How can be sure that these helpers wouldnt sell their good reviews to these products?Because if they can earn money from giving reviews im sure few of these people would take advantage the system's weakness?
The lina review cannot assure us that they can moderate all of their helpers. Moderate in terms that they know that their helpers are accountable to their own obligation. But the project will make a way to tract the helpers who will sell their reviews in the firms. I am sure that there is no possibility to eliminate fraud reviews but it can be decreased as time goes by. Actually, Lina.review is not saying any promises to their investors or community. Though being a helper on lina is one of the good things because they ca charge any fee once they do review on the products according to their job descriptions here. |
|
|
|
There should be someone to answer our questions,because we believe that this project has potentials in the future. If the moderator is active here it will more easier for us to find good answers.??  . Well, I think even there is no moderators on this project, the community believed in this lina project are accommodating all the question whether the questioner is investors or newbie here. Though, it is still much better if one of the team of this project will show up here and many member here will be glad to hear it for sure. |
|
|
|
I read that you are into REVIEWS and online reputations.
bad and good comment or review are both publicity and this is what every company or seller needs.
How can you make that bad reviews to turn around and make it one of the best impact for the company?
I know this is possible and everyone can do this in their own way!
That will not be Lina’s task in my opinion since Lina is only responsible for the reviews whether it be positive or negative but i believe negative reviews has to be accompanied by a clear explanation on how they gave the product or merchant a very low or negative rate and based on those rate they can make their services better if the costumer or helpers make bad review about them and it should not be considered as a hindrance for their success. The negative reviews must be a challenge for a certain product or services to improve it. After making improvements then this will benefit the users and later on will give a positive review which in the end will be an advantage to the merchant. The problem is not everyone understands this principle. Merchants who recieve negative reviews through Lina will surely be dismayed because they are paying and their payment will just result to negative reviews that would lead to low ratings also. True not all are able to get the catch of this principles anyway. And I think receiving any negative reviews is just a normal things here. Because we all know that as a Merchant you are able to create your product to be reviewed in the platform. |
|
|
|
What is their desired Soft cap/Hard cap for their ICO ? And what is the ICO price of its token ?
According to their White paper, the ICO will produce 300 million Lina tokens in its ICO phase and Another 600 million tokens will be produced in the consecutive years(in the course of ten years). I don't see what is their Hard cap or soft cap for their project. The ICO price they are targetting is 1 usd per token. Do they have already announced when will this ICO be started? i am looking forward to this project as i have been here asking questions from the moderators. They don't announce yet the ICO sale/Crowdsale yet. But based on their roadmap it will be between Q2 and Q3 of 2018 where they will generate tokens and release their alpha platform. Maybe we should ask some developer out there. In my idea about the lina.review crodwsales their ico will run until March 31, 2018. but still up to now there is no update from them what is the latest news about their project. I guess in telegram they will give some update over there. |
|
|
|
A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?
If you read the whitepaper of lina.review I am 100% sure you won't ask this question. But let me tell you the strength of lina.review such as follows: 1. Revenue is completely recorded on the blockchain and visible to the public. 2. Users can become Helpers if they have many high-quality reviews. Helper may lose their position if there are many poor-quality reviews. 3. Unlimited types of products or services. 4. Build specific review criteria for each subject with the assistance of available team of Helpers. 5. Users and Helpers can earn Lina token basing on their contribution. 6. The assessment is decentralized so it cannot be faked. 7. The results are completely transparent to the users. |
|
|
|
What a great project,advertiser/merchants will be the main beneficiaries of this decentralized reviews,10% of advertising revenue will be put the whole system? so that the website will have something to pay those helpers so that these people wont need to sell their reviews to these brands or products.
Yeah you are right ,that should be the fees will go thru,to pay those people who are giving reviews to the products/services that these brands wants to get reviewed.So there will be no one that will sell their reviews? because they are already making money with just reviews. Those experts should be examined very well so there will be no biased/paid reviews in the website. Politicians and other government employee have high salary and pay roll, though they still corrupt the country they are serving, this can be apply with LINA.REVIEW! Yes they have payment and budget for helpers, but what will happen if some company that want the best review for their business or product pay some helpers 2 years of their salary in just 1 review? As far as I know, lina review will focus in the service of the firms and company, not in the government. And I think it is hard to integrate reviews in politics since we all know that the politicians don't have the plan to drop their position in just a matter of review. Besides, Lina.review will be implemented on Blockchain technology, which will address issues related to transparency and immutability of the score, as well as develop mechanisms to help users and experts earn profits based on system development and the quality of their reviews (via smart contract). |
|
|
|
If the users would have a chance to be promoted to be a helper,how will the system knows when these people arent from the brands that these helpers should be reviewed?
