You can try to invest it on bit-x or Cex.io since they are trusted investment company that still active. But I suggest you to keep it rather to invest it. Just look for example bitcoin's value was increasing yesterday. I'm sure many people who hold it has gain some profit.
both bit-x and cex.io are exchanges, and if youre referring to "investing" as buying cloud mining hashing power, cex.io stopped doing that some time ago as it was no longer profitable.
|
|
|
If OP doesn't accept that TX as a loan then he must refund it immediately. There's no way it can be considered OK for him to keep it until the 16th, not to mention permanently. Obviously ManyProofs didn't mean to give it away regardless of how he wrote his message because of his lack of knowledge of English. If I sent money by mistake to someone and he refused to refund it (minus any cost incurred by him) of course I'd consider him a scammer. This is a comparable case. I'd consider ManyProofs' actions as a mistake but of course it's not acceptable for OP to take advantage of that mistake. The moment OP noticed that unexpected TX in his address he should have refunded immediately minus the TX fee if he didn't want to use it. Instead he spent it (getting a free gain of the coins) and now refuses to refund until the 16th as per the loan he requested (and didn't happen according to him). That's unacceptable. I hope he at least refund by then.
not saying that there shouldnt be a refund, in fact i do believe that he should get refunded, and hopefully learn from this mistake. but, i was just hoping to get the point across that in the case there was no refund, there would be no one for manyproofs to blame but himself. i should clarify that when i agreed with ausbit's statement, i was referring to the first half that he was lucky to be offered a refund in the first place. but at this point, as the coins sent by manyproof has already been spent, it might be easier to just consider that as the loan taken and discuss terms instead seeing as how op has offered a refund.
|
|
|
whats so "different" about the picks your providing? youre claiming that your picks are different or special in some sort of way in your title after all.
|
|
|
its 75 luck 25 skill as all gambling games needs luck, without it you cant win anything in gambling i believe
i would argue the opposite; imo its 75 skill and 35% luck. if you know what youre experienced poker player and make the right plays, you should come out ahead in the end (long term), the cards you get should just decide how quickly (or slowly) that happens.
|
|
|
Finally, someone made off-chain version of luckyb.it Also, you can made your own game I hope you could improve your site's appearance you should checkout betterbet.io's version of plinko, i have to say it looks amazing. the playing board is also editable to add pegs/levels.
|
|
|
refound me now !!!! 1BYnjSWG4sPbRhqMVAkTE2QxkHoJBDxZ2s
Ha, your lucky the OP has even offered to refund your btc. I wouldn't give you a single satoshi after the way you acted by sending btc with no agreement, i would consider it a donation. u scum im going to agree with ausbit; you quite literally said: "here i give you monies" (lol) and sent bitcoin to his address. no discussion of loan agreements, just you acting rashly. if op decides not to pay it back its entirely your fault as you gave away money. do you think banks or loan sharks just say "hey man heres some money go have fun now?" they get an agreement on repayment, interest rates, etc, none of which you bothered to even consider.
|
|
|
Sorry to hear OP lose on Freebitco.in, it is a good faucet site, but their is house egde is 2.5%, whihc is way too high.
And better to keep away from those x 2 betting, go find some with x 1.X
i would assume that the larger portion of people who use/play at freebitco.in are rather new to bitcoin, and as their site is usually the first one on google searches on "free bitcoin," i would also assume that the majority of these people have no idea of house edge, provably fair, etc. which allows for the site to get away with something ridiculous as a 5% house edge on their dice game.
|
|
|
granted. i will lend you .01 btc, payback .011 btc within 7 days. let's see if you are legit. after the loan, you go two way: lose trust or better trust. reply if granted. plus i saw your trust telling that you lying about not getting loan while you got it.
