Do Calvin Ayre and CSW hold enough bitcoin in reserve that they are able to manipulate the market to this extent? What?! Do you seriously think that?.... Is that gonna be a BitcoinNewsMagazine headline.....LOL |
|
|
|
But not for fraud, for fucking young kids.....
Prison is too good for him & his ilk. I hope they keep him locked up in some filthy, dirty hell hole in Indonesia for a few years before they extradite him to a "nice" prison in the States. Rot in Hell Russ Medlin. Thanks for the updates @tmfp. |
|
|
|
Possibly the mod missed it and no one reported it yet.
I've had a clearer reply from mprep & it seems my re-post is within forum rules, although I'm sure the person who reported the original post will try to get it removed again as he only operates self moderated threads that he can control & doesn't like his previous activities mentioned in any of them. You'd be surprised just how petty the mods can and do get when they start deleting posts by people on their distrust lists. (Not to mention how many post reports go "unhandled" when it suits them)
I've not experienced any "petty" moderation while I've been a member here, in fact I think the majority of moderation is very well balanced. I think this was a case of a user trying desperately to hide his history of scamming & pressuring a moderator by twisting a few rules to his advantage. The fact that mprep got back to me twice & explained the situation to me is commendable & should be applauded. Anyhooo, the post is still there so it looks like the issue is solved, until the user involved tries again I suppose: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg54612402#msg54612402 |
|
|
|
Remove my face from this thread. I haven't even had contact with you guys in 2 years.
Hmmm.....OK - let me try a different approach. Which face picture are you referring to exactly? I have quoted the original post of the team involved in this $4,000,000+ ICO scam to help you, is it one of these?: https://archive.vn/wdH1O |
|
|
|
So I guess my questions are:
How can a direct quote from a forum post be construed as being a doxx post when the original post is still in place?
If quoting a post is considered doxxing, why has it taken over 1 year to remove said post?
Quote or no quote, if the post contains personal sensitive information then it will be considered as doxxing ofc. Similarly, if quoting a post is considered doxxing, why isn't every quote deleted? Possibly the mod missed it and no one reported it yet. There was absolutely no personal info in the post whatsoever. It's the same info as the original post - a quote - with a reply. Edit: Instead of reposting it here, I have uploaded the deleted post to postimage & it can be viewed here: https://postimg.cc/XBv4pcVRAs can be seen, there is no personal info or private details contained in the post. The pictures are quoted from the original post by the "Team" which I referred to earlier: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg32143800#msg32143800There is absolutely no way this could be considered a doxx. It is a quote with a reply, nothing more. Edit2: I have received an answer from mprep, but I'm still none the wiser TBH. I have posted in the thread again using a revised format, an even simpler quote/reply that is used on every forum thread every day by every user - hopefully this will be OK for mprep: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg54612402#msg54612402 |
|
|
|
Hello all. I've been investigating a few scams lately in preparation for starting a scam accusation thread. Today I received a message from mprep regarding a post I made over 1 year ago that he has deleted, quoting doxxing as the reason: From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0: Q: What about deleting DOXes?A: Nope, we don't delete them either as long as they comply with the following rules: <...>
1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.
<...>
Why aren't they deleted? Because such doxing is just compiling information about a user already available publicly, often via search engines. However, the post that was deleted was merely a direct quote from the original post made by the person/s responsible for the scams I am investigating & are still viewable on the forum for all to see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg32143800#msg32143800I know that the person who is partly responsible for said scams has been trying to get his face removed from the scams he has perpetrated because of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg51038033#msg51038033It was my reply to the above post containing the quoted material that was deleted, which I'm willing to post here if required. Plus there's the massive censorship of other threads this user is currently involved with. So I guess my questions are: How can a direct quote from a forum post be construed as being a doxx post when the original post is still in place? If quoting a post is considered doxxing, why has it taken over 1 year to remove said post? Similarly, if quoting a post is considered doxxing, why isn't every quote deleted? Are we now at the stage where every scam accusation/quote belongs in the doxx/investigations thread? I have replied to mprep requesting an explanation, but would be interested to hear the community's thoughts on this type of, what I consider to be, pressured/mistaken moderation. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
|
With the Coinbase f*ckers giving (selling) all their transaction data to the IRS, DEA & god knows who else, this is needed now more than ever before - great stuff!
|
|
|
|
Of course, they deleted my ANN link (twice): A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Wow. Such censorship here now - are members not allowed to ask anything anymore?
(20 posts by 10 users deleted.)
