Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 06:50:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 ... 198 »
2141  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: April 08, 2014, 07:24:44 PM
The ongoing DDoS had shifted gears and they're attacking database intense functions of the stats from thousands of IPs making it hard to filter.

Its causing *stats side* database replication lag, which is playing havoc with random hashrate calcs.

Pool side (ie: the important stuff like earnings) are not affected.

The attackers goal seems to be to stir up confusion.   Judging by these posts its unfortunately working. :-/



Thanks for the update. Do you have any idea how much assets you would need to get a better protection? If I or we all had a better idea, I'd go for a crowd-funding-round.

Not really the point. I honestly am pretty irritated that some person or group has decided that Eligius, a project I volunteer my free time and resources towards, is to be their target without even any reasons or explanations  given.

It's very discouraging and I'm at the end of my patience trying to deal with it.

So, I just ask that everyone please understand that I can't keep dedicating time and effort into combating this pointless attack when other items on the list are more important. I've spent many many hours hardening the pool side against this so that miner earnings arent effected.

To the attacker(s): I don't know what you want. Please let me know what I've possibly done to deserve a now approaching 3 week long attack and what can be done to rectify it. I have no real funds (nor does the pool) to pay any ransom demands so there is no point in that. In any case, I kindly ask that you stop this nonsense.

same thing on my stats page - most (but only 12/15) miners are showing about 20-30% slower speeds. My single bitfury unit looks unaffected along with 2 antminers. the other antminers all sit about 40GH less. hopefully this is just stats-side in which case I can deal with it for a while like with the fail-safe - but it would be nice if there was an objective way to check the pool hashrate (blocks solved on blockchain might show this, but would need 3+ hours of data to be remotely close to an actual average)

There is not much reason why a single person or very small group would go to these efforts against you for such a long period - the goal unless its personal against you just isnt clear in terms of benefit to him/her/them

A government entity makes no sense. They have very little to gain from destabilising a mining pool if it is not actually directly damaging the network hashrate. Thier attacks would be far more effective on trading or bitcoin news sites.

My guess is that some other pool is responsible. A pool attacking would work to shake loose eligius users to join other pools (presumably more stable, larger ones that charge larger fees - *cough*) - This theory serves a direct financial benefit to the attacker.

tl;dr  - There are are 3 likely suspects...
2142  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Server PSU for Antminer S1, step by step guide. on: April 08, 2014, 03:51:39 PM
$7.80 each.....

Replacing $300 Corsair AX1200's



I paid more like $12. Smiley

I paid $5 each Smiley  (but had to pick up locally)

why are they opened up like that? My advice for a simple non-reversible modification:
1) PS-ON : achieve this by using a tiny flattip to pop up pins 3&4 and bend them into contact with eachother. add a quick hit of solder to make this permenant
2) 12V & GND:  remove all the plastic around the outer two slot connectors (the middle one is more complicated so just leave it be). this will leave 6 pins easily accessible for both 12V and the GND slots, and you can jam in as many wires as needed and have lots of points of contact for soldering. (hint: 100W+ soldering iron is needed or it will be extremely frustrating when nothing melts or sticks)
2143  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: April 08, 2014, 03:36:05 PM
Hi Ken,

What's the deal with the hashrate drop over the past day?


To hot in the datacenter.  100+

could not handle 19kW of power? how small is your data center?  (I was running 4kW in a 1bdrm apartment with 2 windows half-open and it was comfortable temperatures (noisy of course))

what happens to the other 40TH of equipment that is in this 'phase'? and the 140TH more after that?
2144  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 08, 2014, 02:40:55 AM
AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) Batch 2
Price:      3599 USD ( 8.065 BTC )

AntMiner S1  180GH/s
AntMiner S1 - 0.893BTC

1000/180=  5.56
AntMiner S2 = 6 AntMiner S1
8.065 BTC > 6 x 0.893BTC

8.065 BTC >  5.36 BTC

so buy AntMiner S2 or 6 AntMiner S1 ?
will be ROI if buy AntMiner S2 or 6 AntMiner S1?

Its worth noting that whent he S2 Batch 2 first went on sale, BTC was significantly higher (I think it was only ~6.2BTC when i ordered). Makes the price comparison more reasonable.

Also, it seems like the S2 can achieve 1.15TH/1.25kW without much more than an extra PSU wattage. If so, you now have the same hashrate as 6xS1, but for about 1.1kW less power consumption
2145  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 07, 2014, 05:34:34 PM
Anyone managed to push theirs past 225?
Every time I 250, it jumps up to 1275W in, but beeps constantly and eventually drops back down in 5-10 seconds.

