|
@Claymore, can you please consider raising the window before disconnecting your miner after not receiving a new job from the pool? Zcash blocks can sometimes take a bit longer, for instance the last 6 blocks took more than 36 minutes when they were supposed to be 15 min in average.
|
|
|
|
3500 btc/zec haha
Jaz sem za foro kupil takoj ob odprtju trga na POLOTU za 50€ ZEC pri ceni 8BTC in prodal, čez nekaj trenutkov pri ceni 10BTC, ker nisem pričakoval tega, kar je sledilo. Moja najhujša napaka doslej. Čez 10 minut bi imel lahko več kot 12k€ iz bornih 50€ vložka ob 3200 BTC/1ZEC. Še danes se mlatim po glavi in se verjetno bom še dolgo.  Pri 8 BTC si tudi kar povprečna ovca, saj cena bi lahko takoj padla na 0.01 BTC, kaj potem ? A na temu forumu sploh se koga zanima bitcoin?
Se mi zdi, da je zadnjih nekaj strani samo na temo altov : )
Jah, ljudi danes sledijo profit, danes skoraj samo early adopters še sekirajo o blockchain fundementale. |
|
|
|
Humans are horrible when it comes to randomness thus are horrible with generating a safe and random password (if it make sense to you than it could be guessed) I can very easily create a very random password: r7z3gfJ$g)lf*?~3' I just press the keyboard a few times without looking, to make it more random I used my left hand on my right hand's position too. No way anybody could guess this with a dictionary attack. But once I create a decent password like this, I can't remember it. And if I can, I will for sure forget it if I don't use it every day. I'm also "struggling" with the idea how to securely store Bitcoins. Even a hardware wallet ultimately comes down to storing a backup passphrase on a piece of paper. And that piece of paper can be stolen. Bitcoin Brain Wallets are a special case, you don't need access to any files to be able to brute force it, and you can search for all wallets at the same time. Can you believe the brain wallet thequickbrownfoxjumpedoverthelazydog has received 106 BTC in total? Thenextweb.com shows some of the brain wallets found by researchers: 1. say hello to my little friend
4. party like it’s 1999
5. yohohoandabottleofrum
9. {1summer2leo3phoebe
13. blablablablablablabla I show these Just to show adding a few numbers to words is not enough to stop a brute force attack. When I said humans are horrible at generating random passwords, I've already took in considerations the definition of a password, which is a string that grant you access and which you suppose to be the only one (and the trusted second party and maybe a third party) to know. No one asked you if you can generate a random string (even then, there is a question about your ability to generate great randomness) btw, hardware wallets are maybe the safest thing we have for now, and of course there is nothing 100% secure/safe, when you break things down there is always a point of failure, but your job is to make the possibility of that happening as low as possible. BTW, I wouldn't recommend brain wallet for anyone. For a hardware wallet, you can write half of the words on one paper the other half on another paper and just keep them separated. |
|
|
|
Interesting challenge. So I am assuming I am real safe since my password to all of my desktop wallets is the same , 2 words linked together who make sense only to me plus a few numbers who make sense only to me and some special characters who I always use  . 13 letters password, upper and lower case plus special character should take 331 years to crack since one 6 random character password needs 31.34 year to get cracked. Humans are horrible when it comes to randomness thus are horrible with generating a safe and random password (if it make sense to you than it could be guessed), not to mention that if you use the same password multiple times for multiple things the risk of being "hacked" becomes really high, it would just take a key-logger or some site/service being hacked (assuming the hacker gets the hashing/salting keys) and they can have access to every place that has the same password. Usually hackers do hack for the reason of: - There is a justified financial gain. - To send a statement. - Just prove it can be done. - Show off their skills (mostly young hackers). Just try to do the best security practices, even then you are not 100% safe. |
|
|
|
Moja mnenja glede Monero in Dash porast, last pump and dump before Zcash release... |
|
|
|
I didn't read all posts in this thread, but I suggest that you use hashcat, it is the fastest and most developed open source tool for brute-forcing, you can download binaries and read more about it here, The great thing about hashcat is that you can set a cluster (brute forcing pool) of many rigs that have multiple GPUs to crack one password... I've used this software to crack Nokia SL3 Locks and this is the way how I've got into bitcoin in the first place (bought miners from a miner who was selling miners after the first halving). Sadly, since the amount is only 1 BTC it is not worth my time to try to crack it, maybe in the future when a bitcoin is so valuable that it would justify wasting hash power on it. Edit: OK you don't have a wallet.dat but you have an encrypted private key so I am not sure about hashcat, it was a couple of years since last time I've used it for Bitcoin so you need to verify this info. |
|
|
|
Yes, can we get a list of supported ETC pools for the Claymore miner? I assume we can just point the software to the ETC pools without any other changes?
