''(like adding mercury) that makes them dangerous.'' Oh really? Fish contains mercury, in fact the mercury found in fish is Methylmercury which is worse than ethylmercury which is what vaccines contain. Thimerosal does not stay in the body a long time so it does not build up and reach harmful levels.
...
A person with a least a tiny amount of understanding will know that the gut of any animal has evolved over millions of years to deal successfully with any substance or element in it's natural surroundings. The gut breaks down food into smaller molecules. The ones which are valuable to the organism's metabolism are absorbed through the gut lining and the ones which are harmful and/or toxic are expelled without entering the blood stream. Injections are a whole different an quite novel mechanism. In this case whatever is in the vaccine is injected directly into the blood stream, or at least directly into the tissues, without any protection from the gut. No defense mechanisms have evolved to deal with this threat. Some of the vaccines are so dangerous that if a nurse drops one on the floor and it breaks before being injected directly into the blood stream of an infant, it constitutes by law a toxic spill and the contaminated carpet is supposed to be taken to a special landfill for hazardous wasted. The multi-dose vials of influenza which they try to shoot pregnant women with continue to contain this thimerosal, and in these kinds of concentrations I believe. Unless the laws were to embarrassing for the vaccine pushers and they got an exemption. http://truthstreammedia.com/2013/09/12/govt-mercury-is-a-toxic-hazardous-waste-unless-its-in-your-vaccines/Edit: Just watching the associated video and it describes the AMA ethyl/methyl scam that you fell for. This is the problem with conspiracy theorists, you go to google, find a link that supports your conspiracy, come back post it here and call it evidence, never mind the thousands of studies showing vaccines are safe, never mind the thousands of websites, you find 1 or 2 that support your conspiracy, WELP IT MUST BE TRUE THEN HURR DURR. No one is saying all vaccines are 100% safe, we are humans, we don't make perfect things, I'm sure some of them contain things that might not be healthy, it happens with everything, drugs and medicine for instance. You agree that steroids are a necessity to cure or treat a lot of different diseases, yet we all know they have awful side effects, does that mean the government is making them like that on purpose to kill us or whatever you think they are doing? |
|
|
|
I suspect that some vaccines would be safe and useful if they were made simple, and locally. But because the big pharmaceutical houses manufacture them in large quantities, they have to be made in ways that can preserve them. It's the preservation processes (like adding mercury) that makes them dangerous. In addition, many (probably most) of them don't have real testing behind them to see if they are really safe, and really work most of the time. The big problem might not be the vaccine idea at all. The big problem is probably only the greed of the big pharmaceutical houses.  ''(like adding mercury) that makes them dangerous.'' Oh really? Fish contains mercury, in fact the mercury found in fish is Methylmercury which is worse than ethylmercury which is what vaccines contain. Thimerosal does not stay in the body a long time so it does not build up and reach harmful levels. Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal. Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal. So, you like your mercury, right? It figures. Do you eat fish? It contains mercury too, in high doses mercury clearly is bad, however in small doses does nothing to your body. God should have protected us from this, anyways, right? |
|
|
|
There are actually weight gain supplements you can buy in health stores for people specifically like you...they have these powders and shakes that will help you put on weight.
Don't buy that shit, it's fairly simple man, you just need to ingest more calories than you burn, typically as a male, you would want to eat 3000 calories or more to gain weight depending on your physical activity, more physical activity means you will have to eat even more. Start at 3000 and if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 3500, repeat, if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 4000 and so on, although you will gain weight on 3500 calories for sure. It DOES NOT MATTER where the calories come from, fat, carbs, proteins, junk food or healthy food, it does not matter, the only thing that matters is eating all the calories, the timing or number of meals is also meaningless. One of my cousins tried this and it didn't make a difference. Guy would eat an entire pizza by himself and not gain an ounce. He just naturally had fast metabolism so he couldn't gain weight from eating food alone. It wasn't until he tried the weight gain supplements that he was able to gain anything (and even then it was only a few pounds). Tried what you dummy, stop saying stupid shit, what do you think the ''weight gain shakes'' are? They are calories, usually bad calories. |
|
|
|
There are actually weight gain supplements you can buy in health stores for people specifically like you...they have these powders and shakes that will help you put on weight.
