Who will define confirmed scammer?

You mean like those with type 2 or 3 flags?
How many members on average per month get a type 2 or 3?

For those that are conclusively proven to scam then sig ban, no pms, no starting threads  etc is a good idea.
I would ban them completely.

Tokens are tokens.

I know some very credible projects that are going to use defi, but even so unless something started or was issued as a token but moving to it's own independent design then it should be moved to tokens.

Defi has a huge potential but like with anything new abusers will be rife and it's up to investors to do their own homework.

What makes you sure it is a personal vendetta?

You yourself appear to have left me a red tag after I commented on your shitty awards thread? Was that a vendetta??

I mean you have no reference for the red trust you left on my account?. The reason is less sensible than whitemanwhites and yours is entirely stupid. People have me on ignore= redtag?
Fuck off you pathetic crying plagiarist weasel.

Now crying when others point out you are guilty of using others work without their permission
Did they make those images for your use? To support something you said? How many different occasions with different images ?
I wonder if you are now editing a ton of posts??



Even so, as you enjoy using the trust system for whatever you like which has nothing to do with scamming or financially motivated wrongdoing then so can anyone else ?

Or are the rules for others and not yourself? Or rather the lack of rules.

Looking through your post history you look to be a plausible alt lauda.
Stop whining about your specific gripes with red trust and start to realize that you're guilty of worse that what you're accusing others of..

If he wants to red tag you for anything he can.
If a member can be tagged by a DT scammer for presenting evidence of their scamming then there are no rules.

It is quite simple his tag would be 1000x more credible and valid than your own.

Owlcatz of bitcointalk is completely untrustworthy as has been demonstrated on several occasions.

If anything is found to be inaccurate below just point to which part and debunk it here publically and I will remove it or edit it as needed.


1. Both of his red tags on this account are bogus.

Both are accusing me of presenting false information about the proven scammer lauda ( his pal) and other scum bag DT members who have proven they will deliberately prevent valid warnings being placed on undeniable scammers accounts.

The pleb owlcatz will not dare debate these points because everyone that has tried to defend their scammy and scam protecting histories or their trust abuse has been crushed publically. Everything I have stated is entirely true and can be verified.

I will debate any points made.

2.  Owlcatz was involved in extorting other forum members.

Quickseller tried to redact the owlcatz involvement with his 2 best pals tman the proven scammer and lauda the proven scammer it seems
After lauda basically appears to have extorted QS via his latest alt primenumber7

However from this post you can see the original thread title and repost by another member of the evidence owlcatz was involved in the extortion.

Re: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij/IronMarvel2/owlcatz extortion attempt

Click the quote links to verify original thread title.


3. Owlcatz the extortionist,  trust abuser and scammer protector is also there defending the proven scamming behavior of his same old pal lauda here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5249969.0


The more owlcatz thinks he can trust abuse peoples accounts with bogus crap that wouldn't stand up to scrutiny the more he just demonstrates what an untrustworthy scumbag he is  

If anyone has been scammed by owlcatz then you may have an easier time locating him thanks to the prior good work of QS before he got owned by lauda.


Anyone can comment here if they can substantiate their on topic points with independently verifiable evidence
If not then ...


I'm making trust threads on each scammer, scammer protector and facilitator , trust abuser and general scum bag here.

All will be backed with publicly available evidence.
Just ask if more clarity is required.

These types of arguments are not helpful.
Civilisation progresses over time.
Religion especially christianity has dissipated I believe due to the progress of science and general rise in educational standards.
There is nothing wrong with Christian's or muslims per say.
However, Muslims do not integrate well into western societies. They remain apart and insular.
As their populations swell you will see a lot more friction perhaps born out of fear.
I don't see a happy ending when that scenario reaches critical mass.
These kind of hacking up old ladies and teachers events which look to be broadly supported when you see the real reactions of muslim crowds burning flags and many calling for more deaths or ex prime ministers saying they could be justified to kill millions of French civilians is only going to feed that fear and increase the friction. Regardless of who started it or whatever it is simply a recipe for disaster and there will always be trouble.

Better to retain Muslims in broadly Muslim countries and let them do their own thing.
If the French want to make little cartoons to sell to other French people let them do their thing and have their free speech.
Diversity and all this trying to make the fox live with chicken is simply a cluster fuck for all involved.