Edit: At 225M I get 1153GH/s using 1148W using an EVGA 1300W G2 on 115V. It will probably be a little better on 240V, but I don't have per-outlet metering on my PDU and I wanted to get power measurements using my KillAWatt.

To get it running @ +225Mhz I would suggest to up the voltage to 0.85V... Get out your pencil!!

Where's the rocket scientist when u need one?

check the overclocking thread. There will be two resistors associated with the output voltage of the TPS53355 regulator. using a pencil mod on one will increase voltage and pencil modding the other will decrease it. Figure out which one ups the voltage and go to town - 0.9V will probably unlock ~1.25TH/1350W.  0.95V might be sufficient for up to ~1.35TH/1.6kW  if you can cool it a lot better then stock

I have a S1 on 0.86V and max clock is 250M (128GH), with 164W at the wall. 275M gives 138GH but over 10% HW error and 180W consumption.

sounds about right then - the S2 is basically 10 S1 units running at clocks similar to your current ones (ps: why dont you run your S1 at stock clocks right now - You would be making a lot more profit then with your underclocked speeds)

A small pencil mod to increase to S2 voltage should make >1.25TH possible. The PCI slot seems to use mutliple pins on a common blade of the cards to provide voltage. It looks pretty good method, and it *might* work with a ribbon cable, but a fat pair of 12AWG wires to carry the voltage would be the best way

MrTeal - what sort of temperatures does it hit at 225MHz - did you modify cooling?


I have more than one S1. I ghettoed one just to check performance and durability of the pencil mod. It runs at 41-43 degrees C ( room temp. 20C ), 1320RPM fanspeed and 3 HW errors a day in average!

I appreciate seeing the voltage/speeds/wattage results posted for these sort of mods, so tip of the hat Wink   For me at $0.15/kwh it makes more sense to run all my gear at full tilt (under 0.7% hw errors of course) for at least until the start of summertime
2146  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Announcement: Bitmain launches AntMiner solution, 0.68 J/GH on chip on: April 07, 2014, 05:31:25 PM
Same question again.
So how many people have received the recent S2 batches?

Any feedback about the performance please?

I want to see feedback from people who actually received the miners

S2 thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=515448

My guess is that less than 50 units were in batch 1. It sold out quickly and as of know I think I have only seen a half-dozen or so confirmations of delivery, some of which were users that received 3+ units
2147  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN]ASICMiner Publicly Looking for Potential Customers/Partners for New Chips on: April 07, 2014, 05:29:40 PM
Sample chips received.  They are real.
what else is known? pictures? will you be able to test them yourself soon?
2148  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 07, 2014, 05:07:03 PM
Anyone managed to push theirs past 225?
Every time I 250, it jumps up to 1275W in, but beeps constantly and eventually drops back down in 5-10 seconds.

Edit: At 225M I get 1153GH/s using 1148W using an EVGA 1300W G2 on 115V. It will probably be a little better on 240V, but I don't have per-outlet metering on my PDU and I wanted to get power measurements using my KillAWatt.

To get it running @ +225Mhz I would suggest to up the voltage to 0.85V... Get out your pencil!!

Where's the rocket scientist when u need one?

check the overclocking thread. There will be two resistors associated with the output voltage of the TPS53355 regulator. using a pencil mod on one will increase voltage and pencil modding the other will decrease it. Figure out which one ups the voltage and go to town - 0.9V will probably unlock ~1.25TH/1350W.  0.95V might be sufficient for up to ~1.35TH/1.6kW  if you can cool it a lot better then stock

I have a S1 on 0.86V and max clock is 250M (128GH), with 164W at the wall. 275M gives 138GH but over 10% HW error and 180W consumption.

sounds about right then - the S2 is basically 10 S1 units running at clocks similar to your current ones (ps: why dont you run your S1 at stock clocks right now - You would be making a lot more profit then with your underclocked speeds)

A small pencil mod to increase to S2 voltage should make >1.25TH possible. The PCI slot seems to use mutliple pins on a common blade of the cards to provide voltage. It looks pretty good method, and it *might* work with a ribbon cable, but a fat pair of 12AWG wires to carry the voltage would be the best way

MrTeal - what sort of temperatures does it hit at 225MHz - did you modify cooling?
2149  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 07, 2014, 01:42:38 PM
Anyone managed to push theirs past 225?
Every time I 250, it jumps up to 1275W in, but beeps constantly and eventually drops back down in 5-10 seconds.

