It's really hard to predict when and how something like that could happen although perhaps something similar has happened before. No one can say exactly about it, although it could not say exactly when it will happen. All we can do is anticipate this by preparing everything we need, such as preparing savings or something like that.
it's possible that terrible things happen in the future more than the pandemic you say.

If you're pretty sure, then honestly I'm the opposite looking at Elche now. Because nothing can be expected from their game so far. Indeed, the season is still very long, but if they continue in such a state then what luck will they wait for?
Indeed, the points gap between them wasn't that great, but the team above him was now slightly better than Elche. If they don't have enough mentality, the pressure will make them fall even more.

Bitcointalk Username: nara1892
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502133;sa=summary
Post Count: 1418
Forum Rank: Hero member
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? YES
Stake Username: nara1892

You're right, don't underestimate Crystal Palace even though they are no better than Chelsea. Because Chelsea also cannot be said to be good after the departure of Thomas Tuchel who was sacked a few weeks ago. I'm not completely sure that this will be a win for Chelsea, but on the other hand I can't say that Crystal Palace can win this match.
But if I bet I'm more likely to pick Chelsea for me to bet on, that's a pretty good chance than betting on Crystal Palace.

In this case actually if they know the consequences and are ready to accept it then there is really no reason to be afraid because they are already prepared with the worst possibilities to be in trading or investing.
the fear here I might think of it as people's unpreparedness to be in crypto, especially in bitcoin and this can clearly be eliminated by learning the ins and outs of what will be explored whether it is trading or indeed investment.

Actually this is quite reasonable because Ronaldo is still iconic for Portugal. On the other hand he already has good enough experience against Spain which made him play from the start.
But it should be if they want to start regeneration from now on because we know Ronaldo will soon end up in Portugal and this will certainly be a problem if there is no regeneration later and young players are still quite difficult later to fill the role up front.

He is very good as a player, but there is no guarantee that he will be good as a coach. That's something different in my opinion, because as a coach you need broad thinking, mentality, strategy and much more. I'm not disbelieving that Messi can do that, but so far I haven't seen any signs of it.



Do not forget that Barcelona will not be strengthened by some of its flagship players. This is a consideration for me to say how the strategy of Barcelona when losing key players. Because I haven't seen them do that so far, if they succeed it will be even better so it's safe to say that Xavi was prepared for the worst. The rotation will be done here, but I don't have an idea who Xavi will choose to fill the vacancy in the line up.

Same thing happened to me, I bet for Portugal win and the result was quite disappointing. Looking at the game, Spain came to win the game and completely dominated the match. In the first half Portugal was able to overcome that, but in the second half their hopes were dashed after Morata managed to record his name on the scoreboard. And it was an absolute victory for Spain.
The strategy adopted by Portugal, I think, is a big mistake, because actually they are able to play more than that. However they chose to hang on and wait, the result was that they failed to maintain their position in the table.

Shouldn't before investing do your research first about which coins are worth investing in and will give you a profit? If I judge from what you say, I see you are not too serious in doing the analysis before putting your money in it. Because, from what you said you threw away some useless coins, that's the statement that is the question in my mind. Or maybe you are investing in a new project?

An interesting game, that's to be expected from these two teams in rising form. I expect open play from both teams, not just waiting for the opposing team to make mistakes. What I mean is that neither of them play it safe, because things like this often happen in big games like this. It's not that they don't have to be careful, but being careful sometimes makes the atmosphere of the game run monotonous. If you look at Arsenal's defeat against Manchester United, they are not so brave in piercing deeper into Manchester United's defense.


Yes, I agree that Manchester United will probably only aim for a draw in this Derby. That is enough to make them more confident to look at the match they will play next, considering the performance of Manchester City which is very impressive.
Meanwhile, in the Manchester City camp, we will try to get a win in this match to be more convinced that they are a team that is very ready to defend the title again.

