Spain is not as powerful and influential as China so Gibraltar stays with the UK. I don't think EU will do something different.



There are still many influential leaders and politicians in the UK that wanted to stay with the EU. Before there were even plans of a re-vote and that the second one won't be including the whole populace.   

Because if we use BetterCoin then it won't connect to gambling anymore which is the main purpose of the coming site.

It sounds awful to you but it is actually more appealing to the eyes of the gambling world. Maybe you don't like gambling my friend. It is fun and entertaining. Just make sure not to gamble more than enough of your extra money.   

1 bitcoin is maybe beyond reach but you can buy it in decimals. When it was at $3,000 you probably said that and will said it again when it reaches $20,000 again soon.

Bitcoin is not losing its popularity. Instead it is becoming more popular. Bakkt was launched, Binance entered in the US and many more coming soon as halving is nearing to happen.

Low income countries don't represent the big volume of bitcoin users, investors and traders.

Maybe you just lack updates my friend. 

I am using Nitrogensports and the same with Cloudbet, your winning bet needs to be graded in order to receive the amount you won. Sometimes it also took hours. Maybe I will transfer to other sports book site but who is more reliable than Nitrogensports? Few years ago, Cloudbet has red trusts for being shady and seeing this thread now won't make Cloudbet any better than Nitrogensports. I am also considering fiat-based sports book if Nitrogensports turns to worst.

The same with Shapeshift, just lately they are also asking their clients to open an account and the need of KYC. Many companies are now shifting to KYC needed platforms probably due to government regulations. Remitano is available in many countries like USA. And they cannot just let their services to other countries without KYC, SEC can probably won't approve their services in the US.

Liverpool and Manchester United is a rich history of rivalry. Currently, Liverpool is on the upper hand, this team is too strong and won the last UEFA.

Frankly, I don't believe on the conspiracy here that players aren't playing well on purpose as they are against Solksjaer. Anyway, Man U needs to man it up if they want to stay relevant in this season. 

If you bet 1 btc on a 2.0 odds then you get 2 btc in return as what the odds say, not 1.9 btc. If there is a 2.0 odds then it means the other side is below 2.0, it is where the house edge is deducted.



That is why in that snooker game both are at 1.887 odds because giving both guys a 2.0 gives no profit for the house. That is synonymous with 11.3% as the house edge. Sports betting sites don't mention house edge but it is there as an open secret. The profit you mentioned needed by the sports betting sites is the house edge mentioned in the crypto casino betting sites. 


 

I am also thinking of betting for the Czechs to score in this game as they have the home court advantage and they are not bad being second in the group but I pulled out because as we know England is just very strong currently. But reading your post it gives me the confidence again to take the bet. 

May your luck continues mate. 

You are mistaken my friend. Sports betting have higher house edge compared to online crypto-based dice and some other online crypto-based casino betting sites.

Take a look at this English Open in snooker moneyline. Both David Grace and Michael Georgiou are 50/50 according to betting experts. But if you bet on any of them you won't get 100% return. Instead it is only 88.87% meaning the house edge is 11.13%. That is much bigger than the 1% to 2% house edge on most online crypto casinos. The only difference with sports betting is you cannot purely rely on luck. You can study and assess the players and their past performances. The only games that aren't dependent on luck on casino games are poker and other games that you can play against other players.   



I mentioned "online crypto-based casino" because land based casino have higher house edge, probably 10% to 20%. The same with online fiat-based casinos where house edge are probably the same with land-based casinos.

My friend you cannot expect to have regular income on gambling. It is a game of chance, luck and some needed analysis. You better gamble responsibly just for fun and do not have high expectations to profit.

And Telegram continues to grow. Telegram is the best messaging app when it comes to privacy and security, no wonder users keep growing by numbers.

The supply doesn't matter because it is about the price and Telegram's market capitalization. If the market capitalization is already in billion dollars then it is probably expensive and harder to grow in price. $50 million dollars or below is just fine. I for one will be watching this when it goes to exchanges.   

