August 2013 Sales as of 08-14 0:00 PM - $210,548.93!
August 2013 Sales as of 08-20-2013 4:00 PM - $309,548.93! Number of orders so far this month 1,759
So average ~87 orders per day, and consistently rising. At this rate, BTCQuick will be overtaking Gox soon!  |
|
|
|
Thanks for that. Using Safari for the first time while logged into Bitfunder. Firefox still returning error. Cheers  |
|
|
|
When i now load http://bitcoinwisdom.com/ , the Bitstamp graph is now default. Someone who has collaborated with Gox, once said to me, "Mark knows its all over". Just a matter of time, me thinks. But consider this. If Gox does finally die, and people get all their money back, should Mark be praised for the managed wind-down that appears to be taking place? Theres certainly an argument that says Gox could have easily taken a path worse than the present. |
|
|
|
|
Had this for last 10 minutes....
'An error occurred during a connection to bitfunder.com.
The OCSP server has no status for the certificate.
(Error code: sec_error_ocsp_unknown_cert)'
|
|
|
|
Now I understand that VBS probably holds a lot of shares in Actm but you are starting to look silly. When AMC was new and was looking like scam more than anything you were supporting it and hyping it all around. Never ever have I heard you say anything wrong. But on every other company that came on scene from then, you just try to look for what is wrong with it (not that it is bad thing overall) and point it out.
Not like I wouldnt actually hate BFL and their shit btw.
I dont think you meant 'silly', did you? You meant 'biased', surely? Thing is, being biased is unavoidable if you have a given interest. The thing to note is Vbs's total grasp of presenting stated stats, as a means to compare and grade. And because of his knowledge of chip design and form, he is even able to present examples of whats gone before/precedence. To be silly, would be to ignore Vbs....whatever his interests may or may not be. |
|
|
|
Q. How was Fenix born?
By the time Ian Bakewell was revealed to be a scammer, most investors thought it was too late to do anything about it. A very few, including strello, nameface, TradeFortress, and wisard thought differently. They stayed in constant communication over bitcointalk, and fought hard for months to recover the units.
I must say this shit is pretty impressive. Well done strello, nameface, TradeFortress, wisard & co. Ditto here. Looks like the method and lawyers you guys deployed, may be needed on the Avalon thread!  What happened to Ian Bakewell? |
|
|
|
For people who like their divs, they are going to love a 54% increase to 0.00000290, on last time. To note, the divs have increased nearly X10 since June.  Who needs depreciating and uncertain mining co's, eh! Nicely done Ascension. |
|
|
|
No we do not have any documentation of an agreement with eASIC as you know. All we have is an NDA and that's meaningless. This is why evidence of an actual agreement is so crucial.
So by that same logic, it was a big deal and not merely "symbolic" when Hashfast sent out a press release confirming their deal with ice.drill was complete. We're striving to set a friendly new tone here in the ACTM threads, but you and Vbs still don't get to have it both ways. BTW, the 'A' in 'NDA' stands for 'Agreement.'  I've not fallen out with you on here, I'm just pointing out that you're not being entirely honest and you have a history of switching around depending what you want shares to do (following your posts elsewhere as well). You also continue to make personal comments as you did with VBS in your previous post. I've don't even think I've commented on your posts before. A non-disclosure agreement means an agreement not to disclose confidential information. It does not constitute a business relationship of any kind whatsoever. Pointing out the word 'agreement' is being facetious, unless you genuinely don't understand NDAs. I have signed more NDAs than I can shake a stick it - I could have got one with eASIC if I so wished, but it would mean diddly squat in terms of business. eASIC have said nothing whatsoever AFAIK about having a deal with ActiveMining. So whatever anyone may think of ActiveMining, a press release from eASIC is a very big deal because it confirms the validity of the offering, validity of the claims from a highly respected ASIC specialist company, and establishment of a business relationship. At the moment we only have Ken's word that eASIC have agreed to anything and nothing confirming a business relationship or that payment has been made. Note that I haven't commented on HashFast at all and I agree with you regarding employee opinion posts being a poor way to judge a company's output. You can only judge on the output, or if employee opinions change significantly over time (which can sometimes signal an upward or downward change in fortunes). So what could be the reason/s that eASIC have not released a statement? |
|
|
|
Can someone with the knowledge/experience comment on what to expect from this on-going NDA? What is it that ACTM actually cant disclose? (that may seem like an obvious question, so im seeking specifics). And what are the precedents with regards to time-frame? EDIT: Sorry, I havnt had enough coffee yet....replace NDA with NRE  |
|
|
|
You should make your own hardware for pulling random data for your coins. Something like a geiger counter near a radiation source. Now that would be truly the best source for truly random data. (Unless if you distrust the laws of physics ) I would have, but at the time, I was fresh out of radioactive material. Maybe next time. dismantle a smoke detector Or a bowl of brazil nuts |
|
|
|
Because he seems to have changed his tone now he has his shares back. Everyone deserves a second chance.
I get that, but i think the change was a result of many of us reporting his posts, possibly. In any event, we are creatures of habit that easily return to our flaws and insecurities. Just ignore the obsessives. Will the orange turn red? We should make that happen. |
|
|
|
Hi micebreaker,
you lost you option to converse sensibly and in a grown up manner on ACtM threads weeks ago. You have been a spiteful, negative and slanderous little piece of dirt on here and I would imagine almost no one wants to see you on here anymore.
I see you have changed your tone dramatically as you are obviously now reinvested in ACtM - as I predicted and was so obviously going to happen. But the pure FUD you were spreading here only last week in order to keep the share price low while you were getting your funds together to buy back in to ACtM is something you should be banned for.
You should also be banned for the personal attacks, the spreading of false news and then coming on here and laughing at us ACtM holders and saying you had taken 20k USD from us and that the company was crap.
So after that you expect people to respect you on here? It ain't gonna happen. Unless that is you show some contrition and make a full apology. If you act like a man you can expect to be treated like one, and visa-versa. The ball is in your court.
Why even try to reason with the unreasonable? |
|
|
|
TheSwede75 is online...
but why he not Explain anything?
Swede who? |
|
|
|
btcgarden is gone. Is labcoin the next to go?
After the swede finishes dumping his shares he will give his update. So if BTCGARDEN was an 'acceptable' precedent, at least the Labcoin IPO price of 0.001 would be returned?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