I am a little confused on how will this system prevent those abusive people,please enlighten me.
The lina project have a set of qualifications for them to hire an individual or consumer but i don't think that lina will hire someone with out a high set of qualifications or without reviewing their backgrounds It says in the WP that LINa Review's Helper Board will be very strict i n the approval for being a Helper due to user-oriented assessment of the system. That's right! meaning to become a Helper you will undergo to their process accordingly for you to reach that position. Then once you approve by the helper board, big responsibility is waiting for you too as a Helper. Or else you might get be demote if you didn't comply completely the task of being a Helper duties and responsibilities. |
|
|
|
A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?
I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products. So it means reviews written by common users to a certain business company are being filtered and approved first before it appears on their profile? And after the filtering what are they going to do with the negative ones, hide or dispose? Why would they need to hide a negative review? If this is the case the transparency is useless. LINA review is not about positive reviews. It is about using blockchain technology, qualifying the reviewers and giving the most reliable review on the market. Only when companies learn to accept criticism that they can grow. As for the common users review this may also be reflected but I think the helpers review will be used in rating the product being reviewed. Again, blockchain technology helps us trace the source of the reviews but the main thing here is hiring qualified reviewers, HELPERS, based on their qualification. I agree that they are lack on transparency. if they keep hiding negative reviews then is useless. Blockchain is build for transparency,reliable and cability. I'm reviewing their whitepaper devs should update on this. What could be the main purpose of Helpers? I mean are they are the one moderating the Lina.Review's website? Helpers (a.k.a as Experts) main responsibility is to review products and services on the system. They also submit a certain number of reviews with acceptable quality every month. Another task of Helper is to vote for submitted user reviews Agreed, on what you said dude. But the duties and responsibilities of a Helpers is not that easy as you can see. Because once they didn't meet the quality standard of their task on lina.review they can be demote by the Helper board in my opinion. |
|
|
|
The project promises to be interesting and new! i hope the usability of the token will improve in the future，I hope will develop further after crowd-sale !
Me too. I hope their token will benefit me also. I already had collected some considerable amount of tokens from different ICOs and most of them are dormant. Some are not even listed in exchanges.  All ico token project is giving any benefits from their participants after their campaign ended up, however in Lina.review I think there is a big difference from the first ico who had been arise up here before into Lina.review features has. So ti will give us a big benefit for sure in the end, just lets wait and see what's next. |
|
|
|
According to Lina's technical details, Lina builds its own blockchain. What's the purpose of having its own blockchain? Why not use Ethereum blockchain alone? Is it more advantageous?
There are many projects who had their own blockchain, this project has one of the best platforms and maybe they also want to have something on their own blockchain. we will see soon what they want to show. I agreed that most of the ico had their own blockchain. But anyway, excuse me for asking this question dude. How did you say that this project has one the best platform? Meaning, you already tried to used their platform? |
|
|
|
I read that you are into REVIEWS and online reputations.
bad and good comment or review are both publicity and this is what every company or seller needs.
How can you make that bad reviews to turn around and make it one of the best impact for the company?
I know this is possible and everyone can do this in their own way!
As per my own opinion the bad reviews of a certain product could become a strong point of a commodity if the people will see that this negative feedback is being developed or being fixed by the company itself that they will see the development of the company in terms of fixing the negative side of their product or company. It is upon the steps that the firm will do in order to enhance their services. Bad review will either destroy the reputation of the firm or it may be a stepping stone of the firm to collect many clients. Therefore, a review may bring change to the reputation and services of a firm so it is a must that the reviews are equal and transparent to all. It should. Bad reviews must be posted as well so not only that costumers/user will be aware, that is also for the advertiser so they can make their products and services better. If Lina will just eliminate the negative one s and posts the positive ones, that is unfair and they will be unreliable platform for reviews. I dont think that the lina.project was beinh developed just to eliminate those negative revirws of a certain companies. Lina was created for the benefit of the consumers for them to be more aware towards the products that they want to avail as well as the services that the costumers wants to purchase. Good Point! It is a win-win situation for both companies and consumers (end users). If there will be a fair review, product quality will certainly be improved and the companies reputation will surely be uplifted if they've done the right countermeasures to improve their product and services. You maybe right on that things, it is a win-win situation. What if they fail to give the 100% full satisfaction to their consumer or users? of course the company reputation will also be lessen and the service quality will turn into waste or nothing only. How is that? |
|
|
|
Overall, this is a well thought of project. Reading the whitepaper, it was very well researched and conceptualized. Only a few holes to be filled in once it has been launched.Decentralized, competitors listed, advantage over competitors listed, problem to be solved is clear, no claims of doing the impossible, but rather thinking first what would be the best option to solve problems with the current industry. Then, there is the target client market and target user market, all other industries, and all individual users.