I chose CoinBettors.com because it is more appealing to my eyes. Coin represents monetary or crypto currencies and bettors for gambling. So the name itself is obviously for gambling and easier for search engines imo.

Op are you planning to establish a gambling site in the future? Is it a casino, sportsbook or both? Good luck with it if you are planning. And don't forget to promote it here in bitcointalk.

Buddy it is not even a poem.

Mine is not even a good one I guess. It is hard to create a good haiku though that fits well on this game. Hurrah to some people that made it sounds cool. I'll try to make a good one next quarter.

Binance do have an impact on bitcoin market but not that big and fast. Little by little Binance known for its many altcoins in its market helps crypto currencies particularly bitcoin become mainstream. The US government is not really against bitcoin after all, as we can see there are many exchanges already in the US. The US just impose very tight rules on bitcoin and crypto currencies because it is decentralized. 

That's a deep conspiracy mate if ever players are doing it on purpose to show the board that Solksjaer is ineffective. Meanwhile, it looks like Man U board board is still supportive on Solksjaer and the team is possible to go into an overhaul. If overhauling and signing new players are Solksjaer's main plan right now. Then the current players if ever really conspiring for bad performances gives the board more reason to support Solksjaer plans.

You don't have to disagree with each other, both reasons can be combined. Except maybe for number 3. How can bitcoin gives you financial freedom when it can go down or up just like normal currencies do? And is bitcoin is even too volatile that is dangerous in terms of your financial security? Maybe you are earning bitcoins online? But everyone can also earn online with fiats too. Maybe the financial freedom you meant is free from government interventions?

Satoshi Nakamoto being anonymous helped a lot. Maybe bitcoin developers already knew that a crackdown is coming. Being decentralized in nature, there is nothing governments can do to shut down on bitcoin. Not even banning miners and considering it illegal since there are many forms and ways miners can do, the world is big.

Now the US is trying to regulate it to assert control on stake holders. The autocratic Chinese government knowing it cannot control bitcoin did massive bans. Binance for example left China, stood still and now its one of the biggest crypto exchange in the world.

That is why the guy said stablecoin. Just like USDT or the Libra currency of Facebook.

But as mentioned by op. There are cases where fiat is necessary. Just like places where there are no internet and electricity. Most cities and developed countries can do a full shift to their own stable crypto currencies but developing and poor countries will be having a difficult time to adapt this kind of monetary system. There are countries that poverty level is very high and needed to focus on those issues rather than developing their own crypto currencies. 

I stopped expecting too much after the whole 2018 was a big disaster on my crypto investments. 2017 was a golden memory for me and I would be very happy if it happens again. It is three months more to go and 2019 ends. With this short span of time there will be 5% chances of Litecoin reaching $2,000. And maybe 30% chance of it reaching $1,000. I will be contented if Litecoin ends at $200 this year.     

Bitcoin was not build to be dependent with other currencies, so yes it will survive alone. Altcoins are born because they want to develop something better than bitcoin. Developers came up with different ideas that can fill the gaps that bitcoin is lacking. Even bitcoin itself went into hard forks because of stakeholders differences on how it would continue as a decentralized currency. Just like numerous fiats existing then bitcoin and altcoins can co exist too.

OP is like a hard core altcoin believer and there is nothing wrong with it. It is normal that many people leaving altcoins because of the long bearish period. It is not about not believing the many altcoin projects were many are also very interesting to watch out but it concerns about their investments value.  

I think it was last year when I heard Telegram will conduct an ICO. I didn't know it continued and went well. These sellers are like IOUs. Way back 2017, there were popular coins that were marketed despite the real supplies aren't distributed yet. These current prices are all speculation based. Are the prices offered above the ICO price already or  they were offered at a lower price?

Telegram is getting more popular and users are growing too. I think their is a real potential in their coins.