Leaving halving aside, this looks a lot like the 2017 season.
Therefore, you can hit the weak hands again and then begin to climb out of control in search of a new ATH in December or before.
BTCullish.
I think that many peeps believe that we are somewhere in 2016, perhaps early 2016... So it seems that it could take a bit of time for this BAD boy to start ramping up... On the other hand, we know that sometimes when the UP movement starts it can get out of control fairly rapidly, so who knows if we might end up experiencing a bit of a premature over exuberance in the upward BTC price movement either this calendar year or even before the May 2020 halvening. I would not rule out any of the scenarios including premature exuberance scenarios, yet even with a premature exuberance scenario, we are quite likely to continue to experience additional actual physical pressures upon our BTC supply post halvening.... Yeah, the fucktards believe that we can kind of price in the halvening before it actually happens or at around the time that it happens, but the reality of the matter is like LFC continues to explain in that the actual feeling of the restricted BTC supply is a kind of physical phenomenon that has to play out and can take a bit of time before it really begins to wear upon the BTC market... and thereby contributing to nearly inevitable upwards BTC price movement based on that actual ongoing constriction in BTC supply.  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EA-3LxrUcAAqK1v.jpgI think if there is no excessively negative news, BTC is on the right track. +/- 10,800 Bitstamp  Good morning WO,s |
|
|
|
|
Leaving halving aside, this looks a lot like the 2017 season.
Therefore, you can hit the weak hands again and then begin to climb out of control in search of a new ATH in December or before.
BTCullish.
|
|
|
|
This weekend you will not return home, there is a virus, you must clean and reinstall the operating system on all hard drives make all updates and backups one by one. |
|
|
|
|
The merits are not my goal, my goal is the legendary rank, but since my username is VB1001 when I reach 1001, the merits are enough for me.
The best reward is to contribute to the forum and try to make the answers, opinions or threads created interesting.
But, thanks to this thread I will reserve my place for the number of "1001" Merits.
Thx for the initiative.
|
|
|
|
Observing $10,101. I hope bitcoin doesn’t get a nose bleed at the thought of going north of $10,000 & dive below again. Activity in the WO lately -  Only the poor remain.  |
|
|
|
<...>
All data is from the last day of the month, in WO the reference price is Bitstamp. |
|
|
|
Good job.
A few months ago I asked the members of WO: How they want statistics, with data or images? They prefer images Thank you. I can give you plots (images), but they are boring plots with just 6 datapoints. I need more data to have attractive plots. If I don't have more datapoints, I do not need to draw boring plots. Don't worry it's an ironic comment. The story before 2018 is difficult for me, all the data, except the price of Bitcoin, is extracted from the archive org, many data are missing in previous years. Maybe you or LoyceV have the possibility to scrape the data in another way and get the complete history.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50843773#msg50843773 |
|
|
|
Playing a little bit! Notes:- prep: percent of change in rep (replies) between two continuous months. - pview: percent of change in total views (views) between two continuous months. - ppages: percent of change in total pages (pages) between two continuous months. - pbtc: percent of change in BTC price (btc) between two continuous months. Assumptions:Statistics are for first days of months.. list id day month2 year date rep repchange views pages btc prep pview ppages pbtc, abb(30)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id day month2 year date rep repchange views pages btc prep pview ppages pbtc |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 1 2019 01jan2019 452916 6406 21006158 22563 3459 . . . . |
2. | 2 1 2 2019 01feb2019 459605 6689 21042628 22974 3901 1.48 .17 1.82 12.78 |
3. | 3 1 3 2019 01mar2019 465823 6218 21079099 23292 4103 1.35 .17 1.38 5.18 |
4. | 4 1 4 2019 01apr2019 473225 7402 21133357 23662 5270 1.59 .26 1.59 28.44 |
5. | 5 1 5 2019 01may2019 480783 7558 21193583 24040 8501 1.6 .28 1.6 61.31 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 6 1 6 2019 01jun2019 488192 7409 21256108 24410 11262 1.54 .3 1.54 32.48 |
7. | 7 1 7 2019 01jul2019 493567 5375 21307690 24679 10052 1.1 .24 1.1 -10.74 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Percents of changes between months are nearly the same for total replies; total pages that likely fluctuated between 1 percent to nearly 1.9 percent. Percents of changes between months for total views are significantly lower for total views; all months have figures below 1 percent, ranges from 0.17% to 0.3%. Within same seven-month period, the percents of changes between months for BTC price have min and max at -10.7% and 61.3%, respectively. It is more interesting if dataset is available for more past months (in 2018, 2017 or longer).Good job.