Edit: At 225M I get 1153GH/s using 1148W using an EVGA 1300W G2 on 115V. It will probably be a little better on 240V, but I don't have per-outlet metering on my PDU and I wanted to get power measurements using my KillAWatt.

To get it running @ +225Mhz I would suggest to up the voltage to 0.85V... Get out your pencil!!

Where's the rocket scientist when u need one?

check the overclocking thread. There will be two resistors associated with the output voltage of the TPS53355 regulator. using a pencil mod on one will increase voltage and pencil modding the other will decrease it. Figure out which one ups the voltage and go to town - 0.9V will probably unlock ~1.25TH/1350W.  0.95V might be sufficient for up to ~1.35TH/1.6kW  if you can cool it a lot better then stock
2150  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 07, 2014, 03:18:45 AM
Anybody tried to oc it?

Mine will arrive on wednesday.....

Can the cards get more power throught the pci bus?

Did anybody checked the machine from this prespective?

Dc-dc, voltage regulatros, others?

I'm very curious....

Your is batch1 or batch2?
Just wondering if batch2 is out already
Batch 2: April 10th

Im a batch 2 order, and if noone overclocks it first I might have to take the plunge. Should be lots of headroom in the components, but it may be necessary to use some sort of powered (with 12AWG wires) riser solution to get the boards up out of the case for better cooling

Mine is batch 1.

I wouldn't use risers, i think i'll make custom heatsinks and high cfm fans.

Heatsink will be this: http://www.fischerelektronik.de/web_fischer/en_GB/heatsinks/A09/Fin%20coolers/PR/KTE2_/index.xhtml;jsessionid=5F73345D9883E646BCDE77C3D3D5D73D

I can order it in custom sizes.

The fans will be high cfm sunons, i posted it already in this topic.
Server psu 2100w at 12v.

I'm only afraid of dc-dc, regulators and other components.

I'll do my best... Smiley

I have a server PSU im currently getting ready to handle lots of PCI connectors. I would love to see more photos of the PCB, since at least the TPS53355 regulators seem abundant enough that overclocking should not be a problem for them. The design is pretty simple other than that for a S1, so I imagine the S2 is similar which means OC/OV should be the exact same methods but very successful.

Those heatsinks would be a lot better - if you get them made let me know Smiley   I would suggest not having too many fins, because the S1 heatsink is a jagged dust-trap because of how many fins it has
2151  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 06, 2014, 01:55:58 PM
Anybody tried to oc it?

Mine will arrive on wednesday.....

Can the cards get more power throught the pci bus?

Did anybody checked the machine from this prespective?

Dc-dc, voltage regulatros, others?

I'm very curious....

Your is batch1 or batch2?
Just wondering if batch2 is out already
Batch 2: April 10th

Im a batch 2 order, and if noone overclocks it first I might have to take the plunge. Should be lots of headroom in the components, but it may be necessary to use some sort of powered (with 12AWG wires) riser solution to get the boards up out of the case for better cooling
2152  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Antminer S1 Sales open] Price changes daily, now 0.893 BTC for 180GH/s on: April 06, 2014, 01:53:14 PM
Found this pretty different method for hosting S1 mounting wise



I considered that.  I assume you reversed the fans so they are blowing up?

M

The orientation looks like it would be blowing down? (up makes more sense for a thermodynamics POV)
2153  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: April 06, 2014, 01:51:46 PM
Found this pretty different method for hosting S1 mounting wise



i considered something like that, but i dont know why the airflow is pointed down - thats the exact opposite of the 'heat rises' concept that would make blowing all the hot air upwards more effective
2154  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Open] 2,65TH/S Hosting shares for sale using 15 Antminers starting NOW !!! on: April 05, 2014, 05:55:44 PM
This is just the same troll activity just a bit undercover, you feel you need to poke your head into this like on page 3 ? you guys are pathetic, get a life

and what are you trying to tell him with back off? and quoting bad shit? you are just bringing it all back he backed off... you guys really have some serious issues in life

wow - i was trying to clarify that he needs not be so aggressive about his argument, even though i 100% agree with the fundamental point of it; which is that this is an odd form of contract to get into by giving hundreds of dollars to a forum member in the expectation that 2, 4 or 6 months from now it will still be enforced even when you are only making a few dollars to run all this equipment for people despite having all the money up-front weeks or months earlier.

I just want to make sure people all keep caveat emptor in mind - the internet and these forums in particular have claimed a lot of scam victims in the last few months and anyone interested in your hosting should make sure they understand all the risks involved before blindly investing 100% up-front.

