Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 01:32:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »
221  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 17, 2015, 01:50:55 AM
Wow guys - that's some blocktastic green run you've got going on there, well done!

Do you think it's because of your modifications -ck mentioned earlier?:

Gimme gimme........ Wink Cheesy
The modifications are custom and private, sorry Smiley Pools need to have some advantage.

I'm intrigued...... Wink
Well ... actually ... it is valid to say it affects the % luck of the pool.

There is a problem in the bitcoin world of saying what the pool's luck is.

Although you would statistically expect that over a long period of time, the pool's accepted hashes would approach the expected: 100% luck, that isn't completely true.

There are factors that reduce the number of blocks found.
Specifically orphans.
Some pools have long term bad luck because they are slow at handling block changes and lose more blocks because of that.
Eligius is an example of this

There were also pools that counted stale shares for a short period of time after the block change had occurred.
While this makes the pool look better by lowering and lying about their reject statistics, it also has the long term effect of lowering the pool luck.
Not sure which pools do this.

One pool in particular doesn't count all the hashes used to produce it's blocks and thus reports luck higher than it really is.
P2Pool

The change does have a long term affect on our % luck, but it doesn't affect what is really 'Luck' - which isn't exactly what pools report Tongue

However, it is also true to simply say that running ckpool has a long term effect on the % luck since it handles block changes very fast.

So it may lead to a better "luck" the metric but has no impact on "Luck" the abstract concept of things seeming to go your way.
222  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: July 15, 2015, 04:34:58 PM
Any word on the chip order?

From three posts and 36 minutes farther up the page:

Also, everyone posting and PMing me about picking up a couple sticks, don't. Sales aren't open yet. We still have no public review or opinion from half the testers.

Welp, i'm sure that gets annoying!

It'll be ready when it's ready. I'm sure when they have news it will be posted. No need for daily inquiries.

1) My last post was on July 09, 2015, 04:17:43 PM (6 days ago).
2) It was a statement not an inquiry and thus required no response.
3) My question was NOT about stickminer availability. RTMFP
4) If sidehack finds me/us annoying he can ban us post haste at his leisure.
5) You are not privy to the back channel communications sidehack/Novak and we have had pertaining to this critical (and might I add brilliant) development effort.
6) By posting in the public forumn versus a PM was complying with his request to NOT be PM'ed about trivial matters (completed product availability).

The question was posted because very recently (yesterday) Bitmain has indicated to us that there are no chips (BM1384's) and S5 hash boards available for sale as they have all been used up making complete S5's (The price of which has risen ~$100 in the last 2 weeks). They are also unwilling to sell broken hash boards. It seems they are even having (creating) issues with supplying warranty based replacements. We have 2 boards that need to be replaced under warranty and they are giving us "the run around".

The above is a "sea change" in attitude with respect to our relationship with Bitmain.
Who in the past has been more than willing to supply us with "raw" components for our immersion cooling endeavors.
I suspect that they are "cleaning out" inventory of their old designs and at the same time gouging the ecosystem due to the lack of mining H/W availability.

Anyway, back to lurking.

Sorry. I did RTMFP but did not fully understand TMFP.
223  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: July 15, 2015, 02:40:44 PM
Any word on the chip order?

From three posts and 36 minutes farther up the page:

Also, everyone posting and PMing me about picking up a couple sticks, don't. Sales aren't open yet. We still have no public review or opinion from half the testers.

Welp, i'm sure that gets annoying!

