 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
|
64Block_4vgbaYGA5bbca12HaeyuWhh
|
|
|
|
|
64Block_4vgbaYGA5bbca12HaeyuWhh
|
|
|
|
|
Username : ezly
Thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
|
Username : ezly
Thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
|
64Block_4vgbaYGA5bbca12HaeyuWhh
|
|
|
|
No excuse. If they can't do their job then they should not be cops.
If they want to be criminals they should be dead. Same logic. |
|
|
|
Oh dear! Can fanatical Obama supporters say "Ooops!" Perhaps they'd better learn how, and quickly: http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/10/shock-poll-only-41-of-democrats-want-congress-to-approve-obamas-iran-deal/August 10, 2015 By The Federalist StaffA new poll released on Monday shows that support for Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran continues to unravel. According to the poll from Monmouth University, only 41 percent of Democrats believe Congress should approve the president’s nuclear deal with the Iranian regime. The numbers only get worse among independents and Republicans. Overall, just 27 percent of those polled believe Congress should approve the controversial nuclear deal with Iran. A majority of Republicans (55 percent) and a plurality of independents (33 percent) believe Congress should reject the deal . . . . Perhaps the most striking finding of the poll is that pluralities within each party — Republican, independent, and Democrat — said they trust Iran “not at all” when it comes to honoring the terms of the agreement . . So there you have it; only 41 % of Democrats think that Obama's 'give away everything including the kitchen sink' nuclear deal with Iran is actually worth the toilet paper it's printed on. So much for Obama's new and shining foreign policy triumph. With those kinds of numbers, if the GOP were to refute the deal (which I admit they probably don't have the guts to do, the wussies) then they just might have the numbers among worried Dem legislators to overturn Obama's inevitable veto of their 'No' vote. That is if there would actually be anything for Obama to veto. It would not after all be a bill. It would just be the Legislative Branch telling Obama that his nuclear 'deal' with Iran does indeed stink. But just think about it, finally 59% of Democrats think that Obama has screwed up big time. Wow people; it's about damn time! But then again you are collectively waking up in a manner best described as too damn little and too damn late. Sigh! his approval ratings in around 41 % too..so that says to me that there might be hope for them after all..only 41% of the oarty are puppets...i just hope the others are starting to wake up |
|
|
|
|
but look on the bright side of this..video games will be a big seller because these kids will be staying home with mommy and daddy until they are 30 something now..facebook will have more revenue from ad sales because will be home doing nothing but sucking off their parents...
|
|
|
|
|
His "opinion" does not make it fact. I refer to this opinion of "deliberate decision".
In that dog's breakfast of competing groups of Syrian rebels abetted by tens of thousands of foreign Islamists and their interests, trying to determine the most appropriate strategy is hardly straightforward.
Hindsight being what it is, the path taken or at least its consequences can be seen with clarity.
Some people believe that mistakes and incorrect evaluations and strategies are somehow nefariously conceived deliberate actions, but real life should teach them that nobody is infallible, either individually or collectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's just admit the truth, eventually someone is going to have a nuclear war.
I always had my bet on Pakistan but I guess we'll see
|
|
|
|
The story does raise a valid point, how did they know how the man has sex?
This is yet another example of the attrocities perpetrated upon others by ISIS. Given the fact that the White House was all aglow in rainbow, do you think that Obama will finally do something about ISIS? The execution of Christians resulted in no response from Obama, maybe the targeting of those who engage in gay sex might finally move Obama into action.
What a deafening chorus of condemnation from Americans who just finished celebrating gay victory after another... |
|
|
|
|
Put Palin in charge of the Dept of Homeland Security or EPA.
|
|
|
|
In some small town in Alabama or somewhere in the South... the WBC arrived to picket the funeral of a soldier so the towns people blocked them leaving the motel with their cars and there wasn't a cop in sight.. LOL
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Good for the townspeople and the cops. Do what you can legally to stop their sadistic, depraved crap...... |
|
|
|
I would imagine he would if they showed up at a black persons funeral chanting "God hates ni**ers"...what do you think?
I would be ok with their church burning to the ground with every one of them in it! If they want to protest then fine...do it on a street corner, not at a funeral of someone they do not even know full of grieving family members, disgusting pieces of trash!
I agree, but unfortunately they have a right to protest funerals. That's why those motorcycle dudes called the Patriot Guards are there, running a buffer b/t the funeral ceremony and those cockroaches. The court ruled that the WBC has to stay a certain distance from the funeral site........ One of these days the vigilantes will raise their angry little heads and the WBC will probably be no more....... that stuff happens. |
|
|
|
"If they come here to Louisiana, if they try to disrupt this funeral, we're going to lock them up," Jindal said. "We're going to arrest them. They shouldn't try that in Louisiana. We won't abide by that here. Let these families grieve. Let them celebrate their daughters, their children, their spouses, their loved ones' lives in peace. They better not try that nonsense here." Read More HereMy take - ah, the face of the right wing censorship comes full forward. Apparently, when tasteless, disgusting behavior is done by the likes of Pam Gellar towards Muslims it's perfectly protected free speech. But when a hateful group like Westboro does their thing, it's immoral. And let the right wing hypocrisy begin.
And for the record, I have no problem with either Geller or Westboro disgusting tactics because free speech is free speech is free speech ! I would love to say 'Rock on, Jindal! Go for it!' but he can't do that. Well, he could, but more $$$ for WBC b/c they'd take this to court and win......... |
|
|
|
Lol.
If the poster of that caricature was an Iranian, as a sign of pride he shouldn't write the message in English but in Arabian language.
It's a fake.
Iranians are not Arabs. |
|
|
|
So, most people will now cut back on how much streaming data they use... by something like 10-20%.
When they raise the taxes to 20%, people will cut back their use by 30-40%... and begin to move out of the area.
The Government will collect LESS money, not more, within a few years, and the poverty will grow, and fester, and spread...
You mean like Detroit? |
|
|
|
The evidence is mounting.
Mounting? That's been known far longer than 2011. ANY psychoactive substance (even CAFFEINE) can cause the ONSET of psychosis IE if you are predisposed to psychosis anyway it can bring it out earlier. If your family has a history of psychosis you shouldn't be using ANY pschoactives at all. ANY. Not just pot. Your lung study is disproven too. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802821 |
|
|
|
Not sure if it will mend broken bones, but if you smoke enough if it, you might not care (or remember) that your bone is broken.
You realize 1) they were using extracted CBD only which is not psychoactive IE doesn't get you high? and 2) that they weren't having the rats smoke that and no one is saying smoking dope will heal a broken bone faster? |
|
|
|
|