A few months ago I asked the members of WO: How they want statistics, with data or images? They prefer images |
|
|
|
Which babe?
I all I see are radishes, a mac laptop, a bottle of some undetected Dom Pérignon (might be 2009?)....
You're disappointing me, if you've only seen radishes, mac and champagne...  |
|
|
|
 July Update, summer, holidays, fewer answers, fewer page views and lower price than the previous month. It is not as attractive as some previous publications, these are the statistics of WO. (Beautiful girl and good taste with the drink) |
|
|
|
‘Building’ Bitcoin’s Software Just Got a Bit More TrustlessLike it or not, there’s a bit of trust involved in the process of setting up, or “compiling,” the software at the heart of bitcoin – but a recent code change could help.
Featuring container software Guix, code was recently merged into the most popular bitcoin implementation, Bitcoin Core, meaning it’s now ready for real users to try out. The change could help to limit trust in code downloaded from operating system Ubuntu during the building process.
“It’s been quite a journey, but #Guix support for deterministic, bootstrappable Bitcoin Core builds has landed in master,” the main developer behind the project, Carl Dong, tweeted last month. “This was a big first step, and should be a good alternative to Gitian building. Lots of Guix related improvements already in the pipeline. I’m optimistic it’ll play a role in the 0.19.0 release,” tweeted Bitcoin Core contributor Michael Ford who was recently named a maintainer of the software. https://www.coindesk.com/building-bitcoins-software-just-got-a-bit-more-trustless
|
|
|
|
...
Ahí tienen relevancia los límites de los que hablaba @seoincorporation. Para nosotros 25k de volumen diario puede ser una pasta, pero UBS por ejemplo se limpia las narices con eso ...  https://pitsupport.blockchain.com/hc/en-us/articles/360028854052Son solo los tipos de verificación que están disponibles, después tu eliges cual es el que mejor que se adapta a tus necesidades de inversión, normalmente son hasta x cantidad, no se refieren que tienes que mover un mínimo diario, si no recuerdo mal, por ejemplo en el registro de Bittrex hay 3 o 4 TIER para verificar, cuanto mas alto es el importe que puedes transferir o retirar mas datos te piden en la verificación. |
|
|
|
I will not speak here about the origin of @satoshi, although it is not known who it is, it is a topic that has been talked about a lot, I will cite his anecdotes and witty phrases, if you have shared any when satoshi was active in the forum, share it, please. - Nov/06/2008Yes, but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years. https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/4/#selection-43.0-43.106- Nov/08/2008As computers get faster and the total computing power applied to creating bitcoins increases, the difficulty increases proportionally to keep the total new production constant. Thus, it is known in advance how many new bitcoins will be created every year in the future. https://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography@metzdowd.com/msg09979.html- Nov/14/2008It's very attractive to the libertarian viewpoint if we can explain it properly. I'm better with code than with words though. https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/12/#selection-89.0-89.126- Jan/03/2009 Most shocking was the one included in the genesis block: The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks. https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b?show_adv=true- Jan/11/2009It's time we had the same thing for money. With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless. http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source- Feb/11/2009The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that's required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source- Feb/15/2009Could be. They're talking about the old Chaumian central mint stuff, but maybe only because that was the only thing available. Maybe they would be interested in going in a new direction.