I don't really know much about religion but from discussing briefly with some muslim guys who were nice blokes and heaped lots of great praise on my bodybuilding achievements, which naturally I lapped up. It would seem being a muslim is quite good for males. Feminism which I strongly disagree with is not popular at all with these guys and it all seems to work out very nicely with lots of sensible rules for males and females. I was kind of tempted to join up or look into it a little bit more,  but apparently there are some pretty serious draw backs for recreational activities.

Both Christians and muslims have some sensible core tenets, but hardliners on either side simply will never accept the other side.
Better to keep them apart. I'm not against any religion but I don't think trying to force your views on anyone is acceptable these days. It never should have been either. We're all just trying to make sense of a largely confusing experience called life. Some choose religion some choose science some try not to think about it too much and just enjoy tv and a pizza.
Stop breeding everyone for a bit, give us all a bit more space and room. Do your own thing leave others to do theirs.

Killing people although perhaps satisfying at the time is not a sensible long term solution however angry you are.
Or if you must then don't pick an old granny to hack apart in public that's just unsportsmanly on all levels.  
You are unhappy with certain actions then you must go to the root and find those directly responsible.
But really killing people is not the answer.

Can you point to some of those specifically
Show me examples.
Specific details.

I can show you the exact opposite.

I mean if you say something is happening but wont bring conclusive proof of highly corroborating evidence that is the same thing really you are talking about others doing.

I'm not sure if speculating on others is worthy of red trust if they cant conclusively debunk it especially concerning behaviors apparently conducted on the forum.

Why is scamming and defaulting on loans not a serious crime?

Surely this is what a type 2 flag or above is for not just a tag.

I have no idea what red tags are for. They serve only to pollute and devalue all other warnings.
If you removed red tags but had the red glowing warnings under the avatar for type 2 flags and above the system would work.
Type 1 flag should be financially motivated wrong doing related only or be deleted.

The only reason to give a tag without a flag is that you have zero evidence of scamming attempting to scam or setting up an scam.
A tag is really a political or personal attack. Nothing more or why not give a flag ?

So asking what is red trust account now? It is nothing you may just like eating lemons.
Why do campaign managers only allow DT with red tags on their campaigns
A they are corrupt
B they are scared they will get a tag

Red tags are subjective silly and dangerous noise.

Looking at the respawn of the account nullius after a lengthy hiatus it is clear this account is rather dangerous.  

Let's run over a few indisputable creepy and disturbing points. You can also review the alia debacle.

1. Nullius first action upon his unfortunate resurrection was to hand out a red tag to cryptohunter. (laudas chief critic).

Let's analyse this...

The basis was that plagiarism was such a disgusting crime that even nullius when a starving peasant he himself would never have considered plagiarism, and so terrible was this crime that even suggesting that we should not ridicule other members who tried to excuse it by explaining they did it to : feed their starving kids or prevent their families going homeless etc. Yes even suggesting it was in poor taste to ridicule those that had already been punished ..deserved a red tag.

Nullius insisted that it was a legitmate tag because plagiarism was disgusting. Lauda comes along and give that post 10 merits. Lauda apparently thinks plagiarism was such a hideous crime that saying we should not make fun of their reasons deserves a tag.

Then what happens .....

Lauda ( the proven scammer) is found to have Multiple instances of Deliberate and Sneaky Plagairsm where he grafted other peoples words sneakily inside his own paragraphs. This is the most disgusting form of plagiarism. I mean this is

A - knowing it is wrong
B - sneakily hiding it up
C - punishing others for doing innocent copy and paste where they may have
Thought it was okay to copy and guide to help others, copied something they have referenced multiple times before that was created to support what they were saying and got lazy or sloppy and didnt even consider it wrong since they missed it.
D - were they wearing a paid sig ?

I mean running around punishing others and even punishing those that say you should not make fun of their perhaps genuine reasons for copy and paste is disgusting if you know you have been sneakily grafting others words into your own paragraphs.

That is the level of scum we are dealing with from a proven scammer.

Nullius does what?  Starts excusing laudas plagiarism and saying oh that's not that bad or that's not really intentional? Lol

This guy right there demonstrated he was dangerous and willing to push clear double standards abuse.

What is more interesting is coming out of retirement to find a bogus reason to red tag laudas chief critic?
Total and utter collusion and abuse of the trust system.


2. Later on Nullius starts saying some very worrying and creepy things publicly.

A.He cant stop wondering if lauda is really female. Why?
B. He wants to cybersex lauda regardless of gender.
C. Not knowing the gender he still flirts with lauda?
D. Clearly he is willing to abuse the trust system for lauda.

