Vitalik, what did you decide about sharding? Is it the best way to achieve scaleability? Will you implement it in Ethereum network?
We now have no one "main net" with sharding technology and people are still doubting a bit. Thank you.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=7314Vitalik was last active on this forum more than 2 years ago so he is not following this topic anymore. You asked this question at wrong place there are so many ways exist to raise this question like Twitter if you really want to know about this. https://twitter.com/VitalikButerinis he still giving out free ETHs? lol! of course but you must wear the same cat bag like him at least one day. send him back a prove (pic with your username and date) via twitter and you will get some free ETH. --> Help Vitalik gain some muscle! https://fitvitalik.io/Done!
|
|
|
guys, could Leslie L. be Satoshi Nakamoto? there is a link from a post of Satoshi via Vitalik Buterin to him. he worked from 2001 to 2014 for Microsoft Research which could explain his preference for Windows developement of the first clients. EDIT: OH MY GOSH, Vitalik Buterin accidental revealed Satoshi Nakamoto! https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/08/10/vitalik-buterin-proposes-consensus-algorithm-requires-1-honesthttps://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1027972126593015809I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less.
The network nodes only accept the first version of a transaction they receive to incorporate into the block they're trying to generate. When you broadcast a transaction, if someone else broadcasts a double-spend at the same time, it's a race to propagate to the most nodes first. If one has a slight head start, it'll geometrically spread through the network faster and get most of the nodes.
A rough back-of-the-envelope example: 1 0 4 1 16 4 64 16 80% 20%
So if a double-spend has to wait even a second, it has a huge disadvantage.
The payment processor has connections with many nodes. When it gets a transaction, it blasts it out, and at the same time monitors the network for double-spends. If it receives a double-spend on any of its many listening nodes, then it alerts that the transaction is bad. A double-spent transaction wouldn't get very far without one of the listeners hearing it. The double-spender would have to wait until the listening phase is over, but by then, the payment processor's broadcast has reached most nodes, or is so far ahead in propagating that the double-spender has no hope of grabbing a significant percentage of the remaining nodes.
|
|
|
https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/08/10/vitalik-buterin-proposes-consensus-algorithm-requires-1-honestthe idea behind comes from Satoshi himself but applied to txs instead of blocks. I believe it'll be possible for a payment processing company to provide as a service the rapid distribution of transactions with good-enough checking in something like 10 seconds or less.
The network nodes only accept the first version of a transaction they receive to incorporate into the block they're trying to generate. When you broadcast a transaction, if someone else broadcasts a double-spend at the same time, it's a race to propagate to the most nodes first. If one has a slight head start, it'll geometrically spread through the network faster and get most of the nodes.
A rough back-of-the-envelope example: 1 0 4 1 16 4 64 16 80% 20%
So if a double-spend has to wait even a second, it has a huge disadvantage.
The payment processor has connections with many nodes. When it gets a transaction, it blasts it out, and at the same time monitors the network for double-spends. If it receives a double-spend on any of its many listening nodes, then it alerts that the transaction is bad. A double-spent transaction wouldn't get very far without one of the listeners hearing it. The double-spender would have to wait until the listening phase is over, but by then, the payment processor's broadcast has reached most nodes, or is so far ahead in propagating that the double-spender has no hope of grabbing a significant percentage of the remaining nodes.
EDIT: uups, accidental revealed a new candiate for Satoshi Nakamoto (no, not Vitalik).
|
|
|
Vitalik, what did you decide about sharding? Is it the best way to achieve scaleability? Will you implement it in Ethereum network?
We now have no one "main net" with sharding technology and people are still doubting a bit. Thank you.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=7314Vitalik was last active on this forum more than 2 years ago so he is not following this topic anymore. You asked this question at wrong place there are so many ways exist to raise this question like Twitter if you really want to know about this. https://twitter.com/VitalikButerinis he still giving out free ETHs? lol! of course but you must wear the same cat bag like him at least one day. send him back a prove (pic with your username and date) via twitter and you will get some free ETH.
|
|
|
(They should be Ferraris. Much more impressive car than the Lambo)
Unless it is a Huracan Performante or Aventador SVJ that has just taken the nurburgring record, balls of steel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRsq35Et-EY&t=6sI bought a Lambo and I am not in the Bcash camp Come on man! It hasn't even moved since that last time you showed us. You're still paying for it, aren't you! edit: <--- see what I mean? edit2: I just realized I'm more jealous of your garage. Nice! EDIT: https://lambo2btc.com
|
|
|
Vitalik, what did you decide about sharding? Is it the best way to achieve scaleability? Will you implement it in Ethereum network?