A lot of people automatically dismiss e-currency as a lost cause because of all the companies that failed since the 1990's. I hope it's obvious it was only the centrally controlled nature of those systems that doomed them. I think this is the first time we're trying a decentralized, non-trust-based system. http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source?commentId=2003008%3AComment%3A9493- Feb/14/2010Right. Otherwise we couldn't have a finite limit of 21 million coins, because there would always need to be some minimum reward for generating. In a few decades when the reward gets too small, the transaction fee will become the main compensation for nodes. I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329- May/16/2010When you generate a new bitcoin address, it only takes disk space on your own computer (like 500 bytes). It's like generating a new PGP private key, but less CPU intensive because it's ECC. The address space is effectively unlimited. It doesn't hurt anyone, so generate all you want.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130.msg1130#msg1130- Jun/21/2010Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198.msg1647#msg1647- Jul/05/2010Sorry to be a wet blanket. Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There's nothing to relate it to. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976- Jul/09/2010When someone tries to buy all the world's supply of a scarce asset, the more they buy the higher the price goes. At some point, it gets too expensive for them to buy any more. It's great for the people who owned it beforehand because they get to sell it to the corner at crazy high prices. As the price keeps going up and up, some people keep holding out for yet higher prices and refuse to sell. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=242.msg2078#msg2078- Jul/29/2010 This phrase has become so famous that it has been included in merchandising items. If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306- Aug/04/2010Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01. The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7524#msg7524- Sep/19/2010I keep a list of all unresolved bugs I've seen on the forum. In some cases, I'm still thinking about the best design for the fix. This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1063.msg13211#msg13211- Dec/12/2010 The latter is devastating. It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2216.msg29280#msg29280
In addition to having a privileged mind, his responses were very ingenious. Thx, @satoshi
Source: https://bitcointalk.orghttp://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-sourcehttps://coindiligent.com/interesting-quotes-satoshi-nakamotosatoshinakamotoinstitute.org |
|
|
|
Beating Bakkt, LedgerX Is First to Launch ‘Physical’ Bitcoin Futures in USBitcoin derivatives provider LedgerX announced it has launched the first physically-settled bitcoin futures contracts in the U.S. Wednesday. https://www.coindesk.com/beating-bakkt-ledgerx-is-first-to-launch-physical-bitcoin-futures-in-usLedgerX lanzo los primeros contratos de futuros, liquidados fisicamente con Bitcoins reales, el miércoles, por lo que vemos han pasado delante de Bakkt. Cuando tenga un enlace en español, actualizo. edit: Enlace en español: LedgerX lanza primero los futuros de bitcoin físicos regulados en el mercado estadounidenseEl proveedor de derivados de bitcoin (BTC) de Estados Unidos, LedgerX, lanzó oficialmente el comercio de futuros de Bitcoin físicos, convirtiéndose en el primero en hacerlo en el mercado interno.
En un anuncio en las redes sociales, el 31 de julio, LedgerX dijo que su oferta de futuros físicos estaba en marcha en su plataforma comercial Omni. https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-first-as-ledgerx-launches-regulated-physical-futures-on-us-market
|
|
|
|
Capital One Hacker roba información confidencial de más de 100 millones de clientesEl banco estadounidense Capital One ha reconocido que, gracias a una brecha en su sistema, una hacker ha podido acceder a la información personal de más de 100 millones de clientes.
Los datos confidenciales de alrededor de 106 millones de cuentas de clientes de Capital One y solicitudes de tarjetas de crédito fueron robados por una supuesta hacker, Paige Thompson, de 33 años, en marzo de este año.
La compañía cree que se expuso la información de aquellas personas que solicitaron una tarjeta de crédito entre el año 2005 y 2009. https://criptotendencia.com/2019/07/30/hacker-roba-informacion-confidencial-de-mas-de-100-millones-de-clientes/Ayer sin ir mas lejos.
Gracias al OP por la información, solo un comentario al respecto, cuando salen estas enormes bases de datos para que "compruebes" si tus datos están comprometidos hay que ir con cuidado, la web que visitas, de donde lo bajas, que es lo que baja, donde haces la consulta, si es online mejor no hacerla, porque al introducir tus datos para la consulta automáticamente "puedes" pasar a formar parte con tus propios datos. A principios de año ya hubo alguna noticia aquí o en el ingles (tengo que buscarlo) donde iban soltando Gb de datos comprometidos y se comentaba que podía ocurrir algo de esto. Lo mejor es si creéis que existe una remota posibilidad de estar expuestos, como habéis dicho antes cambiar mail, contraseñas y a correr. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
