing power. I've heard that story many times and they never follow through. |
|
|
|
how much has been paid into cloudminr ?  Well, they claim to have at least 50k customers. If we assume that each customer bought just "10 Gh/s" at a cost of 0.01 BTC then that would be a total of 500 BTC. So, they've clearly taken in more than the 512 BTC paid out since November. Why on earth should "we" assume something totally idiotic with you ? I guess this is a classic example of how idiots underestimate the intelligence of others. It's simple maths. The minimum purchase order was for 10 Gh/s and the price hasn't been lower than 0.001 BTC per Gh/s. The minimum order is now 100 Gh/s and the price is 0.0014 BTC per Gh/s. That puts the lower bound at 50000 * 0.01 BTC = 500 BTC. |
|
|
|
how much has been paid into cloudminr ? Well, they claim to have at least 50k customers. If we assume that each customer bought just "10 Gh/s" at a cost of 0.01 BTC then that would be a total of 500 BTC. So, they've clearly taken in more than the 512 BTC paid out since November. |
|
|
|
Hmmm is there any good alternative to invest in on Havelock?
Not really. There's BDD but I wouldn't consider that an investment. It's more of a gambling game. Which brings up a point about Havelock's future. Before it went down for maintenance, Havelock was pretty much being kept afloat by AM and BDD stocks. When trading of AM comes to a halt, will Havelock still be able to continue? |
|
|
|
Good move. Remember that FC kept hidden the fact that AM didn't placed a wafer order in December.
People should also remember that before Havelock went down for maintenance, it was pretty much being kept afloat by AM and BDD stocks. When trading of AM comes to a halt, Havelock may not be able to continue. Where is Mabsark to come and say this will all be fine? This will all be fine.
 |
|
|
|
When have you liquidated your shares?
As soon as I found out FriedCat had gone missing. I don't see any point in keeping hold of them now. |
|
|
|
|
In British English, "they" is the correct term when talking about a company.
|
|
|
|
I figured Hashlord was like the Landlord of mining, so probably an informal title for the DC owner/operator.
We seem to be in overall agreement but I think that rather than "HashLord" (with a capital L) being a person or an informal title, it's a company name or brand like HashRatio or Hashnest. |
|
|
|
Check all the links, he owns a *LOT* more
So what? It doesn't entitle them to anything more than someone who owns exactly 5000 shares. They get a seat on the board. |
|
|
|
I think your wrong. Jutaral didn't use any company names he just names the roles of all those involved who ever they maybe. AMHash theoretically involves 5 Parties (Operator, Manufacturer, HashLord, Contract Platform, Contract Holder)
To me, it seems like either a username or a business name, not a description of a role. It's a separate party from AM, RM and Havelock. If it was just a person in control of the hash rate, that person would probably be an AM employee, not a separate party. It makes far more sense to me that HashLord is in the business of hosting miners. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