Don't buy that shit, it's fairly simple man, you just need to ingest more calories than you burn, typically as a male, you would want to eat 3000 calories or more to gain weight depending on your physical activity, more physical activity means you will have to eat even more. Start at 3000 and if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 3500, repeat, if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 4000 and so on, although you will gain weight on 3500 calories for sure. It DOES NOT MATTER where the calories come from, fat, carbs, proteins, junk food or healthy food, it does not matter, the only thing that matters is eating all the calories, the timing or number of meals is also meaningless. that means that if there are 3000 calories there is no change then added to 3500 calories and so on? is there anything else that inhibits weight? because I have difficulty getting on weight and it's easy to lose weight Thanks your tips, i will try tomorrow Naturally some people might have slightly faster metabolisms but it's nothing too extreme, the only thing that makes it hard for you to gain weight is: 1. You are not eating enough 2. You are doing a lot of exercise which means you have to eat even more 3. You have a small appetite |
|
|
|
There are actually weight gain supplements you can buy in health stores for people specifically like you...they have these powders and shakes that will help you put on weight.
Don't buy that shit, it's fairly simple man, you just need to ingest more calories than you burn, typically as a male, you would want to eat 3000 calories or more to gain weight depending on your physical activity, more physical activity means you will have to eat even more. Start at 3000 and if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 3500, repeat, if you are not gaining any weight, pump it up to 4000 and so on, although you will gain weight on 3500 calories for sure. It DOES NOT MATTER where the calories come from, fat, carbs, proteins, junk food or healthy food, it does not matter, the only thing that matters is eating all the calories, the timing or number of meals is also meaningless. |
|
|
|
|
Remember that if there are no posts/tweets to share, you will still get full stakes if you made the required unique posts/tweets.
|
|
|
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
His brain evolved, heh, to refuse any evidence/proof of evolution, his brain has to dismiss any information that questions or disproves god. It's too bad about you jokers. You can't find any proof for evolution, so you badmouth people who show that evolution is a hoax. Well, there have always been false religions like evolution. And there always will be. It's kinda funny. Over the years evolution theory has been changed so extremely much, that it doesn't match what Darwin said at all. The changes have converted evolution almost into adaptation. But there are a whole bunch of evolutionists that keep the old Darwin religion alive, and try to convert unsuspecting people into it. There must be money in it for them, somehow. ''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god. |
|
|
|
I suspect that some vaccines would be safe and useful if they were made simple, and locally. But because the big pharmaceutical houses manufacture them in large quantities, they have to be made in ways that can preserve them. It's the preservation processes (like adding mercury) that makes them dangerous. In addition, many (probably most) of them don't have real testing behind them to see if they are really safe, and really work most of the time. The big problem might not be the vaccine idea at all. The big problem is probably only the greed of the big pharmaceutical houses. ''(like adding mercury) that makes them dangerous.'' Oh really? Fish contains mercury, in fact the mercury found in fish is Methylmercury which is worse than ethylmercury which is what vaccines contain. Thimerosal does not stay in the body a long time so it does not build up and reach harmful levels. Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal. Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal. |
|
|
|
|
BOUNTY IS NOW LIVE
All users who joined the bounty prior to reaching the hard cap will receive a 30% stake bonus. This will be applied at the END of the bounty.
|
|
|
|
The idea that something came from nothing is ludicrous. Science is based on the premise that everything comes from something. To think that something originated from absolutely nothing is unreasonable and illogical.
It would be ridiculous to look around us at all the intricacies and complexities of nature and deny the existence of a higher power and to say that all these things happened by random chance.