3. New members joining the forum with clearly female  user names have been randomly contacted via PM by nullius
A kind of a hey I'm nullius bla bla a total nerd come chat kind of message.
This is a pattern.

A. This kind of stalking and fawning over potential females here happened with nullius and Alia.
B. Again over protective and obsessive where he believes the members are young females.
C. Willing to defend shady behaviour, or even proven scamming and punish those that speak out honestly against them.
D. Willing to abuse the trust system and take other steps to prevent valid warnings.

4. The latest almost public breakdown and self debasing  grovelling and crying that lauda the deliberate and sneaky plagiarist and scammer has been driven from the forum.

I mean unless this is a kind of satire or joke by lauda himself lavishing all of this effort and pathetic slobbering announcing his admiration, love and praise based on bogus and dangerous lies then this is clearly worrying.

Unless it is an alt of lauda hence the love of the miscreant tman and other undesirables and hate of their chief critic then what the fuck is wrong with this person ?
I don't think it is an alt which is both disappointing and worrying.
You have a seriously desperate sex predator here who will go to any lengths possible to get some cybersex or even some approval from any member it believes could be potentially a young female.
It is also not even afraid to make this 100% public. The entity nullius is seriously creepy.
He is clearly someone that can become Obsessed with those he considers female and will target them and there is nothing I have seen and I mean no level of debasement or rule bending / breaking or double standards open abuse of the trust system to total defense of their scams that it will not sink to? Then even make public overtures to them almost begging for contact to resume and lavishing all kinds of provably false accolades and speculative hype on them.

So the question remains: what is it?  Old pervy sad gimp? Complicit and colluding scam partner playing that part ? Mentally deranged fantasist? Lauda themselves ?

There is only one certainty - be very careful what you say to this person via PM.

I hear several members here who come across as potential females have been contacted in private by this ghoulish gimpy old creep. I would not give anything away that could result in your RL details being exposed.

This is not a joke. I would consider this person rather dangerous beyond the usual forum scamming and politics.

I also find it weird that tman, lauda and atriz are absent or recent account activity that is very unusual.

If nullius is simply as sad lonely old horny bastard who want some female contact via the net that would be less worrying if it was all there was to it.  Who knows how we'll end up.  We should not be overly judgemental on this kind of plight.

However I'm not sure that is all there is to nullius.  
Don't say that nobody tried to give a note of warning about this member.
If you're a young female or anyone that is in contact with nullius in private then consider what you say and watch for being lured out of remaining anonymous.


If he keeps to his word and does retire. I will be surprised. On the other hand I want to see if it reveals itself more over time.
I'm hoping he's just desperate for some female attention or admiration that he is driven to debase himself with scammer protecting and undeniable double standards and trust abuse. Not a real threat to people safety here.

Be kind to it? Or crush it with the observable truth relentlessly?

We will see.  

Anyone can comment so long as you bring ...

Independently verifiable evidence to corroborate your statements or views. If not guess what happens to your post?

Most DT are not reputable due to being knowingly complicit with undeniable abuse of the trust system and deliberately preventing legitimate warnings on proven scammers. That is without any shadow of a doubt.

Well what you are describing: deliberately promoting a project with a provably bogus or copied white paper as a legitimate original project are both meeting the threshold for both troll and scam facilitator. That is reason for a ban and assisting setting up a scam  fits with the purpose of a legitimate flag 1 if it was left to remain. To me deliberately and wilfully protecting or promoting a certain scam is just as bad.

This is entirely different from giving a red tag to someone that presents evidence of undeniable scamming from a DT member.
Using tags to brand whistle blowers as scammers is dangerous and disgusting.

DT members that don't stand against it are colluding and complicit.

There is no other way to see it

Also campaign managers bending the rules and allowing DT with red trust to participate are double standards scum and should be removed.

There is no other way to see it or explain in if you want your explanation to stand up to scrutiny.

Red trust is as meaningless and dangerous as merit.

Well that's not the case for all members is it?

Red trust given by who? Oh yes default trust goons.
That's the only red trust that counts right?
Sig scampaign managers only care about that

Unless.....

Yep you're a DT goon. Then red trust doesn't matter they will still allow you on the campaigns.
Take a look often DT will have a red tag or 2 and have no problem getting on good campaigns.