Why was this post deleted? That's not the only one they've deleted, I've had a few deleted too - this has gone full scam. I'll start a new unofficial thread for this shitcoin scam that will be uncensored so forum members are free to post questions & get answers. And I did. |
|
|
|
Now that the scammers at NovaToken [NVT] have "taken control" of GameCredits & their accounts on the official thread there is a huge amount of censorship by the new owners of those accounts, specifically the GMC Foundation account. Anyone who has had their post deleted from the GMC/NVT thread is welcome to re-post it here so that forum members can view & reply, there will be no censorship on this thread. Anyone from the GMC/NVT team are welcome to post here to explain their actions, but spam/insults or trolling will not be tolerated & I'll simply lock the thread & create a self moderated one if it gets daft. Local Rule: The account GMC Foundation is not welcome to post here. So, to get the ball rolling, here's one I had deleted earlier: Here we go - We are happy to offically announce that GameCredits and the NovaToken platform have merged. NovaToken? You must be joking. Look at the "Team" behind NovaToken & you will see a well known & proven scammer/trust abuser by the name of craslovell. Not only that, but there's a very interesting quote on the Emercoin scam thread implying that Novacoin & them were the same group back in 2017: At first glance this is an interesting coin, but there is one thing. I hope that most of the foreign users know what is a Russian coin behind which the Russian administrator of the Garrett forum.bits.media It has almost the same legend as Baltazar for Novacoin. Who knows, maybe it is one and the same person or close friends  Just ask yourself, are you willing to trust your money to these people? If Yes, then Emercoin is your a severe way  What are you even referring to? You deny the connection?  A little more craslovell history: Openly trying to buy trust on BCT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1282808.0Joined the Russian scam Emercoin/Hashcoins/Hashflare/Polybius & openly promoted them: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=362513.msg20324014#msg20324014Got caught scamming as a bounty manager: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141477.msg51034921#msg51034921Promoted another scam with karmashark, Helium - now abandoned: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1809278.2920Here he is scamming again with his Russian Emercoin crew running off with $4,384,281 after doing an ICO for Hamster (scroll down & look at the "Team", then to the end where he's trying to get his photo removed after being called out): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3098967.msg51071494#msg51071494The list of scams involving this crew are endless, they move from one to the other, victim after victim. As for his trust abuse - I've had a link to it in my sig ever since he posted it - click it & see. So, this scam has been taken over by another, bigger scam - but not really, because there's a good chance that they've been behind it from the beginning & are disguising it as a "merge" or "takeover" - whatever they want to call it - it's a bigger & more blatant scam now than it was before. Same shit, different name. As you can see, some of the members of the NVT team have been involved in a few scams & it seems they don't want users of GMC to know about it - that's tough sh*t. Fire away..... |
|
|
|
|
Still flogging this scam to death I see......
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that they show 100% confidence in HitBTC & Bitfinex shows what complete bollox it is. It's just another way for CMC to extract bribes from scam exchanges for raising their "confidence" level & fool users.
Don't fall for it. CMC are nothing but a scam promoting outfit.
|
|
|
|
I warned you all over a year ago, 1st page: **snip the scammy stuff**
So, you're back promoting scams again - I can't believe moderators let you back on this forum after the amount of scams you've pulled. How many times have you been banned now? The next time will be a perma ban...... Oh, & he got banned again btw. |
|
|
|
Did anybody discover the real identity of bonesjonesreturns ?
Judging by the clownish comments & verbal diarrhea, I think it's an alt of D Trump...... |
|
|
|
Supported & tagged. These bumping services are getting on my nerves now..... |
|
|
|
after many tickect admin resole my problem . deposit zec credited now  Then you are very lucky. I suggest you remove all your funds from that scam exchange immediately & use a legit exchange instead. |
|
|
|
Besides, I don't know of any exchange listed on coinmarketcap that is not legit.
Which proves how much you don't know. You could be right, but I'm still young and have my entire life to learn. You, on the other hand, have your entire life to be a jerk. Quoted for reference. CMC specializes in promoting scam exchanges & their scam coins for payment. They will literally list & promote anything for payment - it's nothing but a scam promotion platform. Using them as a reference is a non-defense & meaningless - as is insulting those who correct your mistakes. |
|
|
|
Trying to engage with those scammers is a waste of time but full marks to nutildah for trying to converse with them. The moderators should nuke the current coinsbit thread just like they did with the previous one, that would send out the correct signal to those scammers.@nutildah: You're wasting your breath with these shills buddy - you can throw all the evidence in the world at them - they refuse to see it.
Mods need to ban the lot of them, as well as their scammy coinsbit thread. Again.
If moderators have already nuked their first thread, why are they allowing their new thread? It makes no sense. I've even reported their thread & I know others have as well, but nothing happens. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