Your response seems out-of-line. it did not answer any of the questions or concern raised, and brushes them off as pathetic trolling. I run antminers myself, they are great machines, but I would never ask someone to pay several months of hosting up-front for a service where you are inexplicably getting free electricity
2155  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: April 05, 2014, 05:46:34 PM
Weekly Update 3/26/2014

AMC Mining:

We have completed the signing of our lease for our ~3,700 sq feet datacenter.  The datacenter has 2 480 Volt 250 amp 3 phase power supplies, plus a backup generator which supplies the same amount, the air conditioning has it own power supply.  we are in the process of bringing this datacenter online with ~100 TH of mining equipment.  We also expect to increase to 200 TH within 4 weeks after bringing up the first 100 TH.  The datacenters power and air conditioning can easily support up to 800 TH of mining equipment.  We are planning on adding 100 TH per month until we reach the maximum above.

Shares:
We want to get share trading up and running on Colored Coins as soon as it is safe and legal to do so.


Weekly Update 4/2/2014

Datacenter:

The datacenter should be coming on line this week, barring any unforeseen problems.  We will be bring up 1 rack at a time.  We will have 4 racks in this phase with ~60 TH/s coming on line.  We will be adding additional step-down transformers to bring the total up to 100 TH/s after we get the first phase running.  The next phase will be to bring the datacenter up to 200 TH/s after the first month of running the first phase.

Shares:
Next week I will start transferring shares to CT so our investors can start trading.

it sounds like it is expected to take a few weeks to reach 100TH, and another month to reach 200TH. That means about 5TH is to be added per business day if all goes smoothly
2156  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Server Power Supply Interface Board - for standalone miners and GPU rigs on: April 05, 2014, 05:09:48 PM
bringing this up again:
Delta DPS-835AB, Artesyn 7001138-Y000, IBM x3650 3655 835W (12.1V 69A) Power Supply


at 835W, these units turn on with a simple pin shorting (pins 3 and 4 - which are easy to bend into contact and place a small solder bead across) and have large, well-spaced sockets that can either be filled with wire leads and solder, or have the outer plastic snipped away to expose the metal contacts.

I converted a unit with about 20min, some AWG14 leads, and a few different sizes of heat shrink (1 size for the leads and 1 size to seal off the entire terminal to any accidental contact or shorting). I plan to post some pictures shortly, but right now its doing an excellent job of powering a 7-card bitfury system usin 2+ and 2- power lines that experience no warmth. It will also power an antminer shortly, either using 1+ and 1- per blade (pushing it a bit) or 4 wires to one blade and a seperate PSU for the other

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1766215




Please post your pics

I dont have a convenient photo, but i basically just bent the PS-on pin towards the GND pin beside it, then left a very small dot of solder to keep them connected so that when given AC power, the DC automatically triggers on after a 0.5-1 second pause (presumably charging a capacitor?).  I then snipped away the plastic on the GND and 12V sockets (i left the middle one alone since it has pins for both and i didnt want to much that up somehow). \

snipped away the plastic, bent the 6 pins/socket outwards slightly, and jammed in my wires and a TON of solder to make sure everything was sealed tight. You'll need a 100W+ soldering gun to do this, otherwise you'll be sitting there for 20 minutes trying to even get the solder to melt against such thick connectors/wires.  150W soldering gun makes the task a lot easier
2157  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 05, 2014, 04:13:04 PM
If you're just looking to piss thru money - there's an awful lot of things in the world  you can do that with - that are a lot more "fun" than BTC mining.

mining is fun. how many people buy a $200 box of lego, spend 2-3 days assembling it, and then put it away on a shelf as a decoration? setting up computer gear is fun for some people.

you can blow $1000 gambling for a few hours of fun in vegas and walk away empty-handed.  Some people like me would consider bitcoin mining as a bit of a hobby, particularly one that can make a bit of profit if things go well. not many hobbies make any money.

also, mining depends on your outlook on BTC. do you see it at $1500 or $150 by the end of 2014? Its going to be at one of those extremes, and my money is on it going up (literally). I don't think its hard to envision a near-future where huge facilities hosting 10-20PH of power are located all over the globe, run by both private investors and/or banks and investment firms who want to produce their own bitcoins.  If bitcoin continues to be the leading solution for a future-proof currency it will be very valuable in 5 years from now
2158  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: April 05, 2014, 04:03:52 PM
Minerpart. I'm really drunk at the moment so I can't be too detailed. But I made a simulator in MATLAB ages ago for activemining and shareholders were always better off when money was reinvested as soon as possible.