It'll be ready when it's ready. I'm sure when they have news it will be posted. No need for daily inquiries.
224  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: I am judging interest in a group buy of the Avalon mini on: July 15, 2015, 12:23:19 AM
I'm interested, price dependent
225  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: July 15, 2015, 12:05:15 AM
So no one knows anything about 2.7.1 vs. 2.6.14?
226  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Unofficial Spondoolies SP20 thread on: July 15, 2015, 12:04:14 AM
So no one knows anything about 2.7.1 vs. 2.6.14?
227  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: New R-Box Upgrade Kit on: July 13, 2015, 04:36:10 PM
I bought 2 R-Boxes from this guy to serve as permanent lottery players.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1053031.msg11799713#msg11799713
228  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: New R-Box Upgrade Kit on: July 13, 2015, 01:33:48 PM
I think the 4-chip pod is a more logical target. It should be possible to make a single board which fits both the Gridseed and U3 heatsinks; I'll have to get ahold of an RBox pod to see what it'd require but I know I can hit the other two for sure.

I know someone selling R-boxes for about 20-25$. I could have one shipped to you as a last resort. I think someone above said they'd send one as a donation though.
229  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 12, 2015, 05:09:18 PM
@ WBF1 ...  "Keep Doing"  sacrifice chickens or mining ; )  .... no for real, if i have a look at all the other pools i'm afraid where Bitcoin is going to! Just wanted to adress that i hope my feeling is still right and there is no manipulation here...

I'm not sure what you mean. If kano has a way to manipulate luck for this pool in a positive way, I'm all for it. Pretty sure he doesn't have that ability though, nor does anyone.
230  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 12, 2015, 02:20:06 PM
Whoever is sacrificing chickens, dancing around in the rain naked, wearing their hat inside out, growing a beard, or wearing their lucky underwear... KEEP DOING IT.

 Grin
231  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 11, 2015, 02:36:23 PM
@kano is there any reason payments to a P2SH address (aka "3 series") wouldn't work for payouts from your pool? I thought I'd check for sure. I believe some pools and services have issues sending to anything other than addresses starting with "1".
Our first payout included one ...
Yes it works.

Awesome thanks for the confirmation. Been playing around with copay wallet and it's pretty slick. Thinking about moving over to it from mycelium.
232  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [3900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 11, 2015, 02:27:44 PM
@kano is there any reason payments to a P2SH address (aka "3 series") wouldn't work for payouts from your pool? I thought I'd check for sure. I believe some pools and services have issues sending to anything other than addresses starting with "1".
233  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1800 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 10, 2015, 02:57:34 PM
I'm not rooting for less hash power, I am rooting for more Luck. Luck is one of those things that everyone knows cannot be changed, yet everyone tries to change it. By wearing the same socks every time they play a game, or not shaving, carrying a rabbits foot, etc. The pools luck lately has been better with a lower hashrate. I know and so does everyone else that it makes more sense to have more hashrate, but I was just pointing out that when everyone was letting their beard grow we had good luck...  Cheesy

Just coincidence, yes.  Personally, I would rather the luck/variance roll past quicker.  If bad luck must happen (and it must) I would rather get past it quickly than wait more than a week for a block.  Thus, I prefer a higher hash rate.

The only time I get nervous about high pool hash rate is when a lot of it is rented hash.  I'm going to qualify this by saying that I see no evidence of what I'm about to mention happening in the real world (our long term luck says that it isn't).  That said, rented hash does come with the possibility of reducing luck since the actual rig owner no longer has a stake in the pool payout (only the renter does).  Using the West/NiceHash as an example (only because I'm most familiar with them - not because of anything specific to them), the rig owner selling hash to West/Nice has no incentive to actually submit block solves since they are being paid PPS.  They could withhold block solving shares without penalty.  In fact, they have incentive to not submit solves since it helps keeps difficulty lower and indirectly their PPS rate higher!  The renter, who has the actual stake in the pool, has no way of knowing a block was withheld and pays for the broken hash.  It is a risk that has kept me away from renting hash every time I've considered it.

So, there is one real possible way that higher hash rate could be a bad thing, but as far as I know I've never seen it in action.


Quote
2. Bad luck lasts longer
Another reason that makes us mis-judge mining luck is that when we mine, we mostly experience bad luck. In fact if you go to the trouble of working it out, your hours of mining will be about one-quarter good luck and three quarters bad luck. Why? Bad luck takes longer, good luck rounds take much less time.