Besides if the red tags are bogus and are not based on any objective independently verifiable evidence then wrong doing is that of those leaving fake red trust.

Stop promugating garbage here.

Red tags and type1 flags are not reliable or credible. If there were any provable financially motivated wrongdoing they would have a type 2 flag ( unless they are DT goons then they would collude to prevent any flags on each other)

Want evidence then request and I'll provide.

If there is no evidence of scamming, attempting to scam or clearly setting up for a scam there should be no red trust.
The mere fact it can be used to prevent some and advantage others with respect paid 2 post is a major design error.

I would start at thread on rep about the project manager refusing you and the project using bogus reasons to refuse entry.
 That's if you're an honest member and good poster that can produced value output.

Obviously if one has scammed or tried to then of course you should never be allowed to participate in bounties.

Red tags and type 1 flags need to be removed. Only a fool can not see this.

If you drink lemon tea then clearly you're going to be dealt with once and for all.

Nutildahs stats look compelling but again

If you gave all of your merits to 1 poster who made excellent posts would that be grounds for removal if that person was giving them out to excellent posts only? What if that 1 person then gave them out to a wide range of excellent posts.

We have previously established that most of the top 200 merit earners lose like 80% if you take away the merits that come directly from each other. If you take any high merit earner you will see that their merit fans and recipients are stacked with each other.

Is the goal of the merit system to

1. See it spread over the max amount of accounts regardless of post quality
2. See it speed over the max amount of accounts via posts that meet a certain level of quality
3.  See it given to the very best posts you locate

Also if someone gave all their merit to 100 ppl who in turn pushed those on to a much wider circle eventually is that worse than someone who gives all their merit to 200 people who then pass it between them and to a far narrower and smaller group that the first guy did who had and initially smaller circle.

Or does that Bpip circle stat go down multiple levels already.

To me I would like to see merits spread as widely as possible but many have previously claimed there is no such requirement if the merit source or anyone merit feels they want to give it to a post they feel is good. I know many DT have said before the simply pull up certain members post histories and look through them specifically for good posts.

I wonder what % of vlad2vlads merits go back to the top 200 merit earners compared to other sources. Which in turn are cycled around the other top 200 earners or top 100.

There are multiple wider considerations depending on the the purpose of the merit system.

Set out specific rules and goals for merit or just leave people to give it to posts they claim are good.

I think it should he spread out to the max as long as the post is objectively valuable . I mean once a person is a legend then giving them more and more merit? The prime consideration for most merit sources who also happen to be on DT surprisingly how their merit given will influence DT eligibility among other non post value considerations.

Also now we've made a merit volume button for thread bumping you can expect smart projects to take that into consideration for their community.

While there's any advantage to merit other than denoting a good post and merit is not nailed down to only being given to an objectively good post it will clearly not be given only on that basis.

TLDR. I don't put much faith those stats from nutildah are proof of person damaging the merit system any more than any other member there, if you consider the much bigger picture.

A better merit source is a hard thing to determine when people admit they give merit for entirely different reasons which is apparently totally acceptable.  There seems no requirement to spread it out as widely as possible.
People before have noted the tight concentration of merit cycling, but it's clear if they think they are the best posts or even just posts they think are good that isn't a problem so no point focusing on that angle.
As stated I expect V2V is a lot more capable of discerning an objectively good post that many other merit sources.
His obsession with IX is kind of strange although he does have staying power I'll give him that.
Holding big bags can do that to a person. or maybe its loyalty who can say.

From observing carefully the merit system since inception it appears you can do what you want as a merit source other than merit your own alts or accounts where there is strong compelling evidence they are your alts

Or

If you apparently say you will award them to those who share your board politics even if you award them to objectively valuable and insightful posts.

If they are your earned merits you can do with them anything you want no restrictions?

If they are airdropped merits aka pre merit system based on rank then what rules are there?

Really all legends should have been made merit source and removed for abusing it. Rather than make is super centralized from the outset.

There was nothing complicated. Lauda grafted chunks of others peoples words directly inside her paragraphs. Many different chunks in many different paragraphs on many different occasions. What is complicated about it
. Were they wearing a sig and getting paid to post at the time? Not sure

The thing is she and her scumbag pal nullius were running around punishing others for way way way less deliberate and sneaky plagiarism. Hypocritical double standards turds. Nullius then starts trying to defend laudas plagiarism. Lol

Here is yet another clearly bias delete.

