and if they find just one connection with same IP between my friends account and my account, i will stoping accusations and admit the fact that they stolen legally from me the half of my money. just one
come on megapari, find one same IP between both accounts. i bet u to try
Let's suppose you are indeed friends, for the sake of argument: how did they connect both accounts If you insist that you never used the same device, ip, location,, or anything that may link you to each other! Don't you think this is a bit weird? What are the odds of them picking one specific account and by chance it appears it's your friend's. Banning accounts because they are friends doesn't make sense. Am sure they did it because they believe both accounts belong to the same person. However, I'd prefer if they provide more evidence before taking a final decision.
|
|
|
but sometimes it a whole risk of a thing because it seclude you from your privacy, you have to be hunting for people to refer all because of what you want to get as referral bonus and everyone knows you as a gambler.
Honestly, I don't see how sharing your referral link can affect your privacy! The réf code is usually a bunch of random characters and it doesn't contain any information that may expose your identity. Besides, you are not going to share the link in person (face to face) but you will most likely post it on forums, blogs.. and on those platforms, you don't need to verify your identity, so you can remain anonymous. The worst thing that can happen is that the person who will register under your code will know your username on the gambling website.
|
|
|
I think it is important to differentiate from the house edge the casino gives itself to rigged games, in a game with a house edge you can still win, it is just that the casino has a slight advantage over the player and over the long term this allows the casinos to remain in business, however a rigged game is one in which the gambler will never win, even during the short term, as the casino is hiding some things from the gamblers, like the odds being manipulated or changing the results of a bet after the fact.
Exactly! There is a huge difference between loosing on the long run because of the house edge (which is completely normal) and losing unfairly because the games are rigged. Many gamblers start complaining when they hit a long losing streak and immediately accuse the casino of being rigged without doing the math and realizing how big are the chances of seeing such long losing streaks. To avoid all of this, all you have to do is to play provably fair games and always save the server and client seed so you can verify the results by yourself and know whether the game is rigged or not.
|
|
|
Thank you for the warning OP but I made a quick search and it seems there is no members on this forum with such usernames. So, not sure what you expect us to do! Also, it seems bet365 do not have an official telegram channel, so you can suppose any channel on telegram with such name is a scam one. According to your last posts, it looks like you are looking to buy a verified bet365 account. Not going to comment on whether this is legit or not but you should be careful when dealing with any one offering to sell these accounts and always use a reputable escrow (if you can find one who will accept to escrow such deals).
|
|
|
I read your scam accusation thread and according to the support response, it's the odds provider which detected the f fraudulent activity. I suggest contacting them via the email address they gave to you and ask them for more details. You should also share your bets so other members can tell if there is indeed any suspecious activity or not.
|
|
|
there's a higher possibility of you losing like 9 times out of ten times of bets made Games algorithms are designed in a way that gives advantage to the casino. The casino will always win (on the long run) but saying the gambler will lose nine rounds out of ten isn't accurate (unless you are playing on a scam casino). On most casinos, the house edge is usually between 2 to 5%. Therefore, you are likely to lose ~5.5 rounds out of ten and I believe this is fair enough. The system is rigged and the Machine. I mean some of them are manipulated to keep them in business. Be it 98% or 97% the level of the fairness favours the casino owner
This has nothing with manipulation or the system being rigged. As long as they provide publicly the rtp or the he and give you a way to verify the results (pf games) it should be fine.
|
|
|
شيء مؤسف بالفعل هذا الحادثة صدمتني لدرجة أنني لم أعد أثق بأي شيء على الإطلاق في كريبتو، إذا كان الخلاط هو المكان الذي تلجأ له الناس للحصول على أكبر قدر من الخصوصية ويتبين أنه على العكس المصيدة التي تنتهك فيها كل الخصوصيات يجب دائما العمل وفق المقولة الشهيرة "لا تثق بل تثبت"! ليس في مجال الكريبتو فقط بل في كل المجالات. انت لا تعرف الشخص الذي يقدم لك الخدمة فكيف يمكنك أن تثق به أن لم يقدم لك اي ضمانات لا تقبل الشك؟ بالنسبة للخصوصية فهناك طرق أخرى لا مركزية غير المكسرات و هي تعتبر افضل مثل كوين جوين او حتى استخدام عملات تحفظ الخصوصية مثل موني و و غيرها. كما قال الأخ اوميغا، الايام القادمة ستكشف ان كانت البيانات التي تم ايجادها تخص المستخدمين ام لا، لكن يجب دائما توقع الأسوأ للأسف.
|
|
|
it doesn't matter how many followers and how many sign-ups there are if only a few of them put money into casino.
This is why it's important to know where and with whom you share your referral links. To get good results, you need to share your links where people who are interested in gambling can see it and you need to give them a reason or incentive to click on it and register under your link. Referral programs can be very profitable but it's not for everyone. This is why you see many gamblers complaining about not making any profit from it.
|
|
|
The AI bot prediction accuracy depends on the amount of data you give to it. For example, for a football match, the more it knows about the competing teams, the more accurate its prediction will be. However, there is two other important factors you have to consider which make it hard to beat the house. The first one is the luck factor. The second one is how resourceful the bookies are. They certainly have more data than you so they can get better results and so they will adjust the odds on their favor.
|
|
|
...