God made everything out of, what exactly? |
|
|
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
His brain evolved, heh, to refuse any evidence/proof of evolution, his brain has to dismiss any information that questions or disproves god. |
|
|
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right? Silly boy, clearly Zeus programmed everything, the fact that you are even allowed to type here shows his greatness, silly.. There is no scientific papers because no serious scientist thinks evolution is a hoax, they all know it's real, just like most religious people know evolution is real. No scientific papers for creationism, god, heaven, etc etc. Well, thank you for helping us to see that evolution is a hoax. There are two major reasons why science won't catch up to the knowledge of Bible religion, and the understanding about the God of the universe: 1. Not enough millions of years of time to study the complexity of God, before God brings the end to all this; 2. Too busy trying to prove for things like evolution, which obviously doesn't exist. Evolution is a hoax. 1. Even if god was so complex, scientists would have something at least but they don't, even scientists that believe in god haven't published scientific papers or tried to make any scientific theories for god because there is 0 scientific evidence for his existence as shown in the other thread 2. No one is busy trying to prove evolution, evolution is proven beyond a doubt for quite some time now, thats why even religious people accept it. Creationism is retarded. |
|
|
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right? Silly boy, clearly Zeus programmed everything, the fact that you are even allowed to type here shows his greatness, silly.. There is no scientific papers because no serious scientist thinks evolution is a hoax, they all know it's real, just like most religious people know evolution is real. No scientific papers for creationism, god, heaven, etc etc. |
|
|
|
''the earth system shows signs of entropy all over the place''  What are you on about, are you trolling me or? ''The earth is NOT a closed system without entropy.'' ?? The earth is not a closed system, indeed, that's why evolution does not contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics which clearly you don't understand at all, or just trolling. The 2nd law states ''In any closed system, the entropy of the system will either remain constant or increase.'' Earth is not a closed system, it's an isolated system. We gain radiated heat energy from the sun. This seems fairly easy to understand but religion has destroyed your brain. Again, no scientific law says anything about things being programmed or that true randomness doesn't exist, you are just a nutjob. Show me the scientific law that says that. So, now you are trying to suggest that a pendulum won't ever stop swing on earth. Pendulum retardation. Simple entropy at its finest! The obviousness of the programming is something that any simple scientist understands. Just because the term programming wasn't in common scientific use back when simple cause and effect was scientifically explained, doesn't make C&E to not be programming. C&E programming along with entropy easily show the impossibility of evolution, at least as evolution is expressed by evolution theory. Evolution is a hoax, and you are trying to expand the evolution hoax. Show me the scientific paper/article that says everything is programmed. Life causes entropy of the earth to decrease. This is offset by increased entropy of the sun, which is the primary source of energy for the earth. Overall, the entropy of the universe increases. "Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics." Find the white paper yourself if it exists. Cause and effect in everything is programming. Why? Because if the beginning of everything was slightly different, everything would be different now, via the chain of causes and effects. All things exist exactly as they do because they were set up to exist as they do through the flow of C&E. That is programming. Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex. Evolution can't violate the 2nd law of Thermodynamics, because evolution doesn't exist. The fact that some people attempt to force themselves to believe in non-existent evolution, is and/or produces entropy in the lives of those people... and maybe in all of life, through the self-contradicting lie of the evolution idea. Or do you have some scientific proof for evolution all of a sudden? Evolution is a hoax. Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult? Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs. |
|
|
|
''the earth system shows signs of entropy all over the place'' What are you on about, are you trolling me or? ''The earth is NOT a closed system without entropy.'' ?? The earth is not a closed system, indeed, that's why evolution does not contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics which clearly you don't understand at all, or just trolling. The 2nd law states ''In any closed system, the entropy of the system will either remain constant or increase.'' Earth is not a closed system, it's an isolated system. We gain radiated heat energy from the sun. This seems fairly easy to understand but religion has destroyed your brain. Again, no scientific law says anything about things being programmed or that true randomness doesn't exist, you are just a nutjob. Show me the scientific law that says that. So, now you are trying to suggest that a pendulum won't ever stop swing on earth. Pendulum retardation. Simple entropy at its finest! The obviousness of the programming is something that any