3. Assessing luck over time instead of blocks
Another mistake made by novice miners is to assume that the extremes of luck will be the same for all pool over any time frame. This is wrong for two related reasons:

    The more blocks are solved the closer luck approaches 100%
    Because the timeframe for luck to to approach 100% varies depending on number of blocks solved, comparing various pools' luck over the same time period is invalid. Instead we need to compare luck over similar number of blocks.

from: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/07/faq-bitcoin-mining-and-luck-statistic.html
234  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: New R-Box Upgrade Kit on: July 10, 2015, 02:09:01 AM
If were now talking 4-5 chip "pod" (or "ufo" like I used to call them), vs. 12-18 chip box, I vote pod.

While we're on that subject, what kinda price would we be looking at? 35-ish?
235  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1800 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 07, 2015, 02:15:15 PM
kano you should update the thread title with our present approx hashrate.
236  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1800 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: July 07, 2015, 10:31:08 AM
Is there anyone out who has not had there last get confirmed after ten hours yet or do i have a problem
Same. BC.i shows it as missing as well.

Blocktrail shows it as unconfirmed.
237  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2 on: July 02, 2015, 01:39:56 AM
Were you guys using the batch 2s? Great to know I just dropped $50 on a potential shit heap.... Thanks. I'll play around with it.

Mine has the wire cage, not the dome.
238  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2 on: July 01, 2015, 10:26:59 PM
Just bought an Antminer U3. Cannot get it to run more than 30 seconds before the hash rate drops from 45Gh to about 6Gh. I'm using the latest build, as it seems to be the only one that works with it. my batch file is this:

cgminer -o http://us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 -u  -p --icarus-timing=short --anu-freq 200


I change any of that and CGminer doesn't even open. I've tried using the basic bmsc lines that were in the user manual, but still nothing works.


What am I doing wrong here Huh  Pretend I'm 5 when explaining.
Don't use icarus timing or anu freq in your batch file as they're useless for the U3. If you want to change the frequency use --au3-freq instead, however try first without any options.

Second - the U3 is a steaming pile of shit and there is only so much software can do to work around it. The least worst you can make it work is by using a different power supply to the brick that it comes with, and get a high quality USB cable instead of the one it comes with and then try again, plugging it into a USB2 port only, not a USB 3 port. It's not uncommon these things die off once a day as ZOMBIE even under those conditions and you need to unplug them and plug them back in again to get them running again.

anecdotally, I've had mine running for 5 days now without becoming a ZOMBIE. It has disconnected twice along the way somewhere because it's now showing as "AU3 2" instead of "AU3 0", but luckily it hasn't hit ZOMBIE.

I'm using the power brick it came with but a better USB cable. I got a replacement power brick but it failed in less than a day. Im also not overclocking at all. When I tried pushing it even slightly harder it would ZOMBIE pretty regularly (in less than a day).

Seems to me the biggest problem with the U3 is quality control. Mine SEEMS to be relatively stable whereas others have had nothing but trouble.
239  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: June 30, 2015, 02:58:25 AM
Don't RECOMAND this shit pool something definitely wrong with the payout queue...

I have been trying to say this for days that something is wrong with the payout queue, no one seems to care. My payout queue started at 13 blocks till payout, 10 blocks later still at 11 blocks till payout.  I should be at 3 blocks till payout, starting to question if they seriously broke something during the last upgrade.

Some of my friends I recommended to this pool who have the hashing power to enter payout queue immediately 17 blocks later and 7 days still no payout.

I like the pool, I just wish they would fix the problem.

I don't currently mine here, but I believe the payout queue here is first in, last out. Have you taken that into account?
240  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: June 26, 2015, 08:42:35 PM
Yea, that's very impressive!  So long, Antminer U3, hello GekkoScience!

Plus how cool will it be when we're running gear built by those in our community and not some overseas corporation?!

On that note, is there any plan (even a twinkle in the eye) for some form factor here along the lines of a U3 or R-Box?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!