|
The reputable ones are CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, and The Block. I wouldn't really use these sites for trading-related stuff though; as you're pretty much reacting really slow if you're just going to base your information off news sites. I'd personally rather follow people directly on Twitter, but you do you.
|
|
|
|
|
Criticizing Bitcoin/crypto because of a centralized exchange failure has always been an idiotic criticism in the first place; always voiced out by ignorant people on social media. Those empty cans have always been the most vocal.
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much for your response and positive response but how can we get binance to track and block the Bitcoin because my brother is really in a big mess and that $2000 in my local currency is a huge sum of money and he only helped to trade so he could get some percentage off the trade but everything backfired and now it's a totally different story all together.
I will be glad if you or anyone can help me get to block this coins as there are really alot going on here and seeing my brother in this state really bitters my heart.
Please all help will be greatly appreciated thanks
Try contacting Binance on Twitter, or on their official website. Clearly and thoroughly explained what happen, as well as prepare your proof. https://twitter.com/BinanceHelpDeskhttps://www.binance.com/en/chat |
|
|
|
|
It's always been the case that things could play out differently than the typical past cycles. Though so far — while it's definitely not exactly the same, it's been pretty similar. Will the same or something similar happen in the next cycle? Maybe, maybe not. It's not my business to predict what will happen.
|
|
|
|
|
You simply respond to conversations(or threads) if you think you actually have something decent to contribute, and if what you want to say hasn't been said already. It's that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
Very likely in my opinion, but my gut tells me that it will take a lot longer than usual to get back to near-ATHs — surprising a lot of bitcoin holders.
As for trading, you seem to not know what you're doing lol. If you're merely guessing market movements, you're mostly just gambling.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure how risky it is so proceed with caution, but a loophole might be using one of those cross-border delivery services. Whereas the package will be directly delivered to your doorstep and probably wouldn't go through customs. You just need to pray that they don't have an idea on what a hardware wallet is.
|
|
|
|
It's Michael Saylor, if you really take out home equity to buy bitcoin just because he said it, there is a bit of problem on your end as well, you can't blame a crazy person for being crazy, you blame the so called sane person for doing what the crazy person says.
I believe that the best thing to do would be accept him for who he is, he is a bitcoin maximalist and that is a good thing for bitcoin, I wouldn't be very upset about it to be fair. That doesn't mean that it should be anything good or bad, it just means we should be happy with what we have instead. Obviously it is not going to be simple enough to just grow forever, he will be wrong at some times.
That's true, but it doesn't make what he did/said acceptable. It's like giving a reputable "influencer"(like Andreas Antonopoulos, etc) a pass if he advertised a total utter shitcoin, just because people should think for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
Lol screw the bitcoin/crypto-related damages. Damages will be far higher if we take into account the credit/debit card details and personal identification information(you can save shopping/registration information like names and addresses into password managers) that have been leaked.
|
|
|
|
|
The great thing about Bitcoin is that it's so simple and is always(I'm pretty certain, but someone far more technically-gifted please confirm this for me) backwards-compatible. Chances are, if you held bitcoin on a wallet/address that you used in 2009, that you can still move out the funds in the future.
|
|
|
|
Is it true that cryptocurrencies will weaken the global financial system?
Specifically — Bitcoin will weaken government-controlled fiat currencies assuming things go well for Bitcoin, hence weakening government control. Not necessarily that it will weaken the economy. As for "crypto", it's still very much unlikely to replace most of digital ownership like stocks due to regulatory reasons. It's much easier to decentralize a currency/SoV than a business ownership certificate. |
|
|
|
You probably mean non-custodial. Trustwallet gives you access to your keys and it's a non-custodial wallet. That's different from decentralization.
I don't think it's true to use the term "decentralization". When you use trustwallet, you connect to their server and you rely on a third party.
This. Just a heads up that probably the only truly "decentralized" wallet we have right now is Bitcoin Core (and probably arguably Electrum?) due to the diverse amounts of developers/contributors. But then again, a wallet doesn't necessarily need to be decentralized to be good. |
|
|
|
|
It will indeed likely end you up with losing money. Not everything that goes down necessarily bounces a bit; sometimes, they go straight down to hell and never see the light of day again.
Just a heads up that trading is not that simple. If it was, then majority of people would be making a lot of money. There's a reason why a huge majority of people lose money trading.
|
|
|
|
What if the developer install malware on their new update.(lets say they make new update on 15 JAN)
Quite difficult to do due to the slightly better privacy features of newer Android and iOS operating systems. But it's definitely possible and definitely a risk. Being open sources software wont allow other users to see if its infected i believe.
Of course. Not every user can verify source code. But it only takes one or a few developers to see the bug/malicious code and publicize it to get people to stray away from the software. what of millions of people will download their app then they could take the funds of the users?
They could. Hence why a wallet being open source is very important. |
|
|
|
But what's more worrying is that it's a coin that nearly got wiped out when Luna crashed and even the team behind it has gone silent since June last year  , so some bought the shitcoin fo shitcoins based on a failed (terra) network. There ain't no new GitHub commits since the last 7 months either, so it's not like only the Twitter account has been abandoned. Funnily enough — say all you want about marketcaps being misleading, but it still has a whopping $11.8m marketcap despite it pretty much being abandoned; and with a $7m trading volume since the last 24 hours on Binance. Unbelievable, to say the least. |
|
|
|
Iba na talaga pag yayamain hehe, just kidding. I do agree na dapat lang na iconsider ang personal safety. At isa pa cryptocurrency, maraming nag-iisip na mga yayamanin ang kasali sa event since iisipin nila na marami kayong holdings. Pareho tayo praning sa personal security kahit na di ako yayamanin  . Yayamanin man o hindi, mostly hindi naman malalaman ng holdaper/kidnapper kung malaki ba o maliit ang holdings mo until sa naholdap/kidnap ka na. And yea, minsan mas ok lang talagang maging praning, knowing na may decent chance na mapupunta naman sa YouTube ung ganap nung event. If not, too bad — pero safety first. |
|
|
|
|
Juno is owned by Digital Currency Group (DGC), the company run by Barry Silbert — in which is also seems to be in huge trouble. Safe to assume that Juno is also affected by the FTX/Genesis/GrayScale fiasco.
|
|
|
|
I know that Zhusu can't be fully trusted after what he did however why would he be making this stuff up?
Not saying that he's right or wrong here(as they probably might be), bit Su Zhu and Kyle Davies are on Twitter trying to paint a picture that they're innocent and that they blew up because of FTX and stuff. I'd take anything they with a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