That's right! I believe that this project will certainly change the image of the review industry. I really want to commend the people behind this concept which is really beneficial not only people that belong to the industry but to the ordinary users (consumers). They will surely enjoy the "value of money" effect of trustful reviews before they buy a certain product. You know what pal, while reading their whitepaper I found out that By being implemented on Blockchain technology, Lina.review will address issues related to transparency and immutability of the score, as well as develop mechanisms to help users and experts earn profits based on system development and the quality of their reviews. |
|
|
|
It should some some positive and negative trust like what we have in bitcointalk.org so that people might know that those helpers are legit and not selling their reviews,so that the system wont be that easy to crack,because these greedy people will always find there way to make money.
You may have a point on this one mate, but I think those people that who are greed will no longer be disappear in any form of business, especially in this type of business isn't right? So the better way for us to avoid this things is we must be careful in everything we choose to be involve in any project like this one. I think this is possible, we really are waiting to see what Lina.review platform will look like and how will it function. I hope I can participate in the testing of Lina.review. The lina project review wants to reduce the fake information or fake reviews that are given by the fake reviewees who are being paid by the companies for the sake of their reputation, giving accutate reviews is the main function of yhe lina prjoct review . DO you really wanna take it? do we really need to have those comments and review? how can we be sure that those are true and will be done in a good way? what is your measurable way to say that? if y0ou have! tell me cause I wanna know. Do we really need to have those comments and reviews? I think yes. In the advent of technology where almost everything can be bought online a practical review or even comments can help a buyer make a better decision in buying. Personally when I buy a mobile phone for example, aside from checking the specification of the unit I want, I also make sure to read comments, feed backs or related review so that I can get a better grasp of what I am buying before I finally buy. If people will find out that Lina reviews are reliable and Lina.reviewed products tend to be more competitive, I think this will greatly affect the market. Do we really need it? Yes we do. To save time and avoid wasting my money on products that won't satisfy me, I usually read reviews and feedbacks about the product that I am going to buy. This will help me decide which one should I buy. So a reliable review site is very important to avoid scams. That's a very much important actually. Perhaps there's customer that their capital payment for the goods will turn into nothing, of course we want it to be satisfy in it, therefore reviewing the item or checking them in the first place was just a normal things to do for the customer like us, isn't right? |
|
|
|
removed signature and avatar, waiting token distribution. thanks
I will also remove my sig code and avatar too now, thanks for the wonderful opportunity kwh team. We will wait on your distribution then hold in a long ter, God bless. |
|
|
|
i have 1000+ friends, since i am a newbie, I have read about Facebook bounty but i am not sure newbie can apply Facebook bounty. Please suggest
NEWBIE can apply in all bounties, though some signature campaigns (most of all) are not accepting your rank) you are very welcome on all of the others. examples: Facebook Twitter youtube translations any any any bounties available but the signature. |
|
|
|
In your mind, what makes a good bounty program better than another? Payouts, process, etc...
The token allocated to the bounty program is not a percent of total ICO sold, BUT some percent of the whole token supply! The campaign manager is easy to touch and spreadsheet are always updated. The bounty has its own telegram group (for bounty members separate from investors) Campaign manager and the DEV team have their words and will not delay any. |
|
|
|
Give your ideas about successfull presales
Successful pre-sale of an ICO have a great team and a nice marketing strategy, I saw a lot of ICO having successful PRE-SALE that ends in just an hour or less. For me UTRUST is had the best PRE-SALE ever. |
|
|
|
Send real document this is better.
KYC make ICO better as there are so many scams before and people (investors) started to doubt ICO. But are we really sure about the safety of our identity with those ICO that will be secure and not to use on any transactions? How can we be sure that every team of that ICO is reliable and will not steal our Identification? |
|
|
|
NEO is a cryptocoin that aims to be “China's Ethereum” with technological benefits. it has enjoyed some price spikes recently. will it reach the top ten in 2018?
Definitely, i am counting on neo to be on top 5 this year and soon after 2018 will overtake ripple and ethereum. Neo has a promising project and a brilliant mind of the developers which will surely become the popular and most ICO will adopt the NEP5 token. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