1. It is on my own self moderated reee thread. ( only created due to bias moderation that is removing any truthful negative evidence from the goodbye world lauda leaving thread )

2. On the original thread nullius is telling more lies and disparaging any other members that mention the truth about lauda, claiming that they are the only people being negative aside from trolls.

3. So on my own reeeee: thread where I am presenting the truth I again furnish the reader with the truth that nullius is once more controlling the narrative and misrepresenting the reality of the situation and a mod deletes my own post from my own self moderated reee thread.

This is scandalous.

You can not present the truth on your own self moderated Ree thread that you only had to start because the ontopic and relevant truth was banned from the original thread?

This kind of truth censorship is grotesque.

1. There have been proven scammers as merit sources before suchmoon didnt complain about them
2. Vlad2vlad is 100x a better poster and far more knowledgeable than eg tman, lfc, etc
3. Merit is impossible to abuse on the basis of post value or quality
4. Most DT and merit sources top 20 fans and recipients are stacked with each other.
5. Suchmoon already admitted merit is meaningless so who cares where it goes

The only gripe here really is he is giving out to others suchmoon doesn't agree with.

Tough.

Start imposing the same strict guidelines on all merit sources.

Tighten up the entire thing, restart it or just let it run as is. No point imposing certain requirements on some not others.

Suchmoon has already cried to theymos before and had a source who was giving merit to undeniably good posts kicked off

I don't support the removal of any merit source unless the specific reason is given and all other merit sources that are guilty are also removed on the same basis.

Maybe the mistake we make is trying to find purpose where there is none.
Whenever I think about the future or have a goal or purpose and devise plans to attain these things I feel less happy.

Planning long term and putting pressure on yourself is a big mistake.
Also I find when I'm not trying to attain something vigorously then it seems to happen a lot easier.


Base pleasures like girls and food and even drugs are great in moderation. I like scotch.

Maybe the only purpose is to enjoy ourselves whilst not harming or taking directly from others and helping as far as we reasonably can.
Let's not over estimate our importance or the impact we can have on the flow of things.

Some super intelligent and super gifted people are outside of this but that is the 0.0001% so since I'm not included in that perhaps and I don't have to worry about purpose.

It's like writing a book. I write books for fun and my best exciting and fun stories are the ones that just happen , I make them up as I go along. They don't start with a purpose or framework or goal or even genre. I just enjoy them as I go along and things just happen. bit like real life.

Agent Smith was wrong.

I do think one should have certain responsibilities like helping those that have helped you or those you think deserve help that you can give. If you lay on your death bed having satisfied only those that's cool.

I like to believe this is a simulation because perhaps if their is a path or purpose then you get it more on the later levels
Maybe we are part of some experiment. I cant even consider purpose until I know what this is all about. I mean how can I have some purpose if I don't even know what this is all part of. Putting all that effort and then it was counter productive to the larger goal or direction we're all meant to be headed.

Then again tomorrow I could have an amazing idea and have a micro purpose that I will pursue for a while but it would never be classed by me as my purpose in life. Just some long term goal by my standards.

Keep in mind I post from my phone from wherever I am and it is Friday early evening:)

I think if I were to have kids in later life it would be understandable to adopt a view similar to the prior post.
I've heard kids can really alter your perspective and you are not worried as much about trying to maintain a view of a larger picture and are drawn to focus more on your smaller world. This is probably hardwired in.

For the sake of being happy perhaps zooming in is better than trying to zoom out. Maybe being happy and content is the purpose.

Thanks to those that are making a sensible effort to debate the suggestions in the OP.
There is a tiny bit of transparency at the moment but its kind of not useful.

For example the mod deleting my on topic and relevant posts is doing it at around the same time each session they decide to exercise their terrible judgement or intentional bias.

For example the deletes happen in very quick succession around this time or an hour or so earlier.
I very much suspect it is the same mod.

I also now suspect the mod is stalking my posts in real time? Why you say?

Well, I've just had a post that I made deleted instantly !!! It was not even on a thread this account has posted on before to my memory.

I mean I pressed post and I would estimate 30s to max couple of mins after that it was deleted
I thought did I somehow press delete or not even post it or wtf happened.
I then see the PM That a mod had deleted it?

I mean that means it was not reported at all. A mod was following me around ( because a mod has just finished deleting my own post from my own self moderated thread??) And one other one that was on topic and relevant?

This is why you need transparency. You would know when mods are stalking you.