Yes, I agree with the terms. About the whole MoneyPot case, I didn't settle an agreement with him and neither he specified on which of my addresses he sent it. Yes, I received them but saw where he sent them exactly after logging off my PC. I will refund that loan with 0% interest because we didn't agree on any loan, on night of 16th July And lottery248, I am interested in taking your loan. if you are lying, you know you need to face what consequences will be. except there are no consequences, what does he get if he defaults? more red trust on his account jr member account which is already worth nothing?
|
|
|
Yep, earned 0.034 from scrypt.cc,which is probably a scam not probably, is. its been proven some time ago that its a ponzi.
|
|
|
I need good rate, like everyone is selling, for 20% and stuff
those types of rates usually mean the starbucks card is carded. they might work for a day or two at most.
|
|
|
why do you feel that your signature is worth any more than other peoples? i can see someone like tomatocage or theymos or other super highly respected members asking better money for their sigs but just normal members whom i see making these threads lately need to wake up. sorry no offense man but youre sig is worth what everyone elses is. find a campaign n make the best of it is my opinion.
it might be that rather than advertising some casino or exchange, he might want to give others a chance; example of this being izanagi's couple ring avatar campaign. there might be others that want to advertise the small services they provide on the forum for a small amount (graphic designers/artists, programmers, etc).
|
|
|
granted. i will lend you .01 btc, payback .011 btc within 7 days. let's see if you are legit. after the loan, you go two way: lose trust or better trust. reply if granted. plus i saw your trust telling that you lying about not getting loan while you got it.
so youre taking out a loan here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1122175.0but you suddenly have money to loan out? you havent even paid back your loan to KWH yet, who so nicely gave you a 0.03 loan with no collateral.
|
|
|
Unless there was a loan agreement via PM with the OP that we don't know about i agree with everyone else on the forum, you were an idiot sending btc before any loan was agreeded apon.
And no im not friends with the OP but i know you will think that anyway. OP should keep the coins for having to deal wih you at all.
loan agreements should never be done through pm, they should always be kept as public as possible. the more private it is the harder it is to prove the borrower ended up scamming. Your right but a lot of people here do agree to loans via PM. Just thought the OP may not be saying something but if there was PM's then i guess ManyProofs would have released them to us. when people agree to a loan through pm, loaners who know what theyre doing will not send funds until the details of the loan are disclosed to the public in either the loaner's thread or in a new thread. you can go through the pages in this section and see that people post this information when a loan is given out. in this case, even if manyproofs and op agreed to some conditions, there was no agreement on loan terms (duration, interest rate, repayment address, etc) nor was there confirmation from op that manyproofs would be giving him the loan. manyproof said "here i give u monies," not even a txid. i also see form the loan he gave digital_lord he did the exact same thing; "here i give u monies" (not even exaggerating thats almost word for word.) no naive.
|
|
|
I fimished this survey and didn't get any bitcoins. It says until the whole aurvey is finished so when is it?
read the posts; their reward bankroll is exhausted and wont be paying out any more people, but the people that took the survey first are yet to be paid.
|
|
|
so tomorrow, we know if this was a scam (it was stated they would pay the participants as soon as the survey finished)
assuming there were at least a thousand submissions from the payout and reward poo, it should take more than a day to go through all that info and pick out the meaningful results. dont go pointing fingers yet.
|
|
|
signed up and got the ghs, OP you probably should put a captcha on the register page since you are giving away free ghs, people may use bots and create multiple accounts
Thanks for your input, we have limit the users to one account per IP and emailaddress and hope that will do during BETA test. /Onni Now that you've posted that here it won't. theres always around an ip address limitation, giving out free stuff (especially unconditionally) always leads to abuse.
|
|
|
Unless there was a loan agreement via PM with the OP that we don't know about i agree with everyone else on the forum, you were an idiot sending btc before any loan was agreeded apon.
And no im not friends with the OP but i know you will think that anyway. OP should keep the coins for having to deal wih you at all.
loan agreements should never be done through pm, they should always be kept as public as possible. the more private it is the harder it is to prove the borrower ended up scamming.
|
|
|
not listen to freinds of scammer GO AWAY
No dude, we're not "friends" of the OP. You can't trust anyone on this forum. It's like the streets of Harlem. there is something wrong to this person no, theres something wrong with you actually. people on here are giving you advice and telling you what you did wrong, yet youre assuming youre the victim and everyone here is out to get you. you need to realize you scammed yourself and sent him 0.01 BTC with no mutual agreement from op whatsoever. use your brain next time.
|
|
|
MY BALLS YOUR FACE[/b]
are you that kralle guy? the way you say this sounds awfully familiar.
|
|
|
|