We now have no one "main net" with sharding technology and people are still doubting a bit. Thank you.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=7314Vitalik was last active on this forum more than 2 years ago so he is not following this topic anymore. You asked this question at wrong place there are so many ways exist to raise this question like Twitter if you really want to know about this. https://twitter.com/VitalikButerinVitalik and his new girlfriend.
|
|
|
Gentlemen. It's been a pleasure. see you again in 2021. same place. same time.
|
|
|
ein schöner chart welcher zeigt, dass es noch etwas runter gehen könnte.
|
|
|
I just wanted to let you all know, that I'm secure enough with myself to admit, that I have absolutely no idea what is going on with Bitcorn prices.
What a ride though. Crazy wild swings.
I can't imagine the financial carnage Bitcorn has caused people trying to play the markets.
just normal. like it was 2014/15/16. dark side of the power wants to have low prices for cheap entries before the next bubble.
|
|
|
What does it mean "Gold bar" its just a joke or really some type of wallet? Like trezor or ledger?
it's like a paper wallet but with much more glamor. he posted a pic where he holds it in his own hands. but the pic is deleted now of course.
|
|
|
... Ich versuche grade rauszufinden, wann ich meine Ansprüche wo anmelden muss. So wie ich das verstanden habe, muss ich den Schritt von vor 4 Jahren wiederholen.
Edit: Mein englisch ist grauenvoll bis nicht vorhanden.
Nach aktuellem Plan sollte das Anmelden der Ansprüche ab ca. 26. September bis zum 22. Oktober 2018 auf https://www.mtgox.com möglich sein. Der Prozess wird wohl ähnlich der Anmeldung beim Insolvenzverfahren sein, ja. Es kann also nicht schaden, wenn Du bis Oktober eine Person Deines Vertrauens rekrutieren kannst, die Dir ggf. beim Ausfüllen hilft. ziemlich kurz die zeitspanne. da bin ich mal gespannt. nicht dass danach einer vor gericht klagt, dass die zeitspanne zu kurz ist und es sich erneut verzögert.
|
|
|
Eh, you sell it when you need it. Not before. Happy 21k posts everyone!
Bought bitcoin at $370.
Didn't sell at $1200 top. Also didn't sell at $19K top.
*Looks at current price*
#stillfuckingwinning
Will still buy bitcoin today and in the futureSame action right here ..... buy put in safe storage and let it be resting
|
|
|
Na fortune.com ist ja lustig Welcome! To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, Meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices. Heisst "and your other apps and devices" das die meinen Toaster stalken und den Kühlschrank überwachen? #iot ja, und Deinen Herzschrittmacher auch.
|
|
|
Die zwingende logische Konsequenz muss analog zur Konsequenz der Führer lauten: Legal? Illegal? Scheissegal!
ja, das stimmt, nur rückt der Staat in letzter konsequenz für den bürger mit dem SEK an und setzt seine interessen ohne wenn und aber durch.
|
|
|
That's pretty Brave of you to drop your referral code on us like that. I mean, you know we have a moderator to nForce the rules. You're rolling the dice here. Man... some people never Learn! JESUS, it is NOT my referral code. EDIT: referral code starts with "a=". I don't know what "h=" stands for.
|
|
|
Holy moly, I'm screwed. All my PIN codes are leaked!
|
|
|
my new ASIC miner arrived TOP!! EDIT: 7nm I guess?
|
|
|
Wäre ratsam, aber man munkelt er sei teils sehr emotional. ~hier war mal ein Bild~ habe mir sagen lassen, dass das reizwort bei ihm BCash ist. wie bei Kahn das reizwort Klinsmann --> https://youtu.be/OChMxYHW1zA?t=49sMüsst ihr du mich so erschrecken? Da ignoriert man schon einen User und dann posten andere seinen Avatar in riesengroß. hört doch einfach mit dem ignorieren quatsch auf. niemand kann wissen wer wen ignoriert hat (ausser wo es offensichtlich ist weil der user wirklich ALLE nervt) und dann quotet man halt jemanden um zu antworten. wenn man mit jemanden nicht weiter diskutieren möchte einfach überlesen ohne ihn auszublenden. dann hört die diskussion schon von selber auf. jedoch muss jeder machen wie er es für richtig hält. EDIT: oder war das sarkastisch gemeint?
|
|
|
|