simple scientist understands. Just because the term programming wasn't in common scientific use back when simple cause and effect was scientifically explained, doesn't make C&E to not be programming. C&E programming along with entropy easily show the impossibility of evolution, at least as evolution is expressed by evolution theory. Evolution is a hoax, and you are trying to expand the evolution hoax. Show me the scientific paper/article that says everything is programmed. Life causes entropy of the earth to decrease. This is offset by increased entropy of the sun, which is the primary source of energy for the earth. Overall, the entropy of the universe increases. "Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics." This shows more a misconception about thermodynamics than about evolution. The second law of thermodynamics says, "No process is possible in which the sole result is the transfer of energy from a cooler to a hotter body." [Atkins, 1984, The Second Law, pg. 25] Now you may be scratching your head wondering what this has to do with evolution. The confusion arises when the 2nd law is phrased in another equivalent way, "The entropy of a closed system cannot decrease." Entropy is an indication of unusable energy and often (but not always!) corresponds to intuitive notions of disorder or randomness. Creationists thus misinterpret the 2nd law to say that things invariably progress from order to disorder. However, they neglect the fact that life is not a closed system. The sun provides more than enough energy to drive things. If a mature tomato plant can have more usable energy than the seed it grew from, why should anyone expect that the next generation of tomatoes can't have more usable energy still? Creationists sometimes try to get around this by claiming that the information carried by living things lets them create order. However, not only is life irrelevant to the 2nd law, but order from disorder is common in nonliving systems, too. Snowflakes, sand dunes, tornadoes, stalactites, graded river beds, and lightning are just a few examples of order coming from disorder in nature; none require an intelligent program to achieve that order. In any nontrivial system with lots of energy flowing through it, you are almost certain to find order arising somewhere in the system. If order from disorder is supposed to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, why is it ubiquitous in nature? The thermodynamics argument against evolution displays a misconception about evolution as well as about thermodynamics, since a clear understanding of how evolution works should reveal major flaws in the argument. Evolution says that organisms reproduce with only small changes between generations (after their own kind, so to speak). For example, animals might have appendages which are longer or shorter, thicker or flatter, lighter or darker than their parents. Occasionally, a change might be on the order of having four or six fingers instead of five. Once the differences appear, the theory of evolution calls for differential reproductive success. For example, maybe the animals with longer appendages survive to have more offspring than short-appendaged ones. All of these processes can be observed today. They obviously don't violate any physical laws'' http://physics.gmu.edu/~roerter/EvolutionEntropy.htm |
|
|
|
Didn't you ever play pool? Or at least watch some good pool players play the game? Or haven't you looked at the posts you post to see that they are reactions of other posts? Or go to the top of the current main page of Politics & Society right in this forum. Look at Flying Hellfish's post, Request For Help From P&S Regulars where he says: So in that vein I kindly asked that you trim down the long trails because it is really distracting to readers and IMO completely unnecessary in the vast majority of cases. What are those "trails" Flying Hellfish is talking about? Aren't they strings of C&E, actions and reactions? Evolution is a form of simplicity to complexity, via actions-and-reactions/C&E. Entropy shows us that this doesn't happen. The fact that we can't find even one proof of evolution proves that entropy is correct, even without C&E. Thank you for adding strength to the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. ''Entropy shows us that this doesn't happen'' No it doesn't. https://www.skeptical-science.com/science/claim-law-thermodynamics-disproves-evolution-nope/https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/4l3b55/my_dad_uses_entropy_to_disprove_evolution/''Aren't they strings of C&E, actions and reactions?'' I don't care what they are, the law simply says that every action has a reaction, it does not talk about what causes an ''action'' which is what you are arguing about, saying everything is ''programmed'' which is in no way ever stated in any of our scientific laws. The flaw in your links regarding evolution is, the earth system shows signs of entropy all over the place. This means constant upheaval. Evolution theory evolution has no way of getting around this upheaval. The earth is NOT a closed system without entropy. It's all guesswork regarding ETE. So, what else could there be? The Bible creation story makes way more sense than evolution. If the same scientific effort had gone into creation-proving as has gone into searching for evolution, creation would have been proven long ago, scientifically. As far as reactions go, are they actions or not? Did that little "re" throw you for a loop? Look at https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reaction?s=t for the definition of reaction, and note how many times it says that a