I brought him up in the staff forum back in February. Obviously just a troll account. Pretty sure he is NLC as well. Probably best to just ignore him because nothing will likely be done about it.
Thanks, that more or less answers my question. It's allowed  No real/experienced bitcoiner/trader will take any of freightjoe's posts or comments about the bitcoin seriously,and anyone who does is probably a noob Most serious posters have abandoned the spammy boards. The noobs are the ones left, and they're probably being influenced by FUD. Restricting such FUDs in any form, would spark another kindle of FUD. Directed against the forum, and how it's against criticism. You have a point, but I'm not talking about restricting his FUD. Let him FUD all he wants, but he should contain it in just one thread. Sharing the same FUD in many different threads is just spam. I mean, if you don't like Audi, you don't go to an Audi forum and open 4 topics about how much you dislike it per day, right?
That isn't quite true. There are trolls on the internet who love fucking with people who are passionate about something--doesn't matter if it's Audis, fountain pens, comic books, or bitcoin. Let me rephrase that: You don't go spam an Audi forum without getting banned  I'll ignore the account. |
|
|
|
anyway i just noticed i got 83 friends only so i guess i dont qualify for the facebook part anyway ^^ I think I can bend the rules a bit, 83 non-ICO friends is a decent amount. |
|
|
|
You qualify for 250 bits for playing 1000 rounds. To make it 350 bits, your Facebook account has to qualify, but unfortunately I can't see your friends. That's probably a privacy setting, can you check that first? I've sent you 20 bits for posting your username  |
|
|
|
I'm thinking about freightjoe for example: Why are FUD-trolls allowed to open 4 topics on a day, meanwhile spamming the same FUD in many other topics? Why is this allowed on Bitcointalk? I mean, if you don't like Audi, you don't go to an Audi forum and open 4 topics about how much you dislike it per day, right? Why is it allowed to do that here? I can only think of a few reasons for doing this: someone is getting paid to do this (as part of a FUD campaign in the media from some "established parties" against crypto), or someone is trolling because he missed the boat and hopes to buy more cheaper, or just shorting Bitcoin. Whatever the reason is, I think it's toxic to this community. Each of his topics quickly grows to a few pages because of the generic signature spammers, so his FUD gets all the exposure he needs. So again, my question is: why is this allowed? I know this forum values freedom of speech, but can't his FUD be restricted to just one topic? Let it grow into a Spam Megathread instead of spamming several boards on a daily basis. |
|
|
|
is it possible to run the program and work with the GPU instead of the CPU?
Yes, use oclvanitygen. |
|
|
|
I ran chkdsk /f /r, which replaced bad clusters across several folders but then pc crashed after a day... Your hardware is failing. If you find bad clusters, you should replace the disk. Make sure your backups are up to date (do this NOW!). You shouldn't keep using an unreliable disk, it may even still have warranty (make sure to shred all data before sending it in). |
|
|
|
Story time  Earlier today, moneymakescents777 made the mistake of spamming a Youtube video in a tech topic that's on my Watchlist. It turned out he was spamming a lot, I reported about 30 posts, and they all got deleted. But he didn't get banned. I wanted to see how many posts I could get removed, planning to open a topic in Meta asking how much spam a user can post before he gets banned. But then I used this as a comment with my report: And he's banned. From BPIP: Profile has been Autobanned
70 replies deleted by moderators
13 topics removed I'm not sure if this is a coincidence, but it's worth trying this more often. If Mods can't easily see how often a user had posts deleted, they can't know he's a repeat offender. |
|
|
|
Withdrawal pending will update when cashout processed
Now we know why the chat was removed from the site. |
|
|
|
I'm at this: You have reported 5061 posts with 99% accuracy (4755 good, 71 bad, 235 unhandled).
Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. 37 days later: You have reported 5551 posts with 99% accuracy (5242 good, 71 bad, 238 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. It was a quiet month Only 487 new good reports, 0 bad, 3 unhandled. I did cry for my badge, no result |
|
|
|
username: missbell I've sent you 20 bits! i cant understand how it works Let's talk in Drownhim chat |
|
|
|
Product: EURO
Stars: ***** (1 star)
Impression
Review
Former name: ECU (European Currency Unit)
Current name: EURO
Future: uncertain
Age: barely legal (not even 18 years old)
Replaced: centuries old national currencies with a rich (and violent) history
Inflation: €30 billion per month is being created as we speak (source)
Mining: centralized at the private institution ECB
Independent miners, allegedly called counterfeiters, mine a few dozen million euros per year
Denominations:
*coins: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, 1 and 2 euro. The smallest two are not very popular.
*banknotes: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 and 500 euro. The largest three are barely used, the 500 euro banknote is unicorn rare. It's only used by drug traffickers, bankers, car sellers and other criminals.
Rich list: lead by Amancio Ortega, see Forbes for the full list
Privacy: pseudonymous
Digital equivalent: no privacy
Popularity: all-time low
Visual impression of 2 days worth of inflation
|
|
|
|
|
It's safe to assume anything else than the official domain is a scam. This goes for any mixer, exchange or wallet.
|
|
|
|
Is not clear to me how this thing works in the case of a person with a dynamic IP (when they can change IP simply by resetting the router). It's not a perfect system  This explains it a bit: When you register, the IP that you used when you submitted the registration form is used to calculate your evilness. The more frequently this IP or its neighbors were banned, the more evil is associated with your account. The amount of evil associated with an IP decays slowly over time, but the amount of evil associated with an account does not. You must pay or be manually whitelisted to enable posting on one of these "banned" accounts. My suggestion would be to add evilness retroactive. This too isn't perfect, but might help a bit too. |
|
|
|
Read this: Limiting newbie participation is very harmful for a community. Newbie jail will never return: I consider the newbie-jail period to have been extremely damaging to the forum. When barriers to participation are too high, then the best people often just won't go to the trouble of joining, and the people who are willing to jump through the hoops are often people who aren't good for the community: people with nothing better to do, scammers, get-rick-quickers, etc. Having a permanent newbie jail policy would improve things a lot in the short-term, but would end up being a fatal poison to the community. I'd love to have less spam, especially from bots, but I don't expect theymos to add more restrictions to new registrations. I would like to see much more bans. If I check some random spammers on BPIP, many of them have many deleted posts, but aren't banned. Even posts reported for plagiarism don't always lead to a ban. The chances of getting caught for plagiarism or spam are low, as it's humans fighting against bots. If those spam bots get second, thirth ... and even tenth chances, it feels very demotivating to report them. That gets me on to another point. Can we please stop this backseat modding? What I mean by this is instead of reporting the topic you just post what they should of done or attack the user for spamming and all you are doing is promoting their spam by bumping their thread. Just report it and move on. You can report the posts that quote spam or off-topic posts too (that's what I do) The thing is that there are so many already unbanned inactive registered accounts, that even if you wanted to restrict accounts from registering, setting into motion whatever set of verifications or restrictions, we’ll likely get a lot of already inactive registered accounts coming back to life with a market for them. Considering the fact I've seen "incidents" where there are suddenly 6000 more registrations than usual on one day, I wouldn't be against banning all Brand New accounts that are more than a month old. Make this a one-time thing, so spam bots don't get a reason to start spamming with their new accounts, and this won't hurt many real users, while disabling hundreds of thousands of sleeping spam accounts that are waiting to be activated. As an alternative, it would be good to add "units of evil" to existing Brand New accounts, even if the IP wasn't evil when they registered. That means a spam bot that registered many accounts at once will be punished on all accounts if some of his accounts get banned. |
|
|
|
I am saying that I believe I deserve a second chance Read this post by theymos. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else believes, that topic is filled with endorsements from green-trusted users, and he's still banned. |
|
|
|
Recently my account "Roboabhishek" got banned, and I am sure it was due to copy paste. Quoted for reference. I can Sign the message from "1CjgsXAjvfhUKqtjPzCAMCF5tdB2GpfxC4" linked on my lending thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2220514.0Message: Signing this message on 3rd Dec for proving that I'm the owner of Roboabhishek
Signature: IKzLBfxzJaW30FA1rQcs2ySxotOsQP7FMOonh/WeE6b5NxLJINN5Na6qJLkOjbLnM3lprwfCbwsGgDZQQBjR28M=
Address: 1CjgsXAjvfhUKqtjPzCAMCF5tdB2GpfxC4 Verified. Message: Signing this message on 3rd Dec for proving that I'm the owner of Roboabhishek.
Signature: H0T9jAXTQTMTxb3Ne3IaCmvof1xx/94FonJxEZIguNPaESBNCWA6SNl564AkXlmatqHk/4rwZAsvjLxz6wFuUg8=
Address: 1AquRqe6L3CN7T38zkYNn7BtQuGpsfZLTN
Verified. The user BitcoinMarshall was providing me posts for the loan I provided him. BitcoinMarshall is banned already, so I don't think your loan will be paid back. Self admitted plagiarist. Why are you complaining exactly? I don't really see him complaining, it's more like stating facts. I must say it's kinda refreshing to see someone actually admit to plagiarism, instead of denying it until some quoted evidence is provided. As for the ban: it's your own responsibility to make sure your posts don't break the rules. Even legit hacked accounts aren't getting recovered, and for plagiarism I've only seen 1 exception made for as long as I've been on this forum. That only leaves your loan business: do you have any outstanding loans to deal with? Since your account has light-green trust, I'll leave a neutral feedback to show that it's banned. |
|
|
|
The merit system in my opinion should be reserved for the very best posts or at least ones which have been well thought out. I disagree: if we only allow the very best posters to rank up, this forum will be very quiet in the future. I welcome any Newbie who's not a spammer. |
|
|
|
I want to keep my cookies and delete my distort so the browser doesn’t remember every thread link that I click on.
That's just a browser setting, but it's a global setting in your browser, so it will act the same on all sites you visit. In Firefox, click Preferences > search "history" > untick "Remember browsing and download history" or tick "Clear history when Firefox closes". You may want to do the same for disk cache. I'm not sure if this is what you were looking for, it's kinda trivial, and for sure not a Meta subject. |
|
|
|
The following table is based on the current highest bids on respectively Bittrex, Binance and Poloniex. Please let me know if I made a mistake. Mon Nov 26 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00701875 BTC | | | 0.00690999 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00017588 BTC | | | 0.01029035 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000070 BTC | | | 0.00802586 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00009366 BTC | | | 0.01987784 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00025000 BTC | | | 0.01411587 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00189800 BTC | | | 0.00690181 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00010060 BTC | | | 0.00802085 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009620 BTC | | | 0.00804555 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000279 BTC | | | 0.00682455 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01425039 BTC | | | 0.00957943 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.09859210 BTC | | |
Tue Nov 27 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00755524 BTC | | | 0.00743816 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00017263 BTC | | | 0.01010020 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000072 BTC | | | 0.00825517 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00009345 BTC | | | 0.01983327 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00024880 BTC | | | 0.01404811 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00185400 BTC | | | 0.00674181 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00009640 BTC | | | 0.00768599 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009157 BTC | | | 0.00765833 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000301 BTC | | | 0.00736269 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01424003 BTC | | | 0.00957247 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.09869620 BTC | | |
Wed Nov 28 13:00:07 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00721196 BTC | | | 0.00710020 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00017390 BTC | | | 0.01017451 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000073 BTC | | | 0.00836982 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00009235 BTC | | | 0.01959981 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00026090 BTC | | | 0.01473132 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00191000 BTC | | | 0.00694544 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00010220 BTC | | | 0.00814842 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009292 BTC | | | 0.00777123 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000322 BTC | | | 0.00787637 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01471501 BTC | | | 0.00989176 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.10060888 BTC | | |
Thu Nov 29 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00680679 BTC | | | 0.00670131 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00019193 BTC | | | 0.01122940 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000078 BTC | | | 0.00894310 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00008729 BTC | | | 0.01852590 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00025880 BTC | | | 0.01461274 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00195100 BTC | | | 0.00709453 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00010300 BTC | | | 0.00821220 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009217 BTC | | | 0.00770851 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000337 BTC | | | 0.00824328 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01426470 BTC | | | 0.00958905 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.10086002 BTC | | |
Fri Nov 30 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00696878 BTC | | | 0.00686079 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00017582 BTC | | | 0.01028684 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000072 BTC | | | 0.00825517 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00008939 BTC | | | 0.01897160 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00024770 BTC | | | 0.01398600 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00192100 BTC | | | 0.00698544 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00009840 BTC | | | 0.00784545 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009581 BTC | | | 0.00801293 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000310 BTC | | | 0.00758284 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01436295 BTC | | | 0.00965510 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.09844216 BTC | | |
Sat Dec 1 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00730653 BTC | | | 0.00719331 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00018316 BTC | | | 0.01071629 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000075 BTC | | | 0.00859913 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00008938 BTC | | | 0.01896947 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00025950 BTC | | | 0.01465227 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00195000 BTC | | | 0.00709090 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00010220 BTC | | | 0.00814842 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009653 BTC | | | 0.00807315 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000320 BTC | | | 0.00782745 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01447689 BTC | | | 0.00973169 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.10100208 BTC | | |
Sun Dec 2 13:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)
| | | Altcoin | | | Price | | | Value | | | | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | 0.00735137 BTC | | | 0.00723745 BTC | | | | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | 0.00017900 BTC | | | 0.01047290 BTC | | | | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | 0.00000074 BTC | | | 0.00848448 BTC | | | | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | 0.00008865 BTC | | | 0.01881454 BTC | | | | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | 0.00025370 BTC | | | 0.01432478 BTC | | | | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | 0.00192300 BTC | | | 0.00699272 BTC | | | | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | 0.00010670 BTC | | | 0.00850721 BTC | | | | | | 83.63362106 NMC | | | 0.00009933 BTC | | | 0.00830732 BTC | | | | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | 0.00000318 BTC | | | 0.00777852 BTC | | | | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | 0.01416539 BTC | | | 0.00952229 BTC | | | | | | Total | | | | | | 0.10044221 BTC | | |
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