رغم اني من أكثر المشجعين على استعمال المحافظ الشخصية لحفظ العملات و تجنب المنصات المركزية، لكن الواقع هو أن استخدام المنصات أسهل و لا يتطلب اي خبرة او معرفة تقنية. أضف إلى ذلك وجود دعم تقني يساعدك عند حدوث اي أشكال و هو ما لا تجده في المحافظ الشخصية و خاصة منها مفتوحة المصدر. كما ذكرت، لا اشجع بكلامي هذا على استخدام المنصات لكن هذا هو الواقع. اتذكر اني واجهت عدة مشاكل في كل مرة اضطر فيها لاستخدام محفظة جديدة كما يمكن أن تلاحظ عدد التساؤلات و الاستفسارات في قسم المحافظ حتى من أعضاء قدامى من المفترض أن لديهم خبرة كبيرة في هذا المجال. بينما في قسم المنصات اغلب المواضيع متعلقة بمصداقية المنصات و ليست حول مشاكل تقنية او صعوبة في الاستخدام.
|
|
|
رغم ان خبر إيقاف خدمة تشيبميكسر يعتبر خبرا سيئا لاغلب مستخدمي البيتكوين الا اني لا اعتبره خبرا صادما او غير متوقع. هذا النوع من الخدمات سلح ذو حدين و اغلب الحكومات لا تقبل بهو تعتبره غير شرعي لذلك غلق الموقع كانت مسألة وقت فقطخاصة نظرا لشهرة الموقع و الكميات الكبيرة من البيتكوين التي يقوم بخلطها. تبقى مسألة البيانات التي تم ايجادها مخزنة في سيرفرات الموقع أمرا مقلقا بالفعل و اتمنى ان لا تكون بيانات خاصة بمستعملي الخدمة.
|
|
|
لا أدري ما هي نية الأخ من هذا، لكن قد يكون للأمر علاقة بالايردروبات
على الأغلب هذه هي الغاية من شراء هذه المحافظ القديمة و لذلك يؤكد على أن تكون هناك معاملات باحجام كبيرة. لا أعرف أن كان صاحب هذا الموضوع هو نفسه لكن هناك موضوع مشابه في قسم الخدمات في القسم الانجليزي و ذلك الشخص يدفع بيت خمس و عشر دولارات لكل عنوان حسب حجم المعاملات القديمة. على كل حال اي شخص سيقوم ببيع احد محافظه عليه أن يكون متأكدا تماما انه لن يحتاج لتلك المحفظة مجددا.
|
|
|
شكرا على المجهود اخي اوميغا. قمت بالاشتراك بالقناة و اتمنى ان تواصل العمل على مثل هذه المشاريع. بالنسبة لفلترة الاخبار لحذف المواضيع المكررة فذلك يبدو صعبا بعض الشيئ فكل موقع يعتمد عنوان مختلف و الكلمات المفتاحية لن تكون مفيدة هنا و لا يمكن الاعتماد عليها. البوت يعمل بشكل ممتاز، فقط لاحظت ان هناك أحد الاخبار من نفس الموقع تم تكراره مرتين متتاليتين و لا أعلم سبب ذلك! هذا هو الخبر: Microsoft Edge Testing Built-In Ethereum Crypto Wallet, Screenshots Show
|
|
|
Current number of posts (including this one): 5854 Rank: Legendary Bech32 address: bc1q86rclrx6dme5zd9u4qnvl9e4p9wfnn4aj3pyka
|
|
|
Reapplying for Hero position: Current number of posts (Including this one): 5852 Rank: Legendary bech32 address: bc1q86rclrx6dme5zd9u4qnvl9e4p9wfnn4aj3pyka Merit earned in the last 120 days: 73
|
|
|
Applying for Sr member position: Current number of posts (Including this one): 5853 Rank: Legendary bech32 address: bc1q86rclrx6dme5zd9u4qnvl9e4p9wfnn4aj3pyka Merit earned in the last 120 days: 73
|
|
|
Current number of posts (Including this one): 5852 Rank: Legendary bech32 address: bc1q86rclrx6dme5zd9u4qnvl9e4p9wfnn4aj3pyka Merit earned in the last 120 days: 73
|
|
|
I don't know why some members consider OP's question about a casino with no minimum deposit a weird demand! In fact, what I find weird is the opposite. Why would a casino set a minimum deposit requirement? The only reasons I can think of are: avoiding consolidation fees and using a third-party payment processor (which have such requirement). Those reason might be understandable for coins like bitcoin or any other coin which have high transaction fees. But it make no sense if applied for other coins.
|
|
|
in this story there is something that made me worried and that is the part where the person who is accusing the casino says that after making KYC the casino asked him to make a video call with him , and seriously? Is handing over documents and taking a selfie holding documents not enough for KYC? honestly if a casino asks for video call then that casino is at a very high level of KYC and for me this requirement is scary
I've seen weirder requests from other companies like asking the customer to take a selfie or a photo from the street were you live. Requesting a video call is becoming one of the mandatory requirements to complete identity verification. I believe it's needed to confirm that the submitted documents actually belong to the one accessing the account. Besides, if someone is OK with submitting his documents and revealing his identity, why would he refuse to make the video call?! Anyway, it looks like the accuser doesn't mind doing it.
|
|
|
OP made a point but i was expecting OP to have given us the link to the video as claimed by OP for members to peruse. OP already posted the link. Probably, you have missed it because it's unclickable. Anyway here it is: https://youtu.be/ABj7peI_R2MSo therefore OP should not think that the casino would seat and watch while they make loss. They too would want to make profit as every other persons and businesses plans too.
Casinos' main aim, as any other business, is to make money. However, if a gambler wins big in a legit way, then casino's owner have to embrasse the loss and pay the winning. It's still a risky business even if the odds are, statistically, in the casinos favour.
|
|
|
|