reaction is an action. I can understand why you are having a difficult time realizing that evolution is a hoax. You are looking at picky little things that don't have any worthwhile substance. You would strain a gnat out of your soup, but you would swallow a camel. ''the earth system shows signs of entropy all over the place'' What are you on about, are you trolling me or? ''The earth is NOT a closed system without entropy.'' ?? The earth is not a closed system, indeed, that's why evolution does not contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics which clearly you don't understand at all, or just trolling. The 2nd law states ''In any closed system, the entropy of the system will either remain constant or increase.'' Earth is not a closed system, it's an isolated system. We gain radiated heat energy from the sun. This seems fairly easy to understand but religion has destroyed your brain. Again, no scientific law says anything about things being programmed or that true randomness doesn't exist, you are just a nutjob. Show me the scientific law that says that. |
|
|
|
Look how Asgrath states a couple of totally irrelevant facts about polio vaccine (and from the WHO besides) and thinks it is 'research'. It is a FACT that up until a few years before I was born polio vaccines had, among other contaminates that nobody knew about, a virus called SV40. This virus is found in half of the cancer tumors to this day. That doesn't mean that it 'caused' all of the cancers (a profitable condition for the medical/industrial complex and one which is now very very common) but it is also very likely to be a contributing factor. Of course anyone who studies this finds problems in their career. Most people don't understand the technology of cultivating viruses and how difficult it is to understand what is in the mix. The target virus (say polio in this case) was grown on monkey kidneys (or was back in the day) but a hell of a lot of other things grew as well. Impossible to sort them all out, and very difficult to even identify them. Even in recent times with the rotavirus vaccine several pig viruses were found long after they started injecting them into humans. I might also note that the guy who holds the patents on rotavirus is Paul Offit who sits on various boards who decide what American kids should be shot up with. He won't say how much he makes off his patents. He was also on the panel where Dr. Baker of Baylor Medical School 'joked' that to get rid of the problem of people not wanting to shoot up their kids the U.S. should 'get rid of white people.' Dr. Paul Offit is the go-to guy for the mainstream media whenever they talk about vaccinations. Another funny fact about polio is that the 47,500 kids in India who were paralyzed after getting Gates' vaccine got a problem which was 'clinically indistinguishable' from polio. But it was not polio because it came from a vaccine. To add insult to injury, the rate of physical damage from 'wild strain polio' in India was already very low before Bill Gates' 'philanthropy'. Another thing which people don't know is that 'polio' was often not a crippling disease. My dad had it as a kid and when he was an adult he was in amazingly good physical condition. His job was to climb 200 ft trees talking off all of the limbs, cut to top out, and rig it with cables for high-lead logging. This is not a job for pussies. A real doctor, and one who took a 90% pay cut in order to do the right thing by humanity, gave a pretty good series of lectures on the polio question. Very eye-opening. Here's a little clip of the hours of lectures I've seen (and downloaded so it doesn't get 'lost'): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqhnp-NYGC4 the government is poisoning us!!!!!!!! They are trying to kill everyone!!!!!!!!! Population[5] Years passed Year Billion – 1800 1 127 1927 2 33 1960 3 14 1974 4 13 1987 5 12 1999 6 12 2011 7 12 2023* 8 ROFL one of the most robust findings in the research on conspiracy theories is that there is a commonality to conspiracy theorists, even if the theories themselves are different. For instance, people who believe in the shape-shifting reptilian are much more likely also to doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald acted as a lone wolf. Indeed, those who believe that Osama bin Laden was dead before the Navy Seals shot him are also more likely to consider it plausible that bin Laden is still alive. This has led many researchers to conclude that the agreement with specific conspiracy theories is not so much dependent on the specific topic, but is rather the manifestation of a more general worldview. The “conspiracist ideation,” “monological belief system,” or “conspiracy mentality” can be thought of as the general extent to which people see the world as governed by hidden, sinister forces. Most blame the conspiracy mentality on a sense of profound lack of control in their lives, whether due to randomness or the machinations of others. All you are showing us is that there is something stronger than our best strength to kill each other off. There is no proof that great population has anything to do with the attempts of anyone to save life. In the 20th century, where there was an extremely great population explosion, we had Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and many others, who did their best to kill off the world - probably in excess of 200 million died from their attempts. Why would you think that anybody in the Allies nations of WW2 would cause greater population in any way? After all, these nations killed off millions in their attempts to stop Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and