I've already tried some pools and they work with Claymore, but as I said, they are a scam. You won't get anything. And on dwarfpool i get quite unstable shares, gonna try ethpool next imo this isnt problem of miner but pool?
That's normal. You can't get the same number of shares every time. What do you mean you don't get anything? you know that you can't get anything in the DAO fork chain (the current ETH) ? you need to reindex your wallet with --oppose-dao-fork so you can see payments. |
|
|
|
|
Claymore, Any way to support ETC and ETH dual mining ?
|
|
|
|
I am currently testing RX 480 Radeon cards. So far getting about 24 to 28 mh/s each card with no tweaks.
Using v4.7 and the stock 480 driver from Sapphire.
Will post more stats as I start to push it.
I hope that the new drivers will work as much as the 15.12 do with current cards.
Can you please tell me how did Claymore work for you ? I have a RX480 sapphire reference card with the default drivers and I can't get Claymore to work  |
|
|
|
I didn't talk to Cryptotraider16 or anyone else about Creditbit, and I am not doing any development for this project anymore, I am working on other projects that has nothing to do with Creditbit directly or indirectly and I am sure that Cryptotraider16 has no idea about these projects, simply because they are private projects which are held privately on bitbucket. A mesage to the idiots claiming that I dumped: Address: CZfsLtRRdMruNNPnqPNaZ3TbL5sg3uwXhJ Message: I am mmitech from Bitcointalk and I still hold my stash Signature: IOQCUUWX2YZiHQ8JyvDyYG9EuQ11+HfBiQk6Xbul0xnUtMer9yrgH4ZEwMR9vA181UaNjxQhakW1sDxiMmvapZI= I still hold a bit less than 200K on exchanges, you can verify the message above and quit bitching because at this point it is just pathetic... if you want this project to turn to a great one you should make it great project by contributing to it... I have no interest, time or energy to do that. |
|
|
|
I think using ubuntu later than 14.04 is not good idea.. But I see using newest (like mine 15.10) too...
But I hope maybe someone help us and make tutorial how to run CDM on latest ubuntu server, 15.10 I guess or lubuntu maybe ( newer doesn't support fglrx) with temperature check and fan control or turning miner on startup..
The new Ubuntu (16.04 LTS) support everything you mentioned above, the problem is in drivers and not the OS it self, you should wait a bit for new drivers, meanwhile you can use 14.04 LTS. |
|
|
|
Thank you for your kind reply. I have done the following: 1) Made a script: /etc/init/miner.conf with content https://i.imgur.com/KZ5EyT7.png2) Restarted the pc But then after booting, & auto-login to desktop, the script did not run. Expecting a terminal window to appear just like when I run it manually by typing ./start.bash at terminal. I am not sure how or when to use the "sudo service your_process..." command Need your further guidance, please. Nothing will appear on the screen, the miner will run in the background, you can check it by looking at the logs, you can check the miner live by doing: tail -f /the /path/to claymore log . However I would disable claymore logging and add the console logging, in your case the logs should be then located in: /var/log/upstart/miner.log and you can also perform sudo tail -f /var/log/upstart/miner.log |
|
|
|
Hi, for linux experts, please advice how to autostart "start.bash" script upon reboot or power on of pc. Due to heat build up I have scheduled my pc to turn off at certain time, & turn on using wake-on-lan. I am using ubuntu 12.04 desktop, with gnome-schedule app. I tried using the following command, but did not work: /home/carl/Downloads/cdm/start.bash  In Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and later you can use upstart scripts to start processes/programs as daemons automatically. Start by creating a script in /etc/init/YOUR_SCRIPT.conf For a Claymore miner, your scrypt should look like this:
description "Claymore Miner"
start on filesystem and static-network-up
stop on runlevel [016]
respawn
respawn limit 5 30
console log
nice 15
setuid YOUR_USER_NAME
setgid YOUR_USER_NAME
kill signal INT
script
echo "Starting Claymore Miner"
cd /home/YOUR_USER_NAME/Path_to_your_miner
./EthDcrMiner64 YOUR_EXTRA_SETTINGS
end script
you can use the command sudo service your_process start/stop/restart since Claymore use logging by default you can give up the console logging. |
|
|
|
Been mining @ dwarfpool for some months now, looking at 24hr earnings getting 1.3 eth per/day with 200mhs. Where as calculator says i should mine 1.9 eth/day now I know calculators aren't entirely accurate but this seems too large a variance. I know from mining stats that I have virtually 0 rejects, the dwarfpool sever is very close ~ 70ms average ping. So I wish to find a pool that has fairer payout, for the moment I am trying solo but worried that 200Mh/s is not enough to solo with the current diff. So if anyone can list their fav pool for me to try I'd appreciate that.