This depends on the foster children implementing strategies in the field, because when talking about genius, it is clear that they have their own game patterns in an attempt to subvert their opponents. Not only that, turning off the movement of key players for the opposing team will greatly affect the outcome of the match. Because they can be said as game creators who make the game more alive.
In this game I put more weight on Tottenham and put them as favourites. Because I see Tottenham's attacking line more alive in creating chances.

From this we should learn that don't follow other people's words by justifying them 100%. It can hurt us, I don't blame it when some people have an influencer they follow. But it doesn't have to be every word we follow, meaning we have to be even more selective in choosing which ones we should follow and which ones we shouldn't. From there, it is important for us to do our own analysis which will later become a comparison between what we analyze and what other people say. That way we will be able to choose which one is better.

Manchester City have found a player they didn't have last season, and that's in Erling Haaland. It's no wonder than belief in Haaland is getting higher now, because he is able to score goals regularly in every game. Even now he leads the list of top scorers in the Premier League. And with Haaland's performance, it can be said that their chances are even greater now in the Champions League.


Last season's defeat to Real Madrid was not only because they were unlucky, but Real Madrid itself has a mentality that Manchester City does not have. We can see in the game footage how they panicked the moment Real Madrid scored. Things I didn't see from the Real Madrid squad when they had to fall behind Pep Guardiola's care.
One of them was when Rodrigo scored, and I saw the Manchester City players lose confidence, even though at that moment their chances were bigger than Real Madrid.

I don't expect much from Manchester United, that doesn't mean I don't believe in their game. But for a team that has just woken up, a draw is enough to say that Manchester United are strong enough now. If we look back at last season, it's quite realistic when I just want to see Manchester United only play a draw. As Manchester City's strength is better than Manchester United's, Haaland's presence in the squad adds to their attacking power.

Bayern Munich's victory over Barcelona became a turning point where they were more trusted to become group winners. However, there is still the second leg, where the team that now lost in the first leg will try to retaliate in the second leg. The results in the second leg will be more visible who will have more chances. Now, Bayern Munich is the leader in the group, but things can still change in the second match. I put 2 teams actually, namely Bayern Munich and Barcelona.

That's right, don't get too carried away by panic, it will cost us a lot. This is actually a good thing, as it will show the transparency of Tether itself. Don't we want that, that we all want to see things transparently? From there we can assess further about this Tether.
News like this should not let us be controlled by fear.

This kind of thing is needed in a bear market situation like this. Because not everyone can endure seeing bitcoins in their wallets when the price is far from when they entered. When FUD is heard everywhere, it must be fought with what the OP said. It can help reduce the burden that has been eroded by their slightly declining mentality.
Actually fear can be fought like this, coupled with the statistics from the past that this has indeed happened.

Indeed, basically everything must be based on knowledge, including bitcoin. But it is undeniable that now many are getting into bitcoin just to get rich quick. Though that is the biggest mistake, they only see when it's sweet, but when it's bitter and sour, they don't want to see. That is one of the reasons why many people fail when investing here. Because they do not know the basic concept of bitcoin itself.
How can we get profit, when we don't know what we are doing.

Now it's natural that many people don't believe what Luna says anymore, even though they are innovating as we see today. How much damage did Luna cause when they fell. That trust cannot be rebuilt by what is done now.
Honestly, I'm not interested although lately I've seen some people get from the classic Luna. I think of it as nothing more than a fruit that looks sweet, but is actually bitter.
I also assume the person who owns Luna now is the one who threw the money away.

We have to think carefully before doing that, it will be very unfortunate when we have a piece of land but it is not managed. We must have criteria before making a land sale and purchase transaction, for example a strategic place and so on. Even though our original purpose of buying land in the left behind is for the future, but we must make good use of it.
In my place, many say that buying a vehicle such as a car, electronic device or other goods is too expensive, they even say they don't have the money to buy it. But if they were offered a piece of land, they readily paid for it on the spot. In fact, when compared to land prices, it is not cheaper than electronic goods or the like. This makes me think, land is a property asset that cannot be underestimated.