It's kind of hard to get any work done today. I keep refreshing this page -> https://glbse.com/asset/view/GIGAMININGLooks like all bid orders a 1 BTC will not be filled come tomorrow morning because of higher bids. Your best bet is to make sure you have tightened up your bids for the last 500 before 9am tomorrow. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Your BFL Single rig is equal to my GPU farm  Those are my hash monsters!  Best thing about them is that they never crash. They just keep on hashing. |
|
|
|
I have 2 under-volted 5870's.
One at 840/155 and 1v = 384 mh/s
The other at 755/155 and .95v = 347 mh/s
If I try to set the first card to .95v I have to set the engine clock too low to around 40o, otherwise it crashes.
The 2nd card is happy as can be at .95v
I like the 750/150 at the .95v! I'll have to try that out in a little while. |
|
|
|
The average for me running 0.95V is around 310 MH/s for my 5870s and around 290 MH/s for my 5850s. Each card was tested individually and they range from 680 Mhz to 740 Mhz for what they can handle with most of them just around 700ish.
Good info. Thanks for posting. |
|
|
|
Will there be a limit in shares one can buy or will the richest man win ?
500 remain for the IPO tomorrow. Nefario has confirmed that the highest bid will be the first to be filled. |
|
|
|
Is this what I want?  Looks like you figured it out. |
|
|
|
|
Inaba,
- How many shares will you be releasing on Wednesday?
- If all the shares will not be released on Wednesday, what is the schedule to release the rest?
- When will the first dividends be paid?
- To be clear about dividends, whatever the equipment generates will be divided equally between all shares holders?
Thanks,
gigavps
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like 50 are sold. 1/6 of the way there.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the quick reply. Will GLBSE pull the trigger or will it be you? I'm not sure how this works honestly. As you know I have some interest:)
Thanks.
I will be pulling the trigger. I set glbse.com to release the bonds to me at 6am (i'm an early riser) so that I would have time to get pre IPO shares to the proper owners. Also, thanks for your interest. |
|
|
|
What time will this hit and what time zone?
Thanks.
If everything goes as planned, should be around 9am Tuesday EST. |
|
|
|
I believe I could. Much larger heatsinks, (perhaps the height of where the individual fan would be if removed) and toss the individual fan on top of each "super single" (I like that term ). Same cross-ways fan arrangement, but less turbulence and localized heating. The case fans may need to be a little higher velocity. I went and looked at the dimensions in the first post, and it looks like in its current form it will take up 7U of rack height, but it is 10 inches wide which would make it a tight squeeze to get 2 of them beside each other in a standard 19" rack. Perhaps it would be best to ignore potential improvements here though, because I don't want to delay anything by causing a redesign halfway through. However, for the future SuperComputer, if it isn't watercooled, the best thing to do would be to make it fit in a rack as best as possible. That could mean specially ducted airflow, offset processors (to prevent waste heat from cooking another processor), standard width, (no shelf needed), and no more than 4U height. Take for example a 2U server with quad 90 watt processors: They have fairly large heatsinks, and none of them are in line with each other. Although these might have to be stacked several deep, an offset arrangement would prevent the heat from travelling linearly as it does now, cooking the rear devices. rjk, thanks for your input. I know BFL is eager to get feedback from the community and I appreciate you taking the time to write this up. Hopefully the current heatpipe for the rev3 can work to remove enough heat from the super single chips. We have already seen evidence that BFL is listening to the community (mini rigs instead of rig boxes, off-the-shelf PSUs to power them) so the more constructive feedback we can get to them, the faster they can assimilate these ideas into the products. I do have a question though. Can the current heat pipes be linked together to better dissipate heat? I'm by no means a technical expert in this area, just wondering if there is a way to use the heatpipes currently produced to better achieve "larger heatsinks". |
|
|
|
Still I agree the airflow seems .... inefficient (I am trying to be more nice).
Hi D&T, Can you arrange the boards within the enclosure to make the airflow more efficient and share it with BFL? Thanks, gigavps |
|
|
|
Can't wait for 4/10  Looks like there are only 80 bonds left before the price starts rising. https://glbse.com/asset/view/GIGAMININGThank you again to everyone who's invested thus far. I'm still in shock. |
|
|
|
Hello fellow bitcoiners, I have seen and used undervolt settings at both 1.0v and 0.9v for my 5970s. I have not however been able to find anyone who is running with the voltage at 0.95v. Anyone doing this? Thanks, gigavps P.S. You can see all of my undervolt settings here -> http://farm.gigamining.com/mgpumon/ |
|
|
|
Giga, can you shed some light on this? I know there was talk update updating the functionality of GLBSE, but I'm not sure if it has been implemented. The previous behaviour would have bids fills starting at the highest price, and then for bids at the same price starting with oldest first.
I will consult Nefario today regarding this issue. Looks like there are orders for around 370 out of the 500 remaining bonds. If you are looking to get in and haven't placed a bid yet, there is a bit of room left. |
|
|
|
|
Inaba,
Hopefully you can start to answer some of the outstanding questions in this thread.
Thanks,
gigavps
|
|
|
|
Yup, DIV is in, and the math looks right on my end.
I cannot speak highly enough of amazingrando. Our business dealings have always be flawless and his communication is top notch. This second wave coming out on Monday is a REAL opportunity to get in on a big mining operation. I have personally bought BITBOND and know that he is the real deal. Keep up the great work amazingrando! |
|
|
|
How do we implement asset transfers (transfers, not trades, trades work just fine) in a way that is fair to all?
Transfers should have a fee. The fee should be based on the last trading price or initial offering price and should be the normal .5%. This would solve all of the problems (any sales outside the system) and still getting you guys paid for host the trading and IPO. I feel this is the simplest solution and accounts for most if not all transfers. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
