Honestly, I'm not sure why you are so glad about such decision! I agree with you that there may be so many abusers but this is not a reason to stop such a good campaign. I hope live casino will reconsider their decision and only take valuable criticism into consideration.

^^
You still can join the telegram group shared in OP. It has around fifty members.
I don't know but I've never received any invitation to join another group while I've been in this group so you claims seems a bit strange to me! I've never received any kind of invitation links or any thing like that, so better leave it this way..
I think it's about time to let this thread die til OP decides to become more active.

Both platforms are heavily infested with scammers it's just telegram is more popular than discord. This is why you think the latter is safer, it's not.
Regarding the tg group in OP. There are fifty members and unfortunately it looks like all of them joined the group just to shill for some platforms. Personally, I think reading messages on that group is just a waste of time. I'm leaving it.

No worries Sujonali. Just take care of yourself.
Wish you a speedy recovery!

بل بالعكس اخي Ulven, ان كنت ستراهن على العملات المستقرة فمن الأفضل أن تختار العملات المركزية منها.
على الاقل هناك من يقف خلفها و يحاول ان يدعمها.
برأيي، لا توجد عملة مستقرة لا مركزية  (في العملات المشفرة) و لن توجد.

So withdrawals on bch are automated and won't take too long to be processed! That's cool. But I find it a bit unprofessional from your part to respond to this comment and ignore the one just one post before him (the one complaining about VPN restriction). Am not taking anyone's side here but you are supposed to be the no bs casino, hence you should address all members' concerns and not ignore them.

Sorry, I didn't read all the comments on the last 27 pages so can you tell me who is their representative here? I don't think OP is their official representative. Besides, that account hasn't been active for a long time, so, it doesn't matter much.

If they can't pay $200k then this is not a casino, imo, it's a scam. If they are serious about their business but don't have enough funds to pay that much then they can reach out to the user and agree with him for settlement payment.

Well, I decided to create an account on blizz.io too and see what's the reason behind this. I claimed th $8 bonus and I can see that the wagering requirement is $320 (40x). I hoped I'll manage to make a big win just to see if the wagering requirement will change. Sadly, I couldn't.
However, I notified their live support agent about this and hope I'll get a satisfying answer.

People use VPNs for many legit reasons one of which is privacy. However, when the casino detect/find out that you are accessing their website via a VPN, the first thing they would think of is that you are trying to hide your real location for devious reasons. Therefore, they are within their rights to ask the user in question to verify his identity.

There are many VPNs which offer dedicated IP addresses but you will have to pay for it. I am not aware of any VPN which offer this service for free.

Guys what do you mean buy the game is not working properly! Did anyone try to log in and make a bet? According to the pinned tweet in their twitter page, they already completed the testing phase and fixed all bugs before they made the launch announcement so everything is supposed to be working fine. Unfortunately I can't test it myself because I don't have a Steam account and have no plans to create one.
What's obvious, is that they should improve their FAQ page to help visitors understand how their games work. Also, The provably fair page isn't really helpful especially for someone who isn't a programmer and knows how to read codes.

Thank you for sharing this information and I totally agree with you that how cheat detection systems work and their algorithms shouldn't be disclosed publicly otherwise cheaters will know what to do and what not to do to avoid being caught. btw, most casinos allow only one account per household which I find unpleasant so kudos to you for allowing up to three accounts.

Obviously they are trying to please as many players as possible and incentivize them to play more but, you are right, this doesn't seem fair for top winners.

It's good that you announced the changes before the start of the competition otherwise some users may complain about it.
On the website, the prizes are shown in μBTC (I believe it depends on the currency of the account) while I believe it should be in USD since the prize pool is fixed in USD ($10.000) For example, the first prize is 196560 μBTC which is less than 3,895 USDT according to the current exchange rate.

Yes, I read their T&C too and as some members above pointed out, the list there is for countries restricted by game providers and this is not the cause of the problem. I was referring to countries restricted by the casino whic are determined by their license.
For example, if Netent (game provider) restricts your country but the casino allow it, you still would be able to access the casino but you won't be able to open/play Netent games.

Can you share the list of restricted countries according to your license either here (preferably) or in your T&C!
For privacy reasons, some members may not feel confortable sharing their personal information such as their location. But by by posting the list here, users who can't access your website can check if their country is on that list or not, if it's not then they can report it here and you will know if there is something wrong with your Geo blocker.

Unlike altcoins, Bitcoin is supported by almost all crypto casinos. Therefore, the lightning network seems a better and more practical alternative than using alts. If you are going to use alts and you play on different casinos then you will find yourself forced to continuously exchange coins depending on the casino you are going to play at and the coins it supports.
Another reason, you can use a single wallet to make both on-chain and lightning transactions while in case of altcoins you probably will have to use more than one wallet.

The website is up and working just as they announced.
I appreciate that they did respect the announced the deadline but am a little disappointed because the only way to log on is with a Steam account! I hope they will add other registration options so we can try and test the platform.
There are three games: CoinFlip, Jackpot and Battles but I couldn't figure out how the latter works and didn't find any information about it in their FAQ.

I am not aware of any casino which offers only slot games, at least not a reputable one. Most of the casinos I have tried and have a good reputation offer multiple type of games (slots, table games, live games..)
However, all of them have a menu from which you can choose which type of games you are interested in and want to play. From the menu you can select "slots" then only slot games will be visible.
I think this is your best option and what you should do in case you don't find a casino offering only slot games.

This case is a bit complicated and the answer depends on many factors. What may be true or OK for one casino might be wrong or a NO for another casino.
Some casinos ban users based on their country of origin regardless of where they are staying (country of residence). This may also depend on the type of residence you have whether it's permanent or temporary..
In such cases, better read read carefully the T&C of the service you intend to use and if you still have some doubts you should contact their customer support to have the correct answer.
I know many people who travel abroad just to access and benefit from services which are restricted in their countries, but not sure how legal is that.

Not sure if this is an advertising technique or what, but I noticed lately that many OR post the announcement thread before the official launch of their services. This may be counterproductive as it is obvious that many members don't like it and they probably will never check the ann thread again or visit the website.

I didn't find much information on their twitter page which is not very active, btw. But you are right, the wagering requirement (1.5x) is too low and this may open the door for cheaters. I hope they are aware of this and know how to deal with it.

Money laundering is not about converting bitcoin or other crypto to fiat. It's more about exchanging bitcoin/crypto gained illegaly (tainted) with clean coins for which the source can be traced and proved (source of funds).
Imposing a wagering requirement on deposits before being able to withdraw them can reduce such activity but won't solve the problem completely. For example, someone who has $100k worth of bitcoin won't mind completing the wagering requirement and risking to lose x% of that money as long as he will get clean coins. This is one of the reasons why most casinos have this kyc policy.