Winners! Priority went to those who ordered multiple sets.
This was not mentioned in the OP, it is unfair!
You added this rule AFTER the auction was ended.
So, for example, if 10 minutes before the auction ended I made a bid of "all @0.001" would that mean that I would get 50 sets? Someone else had bidded the exact same amount before me. There is no chance that someone in an auction can bid the same amount as someone else before, and win the bidding. (I hope that you can understand this). Usually you have to increase your bidding. The only way that I can accept this is if it was clearly mentioned in the OP BEFORE the auction started.
Why priority to those who ordered multiple sets, and not priority to those that ordered a single set? This would be fairer, since more people would have the chance to acquire at least 1 set.
I was aware that you had a negative trust history of changing the rules of an auction, I thought that it was just a single instance mistake that happened once, but I was wrong.
Instead of understanding the mistake and try to fix it, you are leaving the loosing bidders with the only option to start begging winners for acquiring a set.
It is your auction, you rules. But adding or changing the rules after action ends, it is not fair.
No hard feelings, just facts & my 2 satoshi
I agree. This was not mentioned in the OP. I placed an offer for 3 sets, as the 4th person. You should have made it more clear. As, in my humble opinion, nothing was clearly stated in the auction and this rule was added after the auction was finished. Would appreciate it if you could fix this problem.
Thanks
Show Posts
