Usually it takes years bago magbullrun ulet, is it a good time to reinvest? or wait sa masmababang presyo?
Simple lang naman — kung bullish ang isang tao sa bitcoin in the long-term, accept the fact nalang na sobrang hirap ipredict ang markets so one of the best solutions is to dollar(or peso, in this case) cost average. https://dcabtc.com/ |
|
|
|
|
If you don't know which coins to buy, then chances are, you haven't done your research. If you're not willing to do your own research, then you're really better off not buying any cryptocurrency or any investment asset at all. Maybe you want to use the money on something else instead? Like a business that you're actually interested in.
|
|
|
|
Maybe people could adopt crypto stablecoins, then? Although they probably think their governments are more reliable than centralized third party companies issuing a digital currency pegged to dollar, which can fail and scam everyone at anytime. On the other hand, if there were trust, it would be a decent solution against the devaluing native currencies of most poor countries which can't give stability to citizens' lives.
USDC and Circle is pretty reputable as far as I know — that while not impossible, chances of failure might be very slim. I'm actually surprised why the masses haven't resorted to using USDC through cheap blockchains(Solana, Tron, etc). Though in the end — it'll completely depend on how good/bad a country's government is. |
|
|
|
|
I don't even need to do a Google search to know that it's 99.9% likely a scam. No founder in the right mind would name a platform as such as if it was an account username.
|
|
|
|
|
Totally unlikely for literally 100% of holders to not have a sell offer knowing the high number of holders BTC have, that you might as well call it impossible. There's always a price to something that people will be willing to sell at.
|
|
|
|
I wonder why there's no one mention signature campaign while every users who make a reply wear a paid signature  Simply because OP is currently incapable of joining a signature campaign, and signature campaigns isn't really the best side "job" recommendation unless you're really interested in bitcoin/cryptocurrencies to start with. |
|
|
|
|
Both? The purpose of the company/business is to advertise their platform through users who make good quality posts. Though there are some other platforms that don't care about quality and just go for quantity.
|
|
|
|
Re: Does a side job/business improve your finanical stability ?
I mean, obviously — it shouldn't even be debatable that extra income is a good thing for financial stability. As long as you aren't putting that much attention to your sidejob/business that you'll risk being fired on your main job. |
|
|
|
The forum's search function simply straight-up sucks for 99% of cases. Just use Google. site:Bitcointalk.org *insert search query here* e.g. site:Bitcointalk.org how to earn merit |
|
|
|
|
Looking at trend patterns is somewhat great and all, but patterns like this are the worst. It might look obvious what the next trend for 2023 would be, but people shouldn't be making decisions based on such data because it's highly highly likely for the pattern to just be a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
but this rise in the new year is too early to call out "bull"
For sure. People being extremely bullish just because of a decent-but-not-so-big increase almost always makes me feel uneasy. I mean, a 30% increase from the bottom is great, but people are being so bullish as if it's guaranteed that the bear market is over. |
|
|
|
Is this a bull trap or was that the bottom? No one knows and time will only tell. In the first place, this price increase in only a blip when zooming out, knowing how big of a drop we had last year.  |
|
|
|
|
I've tried it — and at least with my tests, ChatGPT is pretty fookin good. When asking ChatGPT to construct essays, you just might need to do a very minor amount of cleanup if you know the topic really well.
|
|
|
|
I don't know where you live, but for sure you can try to accept Bitcoin in your business. Maybe after a month, you should came back and give an update about your business, compare the profit between people who pay you with Bitcoin and fiat, so we will know does everyone are prefer to use Bitcoin or fiat to pay in real life. Because not all people want to reveal themselves if they're Bitcoin enthusiasts.
You don't even need to test it. It's pretty much 99.9999% guaranteed that fiat will be the winner. And it's definitely not because of people not wanting to affiliate themselves with Bitcoin — it's simply just the fact that most people simply prefer a stable currency. |
|
|
|
I can think of a couple of logical reasons to not have an outbound transaction in 20 years. Not justifiable in my opinion.
It doesn't need to be a huge transaction. Probably even just a sub $1 transaction sent out just to show that someone is still in control of the wallet once every x years. But yea, I'm really not that convinced that it's a good idea, but it's debatable and definitely makes a very interesting discussion that's for sure. Even though it's obviously a very very controversial idea. |
|
|
|
Plano ko pa naman bumili nito dati para gamitin ng cold wallet para sa future savings ko para diko talaga magalaw pero namahalan ako sa premium para sa plastic card items kaya naginvest nalng ako sa ledger para sigurado. Buti nalang talaga at medyo nagpigil ako that time na bumili lalo na nung nilabas nila yung rare set collection.
Heads up: mga wallet gaya neto at gaya ng Ballet Wallet, para kang nagpagawa ng paper wallet sa ibang tao o sa kompanya — meaning, nagkaroon sila ng copy ng private keys mo at one point. Very risky pang long-term holdings for sure. |
|
|
|
Until there's a need, I can't see anything being implemented about restoring lost coins back into the network after a certain amount of time has passed.
I've thought of this as well. It's definitely controversial because some people simply prefer holding for long long periods of time, but what if we set the timer to something like 20 years? Is it justified to redistribute the coins from a wallet if there wasn't an outbound transaction in 20 years or more? |
|
|
|
Tech itself is sellable idea to show to the public because its use case is outstanding and they can use this on their daily transaction.
Yeap, but the drawdowns should be clearly stated as well. Bitcoin is great and all that, but a lot of people can't financially handle all that volatility. |
|
|
|
|
It's a pretty reputable exchange, but it gets a bad rap among most Bitcoin communities because of the strict AML/KYC requirements. If you're fine with AML/KYC requirements, then go for it. On the other hand, go for the less convenient peer-to-peer exchanges(HodlHodl, LocalCryptos, etc).
|
|
|
|
Taking a quick look at Coldkey, isn't this pretty much something like the Ballet Wallet? Pretty much like trusting a person/manufacturer to generate a paper wallet for you? Yikes. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