many others, from killing off the world. In the face of the best attempts of people to kill off the world, we don't have any success. The world keeps going onward, and that without our knowing how or why. The population explosion shows that the timeline of the world is a lot shorter than standard science suggests. How? By showing that populations grow so fast that, if the world were millions of years old, there would have been standing room only, long ago. But if that seems unlikely, it at least shows that our whole picture of prehistory is really not understood correctly. I'm pretty sure that life expectancy had a huge effect on the world population. In 1950, the world population was under 3 billion. Before 1950 the average life expectancy in the world was never over 50. In 1900, it was only 31! This is thanks to modern medicine and the development of vaccines. That is why our population has grown so quickly over the past century. You also have to keep in mind that infant mortality has gone way down. They don't care about that, they are not mentally stable. Conspiracy theorists want to feel superior, that's why the believe in stupid shit. |
|
|
|
Didn't you ever play pool? Or at least watch some good pool players play the game? Or haven't you looked at the posts you post to see that they are reactions of other posts? Or go to the top of the current main page of Politics & Society right in this forum. Look at Flying Hellfish's post, Request For Help From P&S Regulars where he says: So in that vein I kindly asked that you trim down the long trails because it is really distracting to readers and IMO completely unnecessary in the vast majority of cases. What are those "trails" Flying Hellfish is talking about? Aren't they strings of C&E, actions and reactions? Evolution is a form of simplicity to complexity, via actions-and-reactions/C&E. Entropy shows us that this doesn't happen. The fact that we can't find even one proof of evolution proves that entropy is correct, even without C&E. Thank you for adding strength to the fact that... Evolution is a hoax. ''Entropy shows us that this doesn't happen'' No it doesn't. https://www.skeptical-science.com/science/claim-law-thermodynamics-disproves-evolution-nope/https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/4l3b55/my_dad_uses_entropy_to_disprove_evolution/''Aren't they strings of C&E, actions and reactions?'' I don't care what they are, the law simply says that every action has a reaction, it does not talk about what causes an ''action'' which is what you are arguing about, saying everything is ''programmed'' which is in no way ever stated in any of our scientific laws. |
|
|
|
Look how Asgrath states a couple of totally irrelevant facts about polio vaccine (and from the WHO besides) and thinks it is 'research'. It is a FACT that up until a few years before I was born polio vaccines had, among other contaminates that nobody knew about, a virus called SV40. This virus is found in half of the cancer tumors to this day. That doesn't mean that it 'caused' all of the cancers (a profitable condition for the medical/industrial complex and one which is now very very common) but it is also very likely to be a contributing factor. Of course anyone who studies this finds problems in their career. Most people don't understand the technology of cultivating viruses and how difficult it is to understand what is in the mix. The target virus (say polio in this case) was grown on monkey kidneys (or was back in the day) but a hell of a lot of other things grew as well. Impossible to sort them all out, and very difficult to even identify them. Even in recent times with the rotavirus vaccine several pig viruses were found long after they started injecting them into humans. I might also note that the guy who holds the patents on rotavirus is Paul Offit who sits on various boards who decide what American kids should be shot up with. He won't say how much he makes off his patents. He was also on the panel where Dr. Baker of Baylor Medical School 'joked' that to get rid of the problem of people not wanting to shoot up their kids the U.S. should 'get rid of white people.' Dr. Paul Offit is the go-to guy for the mainstream media whenever they talk about vaccinations. Another funny fact about polio is that the 47,500 kids in India who were paralyzed after getting Gates' vaccine got a problem which was 'clinically indistinguishable' from polio. But it was not polio because it came from a vaccine. To add insult to injury, the rate of physical damage from 'wild strain polio' in India was already very low before Bill Gates' 'philanthropy'. Another thing which people don't know is that 'polio' was often not a crippling disease. My dad had it as a kid and when he was an adult he was in amazingly good physical condition. His job was to climb 200 ft trees talking off all of the limbs, cut to top out, and rig it with cables for high-lead logging. This is not a job for pussies. A real doctor, and one who took a 90% pay cut in order to do the right thing by humanity, gave a pretty good series of lectures on the polio question. Very eye-opening. Here's a little clip of the hours of lectures I've seen (and downloaded so it doesn't get 'lost'): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqhnp-NYGC4 the government is poisoning us!!!!!!!! They are trying to kill everyone!!!!!!!!! Population[5] Years passed Year Billion – 1800 1 127 1927 2 33 1960 3 14 1974 4 13 1987 5 12 1999 6 12 2011 7 12 2023* 8 ROFL one of the most robust findings in the research on conspiracy theories is that there is a commonality to conspiracy theorists, even if the theories themselves are different. For instance, people who believe in the shape-shifting reptilian are much more likely also to doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald acted as a lone wolf. Indeed, those who believe that Osama bin Laden was dead before the Navy Seals shot him are also more likely to consider it plausible that bin Laden is still alive. This has led many researchers to conclude that the agreement with specific conspiracy theories is not so much dependent on the specific topic, but is rather the manifestation of a more general worldview. The “conspiracist ideation,” “monological belief system,” or “conspiracy mentality” can be thought of as the general extent to which people see the world as governed by hidden, sinister forces. Most blame the conspiracy mentality on a sense of profound lack of control in their lives, whether due to randomness or the machinations of others. |
|
|
|
Study entropy. The simplest way to describe entropy is the breaking down of complexity into simplicity. Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur. In fact, entropy suggests devolution. The reason we don't have any factual example of evolution is not because of its nature. Rather, it's because there isn't any evolution. All the talk of evolution is simply talk. When you add the rest of science to the science of evolution, you can easily see that evolution is impossible. You are being played. Evolution is a hoax. ''Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur.'' Badecker has alzheimer's or an IQ below 70, maybe both. The theory of evolution does not contradict any known laws of physics. I have showed you this like 40 times before, of course your brain doesn't work normally. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/astronomy-links/136-physics/general-physics/thermodynamics/816-does-evolution-contradict-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-intermediateEntropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The fact that energy and matter remain without being lost, doesn't have anything to do with the form in which they exist. Entropy is simply the breaking down of the complexity of the form. It's all still there. It simply is less complex. There is nothing in nature that shows the opposite. In addition, cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed. Programmed mutations that cause evolution are not the evolution of evolution theory. ETE mutations have to be random and un-programmed. Now, I can understand your inability to explain what you say... because there isn't any explanation for what you say. And, it's the major reason for not having found even one factual piece of evolution theory evolution, although countless billions or trillions of pieces should be available to make life what it is in the world today. So, why keep on maintaining the evolution fable? Evolution is a hoax. ''Entropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics.'' ? The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time. The Earth is not a thermally isolated system because it receives constant energy from the Sun. This is the energy fixed by plants using photosynthesis, which is then acquired by herbivores that eat the plants and carnivores that eat the herbivores. It is certainly true that without this constant addition of energy to the Earth’s system, life would be impossible, but fortunately for us, the radiation we receive is like the constant motivation for the youngster to keep his or her room tidy. The second law of thermodynamics simply cannot be used the way the anti-evolutionists try to use it. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12052-009-0195-3You are wrong. ''cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed.'' No it doesn't. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/Lesson-4/Newton-s-Third-Lawhttps://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/forces-newtons-laws/newtons-laws-of-motion/a/what-is-newtons-third-lawhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton's_3rd_LawWhere does it say that everything is programmed? Wrong again, as usual, I already showed you this dozens of times. All you manage to do is show that you are deceptive. Google "universal entropy." You will find that entropy is not a diminishing of matter/energy, but that it simply has to do with the way matter/energy exists. At best, we don't understand what could possibly stop entropy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(order_and_disorder) Regarding Newton's 3rd Law, from the site you posted, "To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts." Did you catch the little word "always?" It works like this: "action" > "always" > "reaction." What causes the reaction? The action... always. C&E in everything. It doesn't say only in big things. It doesn't say only in small things. It says always. Whoever or Whatever started C&E was the programmer of the universe. Programming cancels random by definition, and shows us what random really is. Random is really our inability to know or understand the whole process. But in our case, we barely know any of the process. How do we know that we barely know any of the process? We attempt to believe in evolution, even when we are shown that it can't exist in any way that we can come up with, and also when we can't find even one factual example of it having occurred. Evolution is a hoax. "action" > "always" > "reaction." What causes the reaction? rofl smart ass, what causes the action? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(order_and_disorder) And this shows evolution is impossible how? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