The more coin that leaves the operation back to shareholders sooner always made the shareholders worse off in the long run.

In Ken's original post in one of the old ACTM threads he states that reinvestment/dividends will be 50/50

edit: We're supposed to have 60-100 TH/s online right now, whats going on Ken??

50/50 makes sense. That hopefully is enough that the re-investment is sufficient to maintain a constant bitcoin income by increasing the hashpower at roughly the same rate as difficulty rises.

it took a few days to get to 10TH. I cant see 100TH being deployed in any less than another 5-10 business days (it probably takes a full day to load up a rack, and get 20 boards wired and cooled properly for another 10TH - this estimate would be for 2-3 people working together) In order to actually have 100TH by the ned of next week would likely require 4-5 people working together 8hrs/day
2159  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] Undervolt antminer s1 [1.19W/GH at the wall] on: April 05, 2014, 03:57:31 PM
Has nobody overclocked or overvolted an S2 yet?

640 chips (an S1 has 64 chips), 16 chips per TPS53355 regulator  (S1 has 8 per)
S1 was forcing around 30A through the regulator at stock speeds, and up to 40A with overclocking and some overvolting (based on some of the 210GH+ reports in this thread)
S2 is putting about 22-24A on the regulator at stock. Presumably with a bit of voltage modding and overclocking the regulators could handle up to about 1.4TH/2kW

only issues:
1) power. To seriously overclock, adding a 600W+ PSU will be necessary
2) cooling. More fans and/or individual chip heatsinks are necessary to properly exhaust any extra heat since the units read 50C+ temperatures stock
2b) PCI entenders. Looks like the boards are all mounted using PCI (PCIe 16x?) slots. if you used some risers (with a nice pair of 14AWG power cables to protect the risers) you could get the boards up out of the case and arrange them with airflow directly aimed at the heatsinks for better cooling.

I can't wait for my batch 2 unit to arrive - if noone overclocks by then I might have to be the first. (donations will be accepted in case i kill my miner :p)
2160  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Open] 2,65TH/S Hosting shares for sale using 15 Antminers starting NOW !!! on: April 05, 2014, 03:31:00 PM
Just leave him... he will come up with anything to get some attention in life and have some conversations, whatever you tell him he will come up with something.

As for new interested shareholders, you can PM me for more information and then I can give you my skype if you want and I will answer any questions you have (including electricity questions)

So, it's super secret? Why? What are you hiding?

I'm just gonna flat out call you the stupidest host in existence and it reflects in no one making purchases except for existing shareholders who were already invested. You are stealing electricity and I can't wait until you get caught. Your share management is the worst. Setting miners to shareholders wallets is so goddamn stupid and only a fool would not think so. Your dwindling 8% of mining fee shows your low IQ and no one with a brain is going to invest because you can't trust an idiot.

But now I'm conflicted. Your failure in this godawful sale means you are benefiting greatly with the mining. So, I'm going to flip and endorse the sale. I'll delete all my posts. Hopefully you will sell all your shares and the only source of BTC income will be the dwindling, measly 8% of mining which will turn into zero in a couple months. That will be hilarious.

BOUNTY!

Could someone pretend to be interested and then post how he is obtaining free electricity? .01BTC to whoever posts a screen shot of his response! .05BTC if you record a skype conversation with this dummy! Post his skype user name and proof that it is really him. PM me.

I know a lot of people are calling you a troll for constantly posting, maybe it is time to back off a bit and let this run its course?

I agree with you, this is an odd deal. Its a very long-term hosting that has pretty tight profit margins for btcmin0r1, particularly after the first 2-3 months. There is a definite incentive for him in that he keeps the gear at the end, but as mentioned it really requires FREE power for him to make any real gains from this, and also there is nothing holding him back from dissapearing after paying 1-2 week's dividends and then re-joining with a new forum id that is unscathed.

but even if legitimate, the free power is a big concern. Ive considered selling shares of my own 3TH+ setup, and would not do it at the rates charged in this thread (partly because i do pay for power). having almost 6kW of power draw raises red flags for whoever's power he is using, unless it is being 'borrowed' from a private entitiy such as a school or a business (either owned by btcmin0r1 or a close friend so that power is a part of that business's expenses - which is illegal if you were to ask the IRS). Otherwise, he is stealing power from somebody or his landlord who is going to catch on fast when power bills go up by $300/month

I won't say its a scam, but i will urge people to be cautious and do their due-dilligence before they invest money
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 ... 198 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!