Is dwarf reporting 200Mh? I had 90+% of what calculator offers with CDM, so i guess something else is wrong. I tried several pools but not much difference to tell which pays best. Yes dwarfpool reports 200Mh/s on average sometimes less sometimes more but on average i'm satisfied its reporting correct hashrate, as i mentioned earlier I have next to 0 rejects certainly under 5 rejects in a whole week. I'd be happy with 90% of what calculator shows but i'm getting ~ 70% and rejected shares is playing no part in this. 200Mhash indeed calculates to around 1,9 at todays diff. I am mining at dwarf myself and seeing 90%+ of amount calculated. (0.69ETH/Day @78Mhash vs 0.75 calculated) I am also producing 125-150 shares per hour. 1% claymore + 1% dwarf fee, leaves 6% that are just on pool luck side. Something must be off, could you link your dwarf stats? The calculators assume 100% block reward @ 5 Ethers and doesn't count for uncle blocks (which can be as low as 1.25 Ethers) and orphans, and to not forget the pool fee and your miner efficiency. Having 90% of the calculated reward is a great result in my opinion. Edit: BTW, the weighted average of uncles in the network is between 7-10 % |
|
|
|
You have Fogify.net listed as scam, I am really shocked, do you even fucking check the info published on your site ? Fogify.net Bitcoin Mixer SCAM
Fogify is a Bitcoin mixer scam. They will scam you if you send over 1 BTC. Do not trust them! That is the biggest pile of BS I've seen in a time, list one fucking prove that this claim, I dare you or anyone to find a single unsatisfied user. You are harming the website with this false review. Are you the owner or just supporter of fogify.net i think list is made by random users who visit the site but i think admin should manually accept this listings. I have also not seen any proof posted there to verify fogify scam but i haven't used fogify before so don't know about them. But admin of bitcoinscammer should add some measures to prevent fake listing and info being posted. I am the developer, we never had a single complaining user in all forums (reddit, bitcointalk..) today a guy sent me links to this site and another site, how can someone list such things without checking the validity of claims!!! |
|
|
|
You have Fogify.net listed as scam, I am really shocked, do you even fucking check the info published on your site ? Fogify.net Bitcoin Mixer SCAM
Fogify is a Bitcoin mixer scam. They will scam you if you send over 1 BTC. Do not trust them! That is the biggest pile of BS I've seen in a time, list one fucking prove that this claim, I dare you or anyone to find a single unsatisfied user. You are harming the website with this false review. |
|
|
|
This site is a fucking Scam, it has Fogify.net listed as a scam...WTF!!! 100% CONFIRMED SCAM. Already over fifty three scam reports from users of this site. Apparently any funds over .5 btc will be STOLEN. Holy fuck, I dare you to prove this claim, we've never had a single user complaining about the service and when there were any issues they were resolved right away. Fucking scammer. |
|
|
|
To be honest more guys say the same!
I will not cry if i lost 30.000€ i invest! Lifes go on! One time you lost one time you got!
With crbit its looki lost but i dont care at all! But i see who to trust and who not to trust!
In november when crbit start to mine etc i got different story about all! Its it! Money lost! Lifes go on!
What to invest, where to invest is your own problem, where I work and what to work on is my own problem, you are confused a bit around here, my job was never about making you money, but to maintain CRBIT repos, fix bugs and issue regular updates, which I did successfully unless you have something to say about that ? These things are relative, all depends on people's perspectives. |
|
|
|
Too much ego kill your talent!
anyone that doesn't serve your books is killing his talent right ?  |
|
|
|
Quit your BS, if you look at the repo, it has 0 commit from my side, I forked the repo to audit the code... BTW I do not endorse LEOcoin in anyway or shape. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