There is no point saying well that post must have been so clearly off topic that some AI auto deleted it or was auto flagged or whatever.

1. If I post it and place it in the full context of the discussion all of which is still there and continuing unfettered
Not one person would be able to demonstrate it was off topic and irrelevant.  I was strangely agreeing with their points also??
2. There is no AI here contrary to popular belief.

Certain things you are not permitted to criticise or point out the truth.
If you don't believe me check the logs the post and delete was immediate.

The stats I mentioned and appeals process is fundamental to free speech here.
Either the post is off topic and irrelevant and gets deleted along with the other off topic irrelevant posts or it is not.
You can't have double standards.  That is a form of lying and deception.

A guarantee and safe guarding of free speech to me along with all the other benefits mentioned trumps the potential negatives of the stats + reason + possible appeal.

I mean obviously none of it will happen along with all the other indisputable improvements I've seen suggested over the past year or 2. Still it's fun to debate them.

I mean the forum is for fun too right?
Once you have defeated every claim made against you, proven everything you have claimed was true about others, proven you are being unfairly censored and not one mod or admin will stand against you and defend their actions. What else is left?
Just casually debating how to improve things for the future.
Is that pointless at this stage? and do suggestions from very unpopular members ensure they would never be implemented even if provably useful.
?  Who can say.

Strange now though I find DT members making 180 degree turns and agreeing with CH.  So now you get deleted for agreeing with DT members where as CH was deleted for disagreeing with them on the same points. Lol
In time every single thing he said will be proven to be indisputably true.

Well lauda, alia and the rest of the forum clearly recognize that sterilization is not going to be necessary to prevent such a pathetic dream you seem to insist on clinging to.

It is strange that people would even suggest victims get on nicely and be all friendly to those that trust abuse them
That's like nullius having and affair with your wife..... hahahah sorry I do spoil these analogies sometimes with the improbable,  impossible  and unthinkable unless your wife lacks all 5 senses and you carry it around in a bucket . Let's be sensible: that's like nullius trying to steal your 3 legged  dog and catching him trying to get an erection to hump the poor thing and asking if he's aware the dog is male ( he says he wasn't sure but still wanted it anyway) and then asking  would he like to be pals and have a drink after he's finished?

No thanks. Tell Rover to tear this freak apart then to take a dump on the rancid pervy old corpse.

No more being pals with scammers and trust abusers and sweeping it under the carpet.
Crush them. No mercy until they play fair. Trust abuse in the form of undeniable double standards is an easy target.

Have more posts been deleted from thread celebrating lauda the scammers leaving ?

Who has the nutildah post that must have been deleted?

This post refers  to it


This ostentatious and pretentious overblown parting thread by lauda the scammer is the most dishonest thread on here. ( not surprising)

Literally anything true and factual that shines a negative light on laudas shady past is immediately removed.
I'm guessing the poor rejected wretch nerdius is reporting them all. But for mods to remove nutildah is weird. I wonder what snake mod is deliberately ensuring the fake, and misleading  narrative is maintained.

What was the post? I'm interested.


I mean everyone knows lauda bullied and extorted that weak ass lame snake primesellout7 ( via placing a neg on his new account) to suddenly recant all the scamming claims based on strong evidence QS had held as true for years,  and at the same moment lauda ( removed the neg on his new account pn7) and  remembered the QS who he was sure was a certain scammer for years was... not a scammer. Guess what so did tman and owlcatz.

Lauda even bitch slapped primenumber7 if he dared to speak out of line with " hmmm you're starting to sound like quickseller again " after the deal had be struck.

To which primenumber7 suddenly had to shit his pants and start back peddling.

Just another example of laudas great track record here. Bestowing forgiveness and and pardon on those he claimed were dangerous scammers for years when there was a deal available to remove shady shit on himself. Always using the trust system to scam with impunity. Pure slime the pair of them.

Anyone having their posts deleted on that sham thread can post on here. Well if its the truth anyway or you have compelling evidence to corroborate your claims.

How much more pathetic and desperate can nerdius look. I feel embarrassed for it. Anyone who knows poor old nerdius got a spare blow up doll laying around? I'm sure if nerdius had any friends they'd certainly have a sticky one with lots of repair patches on, with both sets of genitalia ( cos nullius wasn't sure which sex lauda was but still wanted to cyber sex them anyway) they could do without for a couple of mins..maybe 10seconds would suffice?  Nearly every page of that thread is filled with posts from nerdius.